Assessment of Quality in Statistics GLOBAL ASSESSMENTS, PEER REVIEWS AND SECTOR REVIEWS IN THE ENLARGEMENT AND ENP COUNTRIES Mirela Kadic, Project Manager.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Yalta Seminar on Global Assessments, 2009 Eurostat and Global Assessments: Context, Approaches, Tools 3.1.
Advertisements

The quality framework of European statistics by the ESCB Quality Conference Vienna, 3 June 2014 Aurel Schubert 1) European Central Bank 1) This presentation.
1 ESS Approach to Quality The revised Code of Practice and the new Quality Assurance Framework UN Statistical Commission's Learning Centre on National.
Quality assurance activities at EUROSTAT CCSA Conference Helsinki, 6-7 May 2010 Martina Hahn, Eurostat.
Michalis Adamantiadis Transport Policy Adviser, SSATP SSATP Capacity Development Strategy Annual Meeting, December 2012.
Initial thoughts on a Global Strategy for the Implementation of the SEEA Central Framework Ivo Havinga United Nations Statistics Division.
Regional workshop on exchange of experiences between African countries “Better statistical dialogue for better development results” Bamako, June.
Harmonization Project FAS Meeting Harmonization project and ISSAI 200 Purpose and scope of the project The purpose is to provide a conceptual basis.
Implementation of the European Statistics Code of Practice Yalta September 2009 Pieter Everaers, Eurostat.
Developing a programme for the implementation of the 2008 SNA and supporting statistics OECD Working Party on National Accounts October 2011, Paris,
Developing a programme for the implementation of the 2008 SNA and supporting statistics Seminar on Developing a programme for the implementation of the.
23 March 2012, Luxembourg MGSC STATISTICS LITHUANIA PROCEDURE FOR MONITORING THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PEER REVIEW Audronė Miškinienė Head.
Sponsorship on Quality The final report Zsuzsanna Kovács Expert Group Meeting on National Quality Assurance Frameworks UNSD, New York, September.
MGSC/2009/06 Eurostat Strategy for Developing Light Peer Reviews (LPR) for Candidate Countries and Adapted Global Assessments (AGA) for Potential Candidates.
Global Assessment of National Statistical Systems: Global Assessment of National Statistical Systems: A tool for planning and monitoring capacity building.
Eurostat New round of peer reviews in the enlargement countries 1 Policy Group on Statistical Cooperation October 2015, Herceg Novi, Montenegro.
United Nations Economic Commission for Europe Statistical Division WHAT MAKES AN EFFECTIVE AND EFFICIENT STATISTICAL SYSTEM Lidia Bratanova, Statistical.
Strategic approach to national implementation programmes for SEEA by UNSD Sixth Meeting United Nations Committee of Experts on Environmental Economic Accounting.
1 Recent developments in quality matters in the ESS High level seminar for Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia countries Claudia Junker, Eurostat,
1 Recent developments in quality related matters in the ESS High level seminar for Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia countries Claudia Junker,
United Nations Statistics Division Developing a short-term statistics implementation programme Expert Group Meeting on Short-Term Economic Statistics in.
4–6 September 2013, Vilnius, Lithuania High-Level Seminar for Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia Countries QUALITY FRAMEWORK AT.
Hallgrímur Snorrason Management seminar on global assessment Session 6: Institutional and legal framework of the national statistical system Yalta
21 June 2011 High level seminar for EECCA on “Quality matters in statistics” High level seminar for EECCA on “Quality matters in statistics” The Code of.
United Nations Statistics Division
Herman Smith United Nations Statistics Division
Strategy of Statistics in Georgia
CRE8TIVE KO Meeting, Rome Italy Quality Assurance
Developing a programme for the implementation of the
Setting Actuarial Standards
10-13 September 2013, Ankara, Turkey
Eurostat Quality Management (in the ESS context)
TurkStat's experience with the preparation for the peer review in 2015
OECD Chief Statistician and Director, Statistics Directorate
Eurostat context for international statistical cooperation
Measuring Data Quality and Compilation of Metadata
Peer review experience in the CSB of Latvia
New round of assessments in the enlargement and EECCA countries
CCSA Conference on Data Quality
Overview of the ESS quality framework and context
Statistics Governance and Quality Assurance: the Experience of FAO
Peer review on compliance with the Code of Practice and the coordination role of the National Statistical Institute Kosovo experience Meetings of.
Management Group on Statistical Cooperation March 2015
Policy Group on Statistical Cooperation October 2014, Antalya
Updated Inventory of national practices
Sectoral Review on Labour Force Statistics
Strategy for statistical cooperation with the enlargement countries 2014 – 2020 MGSC March 2014 Point 3.1 of the Agenda Ferenc Gálik.
9. Quality and Experimental data
The Amended ESS Statistical Law - Regulation (EC) 223/2009
Mandates for Unit A6 "Statistical cooperation" (Doc MGSC/2013/16)
Peer review in the Republic of Macedonia
Peer reviews DIME/ITDG Steering Group 15 February 2019 Claudia Junker
Energy Statistics Compilers Manual
Developing a global programme for the implementation of the
Palestinian Central Bureau of Statistics
Experience of Bulgaria
The European Statistics Code of Practice - a Basis for Eurostat’s Quality Assurance Framework Marie Bohatá Deputy Director General, Eurostat ... Strategic.
Overview of lessons learnt from the Peer Reviews workshop in March
The role of the international department of TurkStat
Sixth SPECA Project Working Group Meeting Geneva, 16 June 2011
United Nations Statistics Division
Transformation of the National Statistical System: Experience
Policy Group on Statistical Cooperation October 2013, Skopje
Statistical cooperation
NOM Prénom Context, Objectives & Organisation
"Experience with the peer reviews, successes and things to change for next reviews" Delina Ibrahimaj, Albania.
Roles and Responsibilities
European Statistical Cooperation Joint EFTA/ECE/SSCU seminar “Economic Globalisation: a Challenge for Official Statistics” 3-6 July 2007, Kiev Inna Steinbuka.
Task Force Peer reviews and quality Eurostat
cooperation in statistics Proposal for the organizational structure
Presentation transcript:

Assessment of Quality in Statistics GLOBAL ASSESSMENTS, PEER REVIEWS AND SECTOR REVIEWS IN THE ENLARGEMENT AND ENP COUNTRIES Mirela Kadic, Project Manager at Statistics Department, ICON Institute Sarajevo, 8 October 2018

Introduction There are many tools available for national authorities and development partners to use to assess the capacity of national statistical systems in order to focus improvement efforts. Type A. Tools used by national authorities to inform national statistical planning/strategies (NSDSs) Type B. Tools for development partners who want to “invest” in statistics to inform project design and monitoring Type C. Tools for monitoring statistical performance internationally Type D. Tools to assess quality and/or compliance with statistical codes of practice

Overview The European statistics Code of Practice (CoP) sets the standards for developing, producing and disseminating European statistics for all members of the European statistical system (ESS). ESS’s quality assurance framework (QAF) describes the tools and procedures put in place to ensure that statistics that are produced are of high quality. It serves as guidance on how to implement the CoP. Assessments form the essential elements of evaluation within the overall quality assurance framework.

What are Global Assessments? Broad strategic reviews of statistical systems, covering: - Institutional environment - Engagement with users and also respondents - Practice in individual statistical domains - Whether resources are efficiently used, and well directed Main objective : To evaluate the level of conformity with European and international standards, incorporating: -the European statistics Code of Practice, -the UN Fundamental Principles of Official Statistics -the Eurostat Statistical Requirements Compendium.

Why should GA be done? GA intends to obtain the picture of the current health of official statistics in a country, in order to: Better direct system strengthening efforts Assess quality of process compared to international standards in selected domains Support the NSI in strengthening its position and coordinating role in the NSS Promote official statistics and the need for good quality statistics in the country A way to strengthen culture of continuous quality assessment in your country

How the GA is done? A GA is not imposed on a country. It is only done at the request of the NSI of the country. Expert selection. Flexible and highly consultative approach, external experts are selected in agreement with the country SAQ – country completes a self-assessment questionnaire and provides key documents Mission 1. First expert mission clarifying and preparing a first draft report Revision of the report by the expert team, NSI and Eurostat Mission 2. Consolidating info and agreeing on the recommendations Final report published Annual monitoring of the implementation of the recommendations -

What are PRs and why do them? Qualitative assessments of how compliant a country's statistical system is with the European Statistics Code of Practice. Focus on the national statistical authority plus some selected other national statistical authorities (ONAs) To assess compliance of the reviewed national statistical authority and some other national statistical authorities (ONAs) with respect to all Principles of the Code of Practice To evaluate the coordination role of the national statistical authority within the statistical system; To highlight transferable practices suitable to foster compliance with the Code of Practice; To recommend actions needed to comply fully with the CoP

How PRs are conducted? They are conducted upon request from a country. SAQ. Used also for ONAs (audit like approach: answers supported with suitable evidence) Experts. A team of independent experts ( statisticians ) conduct the review Single mission The report. Structured around issues - governance, efficiency, impact and contains recommendations The improvement actions are formulated by the national statistical authorities.

What are SRs and why do them? Detailed analysis of the statistical production processes in specific sectors Specifically tailored to countries that aim to align important sectors of statistics with European standards. Sector reviews: Why do them? To assess the administrative and technical capacity of the reviewed statistical systems to produce statistics in the sector concerned; To assess the statistical production in the relevant sector; To assess the statistical production against the EU acquis; To review the medium and long-term planning within the sector;

RESULTS GA: A comprehensive overview of the NSS A set of recommendations Some proposals for possible improvement actions that could be considered Peer reviews: An evaluation of the compliance with the CoP a set of recommendations, followed by improvement actions proposed by NSIs, the implementation of which is followed up and monitored Sector reviews: A detail analysis of a statistical sector a list of recommendations to be undertaken in order to improve the data delivery and functioning of the sector under review

What to do with the results? Some ideas to use the results: Develop a picture of areas most in need of improvement Use final report as a basis for internal reflection on improvement actions and monitoring of improvement actions Changes to resource use (human and financial) how resources are aligned to priority statistical tasks ; Changes to working arrangements internally and with key partners.

Summary GA PR SR Institutional coverage National Statistical System Focus on National Statistical Institute and some ONAs in the context of the NSS NSI and other producers involved in the statistical sector Topics covered Horizontal topics, statistical infrastructure (classifications, etc.) and some sector statistics Only horizontal topics (legislation, human resources, IT, governance) Statistical production processes in specific sectors in detail

Summary (cont.) GA PR SR Self-assessment questionnaires Are not systematically used Formal part of the process Tailored to the needs of the statistical institute and to the statistical sector under review Main purpose Strategic orientation and re-design of statistical system. Basis for multi-annual programmes. Plan the assistance by donors Benchmarking against other members of the ESS and identification of best practices Align important sectors of statistics with European standards

Some GA, PR and SR implemented by ICON, ENP countries

Thank you for your attention! mirela.kadic@icon-institute.de