Volume 12, Issue 2, Pages (August 2010)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Lukasova M. et al. J Clin Invest 2011;121:
Advertisements

Lipoprotein Structure, Function, and Metabolism
Macrophage ABCA2 deletion modulates intracellular cholesterol deposition, affects macrophage apoptosis, and decreases early atherosclerosis in LDL receptor.
Lipoproteins and Atheroscloresis
Omega-6 polyunsaturated fatty acids prevent atherosclerosis development in LDLr-KO mice, in spite of displaying a pro-inflammatory profile similar to.
Volume 14, Issue 6, Pages (December 2011)
Volume 45, Issue 6, Pages (December 2016)
Volume 114, Issue 5, Pages (May 1998)
Volume 9, Issue 3, Pages (March 2009)
Volume 16, Issue 1, Pages (July 2012)
Wip1-Dependent Regulation of Autophagy, Obesity, and Atherosclerosis
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages (January 2012)
Volume 15, Issue 5, Pages (May 2012)
Volume 15, Issue 4, Pages (April 2012)
Sebelipase alfa improves atherogenic biomarkers in adults and children with lysosomal acid lipase deficiency  Don P. Wilson, MD, FNLA, Mark Friedman,
Volume 8, Issue 5, Pages (November 2008)
Volume 12, Issue 2, Pages (August 2010)
SUMOylation Places LRH-1 in PROXimity to Lipid Metabolism
Volume 102, Issue 6, Pages (September 2000)
Volume 11, Issue 3, Pages (March 2010)
Volume 149, Issue 6, Pages (November 2015)
HDL and Atherosclerosis
A Macrophage Sterol-Responsive Network Linked to Atherogenesis
SUMOylation Places LRH-1 in PROXimity to Lipid Metabolism
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages (November 2014)
Volume 24, Issue 2, Pages (August 2016)
Volume 15, Issue 3, Pages (March 2012)
Volume 15, Issue 2, Pages (February 2012)
Volume 14, Issue 6, Pages (December 2011)
New Therapeutic Approaches to the Treatment of Dyslipidemia
Guido T. Bommer, Ormond A. MacDougald  Cell Metabolism 
Volume 7, Issue 3, Pages (March 2008)
Volume 15, Issue 5, Pages (May 2012)
Scavenger Receptor B-1 Emerges as Anti-atherogenic Candidate
Volume 12, Issue 3, Pages (September 2010)
Volume 13, Issue 8, Pages (November 2015)
Volume 14, Issue 10, Pages (March 2016)
Volume 8, Issue 6, Pages (December 2008)
Volume 45, Issue 6, Pages (December 2016)
Daniel J. Rader, Ellen Puré  Cell Metabolism 
Volume 7, Issue 2, Pages (February 2008)
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages (May 2011)
Volume 2, Issue 3, Pages (September 2000)
Volume 93, Issue 5, Pages (May 1998)
Volume 1, Issue 2, Pages (February 2005)
Volume 1, Issue 1, Pages (January 2005)
Volume 9, Issue 5, Pages (May 2009)
Volume 3, Issue 4, Pages (April 2006)
Volume 10, Issue 1, Pages (July 2009)
Volume 10, Issue 5, Pages (November 2009)
Volume 19, Issue 2, Pages (February 2014)
Volume 16, Issue 4, Pages (October 2012)
Volume 15, Issue 3, Pages (March 2012)
Volume 18, Issue 1, Pages (July 2013)
Volume 6, Issue 1, Pages (July 2007)
Volume 8, Issue 6, Pages (December 2008)
Volume 7, Issue 3, Pages (March 2008)
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (August 2013)
Volume 3, Issue 2, Pages (February 2006)
Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages (July 2010)
Volume 10, Issue 6, Pages (December 2009)
Daniel J. Rader, Ellen Puré  Cell Metabolism 
Volume 21, Issue 3, Pages (March 2015)
Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages (January 2016)
Volume 16, Issue 4, Pages (October 2012)
Volume 140, Issue 3, Pages (March 2011)
Volume 27, Issue 4, Pages (October 2007)
Hepatic Proprotein Convertases Modulate HDL Metabolism
The GCN2 eIF2α Kinase Regulates Fatty-Acid Homeostasis in the Liver during Deprivation of an Essential Amino Acid  Feifan Guo, Douglas R. Cavener  Cell.
Volume 1, Issue 5, Pages (May 2005)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 12, Issue 2, Pages 187-193 (August 2010) Intestinal Specific LXR Activation Stimulates Reverse Cholesterol Transport and Protects from Atherosclerosis  Giuseppe Lo Sasso, Stefania Murzilli, Lorena Salvatore, Ilenia D'Errico, Michele Petruzzelli, Paola Conca, Zhao-Yan Jiang, Laura Calabresi, Paolo Parini, Antonio Moschetta  Cell Metabolism  Volume 12, Issue 2, Pages 187-193 (August 2010) DOI: 10.1016/j.cmet.2010.07.002 Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Cell Metabolism 2010 12, 187-193DOI: (10.1016/j.cmet.2010.07.002) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Characterization of iVP16LXRα Transgenic Mice (A) Expression of LXRα target genes in the intestine of iVP16LXRα was measured by real-time quantitative PCR. ABCG5, ABCG8, and ABCA1 mRNA levels were upregulated in the intestine of iVP16LXRα. The results are shown as mean ± SEM (n = 6 for each genotype). (B) Fractional cholesterol absorption of iVP16LXRα versus iVP16 mice. Intestinal cholesterol absorption was measured using the fecal dual-isotope method as described in the Supplemental Experimental Procedures and shows a 40% reduction in iVP16LXRα compared to control mice. (C) Increased fecal neutral sterol excretion was measured in iVP16LXRα compared to iVP16 mice as described in the Supplemental Experimental Procedures. (D) The rates of in vivo cholesterol synthesis in the liver and kidney (extrahepatic control tissue) were measured 60 min after intraperitoneal injection of 3H-water precursor. Reduced cholesterol absorption determines a compensatory increase in liver cholesterol biosynthesis. The results are shown as mean ± SEM (n = 6 for each genotype). (E) Box and whisker plots of plasma total cholesterol measurements with the bottom and the top of the boxes representing the 25th and 75th percentile, i.e., lower and upper quartile, respectively, and the band near the middle of the box representing the 50th percentile, i.e., median, and the ends of the whiskers the minimum and the maximum of all the data for a total of n = 12 mice. (F) Box and whisker plots of cholesterol HDL measurements of n = 12 mice. (G) HDL subclasses in iVP16LXRα and iVP16. HDL subclasses were separated by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis in pre-β and α migrating particles and transferred onto a nitrocellulose membrane, which were detected with an anti-apolipoprotein A-I antibody. (H) Box and whisker plots of pre-βHDL fractions as percent of total Apo A-I. of n = 12 mice. (I) Intestinal-specific LXR activation impact on macrophage-specific cholesterol transport (RCT) in vivo. Macrophage-derived 3H-cholesterol content (from left to right) in plasma, liver, bile, and feces was measured by liquid scintillation counting. Data analysis shows that intestinal-specific LXR activation is able to induce macrophage-mediated RCT resulting in augmented fecal cholesterol removal. The results are shown as mean ± SEM (n = 6 for each genotype) and are expressed as percent of radioactivity injected. ∗p < 0.05 iVP16LXRα versus VP16. Cell Metabolism 2010 12, 187-193DOI: (10.1016/j.cmet.2010.07.002) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Hepatic-Specific LXR Activation Does Not Affect RCT (A) Significant upregulation of LXR target genes ABCG5, ABCG8, SREBP1c, FAS, and SCD1 was observed in the liver of mice infected with AdVP16LXRα compared to control AdVP16 infected mice. (B) Intestinal gene expression levels of LXR targets ABCA1, ABCG5, and ABCG8 did not change after AdVP16 and AdVP16LXRα infection, thus underlining the hepatic-specific LXR activation. (C) Serum and hepatic cholesterol and TG levels were measured in AdVP16 and AdVP16LXRα infected mice. Data show increased TG levels in both serum and liver with a trend toward a reduction in hepatic cholesterol levels. (D) Macrophage-derived 3H-cholesterol content in plasma, liver, bile, and feces was measured by liquid scintillation counting. Data analysis shows that hepatic-specific LXR activation did not alter the macrophage-mediated RCT. The results are shown as mean ± SEM (n = 6 for each Ad-infected animal) and are expressed as percent of radioactivity injected. ∗p < 0.05 AdVP16LXRα versus AdVP16. Cell Metabolism 2010 12, 187-193DOI: (10.1016/j.cmet.2010.07.002) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Hepatic and Plasma Cholesterol and TG Content in iVP16LXRα after High-Cholesterol Diet (A) Macroscopic appearance and oil red O staining of livers from iVP16 and iVP16LXRα mice after 2% cholesterol diet. (B) Hepatic cholesterol subtypes in iVP16 and iVP16LXRα mice on high-cholesterol diet. iVP16 mice showed a 30% increase of total liver cholesterol (TC) amount after high-cholesterol diet compared to iVP16LXRα mice. This difference was identified as a difference in cholesterol esters (CE). Free cholesterol (FC) was unmodified. (C) Hepatic and intestinal ACAT2 enzymatic activity. Data analysis shows a significant difference in both hepatic and intestinal ACAT2 activity between iVP16LXRα and control mice after high-cholesterol diet. (D) Hepatic TG content after 2% cholesterol diet. High-cholesterol diet resulted in a strong increase of hepatic TG levels in iVP16 mice contrarily to iVP16LXRα. (E) The rates of in vivo fatty acids synthesis in the liver and kidney (extrahepatic control tissue) of transgenic mice after high-cholesterol diet was measured 60 min after intraperitoneal injection of 3H-water precursor. iVP16LXRα showed a reduction in de novo fatty acids after high-cholesterol diet. (F) Free cholesterol, cholesterol esters, and TG lipoprotein measurements after separation by SEC in iVP16LXRα and iVP16 mice fed a high-cholesterol diet. iVP16LXRα showed a significant increase in HDL cholesterol and VLDL-TG particles compared to control mice, with significant reduction in VLDL-CE content. The results are shown as mean ± SEM (n = 6 for each genotype). ∗p < 0.05 iVP16LXRα versus VP16. Cell Metabolism 2010 12, 187-193DOI: (10.1016/j.cmet.2010.07.002) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Antiatherogenic Effects of Intestinal LXRα Activation (A) Expression of ABCA1, ABCG5, and ABCG8, in the intestine of iVP16LXRα/LDLR−/− and iVP16/LDLR−/− mice under chow and atherogenic Western diet was measured by real-time quantitative PCR. The results are shown as mean ± SEM (n = 6 for each genotype). Different lowercase letters indicate statistical difference (p < 0.05). (B and C) En face and aortic root analysis of atherosclerosis in iVP16LXRα/LDLR−/− and iVP16/LDLR−/− mice. Atherosclerotic lesions in entire aorta and lesion area of aortic root were quantified as reported in the Supplemental Experimental Procedures. Intestinal-specific activation of LXRα inhibited the development of atherosclerotic lesions in aorta and aortic root. (D) iVP16LXRα/LDLR−/− and iVP16/LDLR−/− mice presented similar levels of atherogenic LDL cholesterol lipoproteins, with a similar ratio of FC/CE. Compared to iVP16/LDLR−/− mice, iVP16LXRα/LDLR−/− presented a significant decrease in the VLDL cholesterol levels with lower CE amounts while showing 15% increase in HDL cholesterol with higher CE levels. ∗p < 0.05 iVP16LXRα/LDLR−/− versus iVP16/LDLR−/−. Cell Metabolism 2010 12, 187-193DOI: (10.1016/j.cmet.2010.07.002) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions