Relational Communication Preferences Across Three Generations Nancy Cheever, Communications Department L. Mark Carrier, Psychology Department Larry Rosen,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Multitasking Across Generations Lyzette Blanco & Dr. Larry Rosen California State University, Dominguez Hills.
Advertisements

Women’s Leadership Group – An Introduction
How to be safe in the digital world. How many ways can we communicate with other people and find out information about people?
It has taken an entire semester to uncover the definition… lets see what it has come to…
Perceptions of Childhood Obesity by Ethnic Groups and Amount of Media Use Heather Ruoti and Larry Rosen, Ph.D. California State University, Dominguez Hills.
In-Game Advertising Review FOX: JUMPER DVD. 2 July 2008 July-2007 July 10, 2007 July 2008 Jumper DVD In-Game Advertising Effectiveness.
Nielsen Research Group Examining Moviegoer Behavior 2012 Study.
TEENS AND THE INTERNET The exciting, scary and reassuring news about social media and internet use.
Multitasking Across Generations L. M. Carrier, L. Rosen, N. Cheever, S. Benitez, J. Chang CSU Dominguez Hills Presented at the Western Psychological Association’s.
Generational Perceptions John Arnold, Matthew Biren, Ashley Nelson, Sasha Sarkkinen, Jane Wilson Faculty Advisor: Mary Hoffman, Ph.D. Department of Communication.
Parenting the Net Generation Torrance Memorial Hospital April 15, 2008 Larry Rosen, Ph.D CSU Dominguez Hills.
Cyberbullying Simple Guidelines for Parents, Teachers, and Students January 17, 2007.
Teacher’s notes: introduction to presentation
Welcome to the iGeneration The iGeneration: Media Use, Health, and English Literacy Western Psychological Association April 24, 2009.
The Impact of Multitasking and Media Across Generations SYMPOSIUM The Impact of Multitasking and Media on Children and Adults Western Psychological Association.
Bullying Behind the Screen
COMMUNICATION ACROSS GENERATIONS COMMUNICATION OF ELDERLY PEOPLE.
The MySpace Generation Parenting Children in a Virtual World: How Parental Attachment Influences Teen Online Behavior Larry Rosen, Ph.D. Nancy Cheever,
Graphical Results Results The Effect of Virtual Worlds on Adolescents' Real World Lives Using an upper-division undergraduate social science course, students.
The Psychological Impact of Living in a Virtual World Exploring MySpace Users Ages Jyenny Babcock California State University, Dominguez Hills.
Tutorials via Social Networking. Samer El-Daher, Lucie Pollard School of Science.
The Pathway to Success Develop Programs for Parents and Families Goal 1 – Initiative 5.
Miguel Martins, Senior Lecturer – Marketing Department eLearning Celebration 22 July 2007 Improving performance on a Marketing module through the use of.
O NLINE L EARNING AND I NTERNET U SE By Linda Thompson EDTC 5103.
Agenda Why Communication is Important
© 2014 K12 Insight Parents, Students and Staff School Time Task Force Survey — Comparison Report Charlotte Mecklenburg Schools April 3 – 25, 2014.
Although definitions of bullying vary, most agree that bullying involves: –Imbalance of Power: people who bully use their power to control or harm and.
The Net Generation: Are They Really THAT Different? El Camino College May 20, 2008 Larry Rosen, Ph.D CSU Dominguez Hills.
Cyberbullying: An Old Problem with New Technology Tara Morse.
Teaching the iGeneration THE “PSYCHOLOGY OF TECHNOLOGY” San Domenico School September 17, 2013 Larry D. Rosen, Ph.D.
The MySpace Generation The MySpace Generation: Symposium Western Psychological Association May 3, 2007 Vancouver, BC Adolescents Living in a Virtual World.
Sexual Harassment on MySpace Are Predators Lurking Around Every (Virtual) Corner?
AGA 2009 Tracking Survey Perceptions of Governmental Financial Management Prepared for the Association of Government Accountants December 29, 2009 © Harris.
Youth Culture Lesson Finding Teachable Moments in Culture From YouthWorker Journal and YouthWorker.com Techno Woes Even Youth Feel Dizzying Pace of Technology.
Video Chat and Instant Messaging By Katie O’Brien and Sarah Talbott.
Equity, Access, and Achievement Gaps between Student Populations in the WCSD Joshua Padilla Program Evaluator/Researcher in WCSD Department of Accountability.
The Design of a Collaborative Learning Environment in a Mobile Technology Supported Classroom, Concept of Fraction Equivalence Sui Cheung KONG Department.
Welcome! “Sticks and stones may break my bones, but names will never hurt me.” –Nursery Rhyme first recorded in the 1800s Explain why you agree or disagree.
W Is Brand enough? Windermere Services Owner’s Retreat March 2-4, 2005.
Results A majority of respondents (67.4%) reported using Facebook daily to several times a day. Respondents that had never used Facebook were omitted from.
Social Media: The New Note Home Does Age Effect Responsiveness and acceptance to Social Media? By: David Yarbrough EDTC 5130.
+ Break Social Media Dependency Through Individual Solvency Project #2, Part 2 Erica Bodden April 27,2014.
Helping Your Child Navigate the Road to Middle School Success Be an Enlightened Parent, Not a Frightened Parent DO NOW: 1. Complete the top half of the.
Internet Safety Krista Sell IST 525 Kutztown University Summer 2011.
Digital Bell Ringer: State your educational setting Do you currently teach in a P-12 educational setting? Yes: please use the check mark No: please use.
Digital Communication: Blogging. What is digital Communication? “The electronic exchange of information”
A Demonstration Interactive Presentation. TRUE or FALSE? 20% of US children under 3 have a TV in their bedroom.
Today we are teaching the Millennial Generation!!!!
Parent Workshop OnlineSafety. Computer Safety Quiz.
Literacy Secretariat Literacy is everyone’s business Effective Early Years Literacy Teaching Practices Margaret Sankey, Manager Andrea Barker, Project.
Dating in the Digital Age Sociology Chapter 24: Social Change: Traditional, Modern, and Postmodern Societies Society: The Basics Chapter 16: Social Change:
 It is the use of technology such as a computer or cell phone to harm someone.  It occurs when someone is threatening, making fun of, or humiliating.
Generation gap.
TEXT MESSAGING AS A FORM OF COMMUNICATION A presentation about the hypothesis, survey and results.
Research Regarding Homework. Center for Public Education Key lessons: What Research says about the value of Homework. Skim the article and find: – Two.
INTERNET SAFETY. THE FACTS Internet Safety is an issue for people of all ages but especially for young people.
Better Writers Statement of Purpose I am investigating techniques used in teaching writing skills as it relates to variations among teachers so that.
Advantages and Disadvantages of ICT. ICT in a Workplace  Advantages:  You can all the people who work there if you need to send a message out.
MADELEINE A. FUGÈRE, ALITA J. COUSINS, & STEPHANIE A. MACLAREN Presented at the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Please contact Dr.
Cyber Safety with Cell Phones By: Tanner Putnam. Cell phones  Cell phones are used to talk and now are used as mini computers.  You can download APPS.
First year HE students´ social media skills Sakari Saukkonen and Jaana Kettunen Institute for Educational Research University of Jyväskylä, Finland.
Chris Bjornsen Department of Psychology,
How to be Kind Online A guide for children aged 7+
Cyberbullying BY LORD MUSHANGO.
Assessments Attitudes of UK Teachers & Parents
Friendship Quality as a Moderator
COMMUNICATION AND PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT
Student welfare services Please don’t hesitate to contact us!
Scribner Road Internet Safety Rules
Table 2. Sample items for measuring attitude towards e-learning
Presentation transcript:

Relational Communication Preferences Across Three Generations Nancy Cheever, Communications Department L. Mark Carrier, Psychology Department Larry Rosen, Psychology Department California State University, Dominguez Hills

Introduction Technological advances have increased the use of , text messaging, and instant messaging, especially among the younger generations.

Introduction Americans spend more time on the computer and using new modes of communication than they do using traditional forms of media and engaging in other daily tasks

Introduction Scholars agree that traditional forms of communication face to face and telephoneare rapidly declining among young people

Introduction Have face to face and other synchronous communication modes become a thing of the past? Are there generational differences?

Introduction How do the preferred modes change based on levels of depression and shyness?

Purpose This study examines the preferred communication methods and relational differences among three generations Looks at how these differences relate to levels of depression and shyness

Three Generations –Net GenerationBorn –Generation XBorn –Baby BoomersBorn

Method Please indicate your preferred way of communicating with each person listed below: –Parents –Children –Best friend –Good friend –Acquaintance –Significant other –Brother/sister –Other relatives –Teacher or boss –Doctor/dentist –Someone asking for help with school or work –Cousins –Make a date –Break a date –Break up with someone

Method Measured shyness levels (online and F2F) –Self-reported –When I communicate face to face I am –When I communicate online in am From very shy to very outgoing Measured depression levels –I frequently feed sad or depressed Strongly agree to strongly disagree

Communication with SIGNIFICANT OTHER Chi-square 87.08, p <.001

Communication with CHILDREN Chi-square 23.78, p <.01 *Net Generation removed

Communication with PARENTS Chi-square 92.93, p <.001

Communication with BEST FRIEND Chi-square 99.70, p <.001

Communication with GOOD FRIEND Chi-square , p <.001

Communication with ACQUAINTANCE Chi-square ; p <.001

Communication with DOCTOR/DENTIST Chi-square 43.73; p <.001

Communication with TEACHER/BOSS Chi-square 46.96, p <.001

Communication with MAKE A DATE Chi-square 85.63, p <.001

Chi-square 86.80, p <.001 Communication with BREAK A DATE

SOMEONE ASKING FOR SCHOOL/WORK HELP Chi-square , p <.001

Preferred communication methods by SHYNESS LEVEL IN PERSON __________________________________________________________ Relation In person Phone Technology (IM, , Text) ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Significant other** Shy76% 14%10% Outgoing83% 12% 5% Children* Shy76% 21% 3% Outgoing85% 13% 3% Best friend** Shy61% 24%16% Outgoing65% 25%10% *p <.05; **p <.01

Preferred communication methods by SHYNESS LEVEL IN PERSON __________________________________________________________ Activity In person Phone Technology (IM, , Text) ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Make a date* Shy37% 47%17% Outgoing40% 50%11% Break a date* Shy25% 50%26% Outgoing28% 55%16% Break up with someone** Shy64% 20%14% Outgoing78% 14% 6% *p <.05; **p <.01

Preferred communication methods by SHYNESS LEVEL ONLINE __________________________________________________________ Relation In person Phone Technology (IM, , Text) ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Acquaintance** Shy29% 40%32% Outgoing21% 26%54% Teacher or boss** Shy49% 27%24% Outgoing54% 13%32% *p <.05; **p <.01

Preferred communication methods by SHYNESS LEVEL ONLINE __________________________________________________________ Activity In person Phone Technology (IM, , Text) ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Break a date** Shy25% 63% 9% Outgoing26% 53%21% Break up with someone* Shy60% 30% 8% Outgoing75% 15% 8% Someone asking for help with work or school** Shy41% 30%27% Outgoing33% 32%35% **p <.01

Preferred communication methods by DEPRESSION LEVEL __________________________________________________________ Relation/activity In person Phone Technology (IM, , Text) ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Make a date** Depressed42% 47%11% Not depressed30% 53%17% Relatives* Depressed54% 39%5% Not depressed46% 47%5% *p <.05; **p <.01

Preferred communication methods by GENDER __________________________________________________________ RelationIn person PhoneIMText ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Acquaintance** Male28% 31%8%17%17% Female20% 27%8%21%24% Cousins** Male48% 34%2%7%7% Female39% 35%4%8%13% Good friend** Male53% 31%3%9%5% Female43% 32%5%13%7% Relatives* Male56% 36%1%2%3% Female49% 44%1%0%4% *p <.05; **p <.01

Preferred communication methods by GENDER __________________________________________________________ ActivityIn person PhoneIMText ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Make a date** Male28% 31%8%17%17% Female20% 27%8%21%24% Break a date** Male34% 50%1%11%3% Female23% 55%3%16%4% **p <.01

No. 1 Preferred method of communication N=1,319 __________________________________________________________ Relation/activity No. 1 preference (%) _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Significant other In person (71%) Parents In person (67%) Brother/sisterIn person (58%) Best friendIn person (56%) Break up with someoneIn person (56%) Teacher/bossIn person (51%) Doctor/dentistTelephone (48%) Good friendIn person (46%) RelativesIn person (44%) Break/make a dateTelephone (43%/40%) AcquaintanceTelephone (25%)

Discussion In general, the No. 1 preferred method of communication is in person In general, people would prefer to communicate either in person or on the telephone The use of , text, and instant messaging is not the most preferred method of communication in any category

Discussion As the relationship presumably gains more distance, the preferred method of communication becomes more technological As age categories increase, preference for face-to-face communication decreases in almost all categories Baby Boomers prefer more than any other generation (very few use instant messaging) Net generation prefers face to face more than any other generation

Discussion No panic about technology stealing children away from synchronous communication modes Older adults may be too busy to use face-to-face communication methods

Discussion Asked their preferred method of communication NOT how they typically communicate People may prefer to communicate in person, but cannot because of their busy lives Technology makes it easier for people to stay connected

Thank You