LIGO Scientific Collaboration

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Beyond The Standard Quantum Limit B. W. Barr Institute for Gravitational Research University of Glasgow.
Advertisements

Max-Planck-Institut für Gravitationsphysik (Albert-Einstein-Institut) HOMODYNE AND HETERODYNE READOUT OF A SIGNAL- RECYCLED GRAVITATIONAL WAVE DETECTOR.
FINESSE FINESSE Frequency Domain Interferometer Simulation Versatile simulation software for user-defined interferometer topologies. Fast, easy to use.
19. October 2004 A. Freise Automatic Alignment using the Anderson Technique A. Freise European Gravitational Observatory Roma
Cascina, January 25th, Coupling of the IMC length noise into the recombined ITF output Raffaele Flaminio EGO and CNRS/IN2P3 Summary - Recombined.
Marcus Ng Mentor: Alan Weinstein Co-mentor: Robert Ward
Polarization Techniques for Interferometer Control Peter Beyersdorf National Astronomical Observatory of Japan LSC March 2002 Advanced Configurations LIGO-G Z.
Optics of GW detectors Jo van den Brand
Optical simulation – March 04 1 Optical Simulation François BONDU VIRGO Tools Goals Example: tuning of modulation frequency A few questions.
LIGO-G W LIGO Scientific Collaboration Meeting – LLO March Summary of recent measurements of g factor changes induced by thermal loading.
Jan 29, 2007 LIGO Excomm, G R 1 DC READOUT INSTALLATION RF PICKOFF OMC ELECTRONICS Squeezer Pickoff PD MMT1 Tip/Tilt MMT2.
Marcus Benna, University of Cambridge Wavefront Sensing in Dual-Recycled Interferometers LIGO What is Wavefront Sensing? How does it work? –Detection of.
Higher order TEM modes: Why and How? Andreas Freise European Gravitational Observatory 17. March 2004.
Lecture 1 Review of Wave optics Today Introduction to this course Light waves in homogeneous medium Monochromatic Waves in inhomogeneous medium.
Thermally Deformable Mirrors: a new Adaptive Optics scheme for Advanced Gravitational Wave Interferometers Marie Kasprzack Laboratoire de l’Accélérateur.
Higher order laser modes in gravitational wave detectors
Marcus Benna, University of Cambridge Wavefront Sensing in Dual-Recycled Interferometers LIGO What is Wavefront Sensing? How does it work? –Detection of.
Koji Arai – LIGO Laboratory / Caltech LIGO-G v1.
Virgo Control Noise Reduction
D EDICATED S PECTROPHOTOMETER F OR L OCALIZED T RANSMITTANCE A ND R EFLECTANCE M EASUREMENTS Laetitia ABEL-TIBERINI, Frédéric LEMARQUIS, Michel LEQUIME.
G R DC Readout for Advanced LIGO P Fritschel LSC meeting Hannover, 21 August 2003.
Design of Stable Power-Recycling Cavities University of Florida 10/05/2005 Volker Quetschke, Guido Mueller.
1 The Status of Melody: An Interferometer Simulation Program Amber Bullington Stanford University Optics Working Group March 17, 2004 G D.
LIGO-G D Enhanced LIGO Kate Dooley University of Florida On behalf of the LIGO Scientific Collaboration SESAPS Nov. 1, 2008.
European Gravitational Observatory12/12/2005 WG1 Hannover 1 Mode Matching of the Fabry-Perrot cavities Julien Marque.
LIGO- G R Telecon on June, Mach-Zender interferometer to eliminate sidebands of sidebands for Advanced LIGO Osamu Miyakawa, Caltech.
1 Wan Wu, Volker Quetschke, Ira Thorpe, Rodrigo Delgadillo, Guido Mueller, David Reitze, and David Tanner Noise associated with the EOM in Advanced LIGO.
LIGO- G R Amaldi7 July 14 th, 2007 R. Ward, Caltech 1 DC Readout Experiment at the Caltech 40m Laboratory Robert Ward Caltech Amaldi 7 July 14.
G Z AJW for Marcus Benna, Cambridge Wavefront Sensing for Advanced LIGO Model of wavefront sensing in a dual- recycled interferometer Consequences.
Phase camera development for gravitational wave detectors
Koji Arai – LIGO Laboratory / Caltech LIGO-G v2.
LIGO-G0200XX-00-M LIGO Scientific Collaboration1 First Results from the Mesa Beam Profile Cavity Prototype Marco Tarallo 26 July 2005 Caltech – LIGO Laboratory.
Haifeng Huang and Kevin K. Lehmann
AIGO 2K Australia - Italy Workshop th October th October 2005 Pablo Barriga for AIGO group.
Nov 3, 2008 Detection System for AdV 1/8 Detection (DET) Subsystem for AdV  Main tasks and requirements for the subsystem  DC readout  Design for: the.
08/24/2004 Stefan Ballmer, MIT / LIGO Hanford G I 1 Hanford 4km Recent improvements and currently limiting noise sources Stefan Ballmer Massachusetts.
Dual Recycling in GEO 600 H. Grote, A. Freise, M. Malec for the GEO600 team Institut für Atom- und Molekülphysik University of Hannover Max-Planck-Institut.
The HESSI Imaging Process. How HESSI Images HESSI will make observations of the X-rays and gamma-rays emitted by solar flares in such a way that pictures.
1 Locking in Virgo Matteo Barsuglia ILIAS, Cascina, July 7 th 2004.
LIGO-G Z March 2007, LSC meeting, Osamu Miyakawa 1 Osamu Miyakawa Hiroaki Yamamoto March 21, 2006 LSC meeting Modeling of AdLIGO arm lock acquisition.
1 DC readout for Virgo+? E. Tournefier WG1 meeting, Hannover January 23 rd,2007 DC vs AC readout: technical noises Output mode cleaner for DC readout.
Monica VarvellaIEEE - GW Workshop Roma, October 21, M.Varvella Virgo LAL Orsay / LIGO CalTech Time-domain model for AdvLIGO Interferometer Gravitational.
LIGO-G R DC Detection at the 40m Lab DC Detection Experiment at the 40m Lab Robert Ward for the 40m Lab to the AIC group Livingston LSC meeting.
ILIAS - Geneve1 Input mirrors thermal lensing effect in Virgo J. Marque.
The VIRGO detection system
FINESSE FINESSE Frequency Domain Interferometer Simulation Andreas Freise European Gravitational Observatory 17. March 2004.
Development of Phase Camera for Advanced Virgo (Experimental part) Kazuhiro Agatsuma Martin van Beuzekom, Mesfin Gebyehu, Laura van der Schaaf, Jo van.
Compton Gamma-ray Generation Experiment by Using an Optical Cavity in ATF POSIPOL 2007 Workshop at LAL Hirotaka Shimizu Hiroshima University.
40m Optical Systems & Sensing DRD, G R 1 40m Optical Systems and Sensing Design Requirements Document & Conceptual Design Michael Smith 10/18/01.
LIGO- G R Amaldi7 July 14 th, 2007 R. Ward, Caltech 1 Prototyping for eLIGO: Power Recycled Fabry Perot Michelson DARM RF ITMy ITMx BS PRM SRM.
H1 Squeezing Experiment: the path to an Advanced Squeezer
Interferometer configurations for Gravitational Wave Detectors
Quantum noise reduction using squeezed states in LIGO
GEO600 Control aspects where do the error signal come from?
Progress toward squeeze injection in Enhanced LIGO
Commissioning Progress and Plans
Output Mode Cleaners: Introduction for non-experts
Design of Stable Power-Recycling Cavities
Homodyne readout of an interferometer with Signal Recycling
Commissioning the LIGO detectors
Homodyne or heterodyne Readout for Advanced LIGO?
Workshop on Gravitational Wave Detectors, IEEE, Rome, October 21, 2004
Modeling of Advanced LIGO with Melody
A New OEO Design Using Optical Phase Modulation and Modulation Suppression G. John Dick and Nan Yu Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology.
Effect of sideband of sideband on 40m and Advanced LIGO
Thermal lensing effect: Experimental measurements - Simulation with DarkF & Finesse J. Marque (Measurements analysis: M. Punturo; DarkF simulation: M.
Heavy IMC end payload requirements
Improving LIGO’s stability and sensitivity: commissioning examples
Some features of NV. Vincent Loriette.
Homodyne detection: understanding the laser noise amplitude transfer function Jérôme Degallaix Ilias meeting – June 2007.
Presentation transcript:

LIGO Scientific Collaboration Study of the Output Mode Cleaner Prototype using the Phasecamera Keita Kawabe, Luca Matone and Joseph Betzwieser LIGO Scientific Collaboration

The Problem: H1 with and without the OMC S3 Spectrum Spectrum with OMC Peter F and Stefan, May 11 LIGO Scientific Collaboration

LIGO Scientific Collaboration Understanding the OMC Difficulty in tracking down the noise in detect and common mode It would be useful to see the spatial map of the light incident on the AS PD, to look at the modal content Consider a simple case of a bright Michelson lock (or straight shot off an ITM into the AS port) so we only have TEM00 mode incoming Create a simple model with all information at hand (astigmatic beam, OMC parameters) Compare the modal content of the experiment and model and see if there’s a difference in this simplified case LIGO Scientific Collaboration

Experimental Setup: OMC ASPD2 OMC ASPD 2 on transmission of OMC OMC kept on resonance by 3 methods Dither locking (maximization of total transmission) 2-Omega locking (maximization of sideband throughput) ASI locking (equalization of upper and lower sidebands) Noise was high with all 3 methods LIGO Scientific Collaboration

Experimental Setup: Antisymmetric Port Light Use the simplest case: Bright Michelson lock TEM00 Astigmatic beam Major and minor axes rotated 25 degrees counterclockwise relative to OMC Two waists of 137um and 107um Spacing of 6.6cm between waists OMC mode matched by maximizing transmission LIGO Scientific Collaboration

Experimental Setup: Phasecamera The purpose of the phase camera is to spatially resolve the RF components of the incoming light field Take a small aperture and move the much larger beam around capturing data from a small section of the light at a time In this case we want to measure the beat between the carrier and sideband Carrier Lower Sideband Upper Sideband 25 Mhz Frequency LIGO Scientific Collaboration

Experimental Setup: Phasecamera (continued) First the incoming light is focused such that the radius of the light is much larger than the pinhole of the photodetector As the “galvos” move the steering mirrors, a different “pixel” of the light becomes incident on the photodetector Spiral scan pattern is used to increase scan speed A full scan of 4000 points takes ~0.5 seconds 1811 PD 0.1mm aperture Spiral Pattern Y Mirror and Galvanometer X Mirror and Galvanometer Incoming Light LIGO Scientific Collaboration

Experimental Setup: Phasecamera (continued again) Reference Frequency 25Mhz For each point in a scan, the RF signal is demodulated at 25Mhz and recorded, along with the DC signal After each point of data is collected, the computer sends the next position to the “galvo” controller and the process repeats Once a full scan is complete, displays the data as a phasemap in “real time” Raw data can be saved to an ASCII text file for later analysis RF 1811 PD Demod Board Demodulated RF Signal DC Laser Light Computer: Display and Control Software Spiral Scan Position Galvanometer Controller Board Control Voltage LIGO Scientific Collaboration

Bright Michelson Lock without the OMC (astigmatic light) Phasecamera data from the AS port Sideband imbalance and/or amplitude modulation is present, as indicated by the TEM00-ish mode This effect is unaffected or decreased by the OMC, depending on the locking scheme LIGO Scientific Collaboration

Phasecamera image from Bright Michelson State with OMC Images are on transmission of the OMC Phase demodulation chosen so all the junk is in the Q phase Note the distinct TEM11 mode structure Amplitude modulation or sideband imbalance is still present, although ratio of RF to DC TEM00 is less LIGO Scientific Collaboration

Modeling: Decomposition of the Light Light inside OMC can be represented in the Hermite Gaussian basis, restricted by boundary conditions Astigmatic Light isn’t perfectly mode matched to the OMC, so higher order modes are created and transmitted even though incoming light is only “TEM00” Simply take the inner product of the astigmatic field with the individual modes in the OMC basis to find amplitude LIGO Scientific Collaboration

Modeling: OMC scan versus OMC model Scanned incoming light by changing length of OMC, going through a full Free Spectral Range Provides an experimental decomposition of the astigmatic light Black curve is the scan data, Blue is the model decomposition, Red is a numerical fit to the data LIGO Scientific Collaboration

Modeling: OMC response function Transmission through the OMC is controlled by reflectivity of mirrors and losses in the cavity Assuming no losses in the cavity or through the back mirror, we get the transmission curve shown Note high transmission (~50%) of “5 odd” mode Apply this transmission to the initial modal content to get transmitted modal content LIGO Scientific Collaboration

Modeling: Prediction for the Phasecamera Model prediction assuming the incoming light is perfectly aligned to the OMC Shows the beating between the carrier and sidebands (25 Mhz demodulation) “Demodulation” phase chosen such that all the junk light is in the phase shown Other phase is empty Looks like the phasecamera images LIGO Scientific Collaboration

Comparing Phasecamera Data and the Model Use a least squares nonlinear fitting algorithm to fit the OMC model to the Phasecamera data With variations of +/-20% in the predicted modes from model (non-misalignment modes) of ~1 LIGO Scientific Collaboration

LIGO Scientific Collaboration Model and Fit Data Normalized the TEM00 mode amplitude to 1 and phase to 0 for clarity Mode Model Misaligned Model Bright Mich Straight Shot   Amplitude Phase In Degrees 2 (normalized) - 0.802 3.889 A 258 99 00 1 01 0.28 -155 0.43 71 0.50 62 10 .13 25 0.044 -15 0.066 2 02 0.23 -57 0.22 -43 0.30 -44 -72 11 0.26 80 .23 87 0.256 100 0.20 20 0.21 31 32 0.27 .27 03 0.11 153 0.023 12 0.03 0.12 -63 0.09 -70 0.04 21 0.05 -172 0.06 -17 -38 30 57 0.080 59 34 04 0.07 -113 -86 0.02 -90 13 23 43 0.127 129 175 22 176 0.003 -161 191 0.10 111 117 131 0.08 91 40 0.061 64 82 .04 LIGO Scientific Collaboration

LIGO Scientific Collaboration Implications Amplitude of misalignment modes (TEM01, TEM10) is consistent with a displacement or angular misalignment of order the waist size or divergence angle In the simple case of a bright Michelson, higher order modes on transmission of the OMC are at most 4% of the TEM00 mode amplitude Transmission of the OMC can be explained with just astigmatic beam and misalignment, no additional “hidden” effects LIGO Scientific Collaboration

Back to the noise in Detect and Common Mode However, in the case of detect or common mode, the incoming light is not just a TEM00 Much more energy in higher order modes The “5 odd” modes (50,32,14) transmit well through the OMC (~50% transmission in amplitude) Any “5 odd” mode present in the incoming light or created through misalignment from “4” or “6” modes will reach the AS photodetector, adding to the noise LIGO Scientific Collaboration

LIGO Scientific Collaboration Summary Created a very simple model which predicts the phasecamera data on transmission of the OMC which only needs the following as input parameters: Astigmatic nature of the light Length of OMC and curvature of mirrors inside the OMC Finesse of the cavity Successful use of the Phasecamera and analysis of the associated data LIGO Scientific Collaboration