Volume 9, Issue 2, Pages (February 2016)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 8, Issue 4, Pages (April 2017)
Advertisements

Rice Male Development under Drought Stress: Phenotypic Changes and Stage- Dependent Transcriptomic Reprogramming  Yue Jin, Hongxing Yang, Zheng Wei, Hong.
M. Fu, G. Huang, Z. Zhang, J. Liu, Z. Zhang, Z. Huang, B. Yu, F. Meng 
Volume 21, Issue 11, Pages (December 2017)
Volume 8, Issue 6, Pages (June 2015)
Spatial Memory Engram in the Mouse Retrosplenial Cortex
Volume 20, Issue 13, Pages (September 2017)
Validating single-cell genomics for the study of renal development
Volume 10, Issue 3, Pages (March 2017)
Jianbin Wang, Julianne Garrey, Richard E. Davis  Current Biology 
Volume 33, Issue 1, Pages (July 2010)
Volume 6, Issue 6, Pages (November 2013)
Roger B. Deal, Steven Henikoff  Developmental Cell 
C. -H. Chou, M. T. M. Lee, I. -W. Song, L. -S. Lu, H. -C. Shen, C. -H
Volume 7, Issue 5, Pages (May 2001)
Volume 5, Issue 1, Pages e4 (July 2017)
Temporal Control of Plant Organ Growth by TCP Transcription Factors
Transcriptional Landscape of Cardiomyocyte Maturation
Molecular Therapy - Methods & Clinical Development
Widespread Inhibition of Posttranscriptional Splicing Shapes the Cellular Transcriptome following Heat Shock  Reut Shalgi, Jessica A. Hurt, Susan Lindquist,
The RdDM Pathway Is Required for Basal Heat Tolerance in Arabidopsis
Volume 11, Issue 4, Pages (April 2018)
Mapping Gene Expression in Two Xenopus Species: Evolutionary Constraints and Developmental Flexibility  Itai Yanai, Leonid Peshkin, Paul Jorgensen, Marc W.
Transcriptional Profiling of Quiescent Muscle Stem Cells In Vivo
Volume 7, Issue 5, Pages (May 2001)
Volume 8, Issue 4, Pages (April 2017)
Volume 12, Issue 6, Pages (December 2003)
Volume 7, Issue 3, Pages (September 2016)
Piwi Proteins and piRNAs in Mammalian Oocytes and Early Embryos
Volume 21, Issue 11, Pages (December 2017)
Volume 7, Issue 9, Pages (September 2014)
Molecular Mechanisms Regulating the Defects in Fragile X Syndrome Neurons Derived from Human Pluripotent Stem Cells  Tomer Halevy, Christian Czech, Nissim.
Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages (January 2010)
Michal Levin, Tamar Hashimshony, Florian Wagner, Itai Yanai 
Volume 8, Issue 6, Pages (September 2014)
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages (January 2016)
Volume 26, Issue 16, Pages (August 2016)
Volume 9, Issue 5, Pages (November 2017)
Volume 16, Issue 9, Pages (August 2016)
Volume 2, Issue 1, Pages (January 2009)
Volume 9, Issue 4, Pages (November 2014)
Volume 10, Issue 10, Pages (October 2017)
Volume 14, Issue 2, Pages (January 2016)
The Arabidopsis Transcription Factor AtTCP15 Regulates Endoreduplication by Modulating Expression of Key Cell-cycle Genes  Li Zi-Yu , Li Bin , Dong Ai-Wu.
Impact of Alternative Splicing on the Human Proteome
Volume 3, Issue 3, Pages (March 2013)
Volume 2, Issue 5, Pages (November 2012)
Volume 118, Issue 2, Pages (July 2004)
Volume 9, Issue 10, Pages (October 2016)
Volume 16, Issue 2, Pages (February 2015)
Physcomitrella patens Auxin-Resistant Mutants Affect Conserved Elements of an Auxin- Signaling Pathway  Michael J. Prigge, Meirav Lavy, Neil W. Ashton,
Arabidopsis NF-YCs Mediate the Light-Controlled Hypocotyl Elongation via Modulating Histone Acetylation  Yang Tang, Xuncheng Liu, Xu Liu, Yuge Li, Keqiang.
Volume 5, Issue 6, Pages (November 2012)
Volume 8, Issue 6, Pages (September 2014)
Volume 7, Issue 8, Pages (August 2014)
A Novel System for Xylem Cell Differentiation in Arabidopsis thaliana
Rice Male Development under Drought Stress: Phenotypic Changes and Stage- Dependent Transcriptomic Reprogramming  Yue Jin, Hongxing Yang, Zheng Wei, Hong.
Volume 11, Issue 4, Pages (April 2015)
Volume 4, Issue 4, Pages (July 2011)
Dissection of miRNA Pathways Using Arabidopsis Mesophyll Protoplasts
Equivalent Parental Contribution to Early Plant Zygotic Development
Nanog-Independent Reprogramming to iPSCs with Canonical Factors
Volume 4, Issue 5, Pages (September 2011)
Roles of Defense Hormones in the Regulation of Ozone-Induced Changes in Gene Expression and Cell Death  Enjun Xu, Lauri Vaahtera, Mikael Brosché  Molecular.
A Light-Independent Allele of Phytochrome B Faithfully Recapitulates Photomorphogenic Transcriptional Networks  Wei Hu, Yi-Shin Su, J. Clark Lagarias 
Genome-wide Functional Analysis Reveals Factors Needed at the Transition Steps of Induced Reprogramming  Chao-Shun Yang, Kung-Yen Chang, Tariq M. Rana 
Volume 25, Issue 5, Pages e4 (May 2017)
Laura A. Moody, Steven Kelly, Ester Rabbinowitsch, Jane A. Langdale 
Volume 27, Issue 7, Pages e4 (May 2019)
DNA Damage-Induced Transcription of Transposable Elements and Long Non-coding RNAs in Arabidopsis Is Rare and ATM-Dependent  Zhenxing Wang, Rainer Schwacke,
Presentation transcript:

Volume 9, Issue 2, Pages 205-220 (February 2016) A Transcriptome Atlas of Physcomitrella patens Provides Insights into the Evolution and Development of Land Plants  Carlos Ortiz-Ramírez, Marcela Hernandez-Coronado, Anna Thamm, Bruno Catarino, Mingyi Wang, Liam Dolan, José A. Feijó, Jörg D. Becker  Molecular Plant  Volume 9, Issue 2, Pages 205-220 (February 2016) DOI: 10.1016/j.molp.2015.12.002 Copyright © 2016 The Author Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Developmental Stages of the Physcomitrella Life Cycle Analyzed by Microarrays. A cartoon representation of P. patens tissues as integrated into a Physcomitrella eFP browser at the Bio-analytical Resource for Plant Biology (BAR) is shown. In the case of sporophyte developmental stages, representative images of tissue used for mRNA isolation are included (bottom). Stages were denominated as sporophyte 1 (S1), sporophyte 2 (S2), sporophyte 3 (S3), and mature (brown) sporophytes (SM) based on the number of days that passed since the fertilization event (d.AF, days after fertilization). Early sporophytes stages retain some gametophytic tissue since originally the embryo develops as part of the archegonia. Scale bars represent 100 μm. Molecular Plant 2016 9, 205-220DOI: (10.1016/j.molp.2015.12.002) Copyright © 2016 The Author Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Assessment of Microarray Data Quality. Quality of tissue sample replicates was tested by qRT–PCR using marker genes. (A) The expression of the gene RM09 (Pp1s407_31V6.1) reported to be present in protonemal tissues was tested. Expression is shown to be enriched in protonemal tissues (caulonema, chloronema, protoplasts, and rhizoids), where differences in expression levels among them can also be observed. (B) In the same way, the PIP2;1 aquaporin (Pp1s8_151V6.1) was tested and the opposite pattern was obtained. In this case, gametophytic and sporophytic tissues showed expression while the transcript was not detected in any protonemal tissue. Relative expression (2−ΔΔCt) was calculated using alpha tubulin (Pp215_51V6.1) as the housekeeping gene and caulonema or gametophore as the reference tissue. The SE range (±) is depicted next to the bars. (C) Genes with tissue preferential expression were selected for pattern corroboration by qRT–PCR. cDNA from the three biological replicates was pooled. Data are shown as fold change (2−ΔΔct) relative to gametophore expression in all cases except when the gene is preferentially expressed in gametophore, in which case rhizoids were used. (D) Correlation of gene expression values as reported by our microarrays with experimental evidence of transcript presence for the PpMKN family of transcription factors. Filled circles above the tissue cartoons indicate which PpMKN genes are expressed at the respective stage according to the literature. Molecular Plant 2016 9, 205-220DOI: (10.1016/j.molp.2015.12.002) Copyright © 2016 The Author Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Global and Tissue-Specific Expression Patterns. (A) PCA applied to the average gene expression values of three replicates per tissue. (B) Hierarchical clustering using Pearson's correlation coefficient. (C) Percentage of tissue-expressed genes (present) in relation to the total number of genes represented on the array (black), and the percentage of tissue-enriched genes in relation to the total number of genes detected as enriched (red). (D) Venn diagram showing the number of common and uniquely expressed genes between the gametophyte and sporophyte generations. Molecular Plant 2016 9, 205-220DOI: (10.1016/j.molp.2015.12.002) Copyright © 2016 The Author Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Heat Map Showing the Expression Dynamics of Transcription Factors Enriched in the Sporophyte. Gene identifiers (left) and gene descriptions (right), including family, gene name, and Arabidopsis homologs (in brackets) are shown when available. Transcription factors were selected from lists of enriched genes in S1, S2, S3, SM, and shared. To generate the shared enriched list, we looked for genes that were enriched in at least three sporophytic developmental stages when compared against non-sporophytic tissues. Red represents high expression while yellow represents low expression values. Two TCP genes were selected from this list for further analysis (highlighted with an asterisk). Molecular Plant 2016 9, 205-220DOI: (10.1016/j.molp.2015.12.002) Copyright © 2016 The Author Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 PpTCP Gene Expression Patterns and Pptcp5 Mutant Phenotype. (A) Normalized microarray intensity values for the six PpTCP gene homologs were plotted to visualize their expression pattern in the different tissues analyzed. (B) Knockout mutation of the PpTCP5 gene shows several capsules emerging from the same foot (arrow) at different developmental stages. Scale bars represent 100 μm. (C) Expression of TCP class II and class I (PpTCPI) genes in mutant and WT lines is shown by RT–PCR amplification. (D) Average percentages of sporophyte branching for WT and knockout lines. Molecular Plant 2016 9, 205-220DOI: (10.1016/j.molp.2015.12.002) Copyright © 2016 The Author Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Gene Ontology Enrichment Analysis for Sporophyte Samples. GO terms for enriched genes in four different sporophytic developmental stages were clustered using DAVID tools and the terms with the highest enrichment scores (P < 0.05) for each developmental stage were selected. ABA, abscisic acid. Molecular Plant 2016 9, 205-220DOI: (10.1016/j.molp.2015.12.002) Copyright © 2016 The Author Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Gene Ontology Enrichment Analysis of Tip-Growing Cells. GO terms from enriched genes in tip-growing cells were clustered using DAVID tools and the terms with the highest enrichment scores (P < 0.05) for each tissue, and all three combined, respectively, were selected. Molecular Plant 2016 9, 205-220DOI: (10.1016/j.molp.2015.12.002) Copyright © 2016 The Author Terms and Conditions

Figure 8 Transcription Factor Families in Gametophytic and Sporophytic Generations. From the total number of enriched transcription factor genes in each generation, the percentage of genes belonging to a specific transcription factor family was calculated. Several transcription factor families are exclusively enriched in spores. Molecular Plant 2016 9, 205-220DOI: (10.1016/j.molp.2015.12.002) Copyright © 2016 The Author Terms and Conditions