Results (after the pilot changes): Where was the research carried out?

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SCIENCE LET’S INVESTIGATE.
Advertisements

Carrying Out an Investigation in Science
Introduction to Science Primary GTP 2009/10. What is Science?
Socratic Seminar “The unexamined life is not worth living.”
Introduction to Primary Science APP. What do the AFs look like? AF1 – Thinking Scientifically AF2- Understanding the applications & implications of science.
IssueTimingActivity Starter10 minutesThink / Pair / Share, Which of these AfL strategies do you do most frequently – least frequently, which do you think.
Science Process Skills. Observe- using our senses to find out about objects, events, or living things. Classify- arranging or sorting objects, events,
ISLAND ADVENTURES LEVELLED WORK HOW SCIENCE WORKS You have to design and carry out an investigation to find out what environmental conditions to keep the.
Question At Wellow, we consistently ensure that children are given opportunities to collaborate within and across different year groups. Sometimes this.
Building Blocks for Science A simple strategy for consistently developing scientific skills throughout the year.
Our Challenge as part of our SIP-To implement across the Learning Communities the strategic focus model to every lesson (WALT) WALT WALT is the beginning.
The Future for Assessment? Assessing Pupil Progress (APP) as a tool for effective Teacher Assessment in Primary Science.
Woodley Primary School Science delivered in different ways.
Templars Primary School The development of whole school science planning.
Inset 2016 Year 3 Inset Create this design using sticks: Remove 8 sticks to make 2 squares. Remove 8 sticks to make 3 squares. Remove 8 sticks.
LET’S INVESTIGATE: The Scientific Method
The Scientific Method.
Autumn Term 1 Amazing Bodies
Maths Multiplication and Division Workshop
Positives... to celebrate Problems... to solve Potential... to explore
Leaders for life A celebration of our Rights Respecting Schools Award Journey…
Reflecting on Effective Strategies for Struggling Readers
BASEAL New Beginnings - 1
Mental and Emotional Health
KS2 Reading Workshop 2017.
Year 7 Mentor Training.
RAG Starter Activity Complete the ‘Heard the Word Grid.’
Pupil Flight Plan Securing Developing Establishing Advancing Year 7
Year 6 – Science Investigation.
Reading Objectives: Close Reading Analyze visuals. RI.4.7
“How do we know how well your child is doing?”
Pupil Questionnaire results:
YEAR 1 NETWORK: SCIENCE 17th MAY 2016.
I can use a range of words to describe my feelings
Year 3 – Feeling good and being me
Mrs. Melissa Romero.
Reading – a skill for life
Scientific Methods Science in Practice.
LET’S INVESTIGATE: The Scientific Method
The Scientific Method.
By Ms. Plunkett and Mrs. Ports
Key Stage 1 Science is built upon through the early learning stages of school life by making sense of the simpler aspects of life through science. Year.
I’m good at… and I’m going to try and be better at…
LET’S INVESTIGATE: The Scientific Method
Thinking about assessment in geography
Lesson Structure From September we will be using Maths No Problem text books. Text books have been developed based on excellent mastery practise across.
Flintham Primary School Maths Meeting 2018
The Impact of Social Media
Assessing science enquiry
About Me Student Picture here. About Me Student Picture here.
I can talk about how I’m feeling
I’m good at… and I’m going to try and be better at…
Year 3 – Feeling good and being me
Term 6 Romans D.T DT2/1.3 Evaluate
Unit 1 Vocabulary Science Skills.
Energy in Ecosystems Key Area 3.4.
Year 3 – Feeling good and being me
TRANSITION TO SECONDARY SCHOOL
I can talk about how I’m feeling
Carrying Out an Investigation in Science
I’m good at… and I’m going to try and be better at…
Plenary
Welcome to Explorify! This presentation will help you introduce your colleagues to Explorify – we’ve given you all the key information but feel free to.
I can talk about how I’m feeling
Monitoring for Meaning
Physics POL (Make a creative title)
I can talk about how I’m feeling
SCIENCE LET’S INVESTIGATE.
I need to improve my… I am now able to… I feel more confident about…
Multiplication and Division
Presentation transcript:

Results (after the pilot changes): Where was the research carried out? Before the pilot changes, only 4% of children believed there were other types of enquiry other than fair testing. After the pilot changes, 69% of children said that there were other types of enquiry other than fair testing. Before the pilot changes, 62% of children said that the teacher chooses the question more than them. After the pilot changes, 71% of children said that they got to choose the question. Shows how their independence has grown throughout the pilot changes. Before the pilot changes, 41% of children said that they watched the teacher do an investigation compared to 17% that said they did it themselves. After the pilot changes, 54% of children said they did the experiment themselves compared to 13% who said that they watched their teacher do an experiment. Roll out next year: Different types of enquiry (independence) Children to develop independence when recording New assessment grids to be implemented Where was the research carried out? Snaresbrook Primary School Year 4 children Two classes Examples of enquiry skills: The children made a human digestive system. “I really enjoy experiments like this. I learn so much more when I can get stuck in. When someone asks me a question I can picture it in my head and it helps me to remember.” – Aleksander. Sorting and classifying invertebrates Making their own sherbet Fair test enquiry about yeast Areas of weakness identified: Children and teachers do not understand the different types of enquiry. Only 4% of children said that there are other types of enquiry than fair testing. Recording is mostly teacher led. Children do not understand/know the different ways to record. Teachers are not confident with assessing ‘working scientifically’. Children do not always know how to improve. Children developed confidence in sorting and classifying invertebrates. They independently chose how they would like to classify animals and explained their reasons why. Children were able to plan their own enquiry. The children were able to write predictions and give reasons. Children ‘exceeding expectations’ were able to use scientific knowledge and vocabulary when writing conclusions. Pilot changes: Developing skills and independence in scientific enquiry To develop independence in different types of recording Assessment – pupil assessment, peer assessment and teacher assessment The children identified what type of enquiry would work best to find out more about yeast. Each group planned a different fair test enquiry.

Results (after the pilot changes): Where was the research carried out? Before the pilot changes, only 4% of children believed there were other types of enquiry other than fair testing. After the pilot changes, 69% of children said that there were other types of enquiry other than fair testing. Before the pilot changes, 62% of children said that the teacher chooses the question more than them. After the pilot changes, 71% of children said that they got to choose the question. Shows how their independence has grown throughout the pilot changes. Before the pilot changes, 41% of children said that they watched the teacher do an investigation compared to 17% that said they did it themselves. After the pilot changes, 54% of children said they did the experiment themselves compared to 13% who said that they watched their teacher do an experiment. Roll out next year: Different types of enquiry (independence) Children to develop independence when recording New assessment grids to be implemented Where was the research carried out? Snaresbrook Primary School Year 4 children Two classes Research and findings: The children made a human digestive system. “I really enjoy experiments like this. I learn so much more when I can get stuck in. When someone asks me a question I can picture it in my head and it helps me to remember.” – Aleksander. Sorting and classifying invertebrates Making their own sherbet Fair test enquiry about yeast Areas of weakness identified: Children and teachers do not understand the different types of enquiry. Only 4% of children said that there are other types of enquiry than fair testing. Recording is mostly teacher led. Children do not understand/know the different ways to record. Teachers are not confident with assessing ‘working scientifically’. Children do not always know how to improve. Children who were ‘meeting expectations’ were mostly able to use a branching key to classify invertebrates although lacked understanding. Children ‘exceeding expectations’ were able to use more scientific vocabulary to describe the different features. Children who were ‘meeting expectations’ were able to give simple reasons to support their predictions and write a basic conclusion. Children ‘exceeding expectations’ were able to use real-life experiences and knowledge when writing predictions and scientific vocabulary when writing conclusions. Pilot changes: Developing skills and independence in scientific enquiry To develop independence in different types of recording Assessment – pupil assessment, peer assessment and teacher assessment