Volume 86, Issue 6, Pages (June 2004)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Structural Origin of Fidelity in DNA directed DNA polymerases BIOC 568 Sept. 2, 2009.
Advertisements

Volume 92, Issue 12, Pages (June 2007)
Molecular Analysis of the Interaction between Staphylococcal Virulence Factor Sbi-IV and Complement C3d  Ronald D. Gorham, Wilson Rodriguez, Dimitrios.
Volume 109, Issue 7, Pages (October 2015)
Membrane-Induced Structural Rearrangement and Identification of a Novel Membrane Anchor in Talin F2F3  Mark J. Arcario, Emad Tajkhorshid  Biophysical.
Volume 84, Issue 6, Pages (June 2003)
The Mechanism of Na+/K+ Selectivity in Mammalian Voltage-Gated Sodium Channels Based on Molecular Dynamics Simulation  Mengdie Xia, Huihui Liu, Yang Li,
C60 Binds to and Deforms Nucleotides
Shaogui Wu, Laicai Li, Quan Li  Biophysical Journal 
Olivier Fisette, Stéphane Gagné, Patrick Lagüe  Biophysical Journal 
Β-Hairpin Folding Mechanism of a Nine-Residue Peptide Revealed from Molecular Dynamics Simulations in Explicit Water  Xiongwu Wu, Bernard R. Brooks  Biophysical.
Structures of Mismatch Replication Errors Observed in a DNA Polymerase
Volume 92, Issue 11, Pages (June 2007)
Structure of the Replicating Complex of a Pol α Family DNA Polymerase
The Closing Mechanism of DNA Polymerase I at Atomic Resolution
Volume 89, Issue 2, Pages (August 2005)
Po-Chao Wen, Emad Tajkhorshid  Biophysical Journal 
The Mechanism of the Translocation Step in DNA Replication by DNA Polymerase I: A Computer Simulation Analysis  Andrei A. Golosov, Joshua J. Warren, Lorena.
Volume 13, Issue 4, Pages (February 2004)
Large-Scale Conformational Dynamics of the HIV-1 Integrase Core Domain and Its Catalytic Loop Mutants  Matthew C. Lee, Jinxia Deng, James M. Briggs, Yong.
Liqun Zhang, Susmita Borthakur, Matthias Buck  Biophysical Journal 
Monika Sharma, Alexander V. Predeus, Nicholas Kovacs, Michael Feig 
Michel A. Cuendet, Olivier Michielin  Biophysical Journal 
Catalytic Center Assembly of HPPK as Revealed by the Crystal Structure of a Ternary Complex at 1.25 Å Resolution  Jaroslaw Blaszczyk, Genbin Shi, Honggao.
Mechanism of the αβ Conformational Change in F1-ATPase after ATP Hydrolysis: Free- Energy Simulations  Yuko Ito, Mitsunori Ikeguchi  Biophysical Journal 
Ryan C. Wilson, Janice D. Pata  Molecular Cell 
Molecular Recognition of CXCR4 by a Dual Tropic HIV-1 gp120 V3 Loop
Volume 16, Issue 10, Pages (October 2008)
Crystal Structure of a Y-Family DNA Polymerase in Action
Structural Basis for Substrate Selection by T7 RNA Polymerase
Crystal Structure of a DinB Lesion Bypass DNA Polymerase Catalytic Fragment Reveals a Classic Polymerase Catalytic Domain  Bo-Lu Zhou, Janice D. Pata,
Structural Basis for a New Templated Activity by Terminal Deoxynucleotidyl Transferase: Implications for V(D)J Recombination  Jérôme Loc'h, Sandrine Rosario,
Molecular Dynamics of a Protein Surface: Ion-Residues Interactions
“DFG-Flip” in the Insulin Receptor Kinase Is Facilitated by a Helical Intermediate State of the Activation Loop  Harish Vashisth, Luca Maragliano, Cameron F.
DNA Lesion Bypass Polymerases Open Up
Volume 96, Issue 7, Pages (April 2009)
Volume 108, Issue 7, Pages (April 2015)
Nucleotide Effects on the Structure and Dynamics of Actin
Ryan C. Wilson, Meghan A. Jackson, Janice D. Pata  Structure 
Loredana Vaccaro, Kathryn A. Scott, Mark S.P. Sansom 
Volume 89, Issue 4, Pages (October 2005)
Till Siebenmorgen, Martin Zacharias  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 30, Issue 3, Pages (May 2008)
Karunesh Arora, Tamar Schlick  Biophysical Journal 
Sundeep S. Deol, Peter J. Bond, Carmen Domene, Mark S.P. Sansom 
Dissecting DNA-Histone Interactions in the Nucleosome by Molecular Dynamics Simulations of DNA Unwrapping  Ramona Ettig, Nick Kepper, Rene Stehr, Gero.
The basis for K-Ras4B binding specificity to protein farnesyl-transferase revealed by 2 Å resolution ternary complex structures  Stephen B Long, Patrick.
Activation of the Edema Factor of Bacillus anthracis by Calmodulin: Evidence of an Interplay between the EF-Calmodulin Interaction and Calcium Binding 
Volume 88, Issue 4, Pages (April 2005)
Replica Exchange Molecular Dynamics Simulations Provide Insight into Substrate Recognition by Small Heat Shock Proteins  Sunita Patel, Elizabeth Vierling,
Protein Grabs a Ligand by Extending Anchor Residues: Molecular Simulation for Ca2+ Binding to Calmodulin Loop  Chigusa Kobayashi, Shoji Takada  Biophysical.
Velocity-Dependent Mechanical Unfolding of Bacteriorhodopsin Is Governed by a Dynamic Interaction Network  Christian Kappel, Helmut Grubmüller  Biophysical.
Hisashi Ishida, Steven Hayward  Biophysical Journal 
An open and closed case for all polymerases
Volume 114, Issue 1, Pages (January 2018)
Volume 13, Issue 10, Pages (October 2005)
Michel A. Cuendet, Olivier Michielin  Biophysical Journal 
DNA Synthesis across an Abasic Lesion by Human DNA Polymerase ι
Karina Kubiak, Wieslaw Nowak  Biophysical Journal 
Conformational Transitions in Protein-Protein Association: Binding of Fasciculin-2 to Acetylcholinesterase  Jennifer M. Bui, Zoran Radic, Palmer Taylor,
Volume 87, Issue 3, Pages (September 2004)
Volume 99, Issue 3, Pages (August 2010)
OmpT: Molecular Dynamics Simulations of an Outer Membrane Enzyme
Volume 98, Issue 10, Pages (May 2010)
Mechanism of Interaction between the General Anesthetic Halothane and a Model Ion Channel Protein, III: Molecular Dynamics Simulation Incorporating a.
A Critical Residue Selectively Recruits Nucleotides for T7 RNA Polymerase Transcription Fidelity Control  Baogen Duan, Shaogui Wu, Lin-Tai Da, Jin Yu 
Structural Insights into the Origins of DNA Polymerase Fidelity
Volume 127, Issue 7, Pages (December 2006)
The Structure of T. aquaticus DNA Polymerase III Is Distinct from Eukaryotic Replicative DNA Polymerases  Scott Bailey, Richard A. Wing, Thomas A. Steitz 
The NorM MATE Transporter from N
Presentation transcript:

Volume 86, Issue 6, Pages 3392-3408 (June 2004) Highly Organized but Pliant Active Site of DNA Polymerase β: Compensatory Mechanisms in Mutant Enzymes Revealed by Dynamics Simulations and Energy Analyses  Linjing Yang, William A. Beard, Samuel H. Wilson, Suse Broyde, Tamar Schlick  Biophysical Journal  Volume 86, Issue 6, Pages 3392-3408 (June 2004) DOI: 10.1529/biophysj.103.036012 Copyright © 2004 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 General pathway for nucleotide incorporation by DNA polymerases and corresponding crystallographic closed (A) and open (B) conformations of pol β/DNA complex as well as key protein residues in the active site in both the closed (C) and open structures (D). In the general pathway, the DNA polymerase binds primer/template DNA to produce a binary DNA polymerase complex, which subsequently binds a complementary dNTP to form a ternary substrate complex (step 1); the enzyme undergoes a subdomain motion forming a closed, catalytically competent state (step 2); after the chemical reaction of dNTP incorporation onto the DNA primer strand (step 3), the polymerase/product complex undergoes a second subdomain motion to result in an open state (step 4). The release of pyrophosphate (PPi) and DNA translocation (step 5) follow, after which the next reaction cycle can begin. Conformational comparisons for protein residues Asp190, Asp192, Phe272, Arg258, and Tyr296 in both crystallographic closed and open states of pol β are shown in (E). The coordinations of the nucleotide-binding Mg2+ (A) and the catalytic Mg2+ (B) are presented in (F). Biophysical Journal 2004 86, 3392-3408DOI: (10.1529/biophysj.103.036012) Copyright © 2004 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Comparison of α-helix N between simulated mutant systems and the crystallographic closed (red) and open (green) structures from two perspectives. All structures are superimposed according to the Cα atoms of the catalytic palm subdomain. The colored ribbons—orange, cyan, pink, gray, and blue—represent, respectively, the simulated mutants R283A, Y271A, D276V, R258K, and R258A. The nascent DNA basepair (P11–T6) in the crystallographic open structure is also presented to indicate the DNA position in the pol β/DNA complex. Biophysical Journal 2004 86, 3392-3408DOI: (10.1529/biophysj.103.036012) Copyright © 2004 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Time evolution of the RMS deviation of the α-helix N Cα atoms in all mutant trajectories relative to those in the crystallographic closed (red) and open (green) structures. All systems are superimposed by the palm Cα atoms. Biophysical Journal 2004 86, 3392-3408DOI: (10.1529/biophysj.103.036012) Copyright © 2004 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Conformational comparison for key protein residues in the active site in the crystallographic closed structure (red), crystallographic open nick structure (green), and in the simulated mutants R283A (orange), Y271A (cyan), D276V (pink), R258K (gray), and R258A (blue). Biophysical Journal 2004 86, 3392-3408DOI: (10.1529/biophysj.103.036012) Copyright © 2004 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Time evolution of the two dihedral angles associated with the Phe272 ring flip motion in all mutant simulations over 8.1ns and a wild-type simulation over 6ns. The two dihedral angles are defined by the following atom quadruplets: C–Cα–Cβ–Cγ for χ1 (red) and Cα–Cβ–Cγ–Cδ for χ2 (blue). Average values for the two dihedral angles during the characteristic ranges are also presented for all trajectories. Biophysical Journal 2004 86, 3392-3408DOI: (10.1529/biophysj.103.036012) Copyright © 2004 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Time evolution of a dihedral angle in residue Tyr296 indicating the ring flip in the R258A simulation. This dihedral angle χ1 is defined by atoms C–Cα–Cβ–Cγ in Tyr296. Average values for χ1 in two characteristic ranges are also given. Biophysical Journal 2004 86, 3392-3408DOI: (10.1529/biophysj.103.036012) Copyright © 2004 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Time evolution of some important hydrogen bonds and van der Waals contacts between protein and DNA nascent basepair for dynamics simulations of R283A (orange), Y271A (cyan), D276V (pink), R258K (gray), and R258A (blue) over 8.1ns, and of wild-type (black) over 6ns. The values in parentheses indicate the distance (in Å) between two heavy atoms in each pair of corresponding interactions in the closed (red) and open (green) states of the crystallographic pol β/DNA complexes; and the hyphen (–) indicates not applicable. Biophysical Journal 2004 86, 3392-3408DOI: (10.1529/biophysj.103.036012) Copyright © 2004 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 8 (A) The sodium counterion probability density of >6% in the active site for mutant and wild-type enzyme simulations. The densities are accumulated on a 1Å cubic lattice over 500 snapshots for the mutants and 200 snapshots for the wild-type, and sampled at a frequency of 3ps during 6.6–8.1ns for each mutant trajectory and during 4.4–5.0ns for the wild-type trajectory. (B) Typical snapshots for mutant and wild-type systems to show sodium ion coordination with key protein residues Asp190, Asp192, Asp256, and several dynamic water molecules in the active site. Biophysical Journal 2004 86, 3392-3408DOI: (10.1529/biophysj.103.036012) Copyright © 2004 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 9 Local electrostatic potential around the incoming dCTP (green) and the complementary template base dG (yellow) in closed, ternary complexes of the wild-type and five mutants R283A, Y271A, D276V, R258K, and R258A. For clarity, the other DNA primer/template residues are not shown. The positions of 40, 258, 271, 279, 280, and 283 in each potential map are indicated. Biophysical Journal 2004 86, 3392-3408DOI: (10.1529/biophysj.103.036012) Copyright © 2004 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 10 Comparison of interaction energies between the incoming dCTP and protein residues selected for mutation in the ternary, closed wild-type pol β/DNA/dCTP complex and the corresponding mutants of R283A, Y271A, D276V, R258A, and R258K. In each pair of energy bars, the left bar represents energy in wild-type (WT) and the right bar represents energy in mutant. Biophysical Journal 2004 86, 3392-3408DOI: (10.1529/biophysj.103.036012) Copyright © 2004 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions