Wataru NAKAZAWA (Osaka University, Japan)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 The Social Survey ICBS Nurit Dobrin December 2010.
Advertisements

AME Education Sector Profile
Measuring Up 2006: The Nation and Pennsylvania Pennsylvania Education Policy Forum Capital Breakfast Series November 15, 2006.
Agenda A world class university Why internationalization? The Global 30 Projects in Japan Nagoya University’s E-elements What’s next ?
1 Predicting Success and Risk: Multi-spell Analyses of Student Graduation, Departure and Return Roy Mathew Director Center for Institutional Evaluation.
Ch. 9. Investments in Human Capital: Education and Training What are the costs and benefits of obtaining a college degree? What factors affect the number.
The interprefectural migration of foreign residents of Japan: salient features and multivariate explanation Yoshitaka Ishikawa (Kyoto University,
The Consequences of Educational Expansion in Reforming China Maocan Guo, Sociology, Harvard Northshore Society Meeting, Oct. 1.
Bulgarian system of education
McTaggart, Findlay, Parkin: Microeconomics © 2007 Pearson Education Australia Chapter 18: Economic Inequality and Redistribution.
Strengths and Weakness of Public and Private Universities - A View from Japan - Kintomo Takakura, M.D., Ph.D. President Tokyo Women ’ s Medical University.
A Longitudinal Analysis of the College Transfer Pathway at McMaster Karen Menard Ying Liu Jin Zhang Marzena Kielar Office of Institutional Research and.
1. Purpose Examine how maternal employment at the child’s age of three affects his/her educational outcome at age of eighteen, using Korean panel data.
Belgium / Flanders Education at a Glance. In 2012 around 35% of the adult population in B held a tertiary qualification Percentage of tertiary-educated.
Haripriya Gundimeda Associate Professor Department of Humanities and Social Sciences Indian Institute of Technology Bombay Human capital estimates for.
Following lives from birth and through the adult years Examining the truth behind the myth of the 'the Monstrous Army on the March' Dylan.
Presentation Outline  Introductions  Why are “price sensitivity” and “value” important?  Strategic pricing & value enhancement framework  From research.
The Educational Systems in PolandPoland. The School System in Poland.
Native and immigrant fertility patterns in Greece: a comparative study based on aggregated census statistics and IPUMS micro-data Cleon Tsimbos 1, Georgia.
Ch. 9. Investments in Human Capital: Education and Training What are the costs and benefits of obtaining a college degree? What factors affect the number.
Education and Equality of Opportunity
Validating ESeC: Class of Origin and Educational Inequalities in Contemporary Italy Bled, July 2006 Antonio Schizzerotto, Roberta Barone and Laura.
For-profit Mid-career Programs as a Second Chance for Disadvantaged Social Groups Hanna Ayalon and Gila Menahem Tel Aviv University, Israel Prepared for.
Southern Regional Education Board Lessons from the 50 th Anniversary SREB Fact Book on Higher Education SREB Annual Board Meeting Amelia Island, Florida.
The Impact of the WSA Program on Reducing High School Dropout Nikolas Pharris-Ciurej UW-BHS Project Workshop October 19, 2007.
1 United States Education at a Glance 2015 Andreas Schleicher Director for Education and Skills Release date: 24 November 2015.
Ch. 9. Investments in Human Capital: Education and Training What are the costs and benefits of obtaining a college degree? What factors affect the number.
Ch. 9. Investments in Human Capital: Education and Training What are the costs and benefits of obtaining a college degree? What factors affect the number.
Lecture 8 Education For All The Age of Sustainable Development.
Printed by Natural History of Sun Protection Behaviors in a Cohort of Children in Colorado Nancy L. Asdigian PhD,* Lori A. Crane.
Institutional Linkage between Schools and the Labor Market in Japan: Safety Net or Root of Inequality Wataru Nakazawa Osaka University International Sociological.
The Korean Education, Training and Skills Sector
Transition from higher education to work Gender differences in employment outcomes of university graduates in Greece Dr. Maria Karamessini Panteion University.
Japan’s Strategies for Student Mobility towards 2020 Eiji Watanabe Counsellor for Education and Sports The Embassy of Japan in the UK.
Theoretical Perspectives on Aging Chapter 2 Part 2 HPR 452.
The American Dream Graduation rates What is the percentage of first generation students who will not earn an undergraduate degree within six years.
#allchildrenmatter Grammar Schools Evidence Pack.
Median Earnings and Tax Payments of Full-Time Year-Round Workers Ages 25 and Older, by Education Level, 2011 FIGURE 1.1 Page 11 SOURCES: U.S. Census Bureau,
The education indicators concerning completion
International Mobility and Tensions
Wataru Nakazawa Osaka University, JAPAN
The Role of Public University in Japan Reexamined: Have Public Universities Expanded Disadvantaged People’s Opportunity for University Education? ISA RC28.
Education and Equality of Opportunity
Use of Academic Resources Among Different Socioeconomic Classes
Ch36: Demographic Trends
Factors affecting social work service use among hospice patients:
Objectives How reliable are the student success measures that are reported to the Board of Trustees? How accurate is the underlying student record data.
Rabia Khalaila, RN, MPH, PHD Director, Department of Nursing
Education Level of Target Group (18-35 years old)
Persistent Inequality in Educational Attainment in Japan: Between Decreasing Youth Population and Increasing Private Cost for Education Wataru Nakazawa,
Toward World-Class Education and Research
Intro to Research Methods
University of Michigan
Patterns and trends in adult obesity
Is Arkansas’s progress in degree completion at risk?
Promoting Gender Equality and Empowerment of Women
Trends in College Admissions (From the National Association for College Admission Counseling and the National Center for Public Policy and Higher Education)
Eliminating Reproductive Risk Factors and Reaping Female Education and Work Benefits: A Constructed Cohort Analysis of 50 Developing Countries Qingfeng.
The Future of Higher Education in Texas
Socioeconomic Differences in Secondary and Postsecondary Access and Completion Susan A. Dumais, Lehman College and The Graduate.
Motivation THIS TALK: 1. Documents a stagnation in the schooling attainment at age 25 of Spanish cohorts born after Can we explain the poorer.
Swedish Institute for Social Research (SOFI)
Child’s Play IBISWorld estimates 2017 daycare industry revenues were $48.9 billion, and will increase 1.9% annually to reach $52.5 billion by Private.
Inequality Starts Before Kindergarten
Parental background and young adults’ homeownership,
Investigating Inequalities in Educational Attainment
Centre for Market and Public Organisation
The Benefits of Education
A college education significantly boosts a student’s annual and lifetime earnings.
TRENDS IN EDUCATION Guntars Catlaks Senior research co-ordinator
Presentation transcript:

Wataru NAKAZAWA (Osaka University, Japan) wnakazawa@hus.osaka-u.ac.jp Decreasing Population, Educational Expansion, and Inequality of Opportunity : Japan as a Low-Fertility Society 2015 Summer Meeting of RC28 at the University of Pennsylvania Wataru NAKAZAWA (Osaka University, Japan) wnakazawa@hus.osaka-u.ac.jp

Changes of population at age 18 and advancement rate to universities Source: Report on School Basic Survey, Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology

Changes in the Advancement Rate and the Placement rate Source: Report on School Basic Survey, Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology

Higher Education Expansion Population of age 18 has decreased since the 1990s. In contrast, the advancement rate to tertiary education increased. The choice of tertiary educational institutions: university, junior college, and specialized training colleges. University entrants increased because of reorganization of junior colleges. It has been difficult for high school graduates to obtain regular jobs due to the bad economic conditions. People believe that it become easier to pass the entrance examination for universities, and the unequal opportunity for university access has decreased.

Annual College Tuition Fees and the Proportion of Fees to Average Income Source: Retail Prices of Major Items for Ku-area in Tokyo (1950-2010), Statistics Bureau, and Survey on Wage of Private Enterprise, National Tax Agency The annual tuition fees for national universities are about 530,000 JPY (in US dollars, $4,300) in 2010. The average tuition fees for colleges of social sciences and humanities exceed 700,000 JPY (in US dollars, $5,700) in 2010. The proportions of college tuition fees to average income of general employees have increased since the latter half of 1970s.

Parentocracy? Parents have to save money for their child’s education. Some parents tend to provide their children with distinguished education to ensure their successful futures. Parents’ education strategies may affect their child’s educational attainments(Brown 1990). Early childhood intervention has impacts on the improvement of cognitive/non-cognitive skills (Heckman et al. 2013). Educational attainments are the result of an accumulation of parents’ educational strategies.

The Proportion of University Entrants/Application to Population at Age 18 Source: Report on School Basic Survey, Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology

University Admission High-stakes written test tend to be used among selective (prestigious) universities. Public universities also tend to use the written test. Non-selective universities tend to use the recommendation or the admission office system. If students use this system, they can obtain absolute promises of admittance much earlier than those who take written tests. They do not take written tests.

Qualitative Differences among Universities The recommendation system was introduced among several private universities. Among applicants who apply for selective universities, this recommendation system is rooted as an easy selection system that does not require special preparation for examination (Nakamura 2011). In globalized societies, selective universities tend to place substantial value on academic grades (Alon, 2009; Alon and Tienda, 2007). Qualitative differences among selective and non-selective universities may appear (Lucas 2001).

Hypotheses The inequality of opportunities for university attendance shrank because of relaxing competition for university admission, or remains among the younger cohorts despite the decreasing number of 18-years old. The effects of socioeconomic backgrounds and academic grades on attending selective or public universities are becoming stronger among the younger cohorts.

Data Social Stratification and Social Mobility (SSM)Survey in Japan (2005). N=5,762, Response Rate = 44.1%. Men and Women Aged from 20 to 69. Survey of Education, Social Stratification, and Social Mobility in Japan (ESSM, 2013) N=2,893, Response Rate = 60.3%. Men and Women Aged from 30 to 64. I only utilized the samples with an educational attainment of high school and over who were born after 1949.

Dependent Variables Two dependent variables with four categories. 1. ①high school ②junior college and specialized training college ③non-selective university ④selective university ※Selective universities included Tokyo, Kyoto, Osaka, Hokkaido, Tohoku, Nagoya, Kyushu, Tsukuba, Chiba, Hitotsubashi, Ochanomizu Women’s University, Yokohama National, Kobe, Nara Women’s University, Hiroshima, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo University of Foreign Studies, Osaka University of Foreign Studies, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo Metropolitan University, Keio, Waseda, ICU, Sophia, Meiji, Rikkyo, Chuo, Gakushuin, Hosei, Tokyo University of Science, Doshisha, Ritsumeikan, Kansai, Kwansei Gakuin, and all national medical schools on the basis of social prestige and the degree of difficulty of passing entrance examinations. 2. ①high school ②junior college and specialized training college ③private university ④public university

Independent and Control Variables Socioeconomic backgrounds Father’s education (primary or secondary = 0, tertiary = 1) Father’s occupation (Erikson, Goldthorpe, and Portocarero (1979) class scheme) The number of book owned in the household at age 15 (under 100=0, over 100=1) The standard of living at age 15 (Above average=1, others=0) Academic grades (rough grade ranges among students in their class when they were in their third year of junior high school) 5-stage ordinal scale: 5 implied high (good) and 1 implied low (poor) Birth Cohort ① 1949 and 1963 (the attendance rate of university went up to about 30%); ② 1964 and 1975 (the attendance rate stagnated below 30%); ③1976 and 1985 (the attendance rate went up again) Gender

Methods Multinomial logistic regression models are estimated. Add the interactions between cohort and socioeconomic backgrounds and academic grades, and delete insignificant interaction terms. As a result, only interaction between father’s education or grades and cohorts are included in these models (the process are omitted in this presentation).

Distribution of Dependent Variables High School Junior College Non Selective Univ. Selective Total (N) 1949-63 47.9% 22.5% 24.2% 5.4 % 2324 1964-75 37.3% 31.6% 26.0% 4.7 1814 1976-85 30.1% 30.9% 33.6% 907 Total (%) 41.0% 27.3% 26.5% 5.1 5045 High School Junior College Private Univ. Public Univ. Total (N) 1949-63 47.9% 22.5% 19.8% 9.9 % 2324 1964-75 37.3% 31.6% 19.6% 11.3 1814 1976-85 30.1% 30.9% 26.1% 12.9 907 Total (%) 41.0% 27.3% 20.9% 10.8 5045

Predictive Probabilities based on Multinomial Logit Models (1) based on birth cohorts and father’s education Non-selective Universities Selective Universities

Predictive Probabilities based on Multinomial Logit Models (2) based on birth cohorts and academic grades Non-selective Universities Selective Universities

Predictive Probabilities based on Multinomial Logit Models (3) based on birth cohorts and father’s education Private Universities Public Universities

Predictive Probabilities based on Multinomial Logit Models (4) based on birth cohorts and academic grades Private Universities Public Universities

Conclusion Inequality of opportunities for universities persists, particularly for progressing on to selective universities. Generally, those who had high academic grades tended to progressed to universities among these three cohorts. It becomes difficult to enter selective universities in the younger two cohorts even if they had the highest academic grade. Non-selective and private universities contributed to the expansion of university education. In terms of attending non-selective, private, and public universities, the trend did not change among these three cohorts. Limitation Less reliable indicator of academic grades.

Acknowledgement This research was supported by Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)(numbers 15K04359) from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS). Permissions to use the SSM-Japan data and the ESSM-2103 data are obtained from the Research Committee of the SSM 2015 and the ESSM.