Volume 32, Issue 1, Pages (October 2008)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 342, Issue 1, Pages (January 2014)
Advertisements

Role of Bmi-1 and Ring1A in H2A Ubiquitylation and Hox Gene Silencing
Volume 133, Issue 1, Pages (July 2007)
Volume 23, Issue 4, Pages (April 2013)
Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages (June 2012)
Sp1 Suppresses miR-3178 to Promote the Metastasis Invasion Cascade via Upregulation of TRIOBP  Hui Wang, Kai Li, Yu Mei, Xuemei Huang, Zhenglin Li, Qingzhu.
Xiang Li, Feng Xu, Ekapun Karoopongse, A
Volume 133, Issue 1, Pages (July 2007)
Volume 20, Issue 4, Pages (October 2011)
Volume 47, Issue 2, Pages (July 2012)
Volume 28, Issue 4, Pages (October 2015)
Volume 51, Issue 4, Pages (August 2013)
Volume 6, Issue 5, Pages (March 2014)
Volume 6, Issue 1, Pages (January 2014)
Volume 130, Issue 3, Pages (September 2013)
Volume 19, Issue 2, Pages (February 2011)
Uc.454 Inhibited Growth by Targeting Heat Shock Protein Family A Member 12B in Non- Small-Cell Lung Cancer  Jun Zhou, Chenghai Wang, Weijuan Gong, Yandan.
Volume 14, Issue 4, Pages (October 2008)
Eun-Joo Kim, Jeong-Hoon Kho, Moo-Rim Kang, Soo-Jong Um  Molecular Cell 
Molecular Therapy - Nucleic Acids
IKKα Activation of NOTCH Links Tumorigenesis via FOXA2 Suppression
A Constitutive Intrinsic Inflammatory Signaling Circuit Composed of miR-196b, Meis2, PPP3CC, and p65 Drives Prostate Cancer Castration Resistance  Ji-Hak.
Volume 12, Issue 3, Pages (September 2010)
Volume 142, Issue 7, Pages e2 (June 2012)
Volume 18, Issue 13, Pages (March 2017)
Volume 56, Issue 1, Pages (October 2014)
Glucose-Induced β-Catenin Acetylation Enhances Wnt Signaling in Cancer
Thymidylate synthase as an oncogene
IL6-Mediated Suppression of miR-200c Directs Constitutive Activation of Inflammatory Signaling Circuit Driving Transformation and Tumorigenesis  Matjaz.
MiR-135b Stimulates Osteosarcoma Recurrence and Lung Metastasis via Notch and Wnt/β-Catenin Signaling  Hua Jin, Song Luo, Yun Wang, Chang Liu, Zhenghao.
Volume 25, Issue 3, Pages (February 2007)
Volume 45, Issue 1, Pages (January 2012)
miR-124 Inhibits Lung Tumorigenesis Induced by K-ras Mutation and NNK
FOXO3a Is Activated in Response to Hypoxic Stress and Inhibits HIF1-Induced Apoptosis via Regulation of CITED2  Walbert J. Bakker, Isaac S. Harris, Tak.
Volume 24, Issue 2, Pages (February 2016)
Volume 6, Issue 1, Pages (January 2014)
TNF-Induced Activation of the Nox1 NADPH Oxidase and Its Role in the Induction of Necrotic Cell Death  You-Sun Kim, Michael J. Morgan, Swati Choksi, Zheng-gang.
Volume 6, Issue 4, Pages (October 2007)
Volume 25, Issue 6, Pages (March 2007)
Volume 3, Issue 6, Pages (December 2014)
Volume 16, Issue 24, Pages (December 2006)
Volume 19, Issue 8, Pages (August 2011)
Volume 35, Issue 4, Pages (August 2009)
Volume 50, Issue 2, Pages (April 2013)
Molecular Therapy - Nucleic Acids
Suppression of IGF1R in Melanoma Cells by an Adenovirus-Mediated One-Step Knockdown System  Haoran Xin, Mingxing Lei, Zhihui Zhang, Jie Li, Hao Zhang,
Volume 35, Issue 6, Pages (September 2009)
Volume 17, Issue 2, Pages (February 2009)
Volume 2, Issue 6, Pages (December 2005)
Volume 19, Issue 6, Pages (September 2005)
Inhibition of PAX3 by TGF-β Modulates Melanocyte Viability
An Epigenetic Switch Involving NF-κB, Lin28, Let-7 MicroRNA, and IL6 Links Inflammation to Cell Transformation  Dimitrios Iliopoulos, Heather A. Hirsch,
Mst1 Is an Interacting Protein that Mediates PHLPPs' Induced Apoptosis
Amanda O'Donnell, Shen-Hsi Yang, Andrew D. Sharrocks  Molecular Cell 
Volume 43, Issue 1, Pages (July 2011)
MELK Promotes Melanoma Growth by Stimulating the NF-κB Pathway
Yap1 Phosphorylation by c-Abl Is a Critical Step in Selective Activation of Proapoptotic Genes in Response to DNA Damage  Dan Levy, Yaarit Adamovich,
Negative Regulation of Tumor Suppressor p53 by MicroRNA miR-504
Volume 125, Issue 4, Pages (May 2006)
Shrestha Ghosh, Baohua Liu, Yi Wang, Quan Hao, Zhongjun Zhou 
Volume 5, Issue 6, Pages (December 2013)
USP15 Negatively Regulates Nrf2 through Deubiquitination of Keap1
The Expression of MicroRNA-598 Inhibits Ovarian Cancer Cell Proliferation and Metastasis by Targeting URI  Feng Xing, Shuo Wang, Jianhong Zhou  Molecular.
SIRT1 Regulates the Function of the Nijmegen Breakage Syndrome Protein
Volume 49, Issue 2, Pages (January 2013)
Volume 17, Issue 5, Pages (May 2013)
Active Repression of Antiapoptotic Gene Expression by RelA(p65) NF-κB
A Direct HDAC4-MAP Kinase Crosstalk Activates Muscle Atrophy Program
Volume 23, Issue 4, Pages (April 2015)
Role of Bmi-1 and Ring1A in H2A Ubiquitylation and Hox Gene Silencing
Presentation transcript:

Volume 32, Issue 1, Pages 11-20 (October 2008) Interplay among BRCA1, SIRT1, and Survivin during BRCA1-Associated Tumorigenesis  Rui-Hong Wang, Yin Zheng, Hyun-Seok Kim, Xiaoling Xu, Liu Cao, Tyler Lahusen, Mi-Hye Lee, Cuiying Xiao, Athanassios Vassilopoulos, Weiping Chen, Kevin Gardner, Yan-Gao Man, Mien-Chie Hung, Toren Finkel, Chu-Xia Deng  Molecular Cell  Volume 32, Issue 1, Pages 11-20 (October 2008) DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2008.09.011 Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 BRCA1 Positively Regulates SIRT1 Expression (A and B) Levels of Sirt1 in mouse mammary tumor cells lines measured using three pairs of Sirt1 primers by real-time RT-PCR (A) and western blot (B). Neu and Ras were derived from Brca1 wild-type (MMTV-cNeu and MMTV-ras transgenic mice, respectively), and 69 and 780 were derived from Brca1 mutant (Brca1Co/Co;MMTV-Cre;p53+/−) mice. The intensity of bands was measured by Quantity One Software (Bio-Rad) and normalized using intensity of β-actin. The quantified numbers are shown at the bottom of the picture. (C) Western blot showing Sirt1 levels in normal mammary glands of wild-type mouse and primary mammary tumors derived in MMTV-cNeu;p53+/− and Brca1Co/Co;MMTV-Cre;p53+/− mice. (D) Expression of SIRT1 in vector and wild-type BRCA1 reconstituted HCC-1937 cell lines by western blot and real-time RT-PCR. (E) Increased BRCA1 in UBR60 cells (by tetracycline withdrawal, −Tet) upregulates endogenous SIRT1 as revealed by real-time RT-PCR. (F) Acute knockdown of BRCA1 in UBR60 cells by BRCA1-specific, but not scrambled, siRNA decreased SIRT1 expression, revealed by real-time RT-PCR. (G and H) BRCA1 positively regulates the SIRT1 promoter. UBR60 cells were transfected with a SIRT1 luciferase reporter (S-2852), and SIRT1 promoter activity was measured 24 hr posttransfection in the presence (+Tet) or absence (−Tet) of overexpressed BRCA1 (G), or acute knockdown of endogenous BRCA1 (H). Two sets of scrambled siRNA and BRCA1 siRNA were used, and BRCA1 protein levels were shown below the panels. (I) ChIP assay by real-time PCR showing that BRCA1 binds to SIRT1 promoter from position 1354–1770 bp. Data in (D)–(I) are presented as average ± SD. Molecular Cell 2008 32, 11-20DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2008.09.011) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Overexpression of Sirt1 Inhibits Growth of Brca1Co/Co;MMTV-Cre;p53+/− Tumor Cells (A and B) Overexpression of Sirt1 inhibits the allografted tumor growth of Brca1Co/Co;MMTV-Cre;p53+/− tumor cells (cell line: 69) compared with GFP-transfected cells, as reflected by average tumor volume (mm3) ± SE (A) and average weight (mg) ± SE (B). The tumor size was measured daily starting 1 week posttransplantation, and the tumor weight was recorded when animals were sacrificed. p is a Student's t test value and represents the comparison between the GFP- and Sirt1-transfected tumors. (C–E) Overexpression of Sirt1 reduced growth of 69 cells (C) and induced cell death at the same time. Cell death at day 6 is shown (E). (D) Western blot to measure the expression level of Sirt1 in Sirt1-transfected 69 cells at 1–12 days after sorting. (F and G) Overexpression of Sirt1 did not inhibit the allografted tumor growth of MMTV-Neu;p53+/− tumor cells (cell line: Neu) compared with GFP-transfected cells by volume (average volume [mm3] ± SE) (F) and weight (average weight [mg] ± SE) (G). (H–J) Overexpression of Sirt1 did not affect the growth (H) and cell death of Neu cells. Cell death at day 6 is shown (J). (I) Western blot analysis to monitor the expression of Sirt1 in Sirt1-transfected Neu tumor cells at 1–12 days after sorting. For the nude mice study, each group of data was collected from ten individual mice, bearing two inoculated tumors each. Data are presented as average ± SD if it is not specifically mentioned. Molecular Cell 2008 32, 11-20DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2008.09.011) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Resveratrol Inhibits Brca1Co/Co;MMTV-Cre;p53+/− Tumor Cell Growth In Vitro and in Allograft Tumors (A and B) Resveratrol reduces Brca1Co/Co;MMTV-Cre;p53+/− tumor cell colony formation in soft agar in both size (A) and number (B). (C and D) Resveratrol does not affect MMTV-Neu;p53+/− tumor cell colony formation in soft agar in both size (C) and number (D). In (B) and (D), data are average ± SD. (E) Nude mice were pretreated with carrier (control), 5 μg, or 10 μg resveratrol per 30 g bodyweight daily by i.p. injection for 10 days. The Brca1Co/Co;MMTV-Cre;p53+/− tumor cells were implanted subcutaneously, and resveratrol treatment was provided daily. The tumor size was measured daily starting 1 week posttransplantation (E). Data shown are mean ± SE. (F) The tumor weight was recorded when animals were sacrificed. Data are mean ± SE. p is a Student's t test value and represents the comparison between the control and two treated groups. (G and H) Resveratrol treatment did not inhibit allografted MMTV-Neu;p53+/− tumor cells in volume (G) or weight (H). In (G) and (H), data are mean ± SE. (I) Brca1Co/Co;MMTV-Cre;p53+/− tumor cells were inoculated subcutaneously into nude mice, and resveratrol treatment started at 5 μg/30 g either next day (Day1+Res) or until the tumor was visible (Tumor+Res). For all in vivo resveratrol treatment, data for each group of allografted tumors were collected from ten individual nude mice, bearing two tumors each. The data are presented as mean ± SE. Molecular Cell 2008 32, 11-20DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2008.09.011) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Resveratrol Downregulates Survivin through Sirt1 at the Transcriptional Level (A) Resveratrol treatment significantly inhibited expression of Survivin and also reduced expression of Bcl2 and XIAP in 69 cells. ∗p < 0.05 by Student's t test. Data are average ± SD. (B) Resveratrol treatment reduced Survivin protein level but did not change Sirt1 level in Brca1Co/Co;MMTV-Cre;p53+/− tumor cells 3 days after the treatment. (C) Resveratrol inhibits Survivin expression from mRNA level in Brca1Co/Co;MMTV-Cre;p53+/− tumor cells (69 and 780) as assessed by RT-PCR. (D) In Sirt1−/− cells, resveratrol cannot reduce Survivin mRNA level. (E) In Sirt1−/− MEFs, Survivin expression was increased. Data from MEFs of different passages (P) are shown. (F) Reconstituting Sirt1 in Sirt1−/− cells was able to reduce Survivin mRNA expression. (G) Sirt1 downregulates Survivin promoter activity. Insert shows the levels of Sirt1 after transfection with increasing amounts of DNA. Data are average ± SD. (H) Deacetylase activity of Sirt1 is required for inhibition of Survivin mRNA expression by Sirt1. Sirt1 knockout MEFs were transfected with plasmids either carrying wild-type Sirt1 (Sirt1) or catalytic site mutated Sirt1 (Sirt1-HY). Molecular Cell 2008 32, 11-20DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2008.09.011) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Sirt1 Displays Important Epigenetic Regulation of the Survivin Promoter (A) Diagram of the 2 kb region of the mouse Survivin promoter, showing the NF-κB and CEBP binding sites. (B) Loss of Sirt1 increases the acetylation level of histone H3 lysine 9 on two fragments of the Survivin promoter, 1033–1700 bp and 475-1052 bp, revealed by ChIP assay. (C) Sirt1 binds to the Survivin promoter on fragment 475–1052 bp strongly, and on 1033–1700 weakly, as revealed by ChIP. Sirt1 does not bind to the fragment 186–595 in the Survivin promoter, and the promoter of the Gapdh gene, which were used as negative controls. Molecular Cell 2008 32, 11-20DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2008.09.011) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Brca1Co/Co;MMTV-Cre;p53+/− Tumors Show Increased Survivin Expression (A–C) Brca1Co/Co;MMTV-Cre;p53+/− primary tumors (A and B) and tumor cell lines (C) express higher Survivin, as revealed by western blot and mRNA level. (D) Western blot analysis showing knockdown efficiency of two mouse Survivin-specific siRNA oligos. (E) Transfection with mouse Survivin siRNA oligos induced apoptosis in Brca1Co/Co;MMTV-Cre;p53+/− tumor cells. (F–H) Survivin shRNA significantly inhibited tumor formation of Brca1Co/Co;MMTV-Cre;p53+/− tumor cells in nude mice allograft as reflected by volume (F) and weight (G) but did not reduce tumor formation of MMTV-cNeu;p53+/− tumor cells (H) in nude mice. The RT-PCR on the bottom shows Survivin expression (upper panel) from two individual tumors of each treatment. The lower panel is Gapdh level as internal control. From (E) to (H), data are presented as average ± SD. Molecular Cell 2008 32, 11-20DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2008.09.011) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 BRCA1 Regulates Survivin through SIRT1 (A–C) BRCA1 negatively regulates Survivin expression. Overexpression of BRCA1 decreases the level of Survivin (A), while downregulation of BRCA1 by siRNA upregulates Survivin, as revealed by real-time PCR (B). (C) Downregulation of BRCA1 results in about a 4-fold increase in Survivin promoter activity, while overexpression of SIRT1 on top of siBRCA1 significantly reduced the activity. Two BRCA1 siRNA exhibited similar results, and data from one siRNA were shown. (D and E) Overexpression of BRCA1 only reduces Survivin in Sirt1 wild-type cells, but not in Sirt1−/− cells, as revealed by RT-PCR (D), and by real-time RT-PCR (E). (F) Resveratrol treatment reduced Survivin expression in Brca1Co/Co;MMTV-Cre;p53+/− allografted tumors in nude mice. Tumors from three pairs of individual nude mice were analyzed. (G) Ectopic overexpression of Survivin significantly reversed the lethality caused by resveratrol. (H) A model showing a BRCA1-SIRT1-Survivin axis signaling pathway involved in tumor cell survival and proliferation. Our data indicate that resveratrol treatment induces deacetylase activity of SIRT1, which inhibits Survivin and potentially other factors leading to reduced cell proliferation and increased apoptosis. Data in (A)–(C) and (E)–(G) are average ± SD. Molecular Cell 2008 32, 11-20DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2008.09.011) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions