The Glt Simulation Valerie Halyo.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Dec/02/04 Su DongCaltech Trigger/DAQ/Online workshop1 Level 1 Trigger: Introduction L1 trigger objects and strategy Implementation features L1 composition.

Advertisements

Dec/02/04 Su DongCaltech Trigger/DAQ/Online workshop1 L1 Configuration and Future Prospects DCZ cuts and new GLT objects L1 rate diagnosis Can an improved.

Digital Filtering Performance in the ATLAS Level-1 Calorimeter Trigger David Hadley on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration.

DCZ status & results B A B AR Trigger Workshop, December 2004 Jamie Boyd University of Bristol for the Trigger Upgrade Group.

GLAST LAT ProjectTest Planning Meeting Aug 2, 2004 E. do Couto e Silva 1/6 SVAC EM2 Goals Develop distributions for E2E tests that involve comparison of.

ZPD Overview Stephen Bailey Harvard University ZPD Conceptual Design Review 11 September 2001.

Eunil Won Harvard University April 11, 2003 for ZPD FDR 1 ZPD Prototype Tests and DAQ Implementation Introduction Prototype Tests - Electrical Signals.

FDR of the End-cap Muon Trigger Electronics 1/Mar./04 1 Slice Test (SLT) of TGC electronics Introduction Simulation Trigger part SLT Wire Wire and Signal.

1 S. E. Tzamarias Hellenic Open University N eutrino E xtended S ubmarine T elescope with O ceanographic R esearch Readout Electronics DAQ & Calibration.

Vienna Group Trigger Meeting CERN, 18 July 2006 Presented by Claudia-Elisabeth Wulz Global Muon Trigger Global.

14/November/2002 CF NSS2002 in Norfolk, Virginia, USA 1 The First Integration Test of the ATLAS End-cap Muon Level 1 Trigger System Introduction Overview.

17-Aug-00 L.RistoriCDF Trigger Workshop1 SVT: current hardware status CRNowFinal Hit Finders64242 Mergers31616 Sequencers2312 AMboards4624 Hit Buffers21212.

NA62 Trigger Algorithm Trigger and DAQ meeting, 8th September 2011 Cristiano Santoni Mauro Piccini (INFN – Sezione di Perugia) NA62 collaboration meeting,

AMB HW LOW LEVEL SIMULATION VS HW OUTPUT G. Volpi, INFN Pisa.

ATLAS Trigger / current L1Calo Uli Schäfer 1 Jet/Energy module calo µ CTP L1.

The KLOE computing environment Nuclear Science Symposium Portland, Oregon, USA 20 October 2003 M. Moulson – INFN/Frascati for the KLOE Collaboration.

7 December SLHC Calo Trigger Simulation Status Report Kevin Flood, Michail Bachtis University of Wisconsin, Madison.

September 2007CHEP 07 Conference 1 A software framework for Data Quality Monitoring in ATLAS S.Kolos, A.Corso-Radu University of California, Irvine, M.Hauschild.

ZPD Project Overview B A B AR L1 DCT Upgrade FDR Masahiro Morii Harvard University Design Overview Progress and Changes since CDR Current Status Plans.

Trigger and DAQ System Zhao Jing Wei Sept. 2002, BESIII review, Beijing Outline Trigger system Event rate estimation Principle of design Scheme Monte Carlo.

Online monitor for L2 CAL upgrade Giorgio Cortiana Outline: Hardware Monitoring New Clusters Monitoring

Ted Liu, July 5,00, idea on Ztrigger L1 Trigger Strategy L1 Trigger Requirements and Trigger Lines L1 Trigger performance Background Study Improving Performance:

TDAQ Experience in the BNL Liquid Argon Calorimeter Test Facility Denis Oliveira Damazio (BNL), George Redlinger (BNL).

Monitoring of L1Calo EM Trigger Items: Overview & Midterm Results Hardeep Bansil University of Birmingham Birmingham ATLAS Weekly Meeting 11/11/2010.

ATLAS and the Trigger System The ATLAS (A Toroidal LHC ApparatuS) Experiment is one of the four major experiments operating at the Large Hadron Collider.

Trigger System LIU Zhen’an Inst. of High Energy Physics, Beijing Sep

11 th April 2003L1 DCT Upgrade FDR – TSF SessionMarc Kelly University Of Bristol On behalf of the TSF team Firmware and Testing on the TSF Upgrade Marc.

Preliminary Design of Trigger System for BES III Zhen’an LIU Inst of High Energy Physics,Beijing Oct

ATLAS The ConditionDB is accessed by the offline reconstruction framework (ATHENA). COOLCOnditions Objects for LHC The interface is provided by COOL (COnditions.

Using direct photons for L1Calo monitoring + looking at data09 Hardeep Bansil University of Birmingham Birmingham ATLAS Weekly Meeting February 18, 2010.

TRTViewer: the ATLAS TRT detector monitoring and diagnostics tool 4 th Workshop on Advanced Transition Radiation Detectors for Accelerator and Space Applications.

CP Athena Monitoring Status as of 20/05/08 Revised directory structure (again!). Phi scale configurable in degrees, radians or channels. Existing plots.

D. Elia (INFN Bari)ALICE Offline week / CERN Update on the SPD Offline Domenico Elia in collaboration with H. Tydesjo, A. Mastroserio Overview:

Overview B A B AR L1 DCT Upgrade FDR Masahiro Morii Harvard University Scope of the Project Current Status Schedule  Commissioning.

DAQ and Trigger for HPS run Sergey Boyarinov JLAB July 11, Requirements and available test results 2. DAQ status 3. Trigger system status and upgrades.

L1Calo Databases ● Overview ● Trigger Configuration DB ● L1Calo OKS Database ● L1Calo COOL Database ● ACE Murrough Landon 16 June 2008.

L1Calo DBs: Status and Plans ● Overview of L1Calo databases ● Present status ● Plans Murrough Landon 20 November 2006.

DB and Information Flow Issues ● Selecting types of run ● L1Calo databases ● Archiving run parameters ● Tools Murrough Landon 28 April 2009.

Trigger System of BES III LIU Zhen’an Inst. of High Energy Physics, Beijing June

Rainer Stamen, Norman Gee

Calorimeter Status Electronics Installation and Commissioning

Testbeam Planning Common to all testbeams:

ETD summary D. Breton, S.Luitz, U.Marconi

CMS High Level Trigger Configuration Management

CERN meeting report, and more … D. Breton

Commissioning of the ATLAS High Level Trigger

CALGO: Software Tasks cal software:

Sizing With Function Points

Electronics, Trigger and DAQ for SuperB

TOF CALIBRATION DATABASE

ATLAS L1Calo Phase2 Upgrade

eXtremely Fast Tracker; An Overview

Sheng-Li Liu, James Pinfold. University of Alberta

CMS Feedback on the High pileup (PU) Fill

Su Dong L1 DCT Upgrade Final Design Review Apr/11/03

Clk_ch4 Clk_ch3 Clk_ch2 Clk_ch1 L1A global L1A _ch T0+T0r

FPGA Implementation of Multicore AES 128/192/256

Special edition: Farewell for Valerie Halyo

L1 Trigger Strategy Ted Liu, Lawrence Berkeley Lab

Special edition: Farewell for Stephen Bailey

CLAS12 Timing Calibration

Special edition: Farewell for Eunil Won

Commissioning of the ALICE-PHOS trigger

L1 simulation review Aug 2005 Jamie Boyd

The IFR Online Detector Control at the BaBar experiment at SLAC

The Online Detector Control at the BaBar experiment at SLAC

ورود اطلاعات بصورت غيربرخط

DC trigger Present DC design Lab tests and implementation.

New Ideas on long-term DCT upgrade: conceptual design for DOCAZ

CBETA bunch pattern and BPM trigger generator Version 2

Presentation transcript:

The Glt Simulation Valerie Halyo

Design L1Atime Dct Emt L1FctPrescale Glti L1GltTickDelay L1GltMatchCombine L1FctDigiMaker L1GltCountObject L1GltDAQData L1GltDecision L1GltDigiMaker L1GltInputMaker L1GltSelectTrigger

Glt Algorithm The GltSim follows the hardware closely It attempts to match the spatial and angular location of calorimeter towers and DCH tracks. This results in 24 trigger lines which are sent to the FcsSim to issue the L1Atime The 9 primitives are: A B Ap M E G X Y U The Match and Combine Objects are: AM BM ApM BMX EM A* B* M* G*

The Clocks Emt Clk4 ->Clk8 Clk8 ->Clk16 Blt Clk8 Glti TSF Zpd Clk4 ->Clk8 Clk8 ->Clk4

Glt LUT Configuration The Glt is configured from the DB for more than 2 years now L1GltConfigP_001 LineConfigP New code to generate the lut is moved to L1GltOnline and used by the online/offline(sim) Online: The Glt Lut is generated on the fly using the Base lut bin file & the config pars from the DB->xtc Offline: Base lut is generated on the fly & the config pars from the DB

Glt Lut Luts were tested on and offline the results are identical Plan: have the base lut online generated on the fly as in the offline

Comparison Data/trgDC/NewSim Using May2004 configuration Input Tick HAD events

Comparison Data/trgDC/NewSim Using May2004 configuration Object Count HAD events

Comparison Data/trgDC/NewSim Using May2004 configuration BunchT0s HAD events

Comparison Data/NewSim Using May2004 configuration Input Tick BhaBha events

Comparison Data/NewSim Using May2004 configuration Object Count BhaBha events

Comparison Data/NewSim Using May2004 configuration BunchT0 BhaBha events

Comparison Data/NewSim Using May2004 configuration Input tick Mu events

Comparison Data/NewSim Using May2004 configuration Object Count Mu events

Comparison Data/NewSim Using May2004 configuration BunchT0 Mu events

Comparison Data/NewSim Using Apr2005 configuration Input tick HAD events

Comparison Data/NewSim Using Apr2005 configuration Object Count HAD events

Comparison Data/NewSim Using Apr2005 configuration BunchT0 HAD events

Comparison Data/NewSim Using Apr2005 configuration Input Tick BhaBha events

Comparison Data/NewSim Using Apr2005 configuration Bunch T0 BhaBha events

Comparison Data/NewSim Using Apr2005 configuration Input Tick Mu events

Comparison Data/NewSim Using Apr2005 configuration Bunch T0 Mu events

Comparison L1Sim++/trgDC Using May2004 configuration Tau Events

Comparison L1Sim++/trgDC Using May2004 configuration Bunch T0 trgDC Tau Events

Board Algorithm test We have two keys with PTD/ZPD configuration The keys are Main problem this is private code since commiting Will create conflicts it depends on the L1DctTeststand code

Tcl parameters The input delays in the Glti are set with tcls parameters and a switch depending if ZPD/PTD are going to be used The time adjustment for the the DAQ window

Conclusion/Plan The code will be tested against the Glt calibration in the teststand Final 1 tick aligment of the Glt Blt inputs