Studies for TBT optics measurements in the PSB

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Optics and magnetic field calculation for the Hall D Tagger Guangliang Yang Glasgow University.
Advertisements

M.Gasior, CERN-AB-BIBase-Band Tune (BBQ) Measurement System 1 Base-Band Tune (BBQ) Measurement System Marek Gasior Beam Instrumentation Group, CERN.
Searching for CesrTA guide field nonlinearities in beam position spectra Laurel Hales Mike Billing Mark Palmer.
Wilson Lab Tour Guide Orientation 11 December 2006 CLASSE 1 Focusing and Bending Wilson Lab Tour Guide Orientation M. Forster Mike Forster 11 December.
Resonance crossing and error tolerances Shinji Machida KEK FFAG05 at Fermilab, April 3-7, 2005.
Space Charge meeting – CERN – 09/10/2014
Impedance measurements at SLS E. Koukovini-Platia CERN, EPFL TIARA mid-term meeting, Madrid, 13 th June 2012 Many thanks to M. Dehler, N. Milas, A. Streun.
E.Benedetto, 30/05/13, LIU-PSB Meeting, PSB chicane magnets: Inconel chamber PSB H- chicane magnets: Inconel vacuum chamber option & consequences on beam.
E. Benedetto SC meeting 19/3/15 Update on the LIU curve emittance vs. intensity.
AC dipole for LHC Mei Bai Collider Accelerator Department Brookhaven National Laboratory.
Yichao Jing 11/11/2010. Outline Introduction Linear lattice design and basic parameters Combined function magnets study and feasibility Nonlinear dynamics.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, N.Kazarinov.
AB-ABP/LHC Injector Synchrotrons Section CERN, Giovanni Rumolo 1 Final results of the E-Cloud Instability MDs at the SPS (26 and 55 GeV/c) G.
Y. Ohnishi / KEK KEKB-LER for ILC Damping Ring Study Simulation of low emittance lattice includes machine errors and optics corrections. Y. Ohnishi / KEK.
Details of space charge calculations for J-PARC rings.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, A.Drozhdin, N.Kazarinov.
1 EPIC SIMULATIONS V.S. Morozov, Y.S. Derbenev Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility A. Afanasev Hampton University R.P. Johnson Muons, Inc. Operated.
Dynamic Aperture Study for the Ion Ring Lattice Options Min-Huey Wang, Yuri Nosochkov MEIC Collaboration Meeting Fall 2015 Jefferson Lab, Newport News,
EMMA Horizontal and Vertical Corrector Study David Kelliher ASTEC/CCLRC/RAL 14th April, 2007.
Update of the SPS transverse impedance model Benoit for the impedance team.
1 FFAG Role as Muon Accelerators Shinji Machida ASTeC/STFC/RAL 15 November, /machida/doc/othertalks/machida_ pdf/machida/doc/othertalks/machida_ pdf.
1 Dynamic aperture of non-scaling FFAG with sextupole Shinji Machida CCLRC/RAL/ASTeC 21 July, ffag/machida_ ppt.
Beam Loss Simulation in the Main Injector at Slip-Stacking Injection A.I. Drozhdin, B.C. Brown, D.E. Johnson, I. Kourbanis, K. Seiya June 30, 2006 A.Drozhdin.
Lecture 9: Inelastic Scattering and Excited States 2/10/2003 Inelastic scattering refers to the process in which energy is transferred to the target,
E Levichev -- Dynamic Aperture of the SRFF Storage Ring Frontiers of Short Bunches in Storage Rings INFN-LNF, Frascati, 7-8 Nov 2005 DYNAMIC APERTURE OF.
1 EMMA Tracking Studies Shinji Machida ASTeC/CCLRC/RAL 4 January, ffag/machida_ ppt & pdf.
By Verena Kain CERN BE-OP. In the next three lectures we will have a look at the different components of a synchrotron. Today: Controlling particle trajectories.
The Introduction to CSNS Accelerators Oct. 5, 2010 Sheng Wang AP group, Accelerator Centre,IHEP, CAS.
E.Benedetto, 1/07/13, LIS Meeting, PSB chicane magnets: Inconel chamber PSB H- chicane magnets: Inconel vacuum chamber option & consequences on beam dynamics.
FFAG’ J. Pasternak, IC London/RAL Proton acceleration using FFAGs J. Pasternak, Imperial College, London / RAL.
U. Raich CERN Accelerator School on Digital Signal Processing Sigtuna Digital Signal processing in Beam Diagnostics Lecture 1 Ulrich Raich CERN.
Single particle dynamics in the ThomX ring Jianfeng zhang 12/02/2015 LAL.
MTE commissioning status S. Gilardoni, BE/ABP With C. Hernalsteens and M. Giovannozzi.
Summary of ions measurements in 2015 and priorities for 2016 studies E. Shaposhnikova 3/02/2016 Based on input from H. Bartosik, T. Bohl, B. Goddard, V.
2nd ATF2 Project Meeting (May 30, 2006)M. Woodley [SLAC]1 ATF2 Layout/Optics (v3.3) nBPM (SLAC) nBPM (KEK) FONT Compton / laserwire ODR Existing ATF Extraction.
Recycler Pbar Transfer -Gattuso 1 Recycler weekly Summary This presentation will probably involve audience discussion, which will create action items.
Weekly Pbar Report 10/26 → 11/2. Stacking This Week …
Resonance Compensation Raymond WASEF S.Gilardoni, A.Huschauer, D.Schoerling Acknowledgments M.Delrieux, J.C.Dumont, H.Genoud, C.Hernalsteens and all PS.
TBT Data & Lattice Measurement for Recycler Ming-Jen Yang December 17, 2014.
MatLab Analysis of RHIC PLL/TF System Carl Schultheiss, Nickolay Malitsky Cern PLL Workshop June 10-11, 2002.
Beam test of slow extraction from the ESR
Orbit Response Matrix Analysis
Zgoubi tracking study of the decay ring
Vertical emittance measurement and modeling Correction methods
Space charge studies at the SPS
Injector Cyclotron for a Medical FFAG
Status on Work for Splitter FS and Dilution System FS
SIS-18 RF KNOCK-OUT OPTIMISATION STUDIES
Cui Xiaohao, Zhang Chuang,Bian Tianjian January 12,2016
Proposals for 2015 impedance-related MD requests for PSB and SPS
Emittance growth AT PS injection
Sergey Antipov, Nicolo Biancacci, and david amorim
Impact of remanent fields on SPS chromaticity
Coupling Correction at the Australian Synchrotron
Benchmarking the SPS transverse impedance model: headtail growth rates
Monday h00: Ramp 10 A/s (chromaticity, crossing angle non-closure, beta-beating): At 7m and 3.5m, put in one by one crossing angles, calculated.
ATF2 IP Tuning Task Simulation Updates
Alternate Lattice for LCLS-II LTU Y
Jeffrey Eldred, Sasha Valishev
Multiturn extraction for PS2
SC Overview 2013 White & Rouge The Codes in Comparison The Noise Issue
Muon Acceleration in a Neutrino Factory
Progress of SPPC lattice design
Check of filamentation time with octupoles on and damper off
SPEAR3 Lower Emittance & Nonlinear Dynamics
Simulation of the FCC-ee lattice with quadrupole and sextupole misalignments Sergey Sinyatkin.
Optics Measurements in the PSB
PSB magnetic cycle 900 ms MeV to 2 GeV
Transverse instability in the AD?
JLEIC Weekly R&D Meeting
Presentation transcript:

Studies for TBT optics measurements in the PSB M. McAteer 15/08/13

Measured PSB trajectories (transverse damper off) Qx Noise peaks

Measured PSB trajectories-“noise” peaks Qx Noise peaks Qx With transverse damper disabled, beam becomes unstable when noise Peaks approach the tune (at ~390 ms at normal operational tune). Normalizing to revolution/sampling frequency shows that the frequencies of these two peaks are constant through the acceleration cycle (0.264 and 0.297 MHz).

Measured and simulated spectra Orange = measured horizontal, blue = measured vertical (excitation with tune kicker in both planes , x amp~5 mm, y amp ~ 1 mm peak to peak, x chromaticity corrected) Red = simulated (tracking simulations with no random errors added to bending magnets, x amp~5 mm, y amp ~ 1 mm peak to peak)

Measured and simulated spectra Orange = measured horizontal, blue = measured vertical (excitation with tune kicker in both planes , x amp~5 mm, y amp ~ 1 mm peak to peak, x chromaticity corrected) Red = simulated (tracking simulations with K2 random errors (0.5 ‰ at 0.1 m) added to bending magnets, x amp~5 mm, y amp ~ 1 mm peak to peak)

Measured and simulated spectra Orange = measured horizontal, blue = measured vertical (excitation with tune kicker in both planes , x amp~5 mm, y amp ~ 1 mm peak to peak, x chromaticity corrected) Red = simulated (tracking simulations with K2 random errors (1.0 ‰ at 0.1 m) added to bending magnets, x amp~5 mm, y amp ~ 1 mm peak to peak)

Measured and simulated spectra Orange = measured horizontal, blue = measured vertical (excitation with tune kicker in both planes , x amp~5 mm, y amp ~ 1 mm peak to peak, x chromaticity corrected) Red = simulated (tracking simulations with K2 random errors (1.5 ‰ at 0.1 m) added to bending magnets, x amp~5 mm, y amp ~ 1 mm peak to peak)