ATP-Dependent Positive Supercoiling of DNA by 13S Condensin: A Biochemical Implication for Chromosome Condensation  Keiji Kimura, Tatsuya Hirano  Cell 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Alain Verreault, Paul D Kaufman, Ryuji Kobayashi, Bruce Stillman  Cell 
Advertisements

Volume 6, Issue 3, Pages (September 2000)
Biochemical Specialization within Arabidopsis RNA Silencing Pathways
BRCA1 Is Associated with a Human SWI/SNF-Related Complex
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages (January 2004)
Maria R Rojas, Amine O Noueiry, William J Lucas, Robert L Gilbertson 
Volume 6, Issue 3, Pages (September 2000)
The Smc5/6 Complex Is an ATP-Dependent Intermolecular DNA Linker
Reconstitution of a Functional Core Polycomb Repressive Complex
Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages (January 1999)
Yan Jiang, Mingyi Liu, Charlotte A. Spencer, David H. Price 
Volume 6, Issue 3, Pages (September 2000)
Volume 9, Issue 7, Pages (April 1999)
Volume 90, Issue 1, Pages (July 1997)
Replication-Independent Histone Deposition by the HIR Complex and Asf1
Peter J. Gillespie, Tatsuya Hirano  Current Biology 
The Role of ABCE1 in Eukaryotic Posttermination Ribosomal Recycling
A Human Nuclear-Localized Chaperone that Regulates Dimerization, DNA Binding, and Transcriptional Activity of bZIP Proteins  Ching-Man A Virbasius, Susanne.
Volume 117, Issue 1, Pages (April 2004)
Stabilization of Chromatin Structure by PRC1, a Polycomb Complex
Alain Verreault, Paul D Kaufman, Ryuji Kobayashi, Bruce Stillman  Cell 
The Nuclear Hat1p/Hat2p Complex
ClpX-Mediated Remodeling of Mu Transpososomes
Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages (July 2006)
Volume 98, Issue 2, Pages (July 1999)
Stephen Schuck, Arne Stenlund  Molecular Cell 
Volume 15, Issue 2, Pages (July 2004)
Volume 139, Issue 4, Pages (November 2009)
Hairpin Coding End Opening Is Mediated by RAG1 and RAG2 Proteins
Transcriptional Fidelity and Proofreading by RNA Polymerase II
Volume 6, Issue 5, Pages (November 2000)
Noritaka Oyama, Keiji Iwatsuki, Yoshimi Homma, Fumio Kaneko 
Scott Gradia, Samir Acharya, Richard Fishel  Cell 
HMGN Proteins Act in Opposition to ATP-Dependent Chromatin Remodeling Factors to Restrict Nucleosome Mobility  Barbara P. Rattner, Timur Yusufzai, James.
Base Excision Repair of Oxidative DNA Damage Activated by XPG Protein
Volume 8, Issue 5, Pages (November 2001)
p53 Protein Exhibits 3′-to-5′ Exonuclease Activity
Jesse Easter, James W Gober  Molecular Cell 
Ana Losada, Tatsuya Hirano  Current Biology 
DNA Topoisomerase I and PC4 Can Interact with Human TFIIIC to Promote Both Accurate Termination and Transcription Reinitiation by RNA Polymerase III 
Efficient Supercoiling of DNA by a Single Condensin Complex as Revealed by Electron Spectroscopic Imaging  David P Bazett-Jones, Keiji Kimura, Tatsuya.
Jesse Easter, James W Gober  Molecular Cell 
Volume 43, Issue 4, Pages (August 2011)
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages (January 2004)
Michelle N Arbeitman, David S Hogness  Cell 
Mechanism of 5′-Directed Excision in Human Mismatch Repair
Initiation of Eukaryotic DNA Replication
Volume 11, Issue 24, Pages (December 2001)
Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages (July 2006)
Volume 8, Issue 5, Pages (November 2001)
Volume 29, Issue 1, Pages (January 2008)
Volume 95, Issue 2, Pages (October 1998)
Replication-Independent Histone Deposition by the HIR Complex and Asf1
Volume 24, Issue 1, Pages (October 2006)
Volume 46, Issue 6, Pages (June 2012)
RSC Unravels the Nucleosome
Volume 123, Issue 4, Pages (November 2005)
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages (January 2002)
Condensins, Chromosome Condensation Protein Complexes Containing XCAP-C, XCAP-E and a Xenopus Homolog of the Drosophila Barren Protein  Tatsuya Hirano,
Volume 15, Issue 3, Pages (August 2004)
Yan Jiang, Mingyi Liu, Charlotte A. Spencer, David H. Price 
Michiko Hirano, Tatsuya Hirano  Molecular Cell 
SWI/SNF Chromatin Remodeling Requires Changes in DNA Topology
Kei-ichi Shibahara, Bruce Stillman  Cell 
A Minimal RNA Polymerase III Transcription System from Human Cells Reveals Positive and Negative Regulatory Roles for CK2  Ping Hu, Si Wu, Nouria Hernandez 
Functional Coupling of Capping and Transcription of mRNA
Volume 93, Issue 5, Pages (May 1998)
Volume 139, Issue 4, Pages (November 2009)
Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages (January 1999)
Volume 84, Issue 2, Pages (January 1996)
Presentation transcript:

ATP-Dependent Positive Supercoiling of DNA by 13S Condensin: A Biochemical Implication for Chromosome Condensation  Keiji Kimura, Tatsuya Hirano  Cell  Volume 90, Issue 4, Pages 625-634 (August 1997) DOI: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80524-3

Figure 1 ATP-Dependent Positive Supercoiling of DNA by 13S Condensin (A) Immunoaffinity purification. Peptide-eluted fractions were resolved by 7.5% SDS-PAGE and the gel was stained with silver (lane 1, load; lane 2, flow-through; and lanes 3–9, eluates). The five subunits of 13S condensin (XCAP-C, -D2, -E, -G, and -H) coeluted in fractions 4 and 5. A pool of the two fractions was used for routine assays. (B) One-dimensional supercoiling assay. A relaxed circular DNA was incubated with an affinity-purified fraction of 13S condensin (lanes 1, 2, 5, 6, 9, and 10) or with buffer alone (lanes 3, 4, 7, 8, 11, and 12) in the presence (lanes 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, and 11) or absence (lanes 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12) of ATP. The reactions contained no topoisomerase I (lanes 1–4), E. coli topoisomerase I (lanes 5–8), or calf thymus topoisomerase I (lanes 9–12). The DNAs were purified, electrophoresed on a 0.7% agarose gel, and visualized by Southern blotting. The positions of relaxed circular DNA (r) and a ladder of supercoiled DNAs (s) are indicated. (C) Antibody blocking. Supercoiling reactions were set up with 13S condensin (lanes 2–8) or with buffer alone (lane 1) in the presence of calf thymus topoisomerase I and ATP. Before adding a relaxed circular DNA, the mixtures were preincubated with control IgG (lane 3, 0.1 μg; lane 4, 1 μg) or anti-XCAP-E peptide antibody (lane 5, 0.1 mg; lanes 6 and 7, 1 μg), and with (lanes 7 and 8) or without (lanes 1–6) the XCAP-E peptide (0.1 μg). Cell 1997 90, 625-634DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80524-3)

Figure 2 The Supercoiling Reaction Products Are Positively Supercoiled A relaxed circular DNA was incubated with an affinity-purified fraction of 13S condensin in the presence of ATP and either E. coli topoisomerase I (A) or calf thymus topoisomerase I (C). For (B) and (D), negatively supercoiled DNA was added as an internal mobility marker to the reaction products of (A) and (C), respectively. Alternatively, the mixture of deproteinized DNAs shown in (D) was further treated with calf thymus topoisomerase I (E) or E. coli topoisomerase I (F). The DNAs were purified, fractionated by two-dimensional agarose gel electrophoresis, and visualized by Southern blotting. The positions of different forms of DNA are indicated as follows: positively supercoiled (1), relaxed circular (2), negatively supercoiled (3), and nicked circular (4), and linearized (5) DNAs. Cell 1997 90, 625-634DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80524-3)

Figure 3 Requirement for ATP Hydrolysis in the Supercoiling Reaction (A) Effects of nucleotide analogs on supercoiling. A relaxed circular DNA was incubated with an affinity-purified fraction of 13S condensin (lanes 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12) or with buffer alone (lanes 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, and 11) in the presence of no topoisomerase I (upper panel), E. coli topoisomerase I (middle panel), or calf thymus topoisomerase I (bottom panel). The reactions were supplemented with no nucleotide (lanes 1 and 2), 4 mM ATP (lanes 3 and 4), 4 mM ATPγS (lanes 5 and 6), 4 mM ADP (lanes 7 and 8), 4 mM GTP (lanes 9 and 10), or 4 mM AMP-PNP (lanes 11 and 12). DNA was purified, electrophoresed in a 0.7% agarose gel, and visualized by Southern blotting. The positions of relaxed circular DNA (r) and a ladder of supercoiled DNAs (s) are indicated. (B) ATPase assay. An affinity-purified fraction of 13S condensin (columns 3–5) or buffer alone (columns 1 and 2) was assayed for ATPase activity without DNA (columns 1 and 3), with double-stranded relaxed circular DNA (columns 2 and 4), or with single-stranded DNA (column 5). ATP and hydrolyzed ADP were separated by thin layer chromatography and quantitated. The activities are shown as picomoles of ATP hydrolyzed/min/pmol of 13S condensin. Cell 1997 90, 625-634DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80524-3)

Figure 4 Stoichiometric Requirement for 13S Condensin in the Supercoiling Reaction A closed circular DNA was incubated with increasing amounts of an affinity-purified fraction of 13S condensin and a fixed amount of E. coli topoisomerase I in the presence (lanes 3–7) or absence (lanes 10–14) of ATP. As a negative control, buffer alone (lanes 2 and 9) or buffer containing the elution peptide (lanes 1 and 8) was used in the presence (lanes 1 and 2) or absence (lanes 8 and 9) of ATP. DNA was purified and subjected to the standard supercoiling assay (upper panels). The same set of reactions was set up without topoisomerase I and loaded directly onto a 0.7% agarose gel. The 13S condensin-DNA complexes were visualized by Southern blotting (lower panels). The positions of the free substrates (arrow) and the protein–DNA complexes (asterisk) are indicated. The molar ratios of 13S condensin-to-DNA present in the reaction mixtures were ∼3.8:1 (lanes 3 and 10), ∼7.5:1 (lanes 4 and 11), ∼15:1 (lanes 5 and 12), ∼30:1 (lanes 6 and 13), or ∼60:1 (lanes 7 and 14). The population of DNA that was not subject to supercoiling in high dosage of 13S condensin (upper panel, lane 7) represents the nicked circular form (see Figure 2A, position 4). Cell 1997 90, 625-634DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80524-3)

Figure 5 DNA-Binding Properties of 13S Condensin (A) Cruciform and linear duplex probes used for the DNA-binding experiments. Duplex (1) and duplex (2) have sequences identical to the north/west (N/W) and the south/east (S/E) arms, respectively, of the cruciform DNA. (B) Cruciform-binding (protein titration). Labeled cruciform DNA was incubated with increasing concentrations of affinity-purified 13S condensin (lanes 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7) or buffer alone with (lane 1) or without (lane 2) the elution peptide. DNA binding was analyzed by an electrophoretic mobility shift assay followed by autoradiography. The protein–DNA complexes are indicated by asterisks and the free probes are indicated by arrows. The molar ratios of protein-to-DNA present in the reaction mixtures were ∼3.8:1 (lane 3), ∼7.5:1 (lane 4), ∼15:1 (lane 5), ∼30:1 (lane 6), or ∼60:1 (lane 7). (C) Cruciform binding (competition). The DNA-binding reactions were performed at a fixed concentration of protein-to-labeled DNA (∼60:1; lanes 2–8). Increasing concentrations of unlabeled duplex DNA (lanes 3, 4, and 5) or cruciform DNA (lanes 6, 7, and 8) were added as competitors into the binding reactions. The molar ratios of labeled-to-unlabeled DNA were 1:0 (lane 2), 1:5 (lanes 3 and 6), 1:50 (lanes 4 and 7), or 1:500 (lanes 5 and 8). Neither protein nor competitor DNA was added into lane 1. (D) DNA length dependence (fixed concentration). A fixed concentration of linear DNA probes (1 fmol/5 μl reaction) of three different lengths (600 bp, open circle; 300 bp, circle; and 100 bp, open square) was incubated with increasing concentrations of affinity-purified 13S condensin (0–100 fmol/5 μl reaction). DNA binding was analyzed using an electrophoretic mobility shift assay and quantitated. The ratio (%) of bound/input DNA is shown. (E) DNA length dependence (fixed weight). A fixed weight (200 pg/5 μl reaction) of linear DNA probes was used in the same DNA binding-assay as shown in (D). (F) DNA length dependence (competition). A fixed weight (70 pg/5 μl reaction) of 100 bp (upper left panel) or 600 bp (lower left panel) labeled DNA probe was incubated with 13S condensin (200 fmol/5 μl reaction for the 100 bp probe and 100 fmol/5 μl reaction for the 600 bp probe). Increasing concentrations of unlabeled 100 bp DNA (lanes 3, 4, 5, and 6) or 600 bp DNA (lanes 7, 8, 9, and 10) were added as competitors into the binding reactions. The ratios (w/w) of labeled-to-unlabeled DNA were 1:0 (lane 2), 1:1 (lanes 3 and 7), 1:6 (lanes 4 and 8), 1:36 (lanes 5 and 9), or 1:216 (lanes 6 and 10). Neither protein nor competitor DNA was added into lane 1. The binding efficiencies were quantitated and are shown as ratio (%) of bound/input DNA (upper right panel, 100 bp probe; lower right panel, 600 bp probe; circle, competition with 100 bp; open circle, competition with 600 bp). Cell 1997 90, 625-634DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80524-3)

Figure 6 Cofractionation of 13S Condensin and the Biochemical Activities (A) Heparin-Sepharose chromatography. An affinity-purified fraction of 13S condensin was fractionated further on a heparin-Sepharose column. Fractions were resolved by 7.5% SDS-PAGE and stained with silver (a) or analyzed by immunoblotting with antibodies against condensin subunits (b). The same fractions were assayed for ATPase activity in the presence (bar) or absence (open bar) of double-stranded DNA (c), for supercoiling activity in the presence of E. coli topoisomerase I (d), for supercoiling activity in the presence of calf thymus topoisomerase I (e), or for cruciform-binding activity (f). For the ATPase assays, percent ATP hydrolysis to ADP is shown. The fractions were load (lane 1), flow-through (lane 2), 0.15 M KCl-eluate (lane 3), 0.4 M KCl-eluate (lane 4), 0.6 M KCl-eluate (lane 5), 0.8 M KCl-eluate (lane 6), and no protein (lane 0). (B) Sucrose gradient sedimentation. An affinity-purified fraction of 13S condensin was fractionated in a 5%–20% sucrose gradient. Fractions were resolved by 7.5% SDS-PAGE followed by silver stain (a) or assayed for ATPase activity in the presence (bar) or absence (open bar) of double-stranded DNA (b). Lanes 1–15, sucrose gradient fractions; lane 16, affinity-purified fraction; lane 17, affinity-purified fraction after concentration with a carrier protein BSA (i.e., before loading onto the gradient). Cell 1997 90, 625-634DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80524-3)

Figure 7 Positive Supercoiling of DNA Induced by 13S condensin. (A) The supercoiling assay. See the text. (B) A superhelical tension model for mitotic chromosome condensation. See the text. Cell 1997 90, 625-634DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80524-3)