CCSD Induction Program Overview and Evaluation January 19, 2015
Background and Perspective Prior to 2013-14 District-Based Mentoring Program 2013-14 District-Based Mentoring Program for 2nd Year Teachers, Full-Release Induction Coaches Through i3 Consortium for 1st Year Teachers 2014-15 All 1st and 2nd Year Teachers Participate in the i3 Induction Consortium
Induction Program Overview Consortium Data: 248 First/Second Year Teachers 21 School Districts 17 Induction Coaches
Induction Program Overview CCSD Teachers Supported by Consortium: 21 First Year Teachers 26 Second Year Teachers
Induction Program Overview CCSD Teachers Supported by Consortium: 21 First Year Teachers 26 Second Year Teachers
Induction Program Overview CCSD’s 47 First/Second Year Teachers are Served by 7 Induction Coaches (2 from CCSD) All CCSD Principals Have Attended the Professional Learning Session “Accelerating New Teacher Success”
Induction Program Overview First Year Beginning Teacher Network Sessions (4 Sessions are Offered Throughout the Year: September 3, 2014: 90% Participation October 1, 2014: 85% Participation **Diane Trpkosh is a Co-Facilitator of the Sessions
Induction Program Overview CCSD Induction Consortium Team: Jamie Coquyt, Tracy Schipper, Laura Medberry, Kendra Hanzlik, Diane Trpkosh Attend 2 Induction Consortium Network Meetings Meet Quarterly On-Site with Kim Owen, GWAEA Induction Consortium Lead, to Evaluate Programming Needs
Induction Program Overview GWAEA Induction Consortium Steering Committee: Laura Medberry is Serving as the Elementary Principal Representative for the Consortium Laura is Also Serving as a National Teacher Induction Network Team Member
Induction Program Evaluation
Beginning Teacher Data My induction coach aligns our work with my district priorities and expectations 1st Year Teachers – 98% 2nd Year Teachers – 96%
Beginning Teacher Data What has been the most important impact your induction coach has made on your teaching practice? 1st Year Teachers: Classroom Management Planning Instruction Emotional Support 2nd Year Teachers: Emotional Support/Classroom Management Analysis of Student Work
What we have learned: Induction Coaches: Clear goals/focus/agenda for interactions More work on lesson planning Efficient use of our time together
College Interaction Data September – Mid-December: 15 face-to-face interactions with each NT meeting goal of at least weekly f2f interactions Average time/f2f interactions/NT = 73 minutes meeting goal of 60-90 minutes/f2f interaction Total for 1st semester: 49, 315 minutes (821.9 hours) supporting NTs at College CSD Participation in High Leverage tool usage: 100% (45) NTs have engaged in work with their induction coach on the following: Analysis of Student Work Lesson Planning Observation Cycles Co-Assessment Processes