Least-squares Joint Imaging of Primaries and Multiples

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
(t,x) domain, pattern-based ground roll removal Morgan P. Brown* and Robert G. Clapp Stanford Exploration Project Stanford University.
Advertisements

Seismic Reflection Processing Illustrations The Stacking Chart and Normal Moveout Creating a seismic reflection section or profile requires merging the.
Velocity Analysis Introduction to Seismic ImagingERTH 4470/5470 Yilmaz, ch
Multiple attenuation in the image space Paul Sava & Antoine Guitton Stanford University SEP.
Multiple Removal with Local Plane Waves
Multi-Component Seismic Data Processing
Introduction to GeoProbe
Overview of SEP research Paul Sava. The problem Modeling operator Seismic image Seismic data.
GG450 April 22, 2008 Seismic Processing.
Reverse-Time Migration
Depth (m) Time (s) Raw Seismograms Four-Layer Sand Channel Model Midpoint (m)
SOES6004 Data acquisition and geometry
Occurs when wave encounters sharp discontinuities in the medium important in defining faults generally considered as noise in seismic sections seismic.
Inversion of Z-Axis Tipper Electromagnetic (Z-TEM)‏ Data The UBC Geophysical Inversion Facility Elliot Holtham and Douglas Oldenburg.
Joint Migration of Primary and Multiple Reflections in RVSP Data Jianhua Yu, Gerard T. Schuster University of Utah.
Wave spreads over a larger surface as it travels through the medium. For a spherical wave, the wave energy falls off as the square of the distance. Its.
Filters  Temporal Fourier (t f) transformation  Spatial Fourier (x k x ) transformation applications  f-k x transformation  Radon (-p x ) transformation.
Imaging of diffraction objects using post-stack reverse-time migration
MD + AVO Inversion Jianhua Yu, University of Utah Jianxing Hu GXT.
G(m)=d mathematical model d data m model G operator d=G(m true )+  = d true +  Forward problem: find d given m Inverse problem (discrete parameter estimation):
Impact of MD on AVO Inversion
The following discussions contain certain “forward-looking statements” as defined by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 including, without.
Wave-equation migration Wave-equation migration of reflection seismic data to produce images of the subsurface entails four basic operations: Summation.
Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Environmental and Exploration Geophysics II tom.h.wilson Department of Geology.
EXPLORATION GEOPHYSICS. EARTH MODEL NORMAL-INCIDENCE REFLECTION AND TRANSMISSION COEFFICIENTS WHERE:  1 = DENSITY OF LAYER 1 V 1 = VELOCITY OF LAYER.
Introduction to Seismology
Wave-equation migration velocity analysis Biondo Biondi Stanford Exploration Project Stanford University Paul Sava.
Radon Transforms in Tau-P space and Multiple Removal
Signal Analysis and Imaging Group Department of Physics University of Alberta Regularized Migration/Inversion Henning Kuehl (Shell Canada) Mauricio Sacchi.
Environmental and Exploration Geophysics II tom.h.wilson Department of Geology and Geography West Virginia University Morgantown, WV.
Data QC and filtering Bryce HutchinsonSumit Verma Objective: Consider the frequency range of different seismic features Look for low frequency and high.
Reflection seismograms
LEAST SQUARES DATUMING AND SURFACE WAVES PREDICTION WITH INTERFEROMETRY Yanwei Xue Department of Geology & Geophysics University of Utah 1.
Least squares migration of elastic data Aaron Stanton and Mauricio Sacchi PIMS 2015.
1 Prestack migrations to inversion John C. Bancroft CREWES 20 November 2001.
Shot-profile migration of GPR data Jeff Shragge, James Irving, and Brad Artman Geophysics Department Stanford University.
2004 SEPM.P. Brown Least-squares Joint Imaging of Multiples and Primaries Morgan Brown 2004 SEP Meeting 19 May 2004.
Geology 5660/6660 Applied Geophysics 26 Feb 2016 © A.R. Lowry 2016 For Mon 29 Feb: Burger (§8.4) Last Time: Industry Seismic Interpretation Seismic.
Lee M. Liberty Research Professor Boise State University.
Efficient modeling and imaging of pegleg multiples Morgan Brown and Antoine Guitton Stanford University, Department of Geophysics Multiples can be bad…
MD+AVO Inversion: Real Examples University of Utah Jianhua Yu.
Fang Liu and Arthur Weglein Houston, Texas May 12th, 2006
Making Marchenko imaging work with field data and the bumpy road to 3D
Dmitri Lokshtanov Norsk Hydro Research Centre, Bergen.
Reflection velocity analysis
Primary-Only Imaging Condition And Interferometric Migration
Applied Geophysics Fall 2016 Umass Lowell
Imaging (and characterisation) of diffractors
SEISMIC DATA GATHERING.
Modeling of free-surface multiples - 2
Fang Liu, Arthur B. Weglein, Kristopher A. Innanen, Bogdan G. Nita
Passive Seismic Imaging
Attenuation of Diffracted Multiples
Wavefield imaging and tomography with the energy norm
Realising the Benefits of Long Offset Data: A Case History from the Utgard High Area Richard Morgan, Richard Wombell, Dave Went Veritas DGC Ltd, Crawley.
A pseudo-unitary implementation of the radial trace transform
High Resolution AVO NMO
Methods for isolating coherent noise in the Radon domain
The Wave Equation Modeled
Multiple attenuation in the image space
Source wavelet effects on the ISS internal multiple leading-order attenuation algorithm and its higher-order modification that accommodate issues that.
Wavelet estimation from towed-streamer pressure measurement and its application to free surface multiple attenuation Zhiqiang Guo (UH, PGS) Arthur Weglein.
Initial asymptotic acoustic RTM imaging results for a salt model
Does AVO Inversion Really Reveal Rock Properties?
Direct horizontal image gathers without velocity or “ironing”
High Resolution Velocity Analysis for Resource Plays
—Based on 2018 Field School Seismic Data
EXPLORATION GEOPHYSICS
LSMF for Suppressing Multiples
Presentation transcript:

Least-squares Joint Imaging of Primaries and Multiples Morgan Brown Stanford University 2002 SEG, Salt Lake City Stanford Exploration Project Brown

A Stack of the Primaries... Stanford Exploration Project Brown

…and a Stack of the Multiples Stanford Exploration Project Brown

CMP gathers are also consistent primaries multiples Stanford Exploration Project Brown

What information can multiples add? At least redundant: Related AVO behavior Similar structural image Different illumination: Near offsets Shadow zones Stanford Exploration Project Brown

How to exploit the information? Constraint on existing information Integrate additional information Three requirements: Image self-consistency Consistency with data Simplicity of images Stanford Exploration Project Brown

The Gameplan Imaging: “NMO for Multiples” Constraint/Integration: Regularized least-squares inversion Synthetic & Real data tests Stanford Exploration Project Brown

NMO for multiples - kinematics Stanford Exploration Project Brown

NMO for multiples - kinematics Building a pseudo-primary t’ S R 1 t’ t Stanford Exploration Project Brown

NMO for multiples - kinematics Building a pseudo-primary t’ S R 2 t’ t Stanford Exploration Project Brown

NMO for multiples - kinematics Building a pseudo-primary t’ S R 3 t’ t Stanford Exploration Project Brown

NMO for multiples - kinematics Building a pseudo-primary t’ S R 4 t’ t Stanford Exploration Project Brown

NMO for multiples - kinematics Building a pseudo-primary t’ S R t’ t Dx Stanford Exploration Project Brown

NMO for multiples - kinematics primary NMO for multiple 1 Effective RMS velocity Stanford Exploration Project Brown

NMO for multiples - kinematics Stanford Exploration Project Brown

Modeling Amplitudes: Assumptions Constant AVO WB reflection. Free surface R.C. = -1. Ignore geometric spreading. Ignoring primary AVO: multi (-r)i*prim AVO: more later. Stanford Exploration Project Brown

Forward Modeling Equation NMO0 d m0 Stanford Exploration Project Brown

Forward Modeling Equation (-r)*NMO1 d m1 Stanford Exploration Project Brown

Forward Modeling Equation (-r)2*NMO2 d m2 Stanford Exploration Project Brown

Forward Modeling Equation Ni :adjoint of NMO for multiple i. Ri : (-r)iI. mi : pseudo-primary panel i. d : input CMP gather. Stanford Exploration Project Brown

Least-squares objective function Stanford Exploration Project Brown

Least-squares objective function Stanford Exploration Project Brown

Image Simplicity and Crosstalk Ideally, the “simplest” model... N0m0 + N1R1m1 + N2R2m2 “inverse” d m0 m1 m2 Stanford Exploration Project Brown

Model Simplicity and Crosstalk …but this problem is underdetermined. N0m0 + N1R1m1 + N2R2m2 “inverse” d m0 m1 m2 Stanford Exploration Project Brown

Discriminating between crosstalk and signal Self-consistent, flat primaries Stanford Exploration Project Brown

Discriminating between crosstalk and signal Inconsistent, curved crosstalk Stanford Exploration Project Brown

Model Regularization suppresses crosstalk Dm= Difference between pseudo-primary panels. Penalizes inconsistent crosstalk events. Dx= Difference along offset. Penalizes curving events. e1,e2 = Scalar regularization parameters. Stanford Exploration Project Brown

Dm: Modeling AVO of multiples No explicit AVO modeling Model relative primary/multiple AVO dependence. Dm differences at different offsets. Stanford Exploration Project Brown

Dm: Modeling AVO of multiples From forward model Mult(h) ~ prim(hp) * (-r) hp S R t’ h t Stanford Exploration Project Brown

Dm: Modeling AVO of multiples In constant velocity: hp S R t’ h t Stanford Exploration Project Brown

Dm: Modeling AVO of multiples In constant velocity: Curves: hp(t) - - m0 m1 Stanford Exploration Project Brown

Synthetic Data Results Raw primaries Raw mult. 1 Raw mult. 2 Stanford Exploration Project Brown

Synthetic Data Results Est. primaries Est. mult. 1 Est. mult. 2 x(-r) x(-r 2) Stanford Exploration Project Brown

Synthetic Data Results Raw primaries Est. primaries Difference Stanford Exploration Project Brown

Synthetic Data #2 Results Raw primaries Est. primaries Difference Stanford Exploration Project Brown

Real Data Results Raw primaries Est. primaries Difference Stanford Exploration Project Brown

Strengths Good separation…. Amplitude-preserving process ...at near offsets …without a prior noise model Amplitude-preserving process General integration framework Stanford Exploration Project Brown

Weaknesses 1-D earth. Amplitudes - Incomplete Modeling? Parameter sensitivity… …e1, e2, r, velocity. Multiples coherent across offset. NMO stretch. Stanford Exploration Project Brown

The Future Migration…tougher battle, richer spoils Different illumination Amplitudes? Converted waves (PS,PSP). “Tall” operator. One image, many datasets. Prior wavefield separation. Stanford Exploration Project Brown

Acknowledgements ExxonMobil, WesternGeco for data. Biondo Biondi, Bob Clapp, Antoine Guitton. Stanford Exploration Project Brown