Volume 152, Issue 3, Pages (January 2013)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Harinath Doodhi, Eugene A. Katrukha, Lukas C. Kapitein, Anna Akhmanova 
Advertisements

Homologous Recombination in Real Time: DNA Strand Exchange by RecA
Probing α-310 Transitions in a Voltage-Sensing S4 Helix
Probing α-310 Transitions in a Voltage-Sensing S4 Helix
Kinetics of the Triplex-Duplex Transition in DNA
Volume 15, Issue 3, Pages (April 2016)
Harinath Doodhi, Eugene A. Katrukha, Lukas C. Kapitein, Anna Akhmanova 
Volume 41, Issue 6, Pages (March 2011)
Thuy T.M. Ngo, Qiucen Zhang, Ruobo Zhou, Jaya G. Yodh, Taekjip Ha  Cell 
Phage Mu Transposition Immunity: Protein Pattern Formation along DNA by a Diffusion- Ratchet Mechanism  Yong-Woon Han, Kiyoshi Mizuuchi  Molecular Cell 
Volume 115, Issue 4, Pages (November 2003)
Sebastian Meyer, Raimund Dutzler  Structure 
Volume 151, Issue 4, Pages (November 2012)
Volume 42, Issue 6, Pages (June 2011)
Volume 133, Issue 1, Pages (April 2008)
Volume 58, Issue 1, Pages (April 2015)
Joseph M. Johnson, William J. Betz  Biophysical Journal 
Impulse Control: Temporal Dynamics in Gene Transcription
Ben Scholl, Xiang Gao, Michael Wehr  Neuron 
Volume 69, Issue 4, Pages e9 (February 2018)
Volume 95, Issue 9, Pages (November 2008)
Vincent B. McGinty, Antonio Rangel, William T. Newsome  Neuron 
Volume 24, Issue 4, Pages (November 2006)
Volume 111, Issue 2, Pages (July 2016)
Homologous Recombination in Real Time: DNA Strand Exchange by RecA
Force-Induced Bidirectional Stepping of Cytoplasmic Dynein
John D. Leonard, Geeta J. Narlikar  Molecular Cell 
Kuangyu Yen, Vinesh Vinayachandran, B. Franklin Pugh  Cell 
Volume 131, Issue 4, Pages (November 2007)
Volume 129, Issue 7, Pages (June 2007)
Megan T. Valentine, Steven M. Block  Biophysical Journal 
New Experiences Enhance Coordinated Neural Activity in the Hippocampus
Volume 35, Issue 1, Pages (July 2009)
Jingyi Fei, Pallav Kosuri, Daniel D. MacDougall, Ruben L. Gonzalez 
Sean A. McKinney, Chirlmin Joo, Taekjip Ha  Biophysical Journal 
Direct Observation of Single MuB Polymers
Ahmet Yildiz, Michio Tomishige, Arne Gennerich, Ronald D. Vale  Cell 
Distinct Strategies to Make Nucleosomal DNA Accessible
Volume 24, Issue 8, Pages (August 2016)
Volume 12, Issue 6, Pages (December 2003)
Single-Molecule Analysis Reveals Differential Effect of ssDNA-Binding Proteins on DNA Translocation by XPD Helicase  Masayoshi Honda, Jeehae Park, Robert.
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages (December 2005)
Mechanism of Force Generation of a Viral DNA Packaging Motor
Using Atomic Force Microscopy to Study Nucleosome Remodeling on Individual Nucleosomal Arrays in Situ  H. Wang, R. Bash, J.G. Yodh, G. Hager, S.M. Lindsay,
Volume 37, Issue 6, Pages (March 2010)
H. Wang, R. Bash, S.M. Lindsay, D. Lohr  Biophysical Journal 
POT1-TPP1 Regulates Telomeric Overhang Structural Dynamics
Volume 126, Issue 3, Pages (August 2006)
Timescales of Inference in Visual Adaptation
Volume 142, Issue 4, Pages (August 2010)
Catalysis-Enhancement via Rotary Fluctuation of F1-ATPase
The Normalization Model of Attention
Benjamin Scholl, Daniel E. Wilson, David Fitzpatrick  Neuron 
Volume 82, Issue 3, Pages (May 2014)
DEAD-Box Proteins Unwind Duplexes by Local Strand Separation
Saswata Sankar Sarkar, Jayant B. Udgaonkar, Guruswamy Krishnamoorthy 
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages e4 (January 2018)
Short-Term Memory for Figure-Ground Organization in the Visual Cortex
Multiple Parallel Pathways of Translation Initiation on the CrPV IRES
Saswata Sankar Sarkar, Jayant B. Udgaonkar, Guruswamy Krishnamoorthy 
Transcription Initiation in a Single-Subunit RNA Polymerase Proceeds through DNA Scrunching and Rotation of the N-Terminal Subdomains  Guo-Qing Tang,
Volume 69, Issue 4, Pages e9 (February 2018)
Mechanisms and Functions of ATP-Dependent Chromatin-Remodeling Enzymes
Mechanistic Basis of 5′-3′ Translocation in SF1B Helicases
Volume 138, Issue 6, Pages (September 2009)
Chul-Hwan Lee, Jun Wu, Bing Li  Molecular Cell 
Conformational Activation of Argonaute by Distinct yet Coordinated Actions of the Hsp70 and Hsp90 Chaperone Systems  Kotaro Tsuboyama, Hisashi Tadakuma,
The Conformational Dynamics of the Mitochondrial Hsp70 Chaperone
Volume 95, Issue 9, Pages (November 2008)
Torque Transmission Mechanism via DELSEED Loop of F1-ATPase
Presentation transcript:

Volume 152, Issue 3, Pages 442-452 (January 2013) ISWI Remodelers Slide Nucleosomes with Coordinated Multi-Base-Pair Entry Steps and Single-Base-Pair Exit Steps  Sebastian Deindl, William L. Hwang, Swetansu K. Hota, Timothy R. Blosser, Punit Prasad, Blaine Bartholomew, Xiaowei Zhuang  Cell  Volume 152, Issue 3, Pages 442-452 (January 2013) DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.12.040 Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Cell 2013 152, 442-452DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2012.12.040) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Probing DNA Translocation on the Exit Side of the Nucleosome by Single-Molecule FRET (A) Schematic of FRET detection for DNA translocation on the exit side of the nucleosome. The nucleosomes are labeled with the FRET donor, Cy3 (green star), and acceptor, Cy5 (red star). The histone octamer and DNA are depicted as a yellow cylinder and a blue line, respectively. (B) Representative Cy3 (green) and Cy5 (red) fluorescence and FRET (blue) time traces showing translocation of a single nucleosome after addition of the enzyme and ATP at time zero. See also Table S1 and Figure S1. Cell 2013 152, 442-452DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2012.12.040) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Identical Step Sizes of DNA Translocation on the Exit Side of the Nucleosome Induced by Different ISWI-Family Enzymes (A) Remodeling of nucleosomes with initial exit-linker DNA length of n = 3 bp or n = −3 bp by ISW2. Left: FRET time trace showing ISW2-induced translocation of a single n = 3 bp nucleosome. 6.2 nM ISW2 and 2 μM ATP were added at time zero. Middle: Histogram of the FRET values at translocation pauses constructed from n = 3 bp nucleosomes. Right: FRET histograms of the translocation pauses constructed from n = −3 bp nucleosomes. (B) Remodeling of the n = 3 bp and n = −3 bp nucleosomes by ISW1b. FRET histograms of the pauses for n = 3 bp (left) and n = −3 bp (right) nucleosomes in the presence of 8.8 nM ISW1b and 10–150 μM ATP. (C) Remodeling of the n = 3 bp and n = −3 bp nucleosomes by Isw2p. FRET distribution of the pauses for the n = 3 bp (left) and n = −3 bp (right) nucleosomes in the presence of 69 nM Isw2p and 1 mM ATP. The nucleosome schemes display the footprint of the histone octamer (yellow oval) on the DNA (blue line). Numbers above double-headed arrows shown in the histograms represent mean step sizes. See also Figure S2. Cell 2013 152, 442-452DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2012.12.040) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 The Multi-bp Translocation Steps on the Exit Side of the Nucleosome Are Comprised of 1 bp Elementary Steps (A) FRET time trace of a nucleosome indicating the dwell times of the first two translocation phases (t1 and t2). (B) Histogram of t1 and t2 values constructed from many nucleosomes. Fits to the Γ-distribution AtN−1exp(-kt) (black lines) yield N = 6.5 ± 0.4 and k = 0.52 ± 0.04 s−1 for the t1 phase (left) and N = 3.4 ± 0.4 and k = 0.67 ± 0.11 s−1 for the t2 phase (right). (C) FRET time trace, before (gray) and after (blue) 5-point averaging, of a single n = 3 bp nucleosome in the presence of 6.2 nM ISW2, 2 μM ATP, and 2 mM ATP-γ-S. A HMM fit is shown by the red line. The horizontal orange dotted lines indicate 1 bp intervals (derived from the calibration in Figure S1D). (D) Histograms of FRET plateaus from many nucleosomes determined with the HMM analysis. Numbers above double-headed arrows represent mean step sizes. See also Figure S3. Cell 2013 152, 442-452DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2012.12.040) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Dependence of the Stepping Kinetics on the Concentrations of ATP and ATP-γ-S (A) The pause duration after the first, 7 bp compound step (tp,7) at various ATP-γ-S concentrations and 2 μM ATP. (B) The pause duration between each 1 bp elementary step (tp) at various ATP-γ-S concentrations and 2 μM ATP. All pauses except for the ones after 6, 7, and 8 bp of translocation were pooled to determine tp. As shown in Figure S4, in addition to the 7th pause, the 6th and 8th pauses also appear longer than the remaining ones, likely due to errors in pause identification. The value of tp at 0 μM ATP-γ-S was derived from 1/k value obtained from the Γ-distribution in Figure 3B. (C) Dependence of tp on the ATP concentration at 2 mM ATP-γ-S. At this saturating concentration of ATP-γ-S, all pauses, including the 7th one, had approximately equal durations and were pooled to determine tp. All data are shown as the mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM) (N = 15–100 events). See also Figure S4. Cell 2013 152, 442-452DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2012.12.040) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 DNA Movement on the Exit Side of the Nucleosome Precedes that on the Entry Side (A) Schematic of the nucleosome construct used for measuring DNA movement at the entry side. (B) Donor signal (green), acceptor signal (red), and FRET (blue) time traces showing ISW2-induced remodeling after adding 12 nM ISW2 and 2 μM ATP at time zero. The dashed line indicates the onset of FRET change after an initial wait time, twait. (C) Comparison of twait on the entry (yellow bars) and exit sides (purple bars) of the nucleosome under identical enzyme and ATP concentrations. Data are shown as the mean ± SEM (N = 80–220 events). See also Figure S5. Cell 2013 152, 442-452DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2012.12.040) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Entry-Side DNA Movement Occurs after 7 bp of DNA Translocation toward the Exit Side and Proceeds in 3 bp Steps (A) Schematic of the nucleosome constructs used to monitor DNA movement at the entry side when exit-side translocation is restricted by a 2 nt ssDNA gap. The gap is located m bp away from the SHL2 site (shown as a purple line) such that m bp of DNA can be translocated to the exit side. (B) FRET time traces of single m = 0, 7, and 8 bp nucleosomes (blue, green, and orange lines, respectively) after addition of 12 nM ISW2 and 2 μM ATP at time zero. (C) FRET values before (red bar) and after (blue bars) remodeling by ISW2 as a function of the distance m to the SHL2 site. Because the DNA path on the entry side may involve bending and/or twisting due to the direct interaction with the remodeling enzyme, we do not expect a similar linear dependence of FRET on the linker DNA length as on the exit side where the linker DNA is largely free of enzyme-induced distortion. Data are shown as the mean ± SEM (N = 80–150 nucleosomes). See also Figure S6. Cell 2013 152, 442-452DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2012.12.040) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 A Model for Nucleosome Translocation by ISWI-Family Remodelers DNA, histone octamer, and remodeler are shown in black/gray/red, yellow, and blue/green, respectively. The upper and lower DNA gyres are depicted as solid black and dashed gray lines, respectively. Each base pair of DNA translocated to the exit side is shown by a red dot. A cartoon representation of the remodeler is shown as a semitransparent light blue or light green shape, and the locations of the ATPase and linker-DNA-binding domains as blue and green spheres, respectively. ISWI-induced remodeling starts with the ATPase domain translocating DNA from the SHL2 site toward the exit side, 1 bp at a time. The translocation by the ATPase domain generates strain on the entry-side DNA (depicted by magenta/purple coloring of the DNA), which initially remains immobile. After 7 bp of DNA translocation, the accumulated strain is sufficiently strong to trigger an entry-side action, possibly a conformational change of the enzyme, which pushes a 3 bp equivalent of DNA into the nucleosome. This action partially relaxes the strain and allows three additional base pairs of DNA to be translocated to the exit side. This cycle then repeats to allow processive nucleosome translocation. Cell 2013 152, 442-452DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2012.12.040) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure S1 The FRET Distributions of Exit-Side-Labeled Nucleosomes before and after Remodeling by ISW2 and Dependence of FRET on the Exit-Linker DNA Length, Related to Figure 1 (A) Left: The initial FRET distribution of the n = 3 bp nucleosomes before addition of enzyme. The FRET histogram (blue bars) displays three peaks centered at FRET = 0.87, 0.49, and 0.70 (derived from a Gaussian fit, black line) that result from the three distinct donor-labeling configurations, with (1) a single donor dye on the H2A subunit proximal to the acceptor dye on the DNA, (2) a single donor dye on the H2A subunit distal to the acceptor dye on the DNA, or (3) two donor dyes (one on each H2A subunit), respectively. This assignment was further confirmed by fluorescence time traces, which showed a single donor-photobleaching step for the high and low FRET peaks, and two donor-photobleaching steps for the intermediate FRET peak. Middle: The FRET distributions of the n = 3 bp nucleosomes upon addition of ISW2 alone (red line) or upon addition of both ISW2 and ATP (black shaded bars) superimposed on the initial FRET histogram (blue bars). Right: The FRET distributions of the n = 3 bp nucleosomes after removal of the population with two donor dyes. This nucleosome population was removed by eliminating FRET traces with two donor-photobleaching steps. As expected, the middle peak in the pre-remodeling FRET distributions disappeared. Blue bars: initial FRET distribution; red line: FRET distribution after addition of ISWI2 alone. Black shaded bars: FRET distribution upon addition of both ISW2 and ATP. (B) The FRET distributions of the n = −3 bp nucleosomes in the absence of ISW2 (blue bars), in the presence of ISW2 alone (red line), and upon addition of both ISW2 and ATP (black shaded bars). The nucleosome population with two donor dyes was removed by eliminating FRET traces with two donor-photobleaching steps. (C) The FRET distributions of the m = 10 bp nucleosomes in the absence of ISW2 (blue bars), in the presence of ISW2 alone (red line), and upon addition of both ISW2 and ATP (black shaded bars). The nucleosome population with two donor dyes was removed by eliminating FRET traces with two donor-photobleaching steps. (D) FRET values for a series of nucleosome constructs with different linker DNA lengths (n bp) on the exit side. The FRET values of the nucleosome population with a single donor dye on the H2A subunit proximal to the acceptor dye are presented here. The FRET distributions of the n = −3, 3, 6, 8, 10, 11, and 13 bp nucleosomes show resolvable peaks for the different donor-labeling configurations, and the peak with the highest FRET value is selected in each case. For the n = 18 bp nucleosome, all donor-labeling configurations yielded very low FRET values that merged into a single peak, the value of which is used here. Except for the first point near 100% FRET and the last point near zero FRET where the FRET values should saturate, the FRET values can be approximated by a linear dependence on the linker length with a slope of −0.059 ± 0.002 (black line). A similar distance dependence was observed previously, with a small difference in the slope due to slight differences in the transmission properties of the emission filters used (Blosser et al., 2009). The deviation from the expected nonlinear distance dependence of FRET is due to the flexible linkers connecting the dyes to the DNA or nucleosome, which substantially broaden the distance dependence of FRET and make it largely linear over a large distance range (Blosser et al., 2009). Data are shown as the mean ± SEM (N = 250–400 nucleosomes). (E) The initial FRET values (black symbols) and final FRET values after remodeling by ISW2 (red symbols) for nucleosomes with a ssDNA gap m bp from the SHL2 site. The linear fit (red line) of the post-remodeling FRET values yields a slope of −0.059 ± 0.002, identical to that of the dependence of FRET on the preset exit DNA linker length as shown in (D). The FRET values of the nucleosome population with a single donor dye on the H2A subunit proximal to the acceptor dye are presented here. The FRET distributions of all constructs show well-resolved peaks for the different donor-labeling configurations, and the peak with the highest FRET value is selected in each case. Data are shown as the mean ± SEM (N = 250–400 nucleosomes). In this work, we used the original Widom numbering system to define the n and m values (Lowary and Widom, 1998). Based on recent crystal structures of nucleosomes constructed with the 601 sequence (Chua et al., 2012; Makde et al., 2010; Vasudevan et al., 2010), all n values would increase by 1 bp because the nucleosome core particle contains only 145 bp instead of 147 bp of DNA. Therefore the linker DNA length on each side of the nucleosome would increase by 1 bp. However, since we only measure translocation distances, i.e., changes in n rather than the absolute values of n, the conclusions drawn in this work do not depend on which numbering system is used. The m values, i.e., the distance between the ssDNA gap and the SHL2 site, remain the same independent of which numbering system is used. Cell 2013 152, 442-452DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2012.12.040) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure S2 Exit-Side DNA Translocation during Remodeling by Different ISWI-Family Enzymes, Related to Figure 2 (A–C) Exit-side DNA translocation of the n = 3 bp or n = −3 bp nucleosomes by ISW2 (A), ISW1b (B), and Isw2p (C). Shown are histograms of the FRET values during the entire remodeling course constructed from n = 3 bp (left) and n = −3 bp (right) nucleosomes. The histograms were constructed from the FRET time traces during the time window that starts when the FRET value begins to decrease and ends when the FRET value begins to level off near zero. Numbers above double-headed arrows shown in the histograms represent mean step sizes. The peaks in these distributions appear broader than those shown in Figure 2 because the FRET values during both pauses and translocation phases are included here, whereas the histograms shown in Figure 2 only include the pause FRET values. (D and E) The distributions of FRET values at direction-reversal points during remodeling by Isw2p (D) and ISW1b (E). The numbers above the peaks indicate the total translocation distances before direction reversal. The lowest peak in (E) is too close to zero to allow accurate calculation of the translocation distance because FRET saturates at zero for large donor-acceptor distances. Cell 2013 152, 442-452DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2012.12.040) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure S3 Observation of 1 bp DNA Translocation Steps at the Exit Side of Nucleosomes in the Presence of ATP-γ-S or at 15°C, Related to Figure 3 (A) Left: A representative experimental FRET time trace (blue) fit by either a HMM algorithm (McKinney et al., 2006) (red) or a step-finding algorithm (Kerssemakers et al., 2006) (green). The FRET trace is the same as shown in Figure 3C. Right: Histograms of FRET plateaus determined using the step-finding algorithm (Kerssemakers et al., 2006). Although the step-finding fit was performed on the entire FRET trace in this case, in the presentation of the distribution of FRET plateau values, we still divided the distribution into two FRET regions as in the case of the HMM analysis for comparison. Numbers above double-headed arrows represent mean step sizes. The peak positions and step sizes shown here are quantitatively similar to those derived using the HMM algorithm (McKinney et al., 2006), which are shown in Figure 3D. (B) Left: FRET time trace, before (gray) and after (blue) 5-point averaging, of a single n = 3 bp nucleosome in the presence of 6.2 nM ISW2 and 2 μM ATP, recorded at 15°C. The red line shows the fit by the HMM algorithm. Right: The distribution of FRET plateaus obtained from FRET traces recorded at 15°C determined using the HMM algorithm. Numbers above double-headed arrows represent mean step sizes. Cell 2013 152, 442-452DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2012.12.040) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure S4 Dependence of the Dwell Times Associated with Individual 1 bp Steps on the Concentrations of ATP and ATP-γ-S, Related to Figure 4 The pause number k denotes the FRET plateau after k bp of DNA translocation from the initial position for the n = 3 bp nucleosomes remodeled by ISW2. (A) Dependence of the dwell times on the concentration of ATP-γ-S at a constant ATP concentration of 2 μM. The asterisks indicate dwell times that could not be directly observed in FRET traces in the absence of ATP-γ-S. At subsaturating ATP-γ-S concentrations, the 7th pause is substantially longer than the dwell times associated with the other steps. The neighboring pauses (6th and 8th) also appear to be somewhat longer than the remaining pauses, most likely due to errors in pause identification. As the concentration of ATP-γ-S increases, the duration of the 7th pause decreases while the durations of the other pauses increase. (B) Dependence of the dwell times on the concentration of ATP at a saturating ATP-γ-S concentration of 2 mM. At saturating ATP-γ-S concentrations, all pauses have approximately the same duration that decreases with increasing ATP concentration. Data are shown as the mean ± SEM (N = 15–25 events). Cell 2013 152, 442-452DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2012.12.040) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure S5 FRET Distributions of Entry-Side-Labeled Nucleosomes before and after Remodeling by ISW2, Related to Figure 5 (A) The initial FRET distribution of the nucleosomes before addition of the enzyme (blue bars). The black line shows the Gaussian fit. The FRET acceptor dye is 10 bp from the entry edge of the nucleosome. The FRET donor dye is attached to H2A. The nucleosome population with two donor dyes was removed by eliminating FRET traces with two donor-photobleaching steps. Hence the FRET distribution exhibits only two peaks (centered at FRET = 0.62 or 0.39), with the higher peak corresponding to the labeling configuration with a single donor dye on the proximal H2A subunit and the lower peak corresponding to the labeling configuration with a single donor dye on the distal H2A subunit. (B) The FRET distributions of the nucleosomes upon addition of ISW2 alone (red line) or upon addition of both ISW2 and ATP (black shaded bars) superimposed on the initial FRET histogram (blue bars). After remodeling, the acceptor dye is moved into the nucleosome and should be within FRET range to both donor dye positions. Because the remodeled nucleosomes may not be centered on the DNA exactly, the FRET distribution after remodeling is relatively broad. Cell 2013 152, 442-452DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2012.12.040) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure S6 Comparison of twait for Nucleosomes with and without a ssDNA Gap and Exit-Side Translocation Time Traces for Nucleosomes with a ssDNA Gap, Related to Figure 6 (A) The waiting times twait before the onset of remodeling activity measured at entry (yellow bars) and exit side (purple bars) of nucleosomes with (solid bars) or without (patterned bars) a ssDNA gap at m = 10 bp from the SHL2 site, which allows for only 10 bp of DNA translocation to the exit side. The ATP concentration is 2 μM. Data are shown as the mean ± SEM (N = 40–100 events). (B) Example FRET time traces of the exit-side-labeled nucleosomes with a ssDNA gap at m = 5 bp (left) and m = 10 bp (right). Cell 2013 152, 442-452DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2012.12.040) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions