Volume 27, Issue 7, Pages (April 2017)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Repression of COUP-TFI Improves Bone Marrow-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cell Differentiation into Insulin-Producing Cells  Tao Zhang, Xiao-Hang Li, Dian-Bao.
Advertisements

Up-Regulation of Activating Transcription Factor-5 Suppresses SAP Expression to Activate T Cells in Hemophagocytic Syndrome Associated with Epstein-Barr.
Volume 32, Issue 3, Pages (February 2015)
CATALASE2 Coordinates SA-Mediated Repression of Both Auxin Accumulation and JA Biosynthesis in Plant Defenses  Hong-Mei Yuan, Wen-Cheng Liu, Ying-Tang.
Volume 8, Issue 3, Pages (March 2015)
Purusharth Rajyaguru, Meipei She, Roy Parker  Molecular Cell 
Volume 18, Issue 1, Pages (January 2008)
DELLAs Modulate Jasmonate Signaling via Competitive Binding to JAZs
Fang Xu, Yu Ti Cheng, Paul Kapos, Yan Huang, Xin Li  Molecular Plant 
Volume 94, Issue 1, Pages (July 1998)
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages (March 2004)
Volume 19, Issue 1, Pages (January 2016)
Volume 24, Issue 3, Pages e4 (July 2018)
NRF2 Is a Major Target of ARF in p53-Independent Tumor Suppression
Shu-Tang Tan, Hong-Wei Xue  Cell Reports 
Volume 8, Issue 9, Pages (September 2015)
Volume 26, Issue 2, Pages (January 2016)
Feng Zhang, Jiazhong Shi, Chunjing Bian, Xiaochun Yu  Cell Reports 
Xanthomonas Type III Effector XopD Desumoylates Tomato Transcription Factor SlERF4 to Suppress Ethylene Responses and Promote Pathogen Growth  Jung-Gun.
Jie Dong, Weimin Ni, Renbo Yu, Xing Wang Deng, Haodong Chen, Ning Wei 
Volume 7, Issue 9, Pages (September 2014)
Volume 26, Issue 18, Pages (September 2016)
Volume 32, Issue 3, Pages (February 2015)
Volume 27, Issue 2, Pages (July 2007)
Volume 125, Issue 3, Pages (May 2006)
Liyuan Chen, Anne Bernhardt, JooHyun Lee, Hanjo Hellmann 
Volume 19, Issue 5, Pages (March 2009)
Glucose-Induced β-Catenin Acetylation Enhances Wnt Signaling in Cancer
Jungmook Lyu, Vicky Yamamoto, Wange Lu  Developmental Cell 
Volume 7, Issue 5, Pages (May 2010)
Volume 25, Issue 23, Pages (December 2015)
Young-Hee Cho, Sang-Dong Yoo, Jen Sheen  Cell 
Volume 9, Issue 7, Pages (July 2016)
Volume 9, Issue 6, Pages (June 2002)
Volume 55, Issue 3, Pages (August 2014)
Volume 21, Issue 5, Pages (November 2011)
Volume 3, Issue 3, Pages (March 2013)
Dimethylation of H3K4 by Set1 Recruits the Set3 Histone Deacetylase Complex to 5′ Transcribed Regions  TaeSoo Kim, Stephen Buratowski  Cell  Volume 137,
CATALASE2 Coordinates SA-Mediated Repression of Both Auxin Accumulation and JA Biosynthesis in Plant Defenses  Hong-Mei Yuan, Wen-Cheng Liu, Ying-Tang.
Volume 6, Issue 5, Pages (September 2013)
Volume 5, Issue 5, Pages (September 2012)
Genetic and Epigenetic Strategies Potentiate Gal4 Activation to Enhance Fitness in Recently Diverged Yeast Species  Varun Sood, Jason H. Brickner  Current.
Repression of COUP-TFI Improves Bone Marrow-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cell Differentiation into Insulin-Producing Cells  Tao Zhang, Xiao-Hang Li, Dian-Bao.
Volume 9, Issue 3, Pages (March 2011)
Arabidopsis WRKY45 Interacts with the DELLA Protein RGL1 to Positively Regulate Age-Triggered Leaf Senescence  Ligang Chen, Shengyuan Xiang, Yanli Chen,
Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages (February 2018)
Arabidopsis NF-YCs Mediate the Light-Controlled Hypocotyl Elongation via Modulating Histone Acetylation  Yang Tang, Xuncheng Liu, Xu Liu, Yuge Li, Keqiang.
Mst1 Is an Interacting Protein that Mediates PHLPPs' Induced Apoptosis
Xiang Han, Hao Yu, Rongrong Yuan, Yan Yang, Fengying An, Genji Qin
Volume 139, Issue 4, Pages (November 2009)
Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages (February 2018)
Volume 11, Issue 3, Pages (March 2012)
Shrestha Ghosh, Baohua Liu, Yi Wang, Quan Hao, Zhongjun Zhou 
Volume 5, Issue 6, Pages (December 2013)
Volume 10, Issue 9, Pages (September 2017)
A Conserved Interaction between SKIP and SMP1/2 Aids in Recruiting the Second-Step Splicing Factors to the Spliceosome in Arabidopsis  Lei Liu, Fangming.
James Fishburn, Neeman Mohibullah, Steven Hahn  Molecular Cell 
Transcriptional Regulation by p53 through Intrinsic DNA/Chromatin Binding and Site- Directed Cofactor Recruitment  Joaquin M Espinosa, Beverly M Emerson 
Volume 49, Issue 2, Pages (January 2013)
Volume 25, Issue 7, Pages e4 (November 2018)
Volume 10, Issue 4, Pages (April 2017)
Volume 10, Issue 10, Pages (October 2017)
Volume 12, Issue 4, Pages (April 2019)
DELLA Proteins Promote Anthocyanin Biosynthesis via Sequestering MYBL2 and JAZ Suppressors of the MYB/bHLH/WD40 Complex in Arabidopsis thaliana  Ye Xie,
Volume 12, Issue 9, Pages (September 2019)
Condensin and Hmo1 Mediate a Starvation-Induced Transcriptional Position Effect within the Ribosomal DNA Array  Danni Wang, Andres Mansisidor, Gayathri.
Volume 10, Issue 10, Pages (October 2017)
Volume 11, Issue 7, Pages (July 2018)
Acetylation Regulates Transcription Factor Activity at Multiple Levels
Volume 12, Issue 2, Pages (February 2019)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 27, Issue 7, Pages 981-991 (April 2017) A Phytophthora Effector Manipulates Host Histone Acetylation and Reprograms Defense Gene Expression to Promote Infection  Liang Kong, Xufang Qiu, Jiangang Kang, Yang Wang, Han Chen, Jie Huang, Min Qiu, Yao Zhao, Guanghui Kong, Zhenchuan Ma, Yan Wang, Wenwu Ye, Suomeng Dong, Wenbo Ma, Yuanchao Wang  Current Biology  Volume 27, Issue 7, Pages 981-991 (April 2017) DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2017.02.044 Copyright © 2017 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Current Biology 2017 27, 981-991DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2017.02.044) Copyright © 2017 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 PsAvh23 Is Required for the Full Virulence of P. sojae in Soybean (A) P. sojae PsAvh23 knockout mutants exhibited reduced virulence. Etiolated soybean hypocotyls were inoculated with zoospore suspensions from P. sojae wild-type strain P6497 (WT), a control strain transformed by the empty vector (EV), or the PsAvh23 knockout mutants T51 and T94. Disease symptoms (left) were photographed at 2 days post-inoculation (dpi), and the lesion length (right) was measured to evaluate infection severity. The values are means ± SEM of three independent biological replicates. Different letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.01, Duncan’s multiple range test). (B) Expression of PsAvh23 in hairy roots enhances susceptibility to P. sojae infection. Soybean hairy roots expressing EV or GFP-PsAvh23 were inoculated with RFP-labeled P. sojae strain P6497 (WT-RFP). Oospore production in the infected roots was observed under a fluorescence microscope (left), and their numbers are presented as means ± SEM (n = 3) (right). Asterisks represent significant differences (p < 0.01, Student’s t test). Scale bars, 20 μm. (C) Expression of PsAvh23 in hairy roots restored the virulence of the PsAvh23 mutant T94. Relative biomass of P. sojae was determined by qPCR at 48 hr post-inoculation (hpi). The values are means ± SEM (n = 3). Different letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.01, Duncan’s multiple range test). (D) Nuclear localization of PsAvh23 in plant cells is required for its virulence function. N. benthamiana leaves expressing GFP-tagged PsAvh23 derivatives were inoculated with P. capsici mycelial plugs 48 hr after Agrobacterium infiltration. Top: lesion areas are indicated by white circles (scale bar, 1.5 cm). Middle: confocal images show the subcellular localizations of the PsAvh23 derivatives in plant cells (scale bar, 5 μm). Bottom: GFP intensity profiles were assessed on cytosol-nucleus transects. c, cytosol; n, nucleus; y axis, GFP intensity; x axis, transect length (μm). See also Figure S1. Current Biology 2017 27, 981-991DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2017.02.044) Copyright © 2017 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 PsAvh23 Interacts with Soybean ADA2 Proteins, and the ADA2-Binding Site Is Required for Virulence Function (A) PsAvh23 interacts with GmADA2 homologs (GmADA2-1/2/3) in yeast. Another P. sojae effector, PsAvh22, was used as a negative control. Yeast transformants were grown on non-selective SD/-Trp/-Leu (SD-2) medium or the selective medium SD/-Trp/-Leu/-His/-Ade (SD-4) supplemented with X-α-gal (80 mg/L). Plates were photographed at 3 days after inoculation. Protein expression in yeast cells was examined by western blot (WB) using anti-Myc and anti-HA antibodies. The minus sign represents EV. (B) In vitro pull-down of His-PsAvh23 derivatives with GST-GmADA2-1. His-PsAvh23 derivatives and GST-GmADA2-1 were expressed in E. coli. Co-precipitation of GmADA2-1 with PsAvh23 was examined by GST pull-down. (C) In vivo coIP of GFP-PsAvh23 derivatives with FLAG-GmADA2-1. Total proteins were extracted from N. benthamiana leaves expressing GmADA2-1 together with WT or mutant forms of PsAvh23. The immune complexes were pulled down using anti-FLAG agarose beads. (D) Schematic representation of WT and mutant PsAvh23 and their interaction with GmADA2-1. PsAvh23 contains two internal repeats (IR1 and IR2). A conserved FVxR sequence (shown in yellow) is present in each of the repeats at the C termini. The FVxR residues are substituted with alanines (shown in green) in the mutants PsAvh23M4 and PsAvh23M6. (E and F) The ADA2-binding site of PsAvh23 is required for its virulence function. Soybean hairy roots expressing EV or GFP-PsAvh23 derivatives were inoculated with WT P. sojae (WT-RFP). Oospore production was observed and numerated at 48 hpi (E). Relative biomass of P. sojae was determined by qPCR at 48 hpi and was presented as means ± SEM (n = 3) (F). Different letters indicate statistically significant differences (p < 0.01, Duncan’s multiple range test). Scale bars, 20 μm. These experiments were repeated three times with similar results. See also Figures S2 and S3 and Table S1. Current Biology 2017 27, 981-991DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2017.02.044) Copyright © 2017 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 PsAvh23 Takes GmADA2-1 away from the ADA2-GCN5 Subcomplex (A) PsAvh23 competes with GmGCN5a to bind GmADA2-1 in vitro in a dose-dependent manner. Co-precipitation of GmADA2-1 with GmGCN5a in the presence of PsAvh23 or PsAvh23M4 was examined by western blotting before (input) and after affinity purification (GST pull-down). Different gradient dilutions (1×, 2×, and 4×) of Myc-PsAvh23 were added to the mix using total protein extracts from E. coli. (B) PsAvh23 interferes with the association of GmGCN5a with GmADA2-1 in plant cells. FLAG-GmADA2-1 and GmGCN5a-HA were co-expressed in N. benthamiana in the presence or absence of GFP-PsAvh23 or GFP-PsAvh23M4 though Agro-infiltration. The concentrations of Agrobacteria carrying different constructs are optical density 600 (OD600) = 0.2 (GmADA2-1 and GmGCN5a) and OD600 = 0–0.4 (PsAvh23 or PsAvh23M4). The immune complexes were pulled down by using anti-FLAG agarose beads. These experiments were repeated three times with similar results. See also Figure S4. Current Biology 2017 27, 981-991DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2017.02.044) Copyright © 2017 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 GmADA2 and GmGCN5 Contribute to Soybean Defense against P. sojae (A) Silencing of GmADA2 or GmGCN5 in soybean hairy roots was confirmed by qRT-PCR. Transcript abundances were normalized with CYP2 as the internal standard. The values are means ± SEM (n = 3). Asterisks represent significant differences (p < 0.01, Student’s t test). (B) Silencing of GmADA2 or GmGCN5 in soybean led to hypersusceptibility to P. sojae. Oospore production in GmADA2- or GmGCN5-silenced roots infected by WT P. sojae (WT-RFP) was observed (left) and numerated (right) at 48 hpi. The values are means ± SEM (n = 3). Asterisks represent significant differences (p < 0.01, Student’s t test). Scale bars, 20 μm. (C) Silencing of GmADA2 or GmGCN5 in soybean partially restored the virulence of P. sojae PsAvh23 knockout mutant. Relative biomass of P. sojae was determined by qPCR at 48 hpi and presented as means ± SEM (n = 3). Different letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.01, Duncan’s test). These experiments were repeated three times with similar results. See also Figures S5A–S5C. Current Biology 2017 27, 981-991DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2017.02.044) Copyright © 2017 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 PsAvh23 Decreases the H3K9ac Levels in Soybean during P. sojae Infection (A) In vitro assay evaluating the HAT activity of GmGCN5a in the presence or absence of GmADA2-1 and PsAvh23. HAT activity on histone H3 or nucleosomes was determined by western blotting using anti-H3ac and anti-H3K9ac antibodies. Protein mixture containing GmADA2-1 and GmGCN5a was incubated with PsAvh23 or PsAvh23M4 at different molar ratios (1 × −4 × in relative to GmADA2-1). p300-CBP-associated factor (PCAF) was used as a positive control with known HAT activity. The chemical inhibitor of HAT, C646, was used as an additional control. (B) Expression of PsAvh23 in soybean hairy roots led to reduced acetylation levels of H3K9. The nuclear fraction was separated from hairy roots expressing EV or GFP-PsAvh23. Duplicated samples were examined in each treatment. (C) H3K9ac levels were decreased in soybean hypocotyls infected by P. sojae. Soybean tissues inoculated with WT P. sojae or the PsAvh23 mutant T94 were collected at different time points. The nuclear fraction was separated and the levels of H3K9ac and H3K27ac were determined using antibodies. The experiments were repeated three times with similar results. See also Figures S5D–S5G. Current Biology 2017 27, 981-991DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2017.02.044) Copyright © 2017 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 PsAvh23 Regulates Defense-Related Gene Expression (A) Expression levels of selected defense-related genes in PsAvh23-expressing, GmADA2-silenced, or GmGCN5-silenced roots after infection with WT P. sojae strain P6497. Infected tissues were collected at 6 hpi and analyzed by qRT-PCR. Relative expression levels were normalized with CYP2 as an internal standard and presented as means ± SEM (n = 3). Asterisks represent significant differences (p < 0.01, Student’s t test). Ubiquitin5 (UBQ5) served as the negative control. See also Figure S6 and Tables S2, S3, S4, and S5. (B) H3K9ac levels at the promoter regions of selected defense-related genes were analyzed by ChIP-qPCR. Immunoprecipitation of acetylated H3K9 was performed on PsAvh23-expressing, GmADA2-silenced, or GmGCN5-silenced hairy roots infected by P. sojae strain P6497 at 6 hpi, and the H3K9 acetylation levels were quantified by qPCR using gene-specific primers. Values for the ChIP samples were first normalized to the input control and then divided by the EV control to obtain the fold enrichment values. The values are the means ± SEM of three independent biological replicates. Asterisks represent significant differences (p < 0.01, compared with EV control, Student’s t test). (C) Expression levels of selected defense-related genes in soybean roots inoculated with P. sojae strain P6497 (WT) or the PsAvh23 mutant T94. Relative expression levels were normalized with CYP2 as the internal standard and presented as means ± SEM (n = 3). Asterisks represent significant differences (p < 0.01, Student’s t test). These experiments were repeated three times with similar results. (D) A working model illustrating how PsAvh23 manipulates the ADA2-GCN5 subcomplex to suppress the activation of defense-related genes during P. sojae infection. GCN5 and ADA2 subunits are key components of the HAT complex SAGA, which acetylates nucleosomal histones and activates the expression of a subset of defense-related genes in response to pathogen infection. As a counter-defense strategy, P. sojae secretes the effector PsAvh23 that competitively binds to ADA2 and inhibits GCN5-mediated histone acetylation. As a result, PsAvh23 suppresses the expression of the defense genes, promoting P. sojae infection. Current Biology 2017 27, 981-991DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2017.02.044) Copyright © 2017 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions