A Hedgehog-Insensitive Form of Patched Provides Evidence for Direct Long-Range Morphogen Activity of Sonic Hedgehog in the Neural Tube  James Briscoe,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Creation of a Sog Morphogen Gradient in the Drosophila Embryo
Advertisements

Volume 32, Issue 3, Pages (November 2001)
The DHHC Palmitoyltransferase Approximated Regulates Fat Signaling and Dachs Localization and Activity  Hitoshi Matakatsu, Seth S. Blair  Current Biology 
Volume 104, Issue 6, Pages (March 2001)
Neuronal patterning: Making stripes in the spinal cord
Volume 6, Issue 4, Pages (April 2010)
Katherine Joubin, Claudio D Stern  Cell 
Volume 61, Issue 5, Pages (March 2009)
Iain Patten, Marysia Placzek  Current Biology 
Smoothened Mutants Reveal Redundant Roles for Shh and Ihh Signaling Including Regulation of L/R Asymmetry by the Mouse Node  Xiaoyan M. Zhang, Miguel.
Regulation of Frizzled by Fat-like Cadherins during Planar Polarity Signaling in the Drosophila Compound Eye  Chung-hui Yang, Jeffrey D. Axelrod, Michael.
The Neural Plate Specifies Somite Size in the Xenopus laevis Gastrula
Ventral neural progenitor domains of the spinal cord are defined by sonic‐hedgehog‐regulated combinatorial expression of transcription factors. Ventral.
Direct and Long-Range Action of a DPP Morphogen Gradient
Opposing Transcriptional Outputs of Hedgehog Signaling and Engrailed Control Compartmental Cell Sorting at the Drosophila A/P Boundary  Christian Dahmann,
A Role for the Roof Plate and Its Resident TGFβ-Related Proteins in Neuronal Patterning in the Dorsal Spinal Cord  Karel F Liem, Gabi Tremml, Thomas M.
All Mouse Ventral Spinal Cord Patterning by Hedgehog Is Gli Dependent and Involves an Activator Function of Gli3  C.Brian Bai, Daniel Stephen, Alexandra.
Act up Controls Actin Polymerization to Alter Cell Shape and Restrict Hedgehog Signaling in the Drosophila Eye Disc  Aude Benlali, Irena Draskovic, Dennis.
Hedgehog and Patched in Neural Development and Disease
Coordinate Regulation of Motor Neuron Subtype Identity and Pan-Neuronal Properties by the bHLH Repressor Olig2  Bennett G. Novitch, Albert I. Chen, Thomas.
Sightless has homology to transmembrane acyltransferases and is required to generate active Hedgehog protein  Jeffrey D. Lee, Jessica E. Treisman  Current.
Victor Hatini, Stephen DiNardo  Molecular Cell 
Proteolysis of the Hedgehog Signaling Effector Cubitus interruptus Requires Phosphorylation by Glycogen Synthase Kinase 3 and Casein Kinase 1  Mary Ann.
Eric J. Rulifson, Chi-Hwa Wu, Roel Nusse  Molecular Cell 
Canonical Wnt Signaling Dynamically Controls Multiple Stem Cell Fate Decisions during Vertebrate Body Formation  Benjamin L. Martin, David Kimelman  Developmental.
Shanthini Sockanathan, Thomas M Jessell  Cell 
Volume 11, Issue 18, Pages (September 2001)
Joanna Chen, Esther M. Verheyen  Current Biology 
Control of Cell Proliferation in the Drosophila Eye by Notch Signaling
Volume 31, Issue 2, Pages (August 2001)
Volume 11, Issue 6, Pages (December 2006)
SOX2 Functions to Maintain Neural Progenitor Identity
Rongwen Xi, Jennifer R. McGregor, Douglas A. Harrison 
Volume 6, Issue 2, Pages (August 2000)
Sonic hedgehog and vascular endothelial growth factor Act Upstream of the Notch Pathway during Arterial Endothelial Differentiation  Nathan D. Lawson,
Volume 5, Issue 3, Pages (September 2003)
A Homeodomain Protein Code Specifies Progenitor Cell Identity and Neuronal Fate in the Ventral Neural Tube  James Briscoe, Alessandra Pierani, Thomas.
Creation of a Sog Morphogen Gradient in the Drosophila Embryo
Volume 104, Issue 6, Pages (March 2001)
The Graded Response to Sonic Hedgehog Depends on Cilia Architecture
Volume 6, Issue 1, Pages (January 2004)
Short-Range Cell Interactions and Cell Survival in the Drosophila Wing
Volume 8, Issue 2, Pages (February 2005)
Combgap Relays Wingless Signal Reception to the Determination of Cortical Cell Fate in the Drosophila Visual System  Yuechun Song, Soohee Chung, Sam Kunes 
A Role of Receptor Notch in Ligand cis-Inhibition in Drosophila
Volume 96, Issue 4, Pages (February 1999)
Eugenia Piddini, Jean-Paul Vincent  Cell 
Specification of Motor Neuron Identity by the MNR2 Homeodomain Protein
Trimeric G Protein-Dependent Frizzled Signaling in Drosophila
Won-Suk Chung, Didier Y.R. Stainier  Developmental Cell 
Justin P. Kumar, Kevin Moses  Cell 
Coordinate Regulation of Motor Neuron Subtype Identity and Pan-Neuronal Properties by the bHLH Repressor Olig2  Bennett G. Novitch, Albert I. Chen, Thomas.
Volume 37, Issue 2, Pages (April 2016)
Åsa Apelqvist, Ulf Ahlgren, Helena Edlund  Current Biology 
Sandra Claret, Matthieu Sanial, Anne Plessis  Current Biology 
Volume 40, Issue 1, Pages (September 2003)
Volume 90, Issue 2, Pages (July 1997)
The sterol-sensing domain of Patched protein seems to control Smoothened activity through Patched vesicular trafficking  Verónica Martı́n, Graciela Carrillo,
Producing Cells Retain and Recycle Wingless in Drosophila Embryos
Volume 11, Issue 3, Pages (September 2006)
Jonas Muhr, Thomas M Jessell, Thomas Edlund  Neuron 
Hedgehog Signaling in Development and Cancer
Numb Antagonizes Notch Signaling to Specify Sibling Neuron Cell Fates
Posttranscriptional Regulation of Smoothened Is Part of a Self-Correcting Mechanism in the Hedgehog Signaling System  Joy Alcedo, Yu Zou, Markus Noll 
Lineage compartments in Drosophila
Volume 86, Issue 3, Pages (August 1996)
Morphogenetic Movements Underlying Eye Field Formation Require Interactions between the FGF and ephrinB1 Signaling Pathways  Kathryn B. Moore, Kathleen.
Transducing the Dpp Morphogen Gradient in the Wing of Drosophila
Assigning the Positional Identity of Spinal Motor Neurons
Volume 7, Issue 2, Pages (February 2001)
Presentation transcript:

A Hedgehog-Insensitive Form of Patched Provides Evidence for Direct Long-Range Morphogen Activity of Sonic Hedgehog in the Neural Tube  James Briscoe, Yu Chen, Thomas M. Jessell, Gary Struhl  Molecular Cell  Volume 7, Issue 6, Pages 1279-1291 (June 2001) DOI: 10.1016/S1097-2765(01)00271-4

Figure 1 A Model of Patched and Smo Function in Hh Signal Transduction (A) Schematic diagram showing the transmembrane proteins Patched (Ptc) and Smoothened (Smo). In the absence of Hedgehog (Hh), Ptc inhibits the Smo-dependent activity of the Hh signal transduction pathway. The second large extracellular loop of Ptc, positioned between transmembrane domains 7 and 8, is depicted in orange. (B) The binding of Hh to Ptc relieves the inhibition of the Hh pathway and permits Smo to activate downstream targets (blue arrow). (C) PtcΔloop2 lacks the second large extracellular loop (see Experimental Procedures section) and is not able to bind Hh ligands, but can still inhibit the Hh pathway, even in the presence of Hh protein. (D and E) A model for the influence of Ptc1Δloop2 on neural patterning. (D) Expression of mPtc1Δloop2 by cells in the ventral neural tube results in a cell-autonomous reduction in Shh signal transduction (indicated as a reduced density of blue dots). As in Drosophila, neural cells expressing mPtc1Δloop2 appear unable to restrict the movement of secreted Shh, resulting in the abnormal dorsal spread of Shh. (E) Schematic diagram showing changes in neuronal cell fate within and dorsal to clusters of cells that express mPtc1Δloop2. mPtc1Δloop2-expressing cells exhibit a ventral-to-dorsal shift in neuronal fate. Just dorsal to mPtc1Δloop2-expressing cells, there is a dorsal-to-ventral shift in neuronal fate. For details, see text Molecular Cell 2001 7, 1279-1291DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(01)00271-4)

Figure 2 Clones of PtcΔloop2-Expressing Wing Cells Cannot Sequester or Transduce Hh (A and B) Wings bearing clones of PtcΔloop2 expressing cells in the anterior (A) or posterior (B) portion of the A compartment. Each wing carries a large A compartment clone (the clone border is outlined in red on the wing, and the clone territory is shown in green in the diagram). Both wings also contain additional clones that populate the P compartment (the border demarcating mutant P compartment cells is outlined in blue and the P compartment is shown in dark blue in the diagram). The red stripe in both diagrams indicates the region formed by A compartment cells that expresses Dpp in response to Hh (yellow arrow) emanating from P compartment cells. In (A), the A compartment clone forms the anterior-most portion of the A compartment and appears wild type. In (B), the A compartment clone forms the posterior portion of the A compartment where it abuts the A/P boundary and is associated with the formation a mirror-symmetric double A winglet as well as the loss of P compartment pattern (discussed in the text). This phenotype is indistinguishable from that associated with similarly positioned clones of smo− cells (Chen and Struhl, 1996). Wings are shown anterior to the left, with longitudinal wing veins 1–5 and posterior wing margin (m) indicated along the wing periphery. PtcΔloop2-expressing cells are marked by the absence of the y+ gene. (C and D) Wing imaginal discs bearing clones of PtcΔloop2-expressing cells (marked by the coincident expression of GFP) in the P compartment and in either the anterior (C) or posterior (D) portions of the A compartment. The discs are oriented anterior to the left, dorsal up, and the A compartment is marked by the expression of Ci (blue). Cells expressing Dpp in response to Hh are marked by expression of a dpp-lacZ reporter gene (β-gal expression is shown in red). In (C), both the A and P compartments appear to be of normal size, and Dpp is expressed in a stripe of A compartment cells that abuts the A/P compartment boundary, as in wild-type wing discs (the overlap of the red [dpp-lacZ] and blue [Ci] stains appears purple). In (D), a large A compartment clone is located next to the A/P boundary, and all cells belonging to the clone fail to express Dpp, despite the presence of Hh-secreting P compartment cells just across the A/P boundary (the overlap between the green [GFP] stain, which marks PtcΔloop2-expressing cells, and blue [Ci] stain appears turqoise). Immediately anterior to this clone, a stripe of wild-type cells express Dpp (red), indicating that they are responding to Hh secreted by P compartment cells Molecular Cell 2001 7, 1279-1291DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(01)00271-4)

Figure 3 Expression of mPtc1Δloop2 in the Chick Neural Tube Inhibits Ptc1 Expression without Affecting Floor Plate Specification (A) Diagram summarizing in ovo electroporation. (B–I) HH stage 10–12 embryos electroporated with mPtc1Δloop2 and incubated until HH stage 18 (B and C) or HH stage 22 (D–I). Cells expressing PtcΔloop2 were identified by expression of GFP (green; B, D, F, G, and I). (B and C) Adjacent sections of a transfected neural tube showing expression of mPtc1Δloop2, indicated by GFP expression (B) and the expression of chick Ptc1 (C). (D–F) The expression of HNF3β (red; E and F) is unaffected. GFP (green, C, F) marks cells expressing mPtc1Δloop2. (G–I) Expression of Shh (red; H and I) in neural tube transfected with mPtc1Δloop2 (green, G and I). The results are representative of eight electroporated embryos Molecular Cell 2001 7, 1279-1291DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(01)00271-4)

Figure 4 Shh-Mediated Repression of Pax7, In Vitro, Is Inhibited by Expression of mPtc1Δloop2 Expression of Pax7 (red; B, C, E, F, H, I, K, and L) in untransfected [i] explants (A–C and G–I) or mPtc1Δloop2 transfected [i] explants (D–F and J–L) grown in vitro for 24 hr with 1 nM Shh-N (A–F) or 4 nM Shh-N (G–L). Explants expressing mPtc1Δloop2 (green; D, F, J, and L) contain Pax7-expressing cells. Only GFP-containing cells express Pax7 (F and L). The results are representative of 46 explants (8 electroporated and exposed to 1nM Shh-N; 20 electroporated and exposed to 4nM Shh-N; 18 control explants) Molecular Cell 2001 7, 1279-1291DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(01)00271-4)

Figure 5 Expression of mPtc1Δloop2 Results in Ectopic Ventral Expression of Pax7 and Pax6 HH stage 10–12 embryos were electroporated in ovo with mPtc1Δloop2 and assayed at stage 24 for expression Pax7 and Pax6. (A–F) Ectopic expression of Pax7 (red; B, C, E, and F) in the ventral neural tube of embryos expressing mPtc1Δloop2 (green; A, C, D, and F). Not all cells that express mPtc1Δloop2 express Pax7 (arrowhead and see Results section). (F) shows the merged image of the area boxed in (E). (G–I) The expression of mPtc1Δloop2 (green; G and I) in the p3 domain (bracket, H) ventral to the normal limit of Pax6 expression results in cell-autonomous ectopic expression of Pax6 (red; H and I). The results are representative of 27 electroporated embryos Molecular Cell 2001 7, 1279-1291DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(01)00271-4)

Figure 6 mPtc1Δloop2 Expression Changes the Pattern of Dbx and Nkx Protein Expression HH stage 10–12 embryos were electroporated in ovo with mPtc1Δloop2 (A–F and M–R) or Pax7 (G–L) and assayed at stage 24 for expression of Dbx1 and Dbx2 (A–L) or Nkx6.1 (M–O) or Nkx2.2 (P–R). (A–C) Expression of mPtc1Δloop2 (green; A and C) affects expression of Dbx1 (red; B and C). Ventral to the normal limit of Dbx1 expression (dotted lines), mPtc1Δloop2 expression induces ectopic Dbx1 expression in a cell-autonomous manner. Within the normal domain of Dbx1 expression, both dorsal and ventral to the Pax7 boundary, expression of mPtc1Δloop2 inhibits Dbx1 expression in a cell-autonomous manner. Arrowheads mark the approximate ventral limit of Pax7 expression. (D–F) Expression of mPtc1Δloop2 (green; D and F) ventral to the normal limit of Dbx2 expression (dotted lines) results in the ectopic, cell-autonomous induction of Dbx2 (red; E and F). Within the normal domain of Dbx2 expression, mPtc1Δloop2 inhibits Dbx2. Regions of Dbx2 expression dorsal to the Pax7 boundary are also affected. Arrowheads mark the ventral limit of Pax7 expression. (G–I) Ectopic expression of Pax7 (green; G and I) does not affect Dbx1 expression (red; H and I). (J–L) Ectopic expression of Pax7 (green; J and L) does not affect Dbx2 expression (red; K and L). The results are representative of 10 embryos. (M–O) Ectopic expression of mPtc1Δloop2, identified by GFP expression (green; M and O), inhibits Nkx6.1 expression in neural progenitor cells (red; N and O). (P–R) Ectopic expression of mPtc1Δloop2 identified by GFP expression (green; P and R) inhibits Nkx2.2 expression (red; Q and R). The results are representative of 15 (Nkx6.1) and 23 (Nkx2.2) electroporated embryos Molecular Cell 2001 7, 1279-1291DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(01)00271-4)

Figure 8 A Dorsal-to-Ventral Change in Neural Fate in Cells Dorsal to Clusters of mPtc1Δloop2-Expressing Cell HH stage 20–24 embryos transfected with mPtc1Δloop2 contained small ventral clusters of transfected cells. These regions of transfected embryos were assayed for Pax6 (A–C) and Nkx2.2 (D–I) expression. (A–C) Pax6 expression (red; B and C) is increased in cells that express mPtc1Δloop2 (green; A and C; arrow). Dorsal to mPtc1Δloop2 cells, the level of Pax6 expression is decreased. (D–I) Nkx2.2 expression (red; E, F, H, and I) is inhibited in mPtc1Δloop2-expressing cells (green; D, F, G, and I; arrow). However, dorsal to the domain of mPtc1Δloop2 expression, cells ectopically express Nkx2.2. The results are representative of 15 electroporated embryos Molecular Cell 2001 7, 1279-1291DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(01)00271-4)

Figure 7 An Altered Pattern of Ventral Neurogenesis after Expression of mPtc1Δloop2 (A) Summary of the relationship between progenitor domains and their neuronal progeny. (B–M) Generation of Evx1/2+ V0 neurons (red; B–D), En1+ V1 neurons (red; E–G), Chx10+ V2 neurons (red; H–J), and MNR2+ MNs (red; K–M) assayed in embryos transfected with mPtc1Δloop2. Embryos were electroporated at HH stage 10–12 and assayed either at HH stage 22–24 (B–J) or HH stage 18 (K–M). Cells transfected with mPtc1Δloop2 were identified by GFP expression (green; B, D, E, G, H, J, K, and M). The normal domains of generation of each cell type are indicated by dotted lines. Expression of mPtc1Δloop2 ventral to the normal domains of generation of V0, V1, and V2 neurons resulted in the ectopic and cell-autonomous generation of these neuronal subtypes. The expression of mPtc1Δloop2 within the domains of progenitors that normally generate each neuronal subtype resulted in the cell-autonomous repression of the generation of each neuronal subtype. n, notochord. The results are representative of 21 electroporated embryos Molecular Cell 2001 7, 1279-1291DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(01)00271-4)