FNAL Superconducting Quadrupole Test

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Superconducting Magnet Program S. Gourlay CERN March 11-12, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory IR Quad R&D Program LHC IR Upgrade Stephen A.
Advertisements

Today’s Objectives: Students will be able to:
CIEMAT technological contributions to linear colliders Fernando ToralGandía, 3/12/2005.
Magnets for the ESRF upgrade phase II
Linac Quad Field and Position Stability Chris Adolphsen SLAC.
October 12, 2006 Heinz-Dieter Nuhn, SLAC / LCLS Undulator Good Field Region and Tuning Strategy 1 Undulator Good Field Region and.
ILC Main Linac Superconducting Cryogen Free Splittable Quadrupole Progress Report V. Kashikhin for Superconducting Magnet Team.
April 24, 2008 FNAL ILC SCRF Meeting 1 Main Linac Superconducting Quadrupole V. Kashikhin, T. Fernando, J. DiMarco, G. Velev.
Superconducting Large Bore Sextupole for ILC
19 Nov 08,ILC08Cherrill Spencer Rotating Coil System Description 1 Short description of the SLAC rotating coil system used to measure the CIEMAT-made prototype.
1 / 19 M. Gateau CERN – Geneva – CH 14th International Magnetic Measurement Workshop September 2005, Geneva, Switzerland.
Rotating Coils - Giordana Severino – Rotating Coils PACMAN meeting Printed Circuit Coils – Future developments.
Alignment and Beam Stability
End Design Discussion D. Arbelaez (LBNL) Oct. 7,
1 Status of EMMA Shinji Machida CCLRC/RAL/ASTeC 23 April, ffag/machida_ ppt & pdf.
SC magnet developments at CEA/Saclay Maria Durante Hélène Felice CEA Saclay DSM/DAPNIA/SACM/LEAS.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, A.Drozhdin, N.Kazarinov.
Magnetic Design S. Prestemon, D. Arbelaez, S. Myers, R. Oort, M. Morsch, E. Rochepault, H. Pan, T. Ki, R. Schlueter (LBNL) Superconducting Undulator Integrated.
SCU1 Vertical Test Results Matt Kasa 9/16/2014. Vertical Cryostat Assembly Coil Training Record the current decay and the terminal voltage across the.
Superconducting Magnet Group Superconducting magnet development for ex-situ NMR LDRD 2003 Paolo Ferracin, Scott Bartlett 03/31/2003.
CLIC Workshop th -17 th October 2008 Thomas Zickler AT/MCS/MNC 1 CLIC Main Linac Quadrupoles Preliminary design of a quadrupole for the stabilization.
1 V. Kashikhin for ILC ALCPG 2007, FNAL Meeting October 23, 2007 Ring to Main Linac Magnets.
Muon Cooling Channel Superconducting Magnet Systems Muon Collider Task Force Meeting on July 31, 2006 V.S. Kashikhin.
CLIC Stabilisation Day’08 18 th March 2008 Thomas Zickler AT/MCS/MNC/tz 1 CLIC Quadrupoles Th. Zickler CERN.
Magnetic Field Stability Measurements Joe DiMarco 23Oct07.
Highlights of Prototype SC Magnet Tests (LCLSII- 4.5-EN-0612) and Proposed Production Magnet Test Plan (LCLSII-4.5-EN-611-R0) and XFEL Magnet Test Results.
SC Quadrupole Discussion Chris Adolphsen. Comments from Fernando Toral on SC Development for XFEL and ILC.
Presentation 7/05/2015 Giordana Severino ESR2.2, WP2 CERN Supervisors Marco Buzio Academic supervisor Prof. Pasquale Arpaia.
MLI Summary Chris Adolphsen SLAC. Summary of MLI Talks Quadrupoles (V. Kashikhin) –Expect test of a SLAC/CIEMAT and FNAL cos(2phi), ~ 60 T/m, SC Quads.
ILC Main Linac Superconducting Quadrupole V. Kashikhin for Superconducting Magnet Team.
Lecture 7 Jack Tanabe Cornell University Ithaca, NY Magnetic Measurements.
Warm-Cold Changes in the Sextupole Harmonic in the Quadrupole Magnets for the BEPC-II Luminosity Upgrade Animesh Jain Brookhaven National Laboratory Upton,
ILC Main Linac Superconducting Cryogen Free Splittable Quadrupole Technical Design V. Kashikhin for Superconducting Magnet Team.
Super Fragment Separator (Super-FRS) Machine and Magnets H. Leibrock, GSI Darmstadt Review on Cryogenics, February 27th, 2012, GSI Darmstadt.
MLI Update Chris Adolphsen SLAC. CAVITY VESSEL T4CM QUAD T4CM BPM QUADS LEADS 80K BLOCK 4K BLOCK Quadrupole Package.
CERN –GSI/CEA MM preparation meeting, Magnetic Measurements WP.
Midterm Review 28-29/05/2015 Progress on wire-based accelerating structure alignment Natalia Galindo Munoz RF-structure development meeting 13/04/2016.
FNAL Workshop, July 19, 2007 ILC Main Linac Superconducting Quadrupole V.Kashikhin 1 ILC Main Linac Superconducting Quadrupole (ILC HGQ1) V. Kashikhin.
Superconducting Cryogen Free Splittable Quadrupole for Linear Accelerators Progress Report V. Kashikhin for the FNAL Superconducting Magnet Team (presented.
September 27, 2007 ILC Main Linac - KOF 1 ILC Main Linac Superconducting Quadrupole V. Kashikhin for Magnet group.
Yingshun Zhu Design of Small Aperture Quadrupole Magnet for HEPS-TF
GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung GmbH Super-FRS multiplet field.
GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung GmbH Super-FRS magnet configurations.
Review of Alignment Tolerances for LCLS-II SC Linac Arun Saini, N. Solyak Fermilab 27 th April 2016, LCLS-II Accelerator Physics Meeting.
Jim Kerby Fermilab With many thanks to Vladimir Kashikhin, the FNAL, KEK, and Toshiba teams. SCRF BTR Split Quadrupole ILC ML & SCRF Baseline Technical.
Design ideas for a cos(2q) magnet
Yingshun Zhu Accelerator Center, Magnet Group
Some Design Considerations and R &D of CEPCB Dipole Magnet
Status of the manufacturing process of a Nb3Sn wiggler prototype
Status of the CLIC DR wiggler design and production at BINP
Alexander Kalimov, State Polytechnic University, St.-Petersburg
ILC Z-pole Calibration Runs Main Linac performance
SC Quadrupole Magnets in ILC Cryomodules
Development of the Canted Cosine Theta Superconducting Magnet
Superconducting Helical Solenoids
Advanced Photon Source Upgrade Project:
CHEN, Fusan KANG, Wen November 5, 2017
Background With new accelerators delivering beams always smaller and more energetic, requirements for very precise beam alignment become more and more.
Main magnets for PERLE Test Facility
Yingshun Zhu Accelerator Center, Magnet Group
Compact and Low Consumption Magnet Design The DESY Experience
SCU Next Phase Meeting July 8, 2014.
I. Bogdanov, S. Kozub, V. Pokrovsky, L. Shirshov,
Conceptual design of superconducting correctors for Hi-Lumi Project
Beam-Based Alignment Results
ILC Main Linac Superconducting Splittable Quadrupole
CEPC Collider Magnets CHEN, Fusan November 13, 2018.
CEPC Final Focus Superconducting Quadrupole and Anti-solenoid Magnets
CEPC Booster Ring Magnets
Electron Collider Ring Magnets Preliminary Summary
Presentation transcript:

FNAL Superconducting Quadrupole Test V. Kashikhin for Superconducting Magnet Team

Outline LC Superconducting Quadrupole Quadrupole Model Design Model Fabrication Rotational Coil Tests Fixed Probe Tests Test Results and Plans 2/23/2019

LC Superconducting Quadrupole The first model of superconducting quadrupole for Linear Accelerator was designed, built and tested at Fermilab. The quadrupole has a 78 mm aperture, and a cold mass length of 680 mm. A superferric magnet configuration with iron poles and four racetrack coils was chosen based on magnet performance, cost, and reliability considerations. Each coil is wound using enamel insulated, 0.5 mm diameter, NbTi superconductor. The quadrupole package also includes racetrack type dipole steering coils. The quadrupole model was built and tested. During tests the special attention were paid on the magnetic center stability and coupling effects between dipole and quadrupole coils.   2/23/2019

LC Quadrupole Specification The variation of quadrupole strength will be used during BBA procedure. The 20 % decrease of quadrupole strength will cause the test beam displacement if magnet magnetic center has an offset relatively the beam center. This offset and corresponding beam deflection will be monitored by Beam Position Monitor (BPM) with submicron accuracy and this value will drive the currents in dipole vertical and horizontal correctors using closed loop feedback system. So, the quadrupole magnetic center during the accelerator operation must be at any time in the offset range of less than 5 microns. 2/23/2019

Quadrupole Model Design It was chosen a “superferric” design where saturated iron poles form a substancial part of the magnetic field in the quadrupole aperture.   2/23/2019

Quadrupole Fabrication Several technical decisions were chosen to simplify magnet manufacturing: superferric magnet configuration, racetrack coils, single wire winding technique, coils wound into stainless steel channels which are used as winding mandrels and as closed molds for epoxy vacuum impregnation, laminated iron yoke with a single lamination used for cross-section (i.e., not 4 pieces), coils are assembled with yoke through the magnet aperture and welded to the yoke only at the ends for an easy model disassembly.   2/23/2019

Quadrupole Wiring Scheme Quadrupole consists of 4 coils. Each coil has 3 sections of NbTi superconductor: one is for quadrupole and two for vertical and horizontal dipoles. There is also heaters in each coil wound from a stainless steel wire. Quadrupole and dipole sections connected in quadrupole and dipole configuration as shown in figure. 2/23/2019

Quadrupole Integarted Gradient The magnet integrated gradient was measured at 700 turns/pole. 200 turns were used for dipoles. The final points at 60-80 A are not shown. 2/23/2019

Quadrupole Model Quench History 2/23/2019

Quench Event and Location Typical quench event (quench N24, at 79.3 A current) 2/23/2019

Field Measurements by Rotational Coils The well known field measurement method by rotational coils was implemented for the quadrupole model measurements. The basic idea of the proposed approach is to collect data from many measurements of the magnet center position with maximum achievable accuracy (in our case in order of 12 um per measurement) for a period of time (~ 200 s). In a case when the center positions follow the Gaussian law, one can show that the mean value of the N measurements could be determined as accurately as s/√N, where s is the sigma of the Gaussian distribution. The measured field is expressed in terms of harmonic coefficients defined in a series expansion given by   2/23/2019

Magnetic Center Stability (1) The determination of the quadrupole magnet center relative to the probe position was done using the standard technique of zeroing the dipole component assuming that it is purely generated from a probe offset.As a result, the quadrupole center coordinates, xcen and ycen were obtained. Distribution of the distance Rcen between the probe axis and the quadrupole center of the magnet for approximately 200 measurements.   The first sets of measurements were performed when the magnet was powered up to 10 A. Left figure shows the result of the quadrupole center displacement (DRcen(I) = Rcen (I) - Rcen(10A)) versus the current ramp where Rcen of the 10 A measurement was subtracted from the other currents. One might conclude that the magnet center moves in the limits of ±2.5 mm when the current is between 3 A and 10 A. 2/23/2019

Magnetic Center Stability (2) In the next set of measurements, we increased the operational current, covering to the region of 10-40 A. The result is shown in left figure. Unexpectedly, the quadrupole center moved linearly with a derivative 4 μm/A of quadrupole current. It corresponds to 8 μm at 10 A and 32 μm at 40 A during 20% current change at BBA. This effect will be investigated during next tests and may be caused by the probe or quadrupole coils offsets, or unequal number of turns in the coils.   2/23/2019

Magnet Center Stability (3) The quadrupole package is assembled with two built-in dipole correctors: horizontal and vertical. Utilizing these two correctors, one could compensate for the linear dependence shown in the above figure. After subtracting this correction, the variation of quadrupole center is in the limits of ~ 8 um 2/23/2019

Dipole Correctors The dipole correctors generate specified integrated field 0.075 T-m at current 40 A Dipoles provide linear magnetic center shift. 2/23/2019

Measurements by a Fixed Probe An attempt was made to measure the stability of the quadrupole center by developing a fixed centering probe to measure flux changes during ramping of the magnet current. The probe is 0.7 m long and was fabricated on a printed circuit board with 1200 turns over 28 layers. Most layers have a spiraling pattern of traces forming simple rectangular loops. These loops are sensitive to the dipole fields present when their axis is not coincident to the quadrupole axis. This total 1152 turns on 24 layers (48 turns per layer). Nested between these layers are 4 layers having two rectangular, adjacent loops of opposite polarity. To the extent that the loops are identical, they will buck dipole fields, but be fully sensitive to the quadrupole field. The two loops each have 12 turns for a total of 48 turns over the nested layers. A photo of the probe is shown below. The total trace length on the board is over 1700 m.   2/23/2019

Fixed Probe Accuracy Close examination of the offset calculated from the flux ratio (left figure) shows that it additionally contains a periodic signal of amplitude ~5 microns and frequency 4-5Hz. This is thought to be caused by ground vibrations from the nearby central helium liquefier plant; these periodic vibrations have been observed previously in the building.   2/23/2019

Center Stability. Fixed Probe (1) The center stability for quadrupole only data is shown in left. The data seems to show some shifts at the level of 10 microns, but the error bars are also at about this level for the higher currents.   2/23/2019

Center Stability. Fixed Probe (2) With the vertical dipole corrector powered in series with the quadrupole, the center stability is shown in left. Note that the dipole can add a very large offset to the quad but because of the series powering, changes proportionally. With the FCP, center offset resolution appears to be on the order of 5-20 microns 2/23/2019

Test Results and Plans The first Fermilab Superconducting Quadrupole for Linear Accelerators was built and tested. The test results show: -Low superconductor magnetization effects because of small superconductor filament size. Measured magnetic center shift ±2.5 mm at currents 3 A - 10 A; -Large influence on the results probes offsets; -Promising accuracy of two magnetic center shift measurement methods: rotational coils and the fixed flat probe; -Useful approach to power in series dipole and quadrupole coils for investigation coupling effects and eliminating currents misbalance; -Because of very large number of turns and various combinations of Lorenz forces between quadrupole and dipole coils the magnet needs substantial training; -In any scenario of BBA procedure must be used programmed dipole correctors to compensate magnet offsets, magnet manufacturing imperfections, and various coupling effects. The second test is planned at 2009 to continue quadrupole training, measurements at larger currents with upgraded measurement and test stand equipment to improve the setup and measurement accuracy.   2/23/2019