Plenty of Fish U.S. Dating Survey Final Report August, 2010.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Life Satisfaction in Past, Present, and Future
Advertisements

1 Moving Beyond Satisfied Members to Loyal Members.
Gillette & MSN Mark Charkin – Regional Sales Manager
1 Version 1 | Internal Use© Ipsos MORI Version 1 | Internal Use Only Paste co- brand logo here IMA Membership Audit Quarter April – June /08/2013.
Washoe County Citizen Survey December th Citizen Survey conducted since 1995 Statistically-valid; proportional to and representative of county population.
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Slide
Alcohol Awareness Month Omnibus Survey Results: Issues Associated with Alcohol Consumption March 14, 2014.
GE Smart Grid Survey June, /2/2014 Table of Contents Background & Methodology Key Findings Detailed Findings Demographic Trends Demographic Profile.
Tablet ownership and behaviour 1 Results from YouGov survey conducted 28 th – 31 st December 2012.
Text 1 July, 2010 DCMS: Training Manual Campaign Management.
Drink Aware Water Safety Research A Presentation Prepared For Drink Aware August 2012 By MOD/PK S
MARKETING INFORMATION AND RESEARCH
Relationships Between Two Variables: Cross-Tabulation
Results from a Mobile Finance Survey. 2 2 Second survey sponsored by CheckFree with fieldwork in April 2008; First survey completed in March ,007.
The Role of the Internet in the Car Purchasing Process Julie Forey Head of Research MSN UK.
Full Survey Results Results of the Where Are We Heading? online Club survey, March-April 2013 Kenilworth RFC.
Holiday Giving Poll November 14, 2012 Telephone survey of 1,010 U.S. Adults 18 years and older on November conducted in ORC Internationals CARAVAN®
© Ipsos MORI Measuring Drinkawares Impact Louise Park, Ipsos MORI 24 July 2013.
WA State Seniors Oral Health Status. Methodology A total of 4,400 surveys were completed by phone with Washington State residents age 55 and older. Geographic.
Gameology Games and Digital Goods Spending Behavior Report July 2011.
A Report to the Law Society of Upper Canada Career Choices Study January, 2008.
Name of presenter(s) or subtitle Canadian Netizens February 2004.
Riding a Bike for Transport 2011 Survey Findings.
MEMBER SATISFACTION SURVEY RESULTS. The State Health Plan conducted a Member Satisfaction Survey in November, focusing on member communication and customer.
Profiles of the Adolescents and Youths in Bangladesh Syeda Sitwat Shahed Narayan Das Research and Evaluation Division, BRAC 7 February, 2012.
2011 WINNISQUAM COMMUNITY SURVEY YOUTH RISK BEHAVIOR GRADES 9-12 STUDENTS=1021.
2011 FRANKLIN COMMUNITY SURVEY YOUTH RISK BEHAVIOR GRADES 9-12 STUDENTS=332.
Media Channel Study Media Channel Study - 1 Contents Main Objectives2 Survey Method3 Media Channels Studied4 Executive Summary5 Detailed Findings6.
Local Patient Participation Report ‘Provide effective healthcare to meet the needs of patients and encourage health promotion’ March
National Consumer Agency Market Research Findings: Online Discount Sites July 2012 Research Conducted by.
Patient Survey Results 2013 Nicki Mott. Patient Survey 2013 Patient Survey conducted by IPOS Mori by posting questionnaires to random patients in the.
State of the Industry Tennis Court Contractors 2014.
Self-employed Evidence base Purpose This slide-pack aims to provide a broad evidence-base on self- employment in the UK. Drawn predominantly from.
Kids and Family Reading Report™ Harry Potter: The Power of One Book
Missouri Brand Awareness & Destination Audit Study Fall 2003 Presented to: Missouri Association of Convention & Visitors Bureaus June 8, 2004.
172 Commercial Street, 2 nd Floor Portland Maine 1 May 2014 Full Service Market Research and Public Opinion Polling 172 Commercial.
NALA Omnibuzz© Research Debrief “Plain English” September 2011.
1 UNIVERSITY OF BRADFORD IT SERVICES STUDENT SURVEY Prepared by Stuart Wright, Senior Research Executive, June 2009 J4130
For more information, contact: Jordan Losen President, VeraQuest, Inc. Ph: Prepared by: VeraQuest, Inc.
Consumers & Online Privacy: Agenda Background and objectives General attitudes to the internet Attitudes to online data and privacy Attitudes to.
Summary of Key Results from the 2012/2013 Survey of Visa Applicants Who Used a Licensed Adviser Undertaken by Premium Research Prepared: July 2013.
Realtime research results XX Ltd Project Name March ‘08.
Third Party Advertising Evaluation: American Express eStatement Topline July 2008.
Hearst digital: We Know Women Online. Online Survey Ran 7 th July to 6 th August 40 questions across 5 key insight areas Sample 4566 Methodology Cosmopolitan.
PROJECTED RIDERSHIP OF THE HOUSATONIC RAILROAD STUDY Presented by Julie Pokela, Ph.D. August, 2010.
COLORADO LOTTERY 2010 IMAGE SURVEY Prepared By The Howell Research Group.
AGA 2009 Tracking Survey Perceptions of Governmental Financial Management Prepared for the Association of Government Accountants December 29, 2009 © Harris.
Student Engagement Survey Results and Analysis June 2011.
Employment, unemployment and economic activity Coventry working age population by disability status Source: Annual Population Survey, Office for National.
Canadian Hospice Palliative Care Association The Way Forward Initiative - Topline Results (National vs. Ontario) February 7, 2014.
An Online Survey Among Michigan Adults Survey Results Prepared by: September 27,
JerryHenry & A S S O C I A T E S FY 2005 Lake of the Ozarks Convention & Visitors Bureau Conversion Study Performance Analysis & Profile Prepared by Jerry.
The Cost Savings and Enhancements of a District’s Wellness Program A Case Study from Broward Presented by: Kay Blake, Training Supervisor Tina Severance-Fonte,
Source: Annual Population Survey, Office for National Statistics. Full time and part time employment Coventry population.
Citizens’ Survey Presentation of Results for Total Sample February 25, 2003 Prepared By: 831 E. Morehead Street, Suite 150 Charlotte, North Carolina
Additional analysis of poverty in Scotland 2013/14 Communities Analytical Services July 2015.
Campus Crusade For Christ Global Religion Survey Topline Report Prepared by: Infosurv, Inc. November 1, 2013.
Copyright © All rights reserved to Student Insights. 1 Student-View ™ Report Level Two July, 2007 SAMPLE REPORT.
CBC News Poll on Discrimination November Methodology This report presents the findings of an online survey conducted among 1,500 Canadian adults.
JUNE 2015 REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY ANNUAL PERCEPTIONS RESEARCH.
SADDLEBACK COLLEGE COMMUNITY BENCHMARK REPORT PRESENTATION Saddleback College Onsite Meeting November 2013, Mission Viejo, CA Pam Cox-Otto, Ph.D. - Interact.
1 1 Perception of Online Advertising - Germany Comparison of 13 different forms of online advertising Report Study:
Continuing Education Provincial Survey Winter 2012 Connie Phelps Manager, Institutional Research & Planning.
Marketing & Brand Research AAA Member Poll 2011 Summer Travel and Entertainment Auto Club of Southern California May 2011.
1 1 Perception of Online Advertising - France Comparison of 13 different forms of online advertising Report Study:
Taking Part 2008 Multivariate analysis December 2008
Context for the experiment?
Innovation and the online payment realm A market study
Natalie Baker and Stephanie McKenzie December 2007 – January 2008
NHS DUDLEY CCG Latest survey results August 2018 publication.
Presentation transcript:

Plenty of Fish U.S. Dating Survey Final Report August, 2010

Table of Contents Page Background, Objectives, and Methodology3 Executive Summary4 Awareness & Usage of Online Dating Sites5 Image of Plenty of Fish vs. Competitors20 General Perceptions & Other Sources Used36 Appendix I: Respondent Profile43 Appendix II: Image of Plenty of Fish by Gender & Region50 Appendix III: Top 4 Competitors – Detailed Data65 Questionnaire70

Background, Objectives & Methodology Background: – Online dating websites are used by a large proportion of singles who are looking to establish serious long-term relationships. – Plenty of Fish commissioned comScore as an objective third-party research vendor to provide reliable insights into attitudes and behaviors related to the online dating category. Research Objectives: – To establish the percentage of marriages and long-term relationships that were formed as a result of matches from online dating websites. – To further establish Plenty of Fish as a leader in the United States online dating landscape. Methodology: – U.S. panelists were invited to participate in the survey by . 1,565 surveys were completed between May 27 – June 15, The Margin of Error for a sample of this size is +/- 2.48% at a 95% confidence interval.. Data were weighted prior to analysis on gender, income, and region of residence to match the online population for visitation to the Personals category. – Respondents were screened to meet the following criteria: Aged Visit online dating website for the purpose of initiating heterosexual relationships. 3

Executive Summary The U.S. dating website landscape is very competitive; Plenty of Fish, eHarmony, and Match are the current market leaders in the category. – Plenty of Fish ranks 3 rd, behind eHarmony and Match for unaided brand awareness. – Plenty of Fish leads all competitors with the highest proportion of active users, but eHarmony and Match have higher overall aided awareness levels. – Plenty of Fish leads competitors as a source of the highest number of dates during the past two years (on average). – Taken together, there is some evidence to suggest that Plenty of Fish has become more popular during the last six months while eHarmony and Match are older sites: although awareness is higher due to length of time in the market, usage may be starting to drop off. Competitive ratings and analysis identified the relative strengths and weaknesses of Plenty of Fish, as experienced by current and recent users. – Relative Strengths: Lots of profiles available, with no limits placed on the number of matches. Easy to use and to maintain profiles. Good place to meet people who share the same culture/religion, who are similar to me. High user satisfaction and likelihood to recommend the site to others. – Relative Weaknesses: Middle of the pack in terms of perception of meeting high quality people. Possible design/navigation issues compared with other sites. Although rated well as a place to establish long-term relationships, compares unfavourably to eHarmony in particular for perception of being a place to establish long-term vs. short-term relationships. Plenty of Fishs free offering appears to be a competitive advantage since overall, dating site users do not perceive much benefit in a paid site compared with a free one. Online dating is the primary source for meeting people for those who use it. – About one-half also use bars/clubs, and smaller proportions use other sources such as work/school and set-ups through friends/family members. 4

Awareness & Usage of Online Dating Sites

Q2. When thinking of online dating/ personal websites, which ones come to mind? n=1,457 Base: Total Sample 6 Unaided Awareness of Dating Websites – Top 15 Sites Mentioned Dating Survey Plenty of Fish ranks third for unaided awareness among users of online dating sites, with eHarmony and Match tied as the top two sites. – Two-in-ten of those who visit dating sites are able to recall Plenty of Fish on an unaided basis.

7 Q2. When thinking of online dating/ personal websites, which ones come to mind? Base: Total Sample 7 Unaided Awareness of Dating Websites – Top 15 Sites Mentioned Dating Survey More females than males are able to recall, unaided, all of the top three brands: eHarmony, Match, and Plenty of Fish.

Q2. When thinking of online dating/ personal websites, which ones come to mind? Base: Total Sample 8 Unaided Awareness of Dating Websites – by Age Dating Survey The highest level of unaided awareness for Plenty of Fish is among users under 55 years of age.

Q3. Please indicate your level of familiarity with each of the following online dating/personal sites. Base: Total Sample n=1,565 9 Dating Sites Ever Visited Dating Survey Plenty of Fish has the largest proportion of currently active users across all online dating sites. – However, overall awareness of Plenty of Fish is much lower than for for eHarmony and Match. Overall Awareness 58% 96% 64% 88% 86% 55% 43% 52% 68% 60% 31%

Q3. Please indicate your level of familiarity with each of the following online dating/personal sites. Base: Total Sample n=1, Currently Active by Site Awareness Dating Survey Plenty of Fish has the highest proportion of active users among those who are aware of each dating website. Proportion 24% 14% 16% 11% 10% 15% 12% 8% 6% 5% 4%

11 Q3. Please indicate your level of familiarity with each of the following online dating/personal sites. Base: Total Sample 11 Dating Sites Ever Visited – Plenty of Fish Dating Survey Gender Income Region B D A/B/C/D/E/F/G/H superscripts = Significantly greater at a 95% confidence level Gender, income, and region of residence have little influence on the degree of familiarity with Plenty of Fish.

12 Base: Recent User 12 When Account was Created Dating Survey Q4. When did you create your account/profile on each of the following websites? Over one-half of Plenty of Fish users set up their accounts more than 12 months ago, placing Plenty of Fish fifth in a field of 11 dating sites in terms of site user account longevity.

13 Q4. When did you create your account/profile on each of the following websites? Base: Recent User 13 When Account was Created: Plenty of Fish Dating Survey Gender Income Region A/B/C/D/E/F/G/H superscripts = Significantly greater at a 95% confidence level A CC Plenty of Fish account longevity is highest among low income dating site users, with a high proportion of recent activity within the high income bracket. D

Q5. Please indicate how many (a) people you have met in person, (b) dates you have had, and (c) relationships of 3 months or longer you have had on each of these sites during the past 2 years: Dating Survey Number of People you have met in person Dates you have had Relationships of 3+ months Base: Recent User 14 Plenty of Fish outranks all other dating sites in terms of the number of dates users have had in the past 2 years, while tying with MSN Dating & Personals for second place with respect to the number of people met in person. – Chemistry leads for the number of relationships of 3+ months.

15 Base: Recent User 15 Dating Survey Gender Income Region Q5. Please indicate how many (a) people you have met in person, (b) dates you have had, and (c) relationships of 3 months or longer you have had on each of these sites during the past 2 years: Number of People you have met in person: Plenty of Fish Dates you have had: Plenty of Fish Dates you have had: Plenty of Fish Relationships of 3+ months: Plenty of Fish 12.2 Higher income Plenty of Fish users met more people in person, had more dates, and had more relationships of 3+ months than their lower income counterparts. – Urban Plenty of Fish users also had a larger number of dates than those in other regions.

Q6. Please indicate how often you have visited each of the following sites just during the past 6 months. Base: Total Sample 16 Frequency of Visiting Dating Survey About one-third of Plenty of Fish users visit at least once per day In comparison, about half of the Match and eHarmony users have not been to the site at all in the past 6 months

Q7. During the past 6 months, what is the average number of messages you receive on each of the following websites? Base: Recent User 17 *Caution: Small base size Average Number of Messages Receive on Each Site Dating Survey Plenty of Fish users received fewer messages on a daily basis than most other competitive sites.

18 Image of Plenty of Fish vs. Competitors

Q8. Please indicate how strongly you agree with the following statements about. Dating Survey Site Ratings: A good place to meet people like me Base: Recent User 19 % Agree (Codes 3-4) n=403n=422n=550n=335n=206n=137n=78 **Note: Certain options not shown as base size too small (n<50) n=98 Plenty of Fish outranks all other online dating sites as a good place to meet people like me.

Q8. Please indicate how strongly you agree with the following statements about. Dating Survey Site Ratings: No Limits on how many matches I can contact 20 % Agree (Codes 3-4) Base: Recent User n=403n=550n=137n=422n=335n=206 n=78 n=98 Plenty of Fish is the top-rated site for no limits on how many matches I can contact.

Q8. Please indicate how strongly you agree with the following statements about. Site Ratings: Can meet people from all professions/occupations Base: Recent User 21 % Agree (Codes 3-4) n=403 n=422n=550n=206n=335n=78n=137 Dating Survey n=98 Plenty of Fish is perceived as the top dating site where users can meet people from all professions/occupations.

Q8. Please indicate how strongly you agree with the following statements about. Dating Survey Site Ratings: Can meet someone to build a long-term sustainable relationship Base: Recent User 22 % Agree (Codes 3-4) n=422 n=550n=403n=137n=335n=78n=206 n=98 Plenty of Fish just slightly trails eHarmony and Match in terms of its ratings as a site where users can meet someone to build a long-term sustainable relationship.

Q8. Please indicate how strongly you agree with the following statements about. Dating Survey Site Ratings: A place for casual/short-term relationships Base: Recent User 23 % Agree (Codes 3-4) n=403 n=335n=78n=137n=550n=206 n=422 n=98 More online dating sites users rate Plenty of Fish as a place for short-term relationships versus other dating sites.

Q8. Please indicate how strongly you agree with the following statements about. Dating Survey Site Ratings: Reasonable fees for the services provided Base: Recent User 24 % Agree (Codes 3-4) n=403n=335n=78n=206n=137n=550n=422n=98 Plenty of Fish is the top-rated site for its reasonable fees for services provided, outperforming its closest competitor (Yahoo! Personals) by 20%.

Q8. Please indicate how strongly you agree with the following statements about. Dating Survey Site Ratings: Easy to maintain/update my account/profile Base: Recent User 25 % Agree (Codes 3-4) n=206n=550n=403n=422 n=335 n=78n=137 n=98 Plenty of Fish ties with both Singlesnet and Match as a site where accounts/profiles are easily maintained/updated.

Q8. Please indicate how strongly you agree with the following statements about. Dating Survey Site Ratings: Easy to navigate the site Base: Recent User 26 % Agree (Codes 3-4) n=335 n=550n=206n=422n=403n=137n=78 n=98 Plenty of Fish ties with eHarmony for ease of navigation, with ratings of just a few points below those of the lead sites on this attribute.

Q8. Please indicate how strongly you agree with the following statements about. Dating Survey Site Ratings: A place where I can meet high quality people Base: Recent User 27 % Agree (Codes 3-4) n=422 n=550n=403n=335n=78n=206 n=137 n=98 eHarmony has the highest ratings as a place to meet high quality people versus other dating sites, with Plenty of Fish in third place.

Q8. Please indicate how strongly you agree with the following statements about. Dating Survey Site Ratings: Can meet someone who shares my religion/culture Base: Recent User 28 % Agree (Codes 3-4) n=422n=550n=403n=206n=335n=78n=137 n=98 eHarmony and Match are perceived at the top two sites where users can meet someone who shares their religion/culture.

Q8. Please indicate how strongly you agree with the following statements about. Dating Survey Site Ratings: Provides me with accurate matches Base: Recent User 29 % Agree (Codes 3-4) n=403 n=422n=550n=137n=335n=78n=206 n=98 Plenty of Fish ranks ahead of its competitors for providing accurate matches.

Q8. Please indicate how strongly you agree with the following statements about. Dating Survey Site Ratings: I would be proud to tell people I met someone through this site Base: Recent User 30 % Agree (Codes 3-4) n=403n=422n=550n=335n=137n=78n=206 n=98 Plenty of Fish outperforms its competitors as a site users would be proud to tell others they met someone through.

Q8. Please indicate how strongly you agree with the following statements about. Dating Survey Site Ratings: I am very happy with my experiences on this site Base: Recent User 31 % Agree (Codes 3-4) n=403n=550n=335n=422n=206n=78n=137 n=98 Users of dating sites are happiest with their experiences on Plenty of Fish versus the competitive sites. Plenty of Fish has the highest satisfaction level of all competitive sites.

Q8. Please indicate how strongly you agree with the following statements about. Dating Survey Site Ratings: A site I would recommend to others 32 % Agree (Codes 3-4) Base: Recent User n=403n=422n=550n=335n=206n=78n=137n=98 Plenty of Fish leads the competitive set in terms of user recommendations.

Dating Survey Messenger Reliable Easy to use/navigate/browse Good results Lots of profiles/people Free Plenty of Fish vs. Other Sites – Likes Poor profile design Quality of people Not enough contacts Inappropriate matches Plenty of Fish vs. Other Sites – Dislikes Q10a/b. Please list up to 3 things that you like/dislike about Plenty of Fish vs. other online site you have visited? Base: Total Sample 33 Plenty of Fish users like the site for a variety of reasons, including its low cost (i.e. free), ease of use, and large selection of people/profiles. Dislikes include the perception that the match results are weak, the site has poor quality people, and that there are too few contacts. Too casual

34 General Perceptions & Other Sources Used

Q9. Please indicate how strongly you agree or disagree with the following statements about paid versus free online dating sites. Dating Survey n=1,565 Base: Recent User 35 Paid vs. Free Websites The majority of dating sites users agree that paying to belong to a dating site does not necessarily result in a better match, that they should not have to pay in order to contact someone on a site, and that they are just as likely to meet professionally oriented people on free sites as they are on paid sites. Slightly fewer believe that paid dating sites have no advantages over free sites.

Q11. Do you know of anyone else (friends, family, etc.) who has done any of the following? Select all that apply. (Dating Survey) n=1,565 Base: Total Sample 36 Knowledge of Other People on Online Dating Sties About one-half of dating site users know someone who has at least one dating site profile and has had a date with a person they met on a dating site. Fewer indicate that they know someone who met their long-term partner or spouse through a dating site.

Q1a. In addition to dating websites, which of the following sources have you used to meet people for the purpose of dating during the past 2 years? Select all that apply. (CHECKBOX) Base: Total Sample Other Sources Used n=1, Bars/clubs/social events was the top source used for meeting prospective dates outside of dating sites over the past 2 years, followed by work/school and set-ups via a friend or family member.

38 Q1a. In addition to dating websites, which of the following sources have you used to meet people for the purpose of dating during the past 2 years? Select all that apply. (CHECKBOX) Base: Total Sample Other Sources Used – By Gender A/B superscripts = Significantly greater at a 95% confidence level Bars/clubs/social events were used by more males than females as an alternative source for meeting prospective dates.

Q1b. Please rank each of the following sources from 1 to 6 in order of your preference for each. The number 1 should be assigned to your favorite source proceeding down to 6 for your least favorite. (RANKING) – Dating Survey n=1,565 Base: Total Sample Mean Ranking Score: Preferred Source for Meeting People (Top Mention) Dating Survey Online dating sites were respondents preferred source for meeting people, followed by some distance by set-ups by friends/family and bars/clubs/social events.

Preferred Source for Meeting People by Gender Base: Total Sample Mean Ranking Score: A/B superscripts = Significantly greater at a 95% confidence level Q1b. Please rank each of the following sources from 1 to 6 in order of your preference for each. The number 1 should be assigned to your favorite source proceeding down to 6 for your least favorite. (RANKING) – Dating Survey Males are more likely to prefer online dating sites for meeting people, while females prefer to be set-up by friends/family members.

Appendix I: Respondent Profile 41

n=1,565 Base: Total Sample 42 Age Dating Survey Gender

Household Size n=1,565 Base: Total Sample 43 Ethnic Background

State of Residence n=1,565 Base: Total Sample 44 Community Type

Occupation/Profession n=1,565 Base: Total Sample 45 Education

Household Income n=1,565 Base: Total Sample 46 Hours Per Week Spent Online

n=1,565 Base: Total Sample 47 Dating Survey Relationship Status

Appendix III: Top 4 Competitors – Detailed Data

49 Base: Recent User 49 Dating Survey Gender Income Region Q5. Please indicate how many (a) people you have met in person, (b) dates you have had, and (c) relationships of 3 months or longer you have had on each of these sites during the past 2 years: Number of People you have met in person: eHarmony Dates you have had: eHarmony Dates you have had: eHarmony Relationships of 3+ months: eHarmony

50 Base: Recent User 50 Dating Survey Gender Income Region Q5. Please indicate how many (a) people you have met in person, (b) dates you have had, and (c) relationships of 3 months or longer you have had on each of these sites during the past 2 years: Number of People you have met in person: Match Dates you have had: Match Dates you have had: Match Relationships of 3+ months: Match

51 Base: Recent User 51 Dating Survey Gender Income Region Q5. Please indicate how many (a) people you have met in person, (b) dates you have had, and (c) relationships of 3 months or longer you have had on each of these sites during the past 2 years: Number of People you have met in person: Yahoo! Personals Dates you have had: Yahoo! Personals Dates you have had: Yahoo! Personals Relationships of 3+ months: Yahoo! Personals

52 Base: Recent User 52 Dating Survey Gender Income Region Q5. Please indicate how many (a) people you have met in person, (b) dates you have had, and (c) relationships of 3 months or longer you have had on each of these sites during the past 2 years: Number of People you have met in person: Singlesnet.com Dates you have had: Singlesnet.com Dates you have had: Singlesnet.com Relationships of 3+ months: Singlesnet.com