Instructions: PLEASE DELETE BEFORE PRESENTATION

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Preparation of the Self-Study and Documentation

Advertisements

Technical Assessment Review / Decision Briefing Template

PROJECT TITLE Project Leader: Team: Executive Project Sponsor (As Required): Date: Month/Day/Year 110/17/2014 V1.

TITLE OF PROJECT PROPOSAL NUMBER Principal Investigator PI’s Organization ESTCP Selection Meeting DATE.

OVERVIEW OF ClASS METHODS and ACTIVITIES. Session Objectives By the end of the session, participants will be able to: Describe ClASS team composition.

TITLE OF PROJECT PROPOSAL NUMBER Principal Investigator PI’s Organization ESTCP Selection Meeting DATE.

The University of Arizona Academic Program Review Orientation April 2015.

Mentor Overview.

How to write a Report On Assessment Source: AUN Secretariat.

Concept Analysis Document Executive Summary Template, (To view template instructions – Save this template to project files, reopen and then select View,

Two Questions Coaching Program [Your Name] [Your Address] [Date] [please name the file: your-name-2questions.pptx] —e.g. bill-marshall-2questions.pptx.

External Examiners’ Briefing Day Assessment Policy Tuesday 6 th January 2015.

Continuing Accreditation The Higher Learning Commission provides institutional accreditation through the evaluation of the entire university organization.

Tips For Writing Your Learning Experience The most common problems and some suggestions.

How to Prepare for an Ohio Technical Assistance Visit.

Providing Effective Descriptive Feedback: Designing Rubrics, Part 2 --Are you assessing what you think you’re assessing? Princess Anne Middle School Instructional.

Developing a Monitoring and Pre-Scoring Plan for the Virginia Grade Level Alternative (VGLA) Adapted from the Virginia Department of Education Division.

On-line briefing for Program Directors and Staff 1.

The Big Picture Getting Started The Process Follow-Up – 5 Year Action Plan Program Review.

NCA Self-Study Brief Summary. Who? What? When  11 team members with the Higher Learning Commission  Visit campus: April 24-April 26  Open session with.

Curtin University is a trademark of Curtin University of Technology CRICOS Provider Code 00301J 2012An overview Academic Promotion to Level B.

Columbia University School of Engineering and Applied Science Review and Planning Process Fall 1998.

Middle States Reaccreditation Process at The Catholic University of America.

Program Evaluation Workshop Overview of the Site Visit Process Rita Marie Cain Professor of Business Law, Bloch School.

Criterion 1 – Program Mission, Objectives and Outcomes Weight = 0.05 Factors Score 1 Does the program have documented measurable objectives that support.

Type Date Here Type Presenter Name/Contact Here Creating & Implementing Your Plan October 2012.

Annual Program Assessment With a Five- Year Peer Review John Henik Associate Vice President, Academic Affairs Dave Horsfield

1 Establishing a New Gallaudet Program Review Process Pat Hulsebosch Office of Academic Quality CUE – 9/3/08: CGE – 9/16/08.

MODULE 7 The Visit Report 1 CAPTE: On-site Reviewer Training This module discusses the report that the team submits at the conclusion of the on-site visit.

Academic Program Review Workshop 2017

Principal Investigator ESTCP Selection Meeting

CBU CALIFORNIA BAPTIST UNIVERSITY Assessment, Accreditation, and Curriculum Office CBU - OIRPA.

Building Your Personnel Action Dossier

Welcome. BSI Parent Night September 19, 2017 Mrs

TBR Academic Audit Training - Fall 2011

Training Objectives Upon conclusion of this training, you will know the following: Why compliance surveys are conducted When compliance surveys are conducted.

Office 365 Security Assessment Workshop

Taught Postgraduate Program Review

Polices, procedures & protocols

Academic Advancement day 2016

Principal Investigator ESTCP Selection Meeting

Instructions The following PowerPoint (PPT) template should be used by Academic Program Review (APR) site team reviewers to develop their exit meeting.

Author name(s) Affiliation

Overview of the FEPAC Accreditation Process

PSYCH 706 Enthusiasstic Studysnaptutorial.com

IPFA 2018 Instructions For Preparing Electronic Presentations

Module 9: Category III: Monitoring Student Progress

Middle States Accreditation Standards and Processes

Validation Team Exit Report

Tips For Writing Your Learning Experience

IPFA 2018 Instructions For Preparing Electronic Presentations

Validation Team Exit Report

Validation Team Exit Report

The Road to Success: A Scaffolded Process

QPO Facilitated Faculty Led Institutional Review

Assessing Academic Programs at IPFW

Principal Investigator ESTCP Selection Meeting

Academic Program Review Comprehensive Report

Your Name Student ID Study Program Faculty

Giving Feedback and Evaluating Academic Writing

Taught Postgraduate Program Review

Fort Valley State University

IPFA 2019 Instructions For Preparing Electronic Presentations

Principal Investigator ESTCP Selection Meeting

Cyclical Program Review

Module: 9 Mapping the Standards How the 2020 Colorado Academic Standards Work Together for Colorado Students! Estimated time: 60 minutes.

Validation Team Exit Report

Validation Team Exit Report

Care Partners Annual Meeting September 30, 2019 Davis, CA

Instructions The following PowerPoint (PPT) template should be used by Academic Program Review (APR) site team reviewers to develop their exit meeting.

Presentation transcript:

Instructions: PLEASE DELETE BEFORE PRESENTATION The following PowerPoint (PPT) template should be used by Academic Program Review (APR) reviewers to develop their exit meeting presentation. The template aligns with the APR criteria outlined in the Review Team Worksheet (APR Manual, Appendix F). Additional slides may be added as needed for feedback and/or comments. If a criterion is met no comments/feedback are necessary. Please skip the slide or include “N/A” for not applicable. Comments/feedback should be detailed with reference to evidence provided in the APR self-study report and/or during the site visit. They should highlight the program’s strengths and/or shortcomings. Reviewers should avoid providing remedies, recommendations, and/or solutions they believe should be applied in order for the program to correct any shortcomings. The program and its own constituents, after sufficient opportunity for discussion and thought, must determine their own path forward. Please send a copy of the presentation to the APR Specialist (apr@unm.edu) prior to the scheduled exit meeting. Please delete this slide before sending the final version of the presentation to the APR Specialist.

APR Exit Meeting Presentation Program: Exit Meeting Date: Site Team Reviewers: Office of Academic Affairs

Overall Program Strengths

Criterion 1. Introduction & Background Overall Findings (select one): Exceeds (E), Met (M), Met with Concerns (MC) or Not Met (NM) Findings on Strengths: Findings on Shortcomings: **Due to the introductory background of this criterion, strengths/weakness may not be necessary**

Criterion 2. Teaching & Learning: Curriculum Overall Findings (select one): Exceeds (E), Met (M), Met with Concerns (MC) or Not Met (NM) Findings on Strengths: Findings on Shortcomings:

Criterion 3. Teaching & Learning: Assessment Overall Findings (select one): Exceeds (E), Met (M), Met with Concerns (MC) or Not Met (NM) Findings on Strengths: Findings on Shortcomings:

Criterion 4. Students Findings on Strengths: Findings on Shortcomings: Overall Findings (select one): Exceeds (E), Met (M), Met with Concerns (MC) or Not Met (NM) Findings on Strengths: Findings on Shortcomings:

Criterion 5. Faculty Findings on Strengths: Findings on Shortcomings: Overall Findings (select one): Exceeds (E), Met (M), Met with Concerns (MC) or Not Met (NM) Findings on Strengths: Findings on Shortcomings:

Criterion 6. Research, Scholarship, & Service Overall Findings (select one): Exceeds (E), Met (M), Met with Concerns (MC) or Not Met (NM) Findings on Strengths: Findings on Shortcomings:

Criterion 7. Peer Comparisons Overall Findings (select one): Exceeds (E), Met (M), Met with Concerns (MC) or Not Met (NM) Findings on Strengths: Findings on Shortcomings:

Criterion 8. Resources & Planning Overall Findings (select one): Exceeds (E), Met (M), Met with Concerns (MC) or Not Met (NM) Findings on Strengths: Findings on Shortcomings:

Criterion 9. Facilities Findings on Strengths: Overall Findings (select one): Exceeds (E), Met (M), Met with Concerns (MC) or Not Met (NM) Findings on Strengths: Findings on Shortcomings:

Conclusion. Strategic Planning Overall Findings (select one): Exceeds (E), Met (M), Met with Concerns (MC) or Not Met (NM) Findings on Strengths: Findings on Shortcomings: