Volume 23, Issue 6, Pages (June 2015)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Conformational Dynamics inside Amino-Terminal Disease Hotspot of Ryanodine Receptor Xiaowei Zhong, Ying Liu, Li Zhu, Xing Meng, Ruiwu Wang, Filip Van Petegem,
Advertisements

Toward a Structure Determination Method for Biomineral-Associated Protein Using Combined Solid- State NMR and Computational Structure Prediction David.
Structure of the Hepatitis C Virus IRES Bound to the Human 80S Ribosome: Remodeling of the HCV IRES Daniel Boehringer, Rolf Thermann, Antje Ostareck-Lederer,
Recognizing Protein-Ligand Binding Sites by Global Structural Alignment and Local Geometry Refinement Ambrish Roy, Yang Zhang Structure Volume 20, Issue.
Biomechanics and biorheology of red blood cells in sickle cell anemia
Heads Up S-Layer Display: The Power of Many
Antibody-Based Affinity Cryoelectron Microscopy at 2.6-Å Resolution
Author gender in The Lancet journals
Using Enhanced Sampling and Structural Restraints to Refine Atomic Structures into Low-Resolution Electron Microscopy Maps  Harish Vashisth, Georgios.
Volume 16, Issue 6, Pages (June 2008)
Heads Up S-Layer Display: The Power of Many
An Approach for De Novo Structure Determination of Dynamic Molecular Assemblies by Electron Cryomicroscopy  Bjoern Sander, Monika M. Golas, Reinhard Lührmann,
Victoria F. Ratcliffe, David Reby  Current Biology 
Volume 21, Issue 9, Pages (September 2013)
A Stochastic Hill Climbing Approach for Simultaneous 2D Alignment and Clustering of Cryogenic Electron Microscopy Images  Cyril F. Reboul, Frederic Bonnet,
Volume 25, Issue 4, Pages e3 (April 2017)
Volume 22, Issue 3, Pages (March 2014)
What can electron microscopy tell us about chaperoned protein folding?
Hahnbeom Park, Frank DiMaio, David Baker  Structure 
Volume 16, Issue 5, Pages (May 2008)
X-ray micro computed-tomography
Amyloid Structures from Alzheimer’s Disease Patients
Street View of the Cognitive Map
Microtubule dynamic instability
PhnK: Another Piece of the Carbon-Phosphorus Lyase Puzzle
Volume 16, Issue 6, Pages (June 2008)
Ab Initio Structure Determination from Electron Microscopic Images of Single Molecules Coexisting in Different Functional States  Dominika Elmlund, Ralph.
Volume 24, Issue 12, Pages (December 2016)
Pawel A. Penczek, Marek Kimmel, Christian M.T. Spahn  Structure 
Volume 18, Issue 6, Pages (June 2005)
Volume 21, Issue 10, Pages (October 2013)
Frank Alber, Michael F. Kim, Andrej Sali  Structure 
Zachary Frazier, Min Xu, Frank Alber  Structure 
Volume 18, Issue 1, Pages (January 2010)
Volume 22, Issue 4, Pages (April 2014)
Volume 22, Issue 6, Pages (June 2014)
The Ribosome Emerges from a Black Box
Structure of the Deactive State of Mammalian Respiratory Complex I
Keeping an Eye on Membrane Transport by TR-WAXS
Architecture of Human Translation Initiation Factor 3
Volume 22, Issue 8, Pages (August 2014)
Volume 20, Issue 10, Pages (October 2012)
Asymmetric EM Reveals New Twists in Phage ϕ29 Biology
Volume 25, Issue 9, Pages e2 (September 2017)
Volume 23, Issue 12, Pages (December 2015)
Dynamic Recognition of the mRNA Cap by Saccharomyces cerevisiae eIF4E
Volume 16, Issue 3, Pages (March 2008)
Ramzi Alsallaq, Huan-Xiang Zhou  Structure 
Low-technology approaches
Street View of the Cognitive Map
Caught on Camera: Intermediates of Ribosome Recycling
Volume 23, Issue 4, Pages (April 2015)
Wei Zhang, Marek Kimmel, Christian M.T. Spahn, Pawel A. Penczek 
Amyloid Structures from Alzheimer’s Disease Patients
Molding Atomic Structures into Intermediate- Resolution Cryo-EM Density Maps of Ribosomal Complexes Using Real-Space Refinement  Haixiao Gao, Joachim.
Recognition of the Regulatory Nascent Chain TnaC by the Ribosome
Volume 16, Issue 8, Pages (August 2016)
Volume 25, Issue 7, Pages e4 (July 2017)
Volume 15, Issue 10, Pages (October 2007)
Automated Prediction of Protein Association Rate Constants
Volume 121, Issue 5, Pages (June 2005)
Volume 23, Issue 9, Pages (September 2015)
Volume 15, Issue 12, Pages (December 2007)
Volume 26, Issue 3, Pages e3 (March 2018)
Volume 21, Issue 10, Pages (October 2013)
Volume 21, Issue 9, Pages (September 2014)
Volume 32, Issue 2, Pages (October 2008)
Volume 20, Issue 11, Pages (November 2012)
Validation of Cryo-EM Structure of IP3R1 Channel
Volume 15, Issue 10, Pages (October 2007)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 23, Issue 6, Pages 1097-1105 (June 2015) Structural Dynamics of Ribosome Subunit Association Studied by Mixing-Spraying Time-Resolved Cryogenic Electron Microscopy  Bo Chen, Sandip Kaledhonkar, Ming Sun, Bingxin Shen, Zonghuan Lu, David Barnard, Toh-Ming Lu, Ruben L. Gonzalez, Joachim Frank  Structure  Volume 23, Issue 6, Pages 1097-1105 (June 2015) DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2015.04.007 Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Setup of the Time-Resolved Cryo-EM Apparatus (A) Schematic view of the mixing-spraying device. The EM grid moves perpendicular to the paper. (B) Photograph of the spray of droplets illuminated by a green laser at the point just before the grid passes through the spray mist in the direction perpendicular to the paper. (C) Photograph of the mixing-spraying chip situated inside the environmental chamber. See also Figure S3. Structure 2015 23, 1097-1105DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2015.04.007) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 The Proportions of 70S Ribosomes from Various Datasets and a Comparison between the Observed Proportions and the Kinetic Simulations of the Subunit Association Reaction (A) Comparison between the experimentally observed proportions of 70S ribosomes (cross, 70S exp) and the kinetic simulations of the subunit association reaction (curves). The numbers next to the individual curves indicate the values of the association rate constants (ka, μM−1 s−1) used in each of the kinetic simulations. ka was set to 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 μM−1 s−1 to estimate the value that is most compatible with the experimental results and ka was set to 13.9 μM−1 s−1 based on previous light-scattering assays (Hennelly et al., 2005). (B) Proportions of 70S ribosomes and 50S subunits in the 60-ms, 140-ms, and Ctrl 15-min datasets. The errors in the computational classification were estimated from four independent restarts of the RELION 3D classification. See also Figures S1 and S2. Structure 2015 23, 1097-1105DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2015.04.007) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Cryo-EM Maps of 70S in Three Conformations and 50S from the Experiments (A) Non-rotated 70S ribosome (NR). (B) Non-rotated 70S ribosome with 30S head swivel (NRS). (C) Rotated 70S ribosome (RT). (D) 50S ribosome subunit. See also Figure S4. Structure 2015 23, 1097-1105DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2015.04.007) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Intersubunit Bridges in the 70S Ribosomes (A) Segmentation of the 70S NR map showing the bridges that are present in 70S NR map. (B) Segmentation of the 70S RT map showing the bridges that are present in 70S RT map. See also Figure S5 and Table 1. Structure 2015 23, 1097-1105DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2015.04.007) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Proportions of 70S Ribosomes in Different Conformations from the Various Datasets Three conformations of 70S ribosomes were observed: rotated (RT), non-rotated with 30S head swivel (NRS), and non-rotated (NR). The errors in the computational classification were estimated from four independent restarts of the RELION 3D classification. See also Table S2. Structure 2015 23, 1097-1105DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2015.04.007) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions