Committee Charge (from 11/20/08 F. S

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Online Course Evaluations Report from Ad hoc Committee.
Advertisements

Student Affairs Committee feasibility study Fall 2010 report to Academic Senate.
New Web-Based Course Evaluation Services Available to Schools and Departments Presentation to Faculty Council November 6, 2009.
South Campus Trail System 1.Golf course architects propose series of hiking/jogging trails for golf course area of south campus presented by Vice President.
CERTI Professional Development What You Need to Know About Electronic Student Course Evaluations Steph Fitch, Chair, Ad Hoc Faculty Senate Committee.
Committees Working Party Executive Officer – Briefing Session April 2013.
Quarterly Report: FY 2010 (Q1 and Q2) Salary Adjustments Presented To Faculty Senate by Nasser Daneshvary, Chair, Faculty Senate Fiscal Affairs Committee.
1(4.89). Reform Faculty Evaluation Process  Streamline and Simplify it  No Annual Evals in Dossier Years  Electronic Dossier System  Senate Interface.
Accreditation follow-up report. The team recommends that the college further refine its program review, planning, and resource allocation processes so.
Students Course and Teacher Evaluation Please refer to notes at the bottom of this slide.
Accessibility on the BLE Linda O’Sullivan E Learning Manager SOAS 1.
Interim Provost’s Report Faculty Senate November 11, 2014.
Teaching Council Recommendations to the Faculty Senate DRAFT 2/9/09 & 3rd DRAFT Feb 13, 2009 for use by the FS Exec Committee, March 4, 2009.
Faculty Senate Shared Governance Committee (ad hoc) Proposed Elections System College Constitution Template Committee Status.
Hiring and Evaluation Processes Greg Granderson & Pat James Hanz.
President’s Budget Advisory Committee Findings and Recommendations.
Evaluation of the Ability to Work Faculty Senate Meeting October 23, 2014 President's Report1.
University Senate April 20, University Senate April 20, 2016 Summary Special Order – Presidential Briefing President Loh spoke about the Review.
The Role of Students in Participatory Governance Richael Young, College of San Mateo Barbara Illowsky, De Anza College.
1 Establishing a New Gallaudet Program Review Process Pat Hulsebosch Office of Academic Quality CUE – 9/3/08: CGE – 9/16/08.
AP 4021: Program Discontinuance A Presentation to the Board of Trustees by the Academic Senate Presidents of Moorpark, Oxnard and Ventura Colleges September.
Teaching Evaluations at Missouri S&T Yinfa Ma, Chair Faculty Senate CET Presentation for FS meeting on November 18, 2010.
FACULTY PROMOTION REVIEW
AES Engineering/Systems Engineering Scholarship
Shared Governance in the EMU-AAUP/EMU Master Agreement
Faculty Senate Special Meeting June 12, 2014
Shared Governance Territorial Act (1889): The faculty, the president, and the regents are jointly responsible for governing the university. NWCCU, Standard.
Input Flow Diagram Output Doc’s Who Start End End Page 2
Tenure Procedure Northwest Vista College
University Faculty Outreach Forum
Yiouli Papadiamantaki – University of the Peloponnese
Faculty Senate Committees
Strategic Planning Council (SPC)Update
MUSC Faculty Senate October 18th, 2016.
2017 Workshop Tenure and Promotion Policy and Procedures Overview
Faculty Senate Meeting November 18, 2010
of Teaching: Challenges
Administrative Review Process
MIC Committee Discussion
IDEA Replacement with EvaluationKIT Stephen Burd
Simpler Systems Reporting Pilot
Presenters: Maureen Chalmers (NWCC) and Steve Krevisky (MXCC)
Faculty Awards and Honors
EdTech Tools Connecting to Classroom Practice and Subject Areas
Nuts and Bolts, or: “What Do I Do Now?”
Dolores Davison, ASCCC Secretary
Do educational innovation projects lead to quality improvement?
Course Evaluation Ad-Hoc Committee Recommendations
Financial Affairs Users Group Update
The Senate Committee on Teaching recommends that the bar graphs be removed from the end-of-semester student course evaluations.  The committee feels that.
Faculty Leadership Institute, June 17, 2017, Sacramento Sheraton
Faculty Senate Year in Review
Fall 2018 Overview from Curriculum Regional Meeting (11/17)
Evaluation of the Ability to Work Faculty Senate Meeting
Campus Curricula Committee Report January 23, 2014
Pilot Goals Focus Consistency Response
PAc-28 Educational Leave of Absence
Administrative Review Committee
University of Missouri System News
MIC Committee Discussion
Administrative Committee Review
Water scarcity and drought
Ad hoc Group of Experts on Better Regulation
Accreditation follow-up report
Campus Curricula Committee Report September 20, 2012
Card Reader Project pilot
Extension Title Series
Faculty Governance at NU
Fall 2016/Spring 2017 Administrative Review Process Update
COURSE EVALUATION Spring 2019 Pilot August 27, 2019.
Presentation transcript:

Committee Charge (from 11/20/08 F. S Committee Charge (from 11/20/08 F.S. Minutes) The Faculty Senate affirms the paramount importance of the accuracy of the campus teaching evaluation system, both for the continual improvement of teaching and for accuracy in administrative procedures and consumer information. Recognizing that rapidly changing technologies and public interests continually alter the teaching environment, the Senate further charges the President to appoint an ad hoc faculty committee to review and recommend to the Faculty Senate such improvements in the current system as the committee may find appropriate.

Committee Report The committee plans to initiate a small pilot program to collect information on the viability of an electronic system of evaluations. Faculty participation in the pilot program will be voluntary.  The program will look into the efficiency, response rates, confidentiality, and effectiveness of electronic evaluations. So far, the Ad Hoc Committee for Teaching Evaluations has been effective at streamlining the current process of administering evaluations using scanned bubble sheets. We have recommended changes that have dramatically Decreased the number of misread and misplaced evaluation packets via changes to the way we administer and process the paper evaluation forms.  Using a pilot program to test the feasibility of electronic evaluations is one step towards our goal of continuous improvement in the evaluation process.