APCFZR1 promotes BRAF ubiquitination in a D-box–dependent manner.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
HMGA2 is a SUMOylation target.
Advertisements

Volume 21, Issue 16, Pages (August 2011)
Phosphorylation of serine 73 targets SREBP-1c for ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation Phosphorylation of serine 73 targets SREBP-1c for ubiquitination.
by Ji-Long Chen, Andre Limnander, and Paul B. Rothman
Regulation and Destabilization of HIF-1α by ARD1-Mediated Acetylation
Volume 11, Issue 4, Pages (April 2003)
Takashi Tanaka, Michelle A. Soriano, Michael J. Grusby  Immunity 
Volume 36, Issue 5, Pages (December 2009)
Volume 7, Issue 5, Pages (May 2001)
Histone Demethylase LSD2 Acts as an E3 Ubiquitin Ligase and Inhibits Cancer Cell Growth through Promoting Proteasomal Degradation of OGT  Yi Yang, Xiaotong.
by Katriina J. Peltola, Kirsi Paukku, Teija L. T
DEPTOR, an mTOR Inhibitor, Is a Physiological Substrate of SCFβTrCP E3 Ubiquitin Ligase and Regulates Survival and Autophagy  Yongchao Zhao, Xiufang Xiong,
MEL23 and MEL24 inhibit Mdm2 and p53 ubiquitination in cells.
Pirh2 promotes p73 ubiquitination in vivo.
Phosphorylation of the WASP-VCA Domain Increases Its Affinity for the Arp2/3 Complex and Enhances Actin Polymerization by WASP  Giles O.C. Cory, Rainer.
Phosphorylation of NF-κB p65 by PKA Stimulates Transcriptional Activity by Promoting a Novel Bivalent Interaction with the Coactivator CBP/p300  Haihong.
Phosphorylation of Cdc20 by Bub1 Provides a Catalytic Mechanism for APC/C Inhibition by the Spindle Checkpoint  Zhanyun Tang, Hongjun Shu, Dilhan Oncel,
Volume 44, Issue 4, Pages (November 2011)
Silvestro G Conticello, Reuben S Harris, Michael S Neuberger 
A Mechanism for Inhibiting the SUMO Pathway
Monica C. Rodrigo-Brenni, Erik Gutierrez, Ramanujan S. Hegde 
UV-Induced RPA1 Acetylation Promotes Nucleotide Excision Repair
Gad Asher, Zippi Bercovich, Peter Tsvetkov, Yosef Shaul, Chaim Kahana 
TopBP1 Controls BLM Protein Level to Maintain Genome Stability
The KSHV Immediate-Early Transcription Factor RTA Encodes Ubiquitin E3 Ligase Activity that Targets IRF7 for Proteosome-Mediated Degradation  Yanxing.
Volume 39, Issue 4, Pages (August 2010)
Volume 45, Issue 2, Pages (January 2012)
Volume 54, Issue 3, Pages (May 2014)
MAGE-RING Protein Complexes Comprise a Family of E3 Ubiquitin Ligases
Volume 29, Issue 4, Pages (February 2008)
Volume 1, Issue 5, Pages (May 2012)
Destruction of Full-Length Androgen Receptor by Wild-Type SPOP, but Not Prostate- Cancer-Associated Mutants  Jian An, Chenji Wang, Yibin Deng, Long Yu,
Ligand-Independent Recruitment of SRC-1 to Estrogen Receptor β through Phosphorylation of Activation Function AF-1  André Tremblay, Gilles B Tremblay,
The Tumor Suppressor MIG6 Controls Mitotic Progression and the G2/M DNA Damage Checkpoint by Stabilizing the WEE1 Kinase  Mari Sasaki, Takeshi Terabayashi,
PI(3,4,5)P3 releases SIN1-PH–mediated inhibition on mTOR-KD, leading to mTORC2 activation. PI(3,4,5)P3 releases SIN1-PH–mediated inhibition on mTOR-KD,
Volume 48, Issue 4, Pages (November 2012)
GSK-3-Mediated Phosphorylation Enhances Maf-Transforming Activity
A Critical Role for Noncoding 5S rRNA in Regulating Mdmx Stability
Volume 4, Issue 4, Pages (August 2013)
Volume 59, Issue 6, Pages (September 2015)
Volume 115, Issue 2, Pages (October 2003)
Yi Tang, Jianyuan Luo, Wenzhu Zhang, Wei Gu  Molecular Cell 
A Role for the Fizzy/Cdc20 Family of Proteins in Activation of the APC/C Distinct from Substrate Recruitment  Yuu Kimata, Joanne E. Baxter, Andrew M.
Ribosomal Protein S7 Is Both a Regulator and a Substrate of MDM2
Jenny L. Weon, Seung Wook Yang, Patrick Ryan Potts  Molecular Cell 
Volume 10, Issue 4, Pages (February 2015)
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages (November 2017)
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (August 2010)
Volume 18, Issue 5, Pages (May 2005)
Volume 128, Issue 7, Pages (June 2005)
Volume 49, Issue 6, Pages (March 2013)
Hua Gao, Yue Sun, Yalan Wu, Bing Luan, Yaya Wang, Bin Qu, Gang Pei 
Volume 47, Issue 3, Pages (August 2012)
Cooperation of a ubiquitin domain protein and an E3 ubiquitin ligase during chaperone/proteasome coupling  Jens Demand, Simon Alberti, Cam Patterson,
Volume 8, Issue 8, Pages (January 2001)
Figure 4 DNM1 mutations affect protein levels and self-dimerization (A) HeLa cells were transfected with green fluorescent protein (GFP)-tagged mutant.
Proteasome-Mediated Degradation of p21 via N-Terminal Ubiquitinylation
Rory Geyer, Susan Wee, Scott Anderson, John Yates, Dieter A. Wolf 
Mutant MFN2 proteins have normal half-lives and are properly localized to mitochondria. Mutant MFN2 proteins have normal half-lives and are properly localized.
Volume 16, Issue 5, Pages (May 2009)
Volume 13, Issue 8, Pages (November 2015)
Key functional sites of SPINDLIN1 could be phosphorylated by Aurora-A.
Mapping the Pirh2 and p73 interaction sites.
Volume 44, Issue 2, Pages (October 2011)
Volume 41, Issue 3, Pages (February 2011)
by Naoe T. Nihira, Kohei Ogura, Kouhei Shimizu, Brian J
Pirh2 is an E3 ligase for p73 in vitro.
c-IAP1 Cooperates with Myc by Acting as a Ubiquitin Ligase for Mad1
The interaction between PARsylated BRCA1 and RAP80 is required for maintaining BRCA1–RAP80–PARP1 complex integrity after DNA damage and normal HRR regulation.
TCTP enhances the protein stability of Pim-3 by blocking the ubiquitin–proteasome degradation of Pim-3. TCTP enhances the protein stability of Pim-3 by.
Presentation transcript:

APCFZR1 promotes BRAF ubiquitination in a D-box–dependent manner. APCFZR1 promotes BRAF ubiquitination in a D-box–dependent manner. A, BRAF specifically bound to FZR1, but not CDC20, in cells. Immunoblot (IB) analysis of whole-cell lysates (WCL) and immunoprecipitates (IP) derived from 293T cells transfected with HA-FZR1 or HA-CDC20 together with the FLAG-BRAF construct. Thirty-six hours after transfection, cells were pretreated with 10 μmol/L MG132 for 10 hours before harvesting. B, Endogenous BRAF bound to endogenous FZR1. IB analysis of WCL and anti-FZR1 IP derived from HeLa cells. C,In vitro–transcribed and –translated BRAF (IVT-35S-BRAF) bound to purified recombinant GST-FZR1. Autoradiography of 35S-labelled BRAF bound to bacterially purified GST-FZR1, but not the GST recombinant protein. D, FZR1, but not CDC20, promoted the degradation of BRAF. IB analysis of WCL derived from 293 cells transfected with HA-FZR1 or HA-CDC20 with FLAG-BRAF constructs. GFP serves as an internal transfection control. E, FZR1-mediated BRAF degradation could be blocked by the 26S proteasome inhibitor MG132. IB analysis of WCL derived from 293 cells transfected with FLAG-BRAF and EV or HA-FZR1 constructs. MG132 (10 μmol/L) was used to inhibit the 26S proteasome where indicated. GFP serves as an internal transfection control. F, APC binding–deficient ΔC-box-FZR1 failed to promote BRAF degradation. IB analysis of WCL derived from 293 cells transfected with FLAG-BRAF and HA-tagged WT-FZR1 or E3 ligase activity–deficient ΔC-box-FZR1 constructs. GFP serves as an internal transfection control. G, Sequence alignments of the putative D-boxes–containing region between BRAF proteins from various species as well as a schematic representation of the various D-box deletion mutants generated and used in the following studies. H, D-box 4–deleted or –mutated BRAF mutants were resistant to FZR1-mediated degradation. IB analysis of WCL derived from 293 cells transfected with the indicated FLAG-BRAF mutants with HA-FZR1 where indicated. GFP serves as an internal transfection control. I, D-box 4 mutants of BRAF failed to bind FZR1. IB analysis of WCL derived from 293 cells transfected with the indicated FLAG-tagged WT- or D-box 4–mutated BRAF constructs with HA-FZR1 where indicated. GFP serves as an internal transfection control. J, D-box 4–mutated BRAF failed to bind FZR1 in vitro. GST pulldown analysis to determine WT, D4-RLAA, or R671Q mutant form of BRAF bound to the indicated GST fusion proteins. K, FZR1 promoted ubiquitination of WT-BRAF, but not D-box 4–mutated BRAF, in cells. APCFZR1 promotes BRAF ubiquitination in vivo. IB analysis of WCL and subsequent His-tag pulldown in 6 mol/L guanine-HCl–containing buffer derived from 293 cells transfected with the indicated plasmids. Cells were pretreated with 10 μmol/L MG132 for 10 hours to block the proteasome pathway before harvesting. L, APCFZR1 promoted BRAF ubiquitination in vitro. Bacterially purified WT- and D4-RLAA-His-BRAF kinase domain (455–767) proteins were incubated with the APCFZR1 complex purified from G1 phase–arrested HeLa cell extract together with purified E1, E2, and ubiquitin as indicated at 30°C for 60 minutes before being resolved by SDS-PAGE and probed with the anti-His antibody. M and N, D-box 4–mutated BRAF displayed an extended half-life compared with its WT counterpart. Melan-a cells ectopically expressing WT- or D4-RLAA-BRAF were treated with 20 μg/mL cycloheximide (CHX) for the indicated time periods before harvesting. Equal amounts of whole-cell lysates (WCL) were immunoblotted with the indicated antibodies (M). N, Quantification of FLAG-BRAF band intensities was plotted as mean ± SD from three independent experiments. FLAG-BRAF bands were normalized to TUBULIN, then normalized to the t = 0 time point. Lixin Wan et al. Cancer Discov 2017;7:424-441 ©2017 by American Association for Cancer Research