SACSCOC Administrative Assessment Changes

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

The PRR: Linking Assessment, Planning & Budgeting PRR Workshop – April 4, 2013 Barbara Samuel Loftus, Ph.D. Misericordia University.

Advertisements

Institutional Effectiveness (ie) and Assessment

Using the New CAS Standards to Assess Your Transfer Student Programs and Services Janet Marling, Executive Director National Institute for the Study of.

 2009– LA Delta Initially Accredited by SACS  July 2010 – Tallulah & Lake Providence Consolidated with LA Delta  July 2012 – LA Delta & NELTC Legislatively.

Arkansas Tech University Continuous Improvement Plan Office of Assessment and Institutional Effectiveness Needs Assessment Prioritize Goals &

National Center for Higher Education Management Systems 3035 Center Green Drive, Suite 150 Boulder, Colorado From Here to Implementation: Putting.

Continual Commitment to Accreditation and Educational Improvement March 22, 2012.

Version 2 November Provost and VPAA G.E. Assessment Task Force Centers Program Assessment and Review Committee President Director of Institutional.

HELPFUL TIPS FOR UNIT PLANNING Office of Institutional Effectiveness.

Dr. Timothy S. Brophy Director of Institutional Assessment University of Florida GRADUATE AND PROFESSIONAL PROGRAM ASSESSMENT PLANS.

Reaffirmation of Accreditation: Institutional Effectiveness Southern Association of Colleges and Schools February 2008 Stephen F. Austin State University.

Learning Outcomes Assessment RESULTS AND ACTION PLAN Beth Wuest Director, Academic Development and Assessment Lisa Garza Director, University Planning.

Graduate Program Review Where We Are, Where We Are Headed and Why Duane K. Larick, Associate Graduate Dean Presentation to Directors of Graduate Programs.

Assessment & Evaluation Committee A New Road Ahead Presentation Dr. Keith M. McCoy, Vice President Professor Jennifer Jakob, English Associate Director.

Addressing Six Critical Questions of Senior Administrators Addressing Six Critical Questions of Senior Administrators Using WEAVEonline Jeanne Butler,

Example Headline Example Headline – 120 pt. Cambria Bold Byline goes here – 40 pt Cambria Italic College/Department Logo/Name goes here. Body text is 32.

Example Headline Example Headline – 120 pt. Cambria Bold Byline goes here – 40 pt Cambria Italic The assessment process is cyclical. Faculty first determine.

Quality Enhancement Plan (QEP) 101 Del Mar College January 8, 2007 Loraine Phillips, Ph.D. Interim Assessment Director Texas A&M University.

SACSCOC FIFTH-YEAR INTERIM REPORT DIVISION OF STUDENT AFFAIRS— ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES Jerry Legge Associate Provost for Academic Planning Allan Aycock.

Institutional Effectiveness Building on MUSC Excellence.

OFFICE OF INSTITUTIONAL EFFECTIVENESS SACSCOC REAFFIRMATION OF ACCREDITATION.

What could we learn from learning outcomes assessment programs in the U.S public research universities? Samuel S. Peng Center for Educational Research.

Florida Tech’s University Assessment Committee For A Continuing Culture of Assessment.

Continual Commitment to Accreditation February 1, 2011.

UWF SACS REAFFIRMATION OF ACCREDITATION PROJECT Presentation to UWF Board of Trustees November 7, 2003.

2006 Fall Workshop PLANNING and ASSESSMENT: A TUTORIAL FOR NEW DEPARTMENT CHAIRS – A REFRESHER COURSE FOR OTHERS.

Moving Forward Accreditation Efforts at BC. ACCJC Annual Report Student Achievement Data Student, Program, and Institutional Learning Outcomes.

Program Review – Assessing the Health of Curriculum Programs Mark Lupton Director, Institutional Research, Planning and Effectiveness South Piedmont Community.

Office of Institutional Effectiveness. Bob Boehmer, Associate Provost for Institutional Effectiveness Sue Achtemeier, Assistant Director for Institutional.

SACS Leadership Retreat 9/23/ Western Carolina University SACS Reaffirmation of Accreditation Frank Prochaska Executive Director, UNC Teaching.

SACSOC ACCREDITATION AND INSTITUTIONAL EFFECTIVENESS STUDENT AFFAIRS LEARNING AND DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVES REVIEW COMMITTEE OCTOBER 17, Allan Aycock.

SACS Coordinators Meeting Wednesday, June 6, 2012 Timothy Brophy – Director, Institutional Assessment Cheryl Gater – Director, SACS Accreditation.

Assessment for Student Learning Kick-Off: Assessment Fellows Assessment Coordinators Pat Hulsebosch Ex. Director-Office of Academic Quality August 28,

The Gold Standard… Faculty are Key.  Annual Assessment based on  Address each SLO  Be specific, measurable, student- focused  Align the new.

External Review Team: Roles and Responsibilities A Very Brief Training! conducted by JoLynn Noe Office of Assessment.

2008 Spring Semester Workshop AN INTRODUCTION TO STRATEGIC PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT WORKSHOP T. Gilmour Reeve, Ph.D. Director of Strategic Planning.

1 Learning Outcomes Assessment: An Overview of the Process at Texas State Beth Wuest Director, Academic Development and Assessment Lisa Garza Director,

Gordon State College Office of Institutional Effectiveness Faculty Meeting August 5, 2015.

College-Wide Assessment and WEAVEonline Basics for TCC Administrators Steven H. Wilson, Ph.D. Dean, Academic Assessment Part Three: How to Close the Loop,

KSU’s Quality Enhancement Plan.  Current Core Requirement 2.12  The institution has developed an acceptable Quality Enhancement Plan (QEP) that (1)

Using Assessment to Achieve Shalom PLANNING AND IMPROVEMENT.

School of Liberal Arts September 9, Overview of Accreditation Process Assessment Plans Resources.

Assessment of Student Learning Outcomes at Pitt Patricia E. Beeson Vice Provost for Graduate and Undergraduate Studies University of Pittsburgh.

CBU CALIFORNIA BAPTIST UNIVERSITY Assessment, Accreditation, and Curriculum Office CBU - OIRPA.

Texas Woman’s University Academic Degree Program Assessment

Student Learning Outcomes (SLOs) Module #4: SLO Annual Report

Assessment Basics PNAIRP Conference Thursday October 6, 2011

CALIFORNIA BAPTIST UNIVERSITY Office of Educational Effectiveness

ACCREDITATION ISSUES Presented By Claudette H. Williams.

Assessment & Evaluation Committee

Institutional Effectiveness USF System Office of Decision Support

Introductions Institutional Effectiveness,

Accreditation Standard 1: Mission, Academic Quality and Institutional Effectiveness, and Integrity: The College Mission & The 2015 Student Success Scorecard.

Institutional Effectiveness Presented By Claudette H. Williams

College Planning Council 8 June 2015

New Certificate Program

Assessment & Evaluation Committee

Terminate an Academic Unit

Reorganize (Merge, Split, Move) an Academic Program or Academic Unit

New Degree (Undergraduate, First Professional, Graduate) Program

Establish a New Academic Unit

Suspend a Degree or Certificate Program

Rename an Academic Program (Degree or Certificate) or Academic Unit

Academic Affairs Cluster 28 May 2015

SACS Coordinators Meeting Academic Units

Outcomes Training.

District discipline lead spring meeting agenda

College Planning Council 8 June 2015

NON-ACADEMIC ASSESSMENT REPORTING FY’17

Presentation transcript:

SACSCOC Administrative Assessment Changes Marvin Moore Christopher Combie Associate Deans Council October 10, 2018

Changes to SACSCOC Principles Previous SACSCOC Requirements 3.3 Institutional Effectiveness 3.3.1 - The institution identifies expected outcomes, assesses the extent to which it achieves these outcomes, and provides evidence of improvement based on analysis of the results in each of the following areas: (Institutional Effectiveness) 3.3.1.2 – Administrative Support Services 3.3.1.3 – Academic and Student Support Services 3.3.1.4 – Research within Mission, if appropriate

current SACSCOC Principles Current SACSCOC Requirements 3.3.1.2 – Moved to Section 7: Institutional Planning and Effectiveness 7.3 – Assessment of “administrative effectiveness” Focus on “assessing institutional performance with respect to mission in all aspects of the institution.” 3.3.1.3 – Moved to Section 8: Student Achievement 8.2.c – Assessment of “student outcomes” for academic and student services that support student success. “These units provide direct support to faculty and students as related to their educational programs, indirect support for student learning, or a specific co-curricular mission that supports the college experience.” 3.3.1.4 – Research within Mission, No corresponding requirement

current SACSCOC Principles 7.3 - The institution identifies expected outcomes of its administrative support services and demonstrates the extent to which the outcomes are achieved. (Administrative effectiveness) 8.2c - The institution identifies expected outcomes, assesses the extent to which it achieves these outcomes, and provides evidence of seeking improvement based on analysis of the results in academic and student services that support student success. (Student outcomes: academic and student services)

Plan of Action 8.2c Actions Colleges need to identify units within the college that deal with student achievement and/or student success Include Institutes and Centers Send to IE for review by December 1 7.3 Actions College level administrative assessment will be included in annual College Review Will no longer report in SAM Need a summary of goals and outcomes in review Reviews will be available for accreditation reviews

Associate Deans Council How to Contact us Christopher Combie, Assistant Director for Assessment, combie@usf.edu, (813) 974-7953 Marvin Moore, Director of Institutional Effectiveness, mmoore@usf.edu, (813) 974-6080 Associate Deans Council October 10, 2018