Self-folding triangular devices at two scales.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Demonstrations I, II, and III.

Advertisements

Soft robotic device applied to the RV in a pressure overload model of RHF. Soft robotic device applied to the RV in a pressure overload model of RHF. (A.

A battery-free microorigami robotic arm.

Comparison of predicted and measured forces and moments.

Basic design concept of human mimetic humanoid.

Comparing previous simulation work with current study.

TPAD controller schematic and testing for WPC.

TPAD controller performance for three force components.

Cable-driven system diagram for structure matrix.

Deployment of the septal anchoring system.

Demonstration of high-speed and precise actuation.

Three different types of transfer functions with a codomain of [0,1].

TPAD training protocol.

Self-sensing of actuator position.

Examples of AEGIS autonomous target selection.

Workspace comparison of Delta robots.

Ex vivo testing of the soft robotic devices.

Soft robotic device applied to the left side in a coronary ligation HF model. Soft robotic device applied to the left side in a coronary ligation HF model.

Group data during free walking between sessions 1 and 16.

Soft robotic VAD implementations, control schemes, and HF models.

The foldable robotic arm with seven modules assembled in series.

AEGIS intelligent targeting compared with blind targeting.

Allometric scaling of select biohybrid and organic devices.

Comparison of repertoire distributions to baseline.

Tukey boxplots overlaid on data points from objective and subjective measures, displaying results from study 1. Tukey boxplots overlaid on data points.

Kinematic pattern analyses.

Soft robotic VAD implementations, control schemes, and HF models.

Tactile features for prosthesis perception.

The milliDelta: a millimeter-scale Delta robot.

Online verification using reachable occupancies.

Illustration of the addressable wireless folding concept.

Cell viability tests. Cell viability tests. SEM images of (A) MC3T3-E1 cells and (B) MSCs on days 1, 3, and 5 of culture. (C) Survival rates of MC3T3-E1.

Prosthesis system diagram.

Effect of slenderness on optimal shapes.

SoFi system overview. SoFi system overview. (Top, left to right) Soft robotic fish and diver interface module. (Bottom, left to right) Subcomponents of.

Soft robotic device applied to the left side in a coronary ligation HF model. Soft robotic device applied to the left side in a coronary ligation HF model.

Fig. 2 Preserved long-term functionality of the TEHVs over 1-year follow-up as assessed by ICE and cardiac MRI flow measurements. Preserved long-term functionality.

Microrobots with different cell-carrying capacities under different grid lengths (lg) and burr lengths (lb). Microrobots with different cell-carrying capacities.

Self-sensing of actuator position.

2D motility characterization and external magnetic steering of RBC microswimmers. 2D motility characterization and external magnetic steering of RBC microswimmers.

Fig. 3 Electron PSD in various regions.

Schematic of experimental setup and screen captures from swimming.

Details of an implementation of a mechanism within the control chambers for selective lengthening of the sides of the soft robot. Details of an implementation.

Fig. 4 Resynthesized complex boronic acid derivatives based on different scaffolds on a millimole scale and corresponding yields. Resynthesized complex.

Active deformation of an RBC cargo propelled and pushed by a single bacterium through a 2-μm gap. Active deformation of an RBC cargo propelled and pushed.

Fig. 6 Comparison of properties of water models.

Schematic representation of MT sorting under a given electric field.

Fig. 4 Application of the DC-TENG to drive electronic devices.

Soft robotic device applied to the RV in a pressure overload model of RHF. Soft robotic device applied to the RV in a pressure overload model of RHF. (A.

Deployment of the septal anchoring system.

Comparison of predicted and measured forces and moments.

RAD sampler design. RAD sampler design. (A) One arm of the RAD sampler with revolute joints shown as dotted lines. A fold is initiated by rotating the.

Folding unit based on the plane symmetric Bricard linkage.

Overhead snapshots. Overhead snapshots. (A to E) Mark I3, robot experiments (movie S1). (F) Mark I3, simulation (movie S2, side by side with a run on the.

Results of a representative participant with multiple training sessions. Results of a representative participant with multiple training sessions. Average.

Galloping-like gait with the design of a two-legged robot.

AEGIS autonomous targeting process.

Examples of AEGIS autonomous target selection.

Fig. 3 ET dynamics on the control and treatment watersheds during the pretreatment and treatment periods. ET dynamics on the control and treatment watersheds.

Growth enables a soft robot to move its tip through constrained environments and to form 3D structures defined by the path of its tip. Growth enables a.

Fig. 5 The different fractions of the rates of energy flow in the oscillating thermal circuit for the experiment with L = 58.5 H shown in Fig. 4A. The.

Fabrication of metal origami structures.

Response of the actuator to different stimulations.

Fig. 5 Comparison of the liquid products generated from photocatalytic CO2 reduction reactions (CO2RR) and CO reduction reactions (CORR) on two catalysts.

Proprioception. Proprioception. (A) Computer-aided design (CAD) model of each component of the cylinder and the completed device with three different stiffness.

Kinematic and mechanical advantage trade-off study.

Fig. 5. High burdens of AA signature mutations and predicted immunogenicity in Taiwan HCCs. High burdens of AA signature mutations and predicted immunogenicity.

The biomimetic pressure sensing ability.

Fig. 3 Electronic conductivity studies.

Comparison of children’s behavior between the three conditions.

Presentation transcript:

Self-folding triangular devices at two scales. Self-folding triangular devices at two scales. (A) Size comparison of the two devices and the close up view of the electronic components in the larger device. I, II, and III show the circuit parts indicated in Figure 3A. Inductors L1, L2, and L3 (shown in Fig. 3A) are implemented by using two inductors connected in parallel as shown in the inset to increase the current capacity. (B) Top view of the smaller device. (C) Bottom view of the smaller device. Inductors and capacitors are placed at the bottom of the device. The corresponding circuit diagram can be seen in Fig. 3B. Mustafa Boyvat et al. Sci. Robotics 2017;2:eaan1544 Copyright © 2017 The Authors, some rights reserved; exclusive licensee American Association for the Advancement of Science. No claim to original U.S. Government Works