Uniform e Admissions Control Signaling for HCF and EDCF

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc: IEEE /705ar0 Submission Javier del Prado et. al November 2002 Slide 1 Mandatory TSPEC Parameters and Reference Design of a Simple Scheduler.
Advertisements

January 2002 Khaled Turki et. al, Texas InstrumentsSlide 1 doc.: IEEE /022r0 Submission TID Field Usage in QoS CF-Poll Khaled Turki and Matthew.
1 Medium Access Control Enhancements for Quality of Service IEEE Std e TM November 2005.
Doc.: IEEE /453 Submission December 2000 Liwen Wu, Cisco SystemsSlide 1 Traffic Police Enhancement for E-DCF Liwen Wu, ( )
1 Medium Access Control Enhancements for Quality of Service IEEE Std e TM November 2005.
Doc.: IEEE /678r1 Submission January 2003 Mark Bilstad, Cisco SystemsSlide 1 Uniform e Admissions Control Signaling for HCF and EDCF Bob.
Doc.: IEEE /0126r1 Submission January mc HEMM Date: Authors: Graham Smith, DSP GroupSlide 1.
Doc.:IEEE /566r2 Submission November 2001 S. Choi, Philips & M.M. Wentink, Intersil Slide 1 Multiple Frame Exchanges during EDCF TXOP Sunghyun.
Doc.: IEEE /248r0 Submission Bobby JoseSlide 1 February 2002 Contention Free TXOP Request and Allocation Issues Bobby Jose,
Implementation for Intra-AC Differentiated Services
IEEE : Wireless LANs ALOHA, Slotted ALOHA
QoS Tutorial Date: Authors: Nov 2008 Nov 2008
Enhancing BSS Transition Management
EDCF TXOP Bursting Simulation Results
Emergency Services signalling for WLAN
Requirements and Implementations for Intra-flow/Intra-AC DiffServ
Requirements and Implementations for Intra-flow/Intra-AC DiffServ
802.11e features for the enterprise
QoS Statistics Date: Authors: January 2005 January 2005
Hybrid Coordination Function (HCF) Frame Exchange and NAV Details
Some Power-save changes in e Draft
QoS with EDCA Downgrading
Signaling Acceptable Error Rate in TSPEC
Use of EDCA Access During HCF Polling
doc.: IEEE /xxx Authors:
Burst Transmission and Acknowledgment
EDCF Issues and Suggestions
Terminology Corrections and Improvements for the TGe Draft
QoS STA function applied to Mesh STA
QoS Poll Modifications Allowing Priority
AP Power Down Notification
Proposal for Load Balancing
Clarification on Some HCF Frame Exchange Rules
Joint meeting with 802.1AVB Date: Authors: July 2009
HCF medium access rules
Enhancing BSS Transition Management
Clarification on Some HCF Frame Exchange Rules
TGe Consensus Proposal
802.11e features for the enterprise
Suggested changes to Tge D3.3
Student : Min-Hua Yang Advisor : Ho-Ting Wu Date :
Interworking with 802.1Qat Stream Reservation Protocol
Acknowledgement for Multicast Streams
QoS STA function applied to Mesh STA
Proposed Overlapping BSS Solution
Requirements and Implementations for Intra-flow/Intra-AC DiffServ
Multiple Frame Exchanges during EDCF TXOP
Uniform e Admissions Control Signaling for HCF and EDCF
Suggested changes to Tge D3.3
Interworking with 802.1Qat Stream Reservation Protocol
Interworking with 802.1Qat Stream Reservation Protocol
HCCA TXOP handling difficulties
Advanced power save support
FILS Frame Content Date: Authors: February 2008
NAV Operation Rules under HCF
QoS Metrics Date: Authors: January 2005 Month Year
Proposed Resolution for Draft 3.0
IEEE 802.1Qat and IEEE Quality of Service Inteworking
IEEE 802.1Qat and IEEE Quality of Service Inteworking
Requirements and Implementations for Intra-flow/Intra-AC DiffServ
802.11e QoS Tutorial Date: Authors: Oct 2008 Oct 2008
Some Power-save changes in e Draft
WME Overview 7/20/03 doc.: IEEE /678r0 July 2003
Chapter 11 Comment Resolution for Letter Ballot 63
Signaling for Streaming in IEEE e
Srinivas Kandala Sharp Labs
NAV Operation Rules under HCF
Admissions Control and Scheduling Behaviours for Scheduled EDCA
Proposal for Load Balancing
TXOP Request: in Time vs. in Queue Size?
Presentation transcript:

Uniform 802.11e Admissions Control Signaling for HCF and EDCF doc.: IEEE 802.11-02/678r0 November 2002 Uniform 802.11e Admissions Control Signaling for HCF and EDCF Bob Meier, Liwen Wu, Mark Bilstad Cisco Systems November 11, 2002 rmeier@cisco.com Bob Meier, Cisco Systems Bob Meier, Cisco Systems

Considerations/Issues doc.: IEEE 802.11-02/678r0 November 2002 Considerations/Issues There is a recognized need for Explicit Admissions Control Signaling, independent of access method Explicit EDCF Admissions Control enables infrastructure policy and policing. For example, it may be desirable to limit QoS bandwidth for “guest” users in an enterprise network. The current TSPEC Status Codes are insufficient. A WSTA cannot determine if a TSPEC is rejected because 1) resources are not available, or 2) HCF Polling is not enabled for the traffic type. The current draft (3.3) does not indicate whether a QSTA can use EDCF-based access for a traffic stream with an existing TSPEC. Bob Meier, Cisco Systems Bob Meier, Cisco Systems

New TSPEC Status Code Status Code Result Code Definition doc.: IEEE 802.11-02/678r0 November 2002 New TSPEC Status Code Table 20.5 – Status Codes Status Code Result Code Definition 5 NOT_ENABLED The TS has not been created because the requested access method is not enabled for the traffic type. 6-255 reserved Bob Meier, Cisco Systems Bob Meier, Cisco Systems

Add 16 bits to the TSPEC TSInfo Field in Figure 42.8 November 2002 Add 16 bits to the TSPEC TSInfo Field in Figure 42.8 Bit 16 Bit 17 Bit 18 Bits 19-20 Bits 21-31 HCF Access EDCF Access HCF+EDCF Access Access Method reserved Table 20.1.x - Access Method field encoding Bit 19 Bit 20 Usage No Access Method 1 EDCF Access HCF Access Combined HCF and EDCF Access Bob Meier, Cisco Systems

November 2002 Section 7.3.2.15 A QSTA sets the TSInfo “Access” fields in an ADDTS request to indicate to the HC the access methods that it will accept for the traffic stream and to indicate its preferred access method. The fields are set in an ADDTS Request as follows: The HCF Access field is set ON if the QSTA will accept HCF as the access method. The EDCF Access field is set ON if the QSTA will accept EDCF as the access method. The HCF+EDCF Access field is set ON if the QSTA will accept combined HCF and EDCF as the access method for an uplink traffic stream. The Access Method field in an ADDTS Request is used to indicate the access method preferred by the QSTA. An HC uses the TSInfo Access Method field in an ADDTS Response to establish the access method used for the traffic stream for an accepted TSPEC. The HC cannot establish an access method where the QSTA has indicated that it will NOT accept the access method. The Access Method must be non-zero for an accepted TSPEC. If HCF+EDCF is established as the access method for an uplink traffic stream, then the QSTA may use EDCF to transmit uplink frames for the traffic stream. The HC should also generate (+)CF-Poll frames for the traffic stream, as required, to mitigate contention and bound delay. The HCF+EDCF access method is useful for minimizing latency in environments with sporadic congestion. It also permits EDCF access for error recovery if an expected poll or response is not received for a polled TXOP. Bob Meier, Cisco Systems