Instrument: Agilent 6495 QQQ, acquisition software version B

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Agilent 6410 Triple Quad LC/MS Software

Advertisements

Improvements in Mass Spectrometry for Life Science Research – Does Agilent Have the Answer? Ashley Sage PhD.

Using Skyline for Targeted Lipidomics

17.1 Mass Spectrometry Learning Objectives:

LC/MS WORKSHOP IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY Kamel Harrata  Instrument Description  Data Acquisition  Data Processing.

Spectral Counting. 2 Definition The total number of identified peptide sequences (peptide spectrum matches) for the protein, including those redundantly.

Karl Clauser Proteomics and Biomarker Discovery Taming Errors for Peptides with Post-Translational Modifications Bioinformatics for MS Interest Group ASMS.

Electronic Supplementary Material for the manuscript entitled: Effective selenium detoxification in the seed proteins of a hyperaccumulator plant: the.

Proteomics and Biomarker Discovery “Research-grade” Targeted Proteomics Assay Development: PRMs for PTM Studies with Skyline or, “How I learned to ditch.

Common parameters At the beginning one need to set up the parameters.

Agilent MassHunter Quantitation Analysis Software

TPD Workstation Software TPD software for control/ analysis of experiments Multiple temperature steps. Optimised data acquisition.

Laxman Yetukuri T : Modeling of Proteomics Data

INF380 - Proteomics-101 INF380 – Proteomics Chapter 10 – Spectral Comparison Spectral comparison means that an experimental spectrum is compared to theoretical.

Untargeted Metabolomics: Tandem LC-MSMS. Column and Flow Rate Selection Insert Barnes table for flow rates and sensitivity gain. Reverse Phase and Normal.

Precursor m/z double charge iTRAQ ratio 114: iTRAQ ratio 116: iTRAQ ratio 121: Precursor m/z triple charge iTRAQ.

Temple University MASS SPECTROMETRY FURTHER INVESTIGATIONS Ilyana Mushaeva and Amber Moscato Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Temple University.

Temple University MASS SPECTROMETRY INTRODUCTION Ilyana Mushaeva and Amber Moscato Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Temple University.

Mass Analyst Analysis of MS(MS) data. Short function overview: Load mzXML data (ms-ms data) Load pepXML and/or mascot data (found proteins/peptides after.

Automating Drug Metabolism Studies

Low lightHigh light High light response in Arabidopsis thaliana 4 days 1100 transcripts change Anthocyanin light response mutant.

1 CH908 Structural Analysis by Mass Spectrometry revision lecture. Prof. Peter O’Connor.

Training From MS scan to SIM. Work Flow MS Scan Use Qual anal to determine which parent ion to look at  use the most abundant ion, usually the.

Isotope Labeled Internal Standards in Skyline

CONTENTS Fragmentation of molecular ions - theory What a mass spectrum tells you Molecular ions Fragmentation Mass spectra of alkanes Mass spectra of halogenoalkanes.

Multiplexed Data Independent Acquisition for Comparative Proteomics

STRUCTURAL DETERMINATION MASS SPECTRUM (MS) LAB 12.

Agenda  Welcome from the Skyline team!  PRM Targeted Proteomics Using Full-Scan MS2  Introduction with Brendan MacLean  PRM Introduced by Bruno Domon.

Workflows to set up acquisition methods for scheduled sMRM-HR on the TripleTOF 5600 Start from a data dependent acquisition (DDA) Perform data base search.

LC separation and MS of histone tryptic peptides allow for their post-translational modification quantitation -For most K residues our histone assay, we.

DIA Method Design, Data Acquisition, and Assessment

12. Structure Determination: Mass Spectrometry

B Monoisotopic mass of neutral peptide M r (calc): Fixed modifications: Carbamidomethyl Ions score: 45 † Expect: ‡ Matches (red): 18/50.

Finding the unexpected in SWATH™ Data Sets – Implications for Protein Quantification Ron Bonner; Stephen Tate; Adam Lau AB SCIEX, 71 Four Valley Drive,

Multiplication Find the missing value x __ = 32.

Patterns and sequences We often need to spot a pattern in order to predict what will happen next. In maths, the correct name for a pattern of numbers is.

University of Washington, Department of Genome Sciences

Large Scale DIA With Skyline

LC-MS/MS Identification of Impurities Present in Synthetic Peptide Drugs Dr Anna Meljon*, Dr Alan Thompson, Dr Osama Chahrour, and Dr John Malone Almac.

Skyline not identifying peptides

MassMatrix Search Results Explained

View  text zoom  large Set properties text size to 14 point

Agenda Welcome from the Skyline team!

Volume 4, Issue 6, Pages e4 (June 2017)

Organic Chemistry Lesson 18 Mass spectrometry.

Starter Complete the quiz and hand in..

PCCSE Project Peculiar P100 Peak Picking Puzzles

C2.8 Instrumental Analysis

General Overview of the module and the methods

Proteomics Informatics David Fenyő

Interpretation of Mass Spectra I

Experimental Design: The Scientific Method.

Volume 4, Issue 6, Pages e4 (June 2017)

Dot to Dot Types of Number

Acetylcholine, Run 17, 148->87 m/z

Relative quantitation of phosphopeptides from conditioned media from subtype specific breast cancer cell lines. Relative quantitation of phosphopeptides.

Top-down protein identification.

Schematic of MS1 filtering.

We refer to “Skyline iRT Retention Time Prediction (Page 2-9)” and want to calibrate retention time of all experiment runs. First, we have created a document.

2D-LC-MS/MS analysis of tryptic digest of HEK293-SUMO3 cells (2 μg inj

Comparisons of MS/MS ion fragmentation spectra derived from GNPS network annotations (see Table S4 posted at ftp://massive.ucsd.edu/MSV /updates/ _aedlund_ /other/)

Skyline's internal model for small molecules has been aligned with that of peptides - the Targets tree now contains neutral molecules with children that.

Compound is first vaporized and converted into ions, which are then separated and detected. Electron Impact (EI) Mass Spectrometry 1.

Proteomics Informatics David Fenyő

Missing MS2 transition My trouble is, when the PRM raw file was imported, most of transition was not extracted, but all precursors were extracted, even.

What makes a good experimental design?

What I expect to see in Skyline

MS3 for peptide identification and mapping phosphorylation sites

Skyline for Small Molecules, a Sneak Peek at Emerging Capabilities

Presentation transcript:

Instrument: Agilent 6495 QQQ, acquisition software version B.07.00 Problem: CE optimization results sometimes produce unexpected peak area graphs or have completely missing data in Skyline. This happens for some or all CE steps for a single ion, and may affect multiple ions for a peptide. Instrument: Agilent 6495 QQQ, acquisition software version B.07.00 CE optimization transition list is generated in Skyline and imported into Agilent MassHunter and used to acquire data 3 transitions as examples: DPENFPFVVLGNK y8 (Good, CE pattern and best CE match between programs) QIGDNLIVPGGVK y6 (Not good, CE pattern and best CE is different between programs) VSEVKPSYR y3 (Not good, CE pattern and best CE is different between programs) Product ion masses in data file are sometimes different from the product ion masses in the acquisition method

DPENFPFVVLGNK y8 (Good, CE pattern and best CE match between programs) Acquisition method:

DPENFPFVVLGNK y8 – Data in Skyline Normal peak area graph when areas plotted Largest peak area achieved with CE of 25 Data reported for all CEs for this ion Data reported for all other ions for this peptide Peptide Sequence Replicate Name Precursor Mz Precursor Charge Product Mz Product Charge Fragment Ion Area Opt Step CE DPENFPFVVLGNK 1 742.387191 2 881.533464 y8 6296 -5 5 15016 -4 9 43049 -3 13 122526 -2 17 242788 -1 21 339380 25 265251 29 183871 33 97741 3 37 38828 4 41 10137 45 Best CE with highest peak area: 25 Exported report for peak area

DPENFPFVVLGNK y8 – Data in MassHunter Qualitative Analysis program Normal peak area graph when areas plotted Largest peak area achieved with CE of 25 Data reported for all CEs for this ion Data reported for all other ions for this peptide Name RT Precursor m/z (prod.) Height Area CE DPENFPFVVLGNK.742.387191.881.583464.45 37.863 742.3872 881.5835 847 9681 5 DPENFPFVVLGNK.742.387191.881.573464.41 37.808 881.5735 3458 38688 9 DPENFPFVVLGNK.742.387191.881.563464.37 37.825 881.5635 7818 97394 13 DPENFPFVVLGNK.742.387191.881.553464.33 37.797 881.5535 15119 185448 17 DPENFPFVVLGNK.742.387191.881.543464.29 37.834 881.5435 20925 260386 21 DPENFPFVVLGNK.742.387191.881.533464.25 881.5335 31763 342094 25 DPENFPFVVLGNK.742.387191.881.523464.21 37.85 881.5235 21750 243353 29 DPENFPFVVLGNK.742.387191.881.513464.17 37.851 881.5135 10133 124884 33 DPENFPFVVLGNK.742.387191.881.503464.13 37.831 881.5035 3890 42210 37 DPENFPFVVLGNK.742.387191.881.493464.9 37.809 881.4935 1521 14419 41 DPENFPFVVLGNK.742.387191.881.483464.5 37.788 881.4835 543 6726 45 Best CE with highest peak area: 25 Exported report for peak area

QIGDNLIVPGGVK y6 (Not good, CE pattern and best CE is different between programs) Acquisition method:

QIGDNLIVPGGVK y6 – Data in Skyline Strange peak area graph pattern Largest peak area achieved with CE of 17 No data reported for 2 CEs (Opt Step -4 and Opt Step -5 are completely missing No data reported at all for 3 other ions for this peptide Peptide Sequence Replicate Name Precursor Mz Precursor Charge Product Mz Product Charge Fragment Ion Area Opt Step CE QIGDNLIVPGGVK 1 659.384451 2 564.359522 y6 328647 -3 13 339826 -2 17 187954 -1 21 82739 25 23024 29 54033 33 119839 3 37 186777 4 41 #N/A 5 45 Best CE with highest peak area: 17 Exported report for peak area

QIGDNLIVPGGVK y6 – Data in MassHunter Qualitative Analysis program Normal peak area graph when areas plotted Largest peak area achieved with CE of 21 Data reported for all CEs for this ion Data reported for all other ions for this peptide Name RT Precursor m/z (prod.) Height Area CE QIGDNLIVPGGVK.659.384451.564.309522.5 24.79 659.3845 564.3095 1725 9955 5 QIGDNLIVPGGVK.659.384451.564.319522.9 24.786 564.3195 4663 27854 9 QIGDNLIVPGGVK.659.384451.564.329522.13 24.799 659.4 564.35 14567 79634 13 QIGDNLIVPGGVK.659.384451.564.339522.17 24.792 31632 183214 17 QIGDNLIVPGGVK.659.384451.564.349522.21 62754 341240 21 QIGDNLIVPGGVK.659.384451.564.359522.25 24.785 73279 319256 25 QIGDNLIVPGGVK.659.384451.564.369522.29 24.798 48075 255764 29 QIGDNLIVPGGVK.659.384451.564.379522.33 24.797 564.4 31922 180496 33 QIGDNLIVPGGVK.659.384451.564.389522.37 25037 120278 37 QIGDNLIVPGGVK.659.384451.564.399522.41 10590 54377 41 QIGDNLIVPGGVK.659.384451.564.409522.45 24.787 4855 22916 45 Best CE with highest peak area: 21 Exported report for peak area

VSEVKPSYR y3 (Not good, CE pattern and best CE is different between programs) Acquisition method:

VSEVKPSYR y3– Data in Skyline Strange peak area graph pattern Largest peak area achieved with CE of 25 Peptide Sequence Peptide Sequence Replicate Name Precursor Mz Precursor Charge Product Mz Product Charge Fragment Ion Area Opt Step CE VSEVKPSYR 1 358.865435 3 435.222578 y3 18786 -5 5 22070 -4 9 31284 -3 13 42665 -2 17 85446 -1 21 104957 25 6 29 587 2 33 3109 37 8867 4 41 45 Best CE with highest peak area: 25 Exported report for peak area

VSEVKPSYR y3 – Data in MassHunter Qualitative Analysis program Normal peak area graph when areas plotted Largest peak area achieved with CE of 9 Name RT Precursor m/z (prod.) Height Area CE VSEVKPSYR.358.865435.435.172578.5 4.605 358.85 435.15 5996 18713 5 VSEVKPSYR.358.865435.435.182578.9 4.607 435.2 32037 132573 9 VSEVKPSYR.358.865435.435.192578.13 4.61 22761 111688 13 VSEVKPSYR.358.865435.435.202578.17 11338 52488 17 VSEVKPSYR.358.865435.435.212578.21 8706 38092 21 VSEVKPSYR.358.865435.435.222578.25 4.617 5637 21313 25 VSEVKPSYR.358.865435.435.232578.29 435.25 2162 8872 29 VSEVKPSYR.358.865435.435.242578.33 963 3031 33 VSEVKPSYR.358.865435.435.252578.37 4.616 160 511 37 VSEVKPSYR.358.865435.435.262578.41 41 VSEVKPSYR.358.865435.435.272578.45 45 Best CE with highest peak area: 9 Exported report for peak area