ASGE Technology Committee systematic review and meta-analysis assessing the ASGE Preservation and Incorporation of Valuable Endoscopic Innovations thresholds.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Vani Konda, MD, Subhas Banerjee, MD, Bradley A. Barth, MD, Yasser M
Advertisements

Diagnostic yield of small-bowel capsule endoscopy in patients with iron-deficiency anemia: a systematic review  Anastasios Koulaouzidis, MD, MRCP, Emanuele.
Ongoing colorectal cancer risk despite surveillance colonoscopy: the Polyp Prevention Trial Continued Follow-up Study  Andreas Stang, MD, MPH, Thomas.
Confocal laser endomicroscopy
Abdul M. Kouanda, MD, Ma Somsouk, MD, Justin L
SCENIC international consensus statement on surveillance and management of dysplasia in inflammatory bowel disease  Loren Laine, MD, Tonya Kaltenbach,
Risk of recurrence of Barrett’s esophagus after successful endoscopic therapy  Rajesh Krishnamoorthi, MD, Siddharth Singh, MD, Karthik Ragunathan, MD,
Sachin Wani, Dayna Early, Steve Edmundowicz, Prateek Sharma 
Julian A. Abrams, MD, MS, Sri Komanduri, MD, Nicholas J
Confocal laser endomicroscopy
Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Effect of Warming Local Anesthetics on Injection Pain  Mary-Ellen Hogan, BScPhm, PharmD, Sondra vanderVaart,
M. Chazapis, D. Gilhooly, A. F. Smith, P. S. Myles, G. Haller, M. P. W
Barrett's esophagus: diagnosis and management
Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty Alters Gastric Physiology and Induces Loss of Body Weight in Obese Individuals  Barham K. Abu Dayyeh, Andres Acosta, Michael.
Autofluorescence imaging
Stent placement by EUS or ERCP for primary biliary decompression in pancreatic cancer: a randomized trial (with videos)  Ji Young Bang, MD, MPH, Udayakumar.
Public health impact of colonoscopy use on colorectal cancer mortality in Germany and the United States  Chen Chen, MSPH, Christian Stock, PhD, Michael.
Optical biopsy for colorectal polyps: moving along the S-shaped curve
Comparison of EUS with MRCP in idiopathic acute pancreatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis  Jianhua Wan, MD, Yaobin Ouyang, MD, Chen Yu, MD,
Single-balloon enteroscopy-assisted ERCP in patients with surgically altered GI anatomy: getting there  Barham Abu Dayyeh, MD, MPH  Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 
Volume 154, Issue 8, Pages e5 (June 2018)
Advances in Endoscopic Imaging of Colorectal Neoplasia
Devices and techniques for ERCP in the surgically altered GI tract
Devices for use with EUS
Per-oral endoscopic myotomy (with video)
Diversity in gastroenterology in the United States: Where are we now
Electronic chromoendoscopy
Yoji Ishizu, MD, PhD, Masatoshi Ishigami, MD, PhD 
Endoscopic submucosal dissection
Endoscopic anti-reflux devices (with videos)
Eric J. Vargas, MD, Barham K. Abu Dayyeh, MD, MPH, FASGE 
ASGE Bariatric Endoscopy Task Force systematic review and meta-analysis assessing the ASGE PIVI thresholds for adopting endoscopic bariatric therapies 
The use of carbon dioxide in gastrointestinal endoscopy
Barrett's esophagus: diagnosis and management
Prateek Sharma, MD, Sachin Wani, MD, Amit Rastogi, MD 
Volume 3, Issue 8, Pages (August 2018)
Endoscopes and devices to improve colon polyp detection
Acetic-acid chromoendoscopy for Barrett's esophagus: the “pros”
Endoscopic mucosal resection
Shajan Peter, MD, C. Mel Wilcox, MD, Klaus Mönkemüller, MD, PhD 
Dysplasia detection in Barrett’s esophagus by use of volumetric laser endomicroscopy with laser marking  Arvind J. Trindade, MD, Sumant Inamdar, MD, MPH,
White Paper AGA: Advanced Imaging in Barrett’s Esophagus
Adenosine triphosphate bioluminescence for bacteriologic surveillance and reprocessing strategies for minimizing risk of infection transmission by duodenoscopes 
Sa1066 SCOPING THE SCOPE: ENDOSCOPIC EVALUATION OF ENDOSCOPE WORKING CHANNEL DAMAGE/DEBRIS USING A NOVEL FLEXIBLE INSPECTION SCOPE AND ASSESSMENT OF.
Ji Young Bang, MD, MPH  Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 
Biliary and pancreatic lithotripsy devices
Mo1382 EUS-Guided Needle-Based Confocal Laser Induced Endomicroscopy (nCLE): A Correlation Study of “Through the Needle” Imaging With Normal Histology.
Diagnosing pancreatic malignancy in the setting of chronic pancreatitis: is there room for improvement?  James J. Farrell, MD  Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 
Interventional EUS (with videos)
Probe-Based Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy
David L. Diehl, MD, FACP, FASGE, Jay P. Babich, MD 
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
Much ado about very little (lamina propria)?
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
Worrisome endoscopic feature in the stomach of patients with familial adenomatous polyposis: the proximal white mucosal patch  Nitin Das Kunnathu, MD 
Gregory G. Ginsberg, MD  Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 
Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty for obesity: defining the risk and reward after more than 1600 procedures  Andrew C. Storm, MD, Barham K. Abu Dayyeh, MD,
Gavin C. Harewood, MD, FRCPI, MSc  Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 
Confocal microscopy from the bench to the bedside
Inadequate colonoscopy preparation: Is it time to send out an SMS?
Mucosal scars in collagenous colitis
Mohammad F. Madhoun, MD, MS, Gregory A. Cote, MD, MS, Sushil K
Comparison of microdissection testicular sperm extraction, conventional testicular sperm extraction, and testicular sperm aspiration for nonobstructive.
Henning Gerke, MD  Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
Enteral stents: from esophagus to colon
Public health impact of colonoscopy use on colorectal cancer mortality in Germany and the United States  Chen Chen, MSPH, Christian Stock, PhD, Michael.
Arvind J. Trindade, MD, Udayakumar Navaneethan, MD, Harry R
Comparison of narrow-band imaging, volumetric laser endomicroscopy, and pathologic findings in Barrett's esophagus  Chikatoshi Katada, MD, Rish K. Pai,
Endoscopic bariatric therapies
Presentation transcript:

ASGE Technology Committee systematic review and meta-analysis assessing the ASGE Preservation and Incorporation of Valuable Endoscopic Innovations thresholds for adopting real-time imaging–assisted endoscopic targeted biopsy during endoscopic surveillance of Barrett’s esophagus  Nirav Thosani, MD, Barham K. Abu Dayyeh, MD, MPH, Prateek Sharma, MD, FASGE, Harry R. Aslanian, MD, FASGE, Brintha K. Enestvedt, MD, MBA, Sri Komanduri, MD, FASGE, Michael Manfredi, MD, Udayakumar Navaneethan, MD, John T. Maple, DO, FASGE, Rahul Pannala, MD, MPH, FASGE, Mansour A. Parsi, MD, FASGE, Zachary L. Smith, DO, Shelby A. Sullivan, MD, Subhas Banerjee, MD, FASGE  Gastrointestinal Endoscopy  Volume 83, Issue 4, Pages 684-698.e7 (April 2016) DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.01.007 Copyright © 2016 Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Flow diagram depicting included studies selection for the meta-analysis. CINAHL, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature; BE, Barrett's esophagus; CLE, confocal laser endomicroscopy; NBI, narrow-band imaging; eCLE, endoscope-based CLE; pCLE, probe-based CLE; PIVI, ASGE Preservation and Incorporation of Valuable Endoscopic Innovations. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2016 83, 684-698.e7DOI: (10.1016/j.gie.2016.01.007) Copyright © 2016 Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 A, Forest plot of studies evaluating sensitivity. B, Forest plot of studies evaluating negative predictive value. C, Forest plot of studies evaluating specificity of chromoendoscopy-guided targeted biopsy against current standard biopsy protocol during surveillance of nondysplastic Barrett’s esophagus. NPV, negative predictive value. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2016 83, 684-698.e7DOI: (10.1016/j.gie.2016.01.007) Copyright © 2016 Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 A, Forest plot of studies evaluating sensitivity. B, Forest plot of studies evaluating negative predictive value. C, Forest plot of studies evaluating specificity of chromoendoscopy-guided targeted biopsy against current standard biopsy protocol during surveillance of nondysplastic Barrett’s esophagus. NPV, negative predictive value. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2016 83, 684-698.e7DOI: (10.1016/j.gie.2016.01.007) Copyright © 2016 Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 A, Forest plot of studies evaluating sensitivity. B, Forest plot of studies evaluating negative predictive value. C, Forest plot of studies evaluating specificity of narrow-band imaging–guided targeted biopsy against current standard biopsy protocol during surveillance of nondysplastic Barrett’s esophagus. NBI, narrow-band imaging; NPV, negative predictive value. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2016 83, 684-698.e7DOI: (10.1016/j.gie.2016.01.007) Copyright © 2016 Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 A, Forest plot of studies evaluating sensitivity. B, Forest plot of studies evaluating negative predictive value. C, Forest plot of studies evaluating specificity of narrow-band imaging–guided targeted biopsy against current standard biopsy protocol during surveillance of nondysplastic Barrett’s esophagus. NBI, narrow-band imaging; NPV, negative predictive value. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2016 83, 684-698.e7DOI: (10.1016/j.gie.2016.01.007) Copyright © 2016 Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 A, Forest plot of studies evaluating sensitivity. B, Forest plot of studies evaluating negative predictive value. C, Specificity of confocal laser endomicroscopy–guided targeted biopsy against current standard biopsy protocol during surveillance of nondysplastic Barrett’s esophagus. CLE, confocal laser endomicroscopy; eCLE, endoscope-based confocal laser endomicroscopy; pCLE, probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy; NPV, negative predictive value. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2016 83, 684-698.e7DOI: (10.1016/j.gie.2016.01.007) Copyright © 2016 Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 A, Forest plot of studies evaluating sensitivity. B, Forest plot of studies evaluating negative predictive value. C, Specificity of confocal laser endomicroscopy–guided targeted biopsy against current standard biopsy protocol during surveillance of nondysplastic Barrett’s esophagus. CLE, confocal laser endomicroscopy; eCLE, endoscope-based confocal laser endomicroscopy; pCLE, probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy; NPV, negative predictive value. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2016 83, 684-698.e7DOI: (10.1016/j.gie.2016.01.007) Copyright © 2016 Terms and Conditions

Supplemental Figure 1 Publication bias funnel plot for chromoendoscopy (A), narrow-band imaging (B), autofluorescence imaging with NBA (C), and confocal laser endomicroscopy (D). Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2016 83, 684-698.e7DOI: (10.1016/j.gie.2016.01.007) Copyright © 2016 Terms and Conditions

Supplemental Figure 1 Publication bias funnel plot for chromoendoscopy (A), narrow-band imaging (B), autofluorescence imaging with NBA (C), and confocal laser endomicroscopy (D). Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2016 83, 684-698.e7DOI: (10.1016/j.gie.2016.01.007) Copyright © 2016 Terms and Conditions