Volume 113, Issue 9, Pages (November 2017)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Neutrophil-Bead Collision Assay: Pharmacologically Induced Changes in Membrane Mechanics Regulate the PSGL-1/P-Selectin Adhesion Lifetime  K.E. Edmondson,
Advertisements

Temperature Control Methods in a Laser Tweezers System
Sukant Mittal, Ian Y. Wong, William M. Deen, Mehmet Toner 
Koichiro Uriu, Luis G. Morelli  Biophysical Journal 
Indrajeet Singh, Efrosyni Themistou, Lionel Porcar, Sriram Neelamegham 
Molecular Dynamics Simulations of the Lipid Bilayer Edge
Volume 101, Issue 4, Pages (August 2011)
Volume 109, Issue 2, Pages (July 2015)
Dynamics of Active Semiflexible Polymers
Jing Han, Kristyna Pluhackova, Tsjerk A. Wassenaar, Rainer A. Böckmann 
Volume 113, Issue 12, Pages (December 2017)
Dynamics of the Serine Chemoreceptor in the Escherichia coli Inner Membrane: A High- Speed Single-Molecule Tracking Study  Dongmyung Oh, Yang Yu, Hochan.
Micro Magnetic Tweezers for Nanomanipulation Inside Live Cells
Quantifying Cell Adhesion through Impingement of a Controlled Microjet
Volume 111, Issue 2, Pages (July 2016)
On the Origin of Kinesin Limping
Hirokazu Tanimoto, Masaki Sano  Biophysical Journal 
Intact Telopeptides Enhance Interactions between Collagens
Smooth DNA Transport through a Narrowed Pore Geometry
Modes of Diffusion of Cholera Toxin Bound to GM1 on Live Cell Membrane by Image Mean Square Displacement Analysis  Pierre D.J. Moens, Michelle A. Digman,
Christopher B. Stanley, Tatiana Perevozchikova, Valerie Berthelier 
DNA Translocation Governed by Interactions with Solid-State Nanopores
Cellular Contraction Can Drive Rapid Epithelial Flows
Volume 96, Issue 2, Pages (January 2009)
Collective Cell Migration in Embryogenesis Follows the Laws of Wetting
Volume 111, Issue 7, Pages (October 2016)
V.M. Burlakov, R. Taylor, J. Koerner, N. Emptage  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 103, Issue 10, Pages (November 2012)
Volume 113, Issue 9, Pages (November 2017)
Martin Clausen, Michael Koomey, Berenike Maier  Biophysical Journal 
Actin Assembly at Model-Supported Lipid Bilayers
Confinement-Dependent Friction in Peptide Bundles
Flow-Enhanced Stability of Rolling Adhesion through E-Selectin
Strongly Accelerated Margination of Active Particles in Blood Flow
Volume 107, Issue 8, Pages (October 2014)
Catalysis-Enhancement via Rotary Fluctuation of F1-ATPase
Will J. Eldridge, Zachary A. Steelman, Brianna Loomis, Adam Wax 
Volume 96, Issue 5, Pages (March 2009)
Comparative Studies of Microtubule Mechanics with Two Competing Models Suggest Functional Roles of Alternative Tubulin Lateral Interactions  Zhanghan.
Cholesterol Modulates the Dimer Interface of the β2-Adrenergic Receptor via Cholesterol Occupancy Sites  Xavier Prasanna, Amitabha Chattopadhyay, Durba.
Dynamics of Active Semiflexible Polymers
Hung-Yu Chang, Xuejin Li, George Em Karniadakis  Biophysical Journal 
Lipeng Lai, Xiaofeng Xu, Chwee Teck Lim, Jianshu Cao 
Rheological Analysis and Measurement of Neutrophil Indentation
Satomi Matsuoka, Tatsuo Shibata, Masahiro Ueda  Biophysical Journal 
Fredrik Elinder, Michael Madeja, Hugo Zeberg, Peter Århem 
Volume 86, Issue 5, Pages (May 2004)
Benchmarks of Biomembrane Force Probe Spring Constant Models
Robust Driving Forces for Transmembrane Helix Packing
Volume 90, Issue 10, Pages (May 2006)
Mechanics of Individual Keratin Bundles in Living Cells
Dynamics of Mouth Opening in Hydra
Volume 108, Issue 9, Pages (May 2015)
Volume 111, Issue 9, Pages (November 2016)
Volume 111, Issue 6, Pages (September 2016)
Bending and Puncturing the Influenza Lipid Envelope
John E. Pickard, Klaus Ley  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 113, Issue 10, Pages (November 2017)
Volume 88, Issue 6, Pages (June 2005)
Raghvendra Pratap Singh, Ralf Blossey, Fabrizio Cleri 
Volume 115, Issue 12, Pages (December 2018)
Mechanotransduction Dynamics at the Cell-Matrix Interface
The Role of Network Architecture in Collagen Mechanics
Volume 114, Issue 6, Pages (March 2018)
Volume 97, Issue 2, Pages (July 2009)
Jérémie Barral, Frank Jülicher, Pascal Martin  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 108, Issue 9, Pages (May 2015)
Volume 110, Issue 12, Pages (June 2016)
George D. Dickinson, Ian Parker  Biophysical Journal 
Border Forces and Friction Control Epithelial Closure Dynamics
Presentation transcript:

Volume 113, Issue 9, Pages 1945-1955 (November 2017) High Tensile Strength of Engineered β-Solenoid Fibrils via Sonication and Pulling  Zeyu Peng, Amanda S. Parker, Maria D.R. Peralta, Krishnakumar M. Ravikumar, Daniel L. Cox, Michael D. Toney  Biophysical Journal  Volume 113, Issue 9, Pages 1945-1955 (November 2017) DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2017.09.003 Copyright © 2017 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 The backbone structure of the (a) RiAFP and (b) SBAFP studied in this work. The two proteins have distinct cross-sectional shapes (flat-rectangular for (a) RiAFP and triangular for (b) SBAFP). Images created using visual molecular dynamics (49). To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2017 113, 1945-1955DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2017.09.003) Copyright © 2017 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 TEM images of fibrils, synthesized from RiAFP and SBAFP before and after sonication, are shown. Prolonged sonication-induced length reduction of fibrils is observed. The scale bars represent 200 nm for RiAFP and 100 nm for SBAFP. Biophysical Journal 2017 113, 1945-1955DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2017.09.003) Copyright © 2017 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 The frequency distributions of fibril lengths after sonication for 20 and 40 h are shown for (a) RiAFP, (b) RiAFP in DTT, and (c) SBAFP. In (a) and (b), the bin width is set at 50 nm. For (a), the average length after 20 (40) h is 186 ± 87 nm (186 ± 86 nm). For (b), the average length of RiAFP fibrils after 20 (40) h of sonication is 129 ± 65 nm (130 ± 60 nm). For (c), the bin width is set at 20 nm. The average length of SBAFP fibrils after 20 (40) h of sonication is 46 ± 16 nm (47 ± 19 nm). Biophysical Journal 2017 113, 1945-1955DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2017.09.003) Copyright © 2017 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Histograms of fibril widths (measured with ImageJ software). (A) Unsonicated mutant RiAFP fibrils. (B) Unsonicated mutant SBAFP fibrils. (C) Sonicated mutant RiAFP fibrils. (D) Sonicated mutant fibrils of RiAFP in DTT. Biophysical Journal 2017 113, 1945-1955DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2017.09.003) Copyright © 2017 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Possible fibril cross-sections. (A) The observed widths of unsonicated and sonicated RiAFP fibrils are consistent with monomeric thickness in one transverse dimension and (most likely) dimeric thickness in the other. (B) SBAFP fibrils, both unsonicated and sonicated, show variable width. We assume it is most likely that they are of monomeric thickness in one transverse dimension and multimeric (with variable multimer number) in the other transverse dimension. Biophysical Journal 2017 113, 1945-1955DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2017.09.003) Copyright © 2017 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Regression of L2 to fibril width b for engineered SBAFP fibrils after sonication, consistent with a ribbon geometry assumption per Fig. 5. We have assumed zero intercept, and obtain a slope of 404 (36) nm with an R2 value of 0.71. The same regression of fibril squared length to width were observed in (25). Biophysical Journal 2017 113, 1945-1955DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2017.09.003) Copyright © 2017 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Plots (a) and (b) show typical force-displacement curves for RiAFP and SBAFP (purple and green), respectively. In black, the smoothed curves are shown. Below, histograms show the mean and SD of the (c) maximum force, (d) UTS, and (e) Young’s modulus Y, for RiAFP and SBAFP (purple and green, respectively). The values shown in the histograms are as follows: (c) RiAFP: 1751.3 ± 219.0 pN, SBAFP: 1256.3 ± 177.8 pN; (d) RiAFP: 0.38 ± 0.05 GPa, SBAFP: 0.31 ± 0.04 GPa; and (e) RiAFP: 7.91 ± 2.06 GPa, SBAFP: 11.00 ± 2.41 GPa. To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2017 113, 1945-1955DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2017.09.003) Copyright © 2017 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 8 The ultimate tensile strength with respect to the natural log of the pulling speed is plotted for (a) RiAFP (purple) and (b) SBAFP (green). The errors are calculated using the SD of the maximum forces at each speed. For each protein, we note two distinct linear regimes, to which we fit two lines (black). For RiAFP, the lines are given by UTSslow=0.045ln(v)+0.367 and UTSfast=0.275ln(v)−0.369. For SBAFP, the lines are given by UTSslow=0.029ln(v)+0.330 and UTSfast=0.202ln(v)−0.023. To estimate the UTS at speeds achieved during sonication, we extrapolate UTSfast to v = 1000 m/s, which gives a UTS of 1.5 GPa for RiAFP and a 1.4 GPa for SBAFP. To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2017 113, 1945-1955DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2017.09.003) Copyright © 2017 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 9 The average and SD of the Young’s modulus Y as a function of the natural logarithm of the pulling speed is shown. The results for RiAFP and SBAFP are shown in purple and green, respectively. The proteins have similar asymptotic values for Y at low pulling speeds of 6.0 GPa, which can be estimated by fitting exponentials (black) and extrapolating the fits to low speeds. At high speeds, Y for SBAFP increases more quickly than that of RiAFP. The value for Y of RiAFP at ln(1000m/s) is plotted to more clearly illustrate its behavior as the speed increases. To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2017 113, 1945-1955DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2017.09.003) Copyright © 2017 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 10 Model of prescission conditions for fibrils undergoing sonication. The picture is that fibrils of length L align radially in the vicinity of an imploding bubble of radius R thanks to the radial fluid flow. The radial coordinate from the center of the bubble is s and the fibril has an edge closest to the bubble of s0. The position s∗ denotes the radial distance at which the fixed fibril velocity matches the fluid velocity, so that the net viscous stress vanishes there. To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2017 113, 1945-1955DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2017.09.003) Copyright © 2017 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions