Volume 46, Issue 6, Pages (June 2012)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
McGraw-Hill/IrwinCopyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Chapter 3 Descriptive Statistics: Numerical Methods.
Advertisements

Volume 44, Issue 1, Pages (January 2016)
The Functional Impact of Alternative Splicing in Cancer
Alternative Computational Analysis Shows No Evidence for Nucleosome Enrichment at Repetitive Sequences in Mammalian Spermatozoa  Hélène Royo, Michael Beda.
Volume 43, Issue 6, Pages (September 2011)
Volume 41, Issue 6, Pages (March 2011)
Volume 54, Issue 6, Pages (June 2014)
Volume 12, Issue 2, Pages (July 2015)
Volume 38, Issue 4, Pages (May 2010)
Fulvia Bono, Judith Ebert, Esben Lorentzen, Elena Conti  Cell 
Structure of an LDLR-RAP Complex Reveals a General Mode for Ligand Recognition by Lipoprotein Receptors  Carl Fisher, Natalia Beglova, Stephen C. Blacklow 
Volume 44, Issue 3, Pages (November 2011)
Discovery and Characterization of piRNAs in the Human Fetal Ovary
Volume 7, Issue 5, Pages (June 2014)
Structure and Intrinsic Disorder in Protein Autoinhibition
Volume 63, Issue 4, Pages (August 2016)
Alternative Splicing May Not Be the Key to Proteome Complexity
Translation of Genotype to Phenotype by a Hierarchy of Cell Subsystems
Volume 64, Issue 3, Pages (November 2016)
Volume 20, Issue 12, Pages (June 2010)
Understanding Tissue-Specific Gene Regulation
Transcriptome Survey of the Contribution of Alternative Splicing to Proteome Diversity in Arabidopsis thaliana  Haopeng Yu, Caihuan Tian, Yang Yu, Yuling.
The Functional Impact of Alternative Splicing in Cancer
Volume 154, Issue 1, Pages (July 2013)
Volume 33, Issue 4, Pages (February 2009)
Jianing Yu, David Ferster  Neuron 
Integrative Multi-omic Analysis of Human Platelet eQTLs Reveals Alternative Start Site in Mitofusin 2  Lukas M. Simon, Edward S. Chen, Leonard C. Edelstein,
Volume 50, Issue 6, Pages (June 2013)
Volume 64, Issue 2, Pages (October 2016)
Joseph Rodriguez, Jerome S. Menet, Michael Rosbash  Molecular Cell 
Daniel F. Tardiff, Scott A. Lacadie, Michael Rosbash  Molecular Cell 
Orientational Preferences of Neighboring Helices Can Drive ER Insertion of a Marginally Hydrophobic Transmembrane Helix  Karin Öjemalm, Katrin K. Halling,
Properties of proteins and residues with frequent hotspot mutations
Volume 69, Issue 5, Pages e5 (March 2018)
Ptbp2 Controls an Alternative Splicing Network Required for Cell Communication during Spermatogenesis  Molly M. Hannigan, Leah L. Zagore, Donny D. Licatalosi 
RAS Proteins and Their Regulators in Human Disease
Nuclear PI5P, Uhrf1, and the Road Not Taken
RNA Regulation by Poly(ADP-Ribose) Polymerases
Volume 10, Issue 7, Pages (February 2015)
Volume 89, Issue 6, Pages (March 2016)
Regulation by Small RNAs in Bacteria: Expanding Frontiers
Volume 66, Issue 1, Pages e6 (April 2017)
Crystal Structure of β-Arrestin at 1.9 Å
Volume 22, Issue 6, Pages (June 2006)
Volume 44, Issue 3, Pages (November 2011)
Volume 47, Issue 2, Pages (July 2012)
SUMO Takes Control of a Ubiquitin-Specific Protease
Volume 8, Issue 6, Pages (September 2014)
DEAD-Box Proteins Unwind Duplexes by Local Strand Separation
Volume 122, Issue 6, Pages (September 2005)
Alternative Splicing in the Mammalian Nervous System: Recent Insights into Mechanisms and Functional Roles  Bushra Raj, Benjamin J. Blencowe  Neuron 
Volume 66, Issue 4, Pages e4 (May 2017)
Volume 45, Issue 5, Pages (March 2012)
Volume 22, Issue 2, Pages (February 2014)
Volume 53, Issue 6, Pages (March 2014)
Volume 47, Issue 4, Pages (August 2012)
Volume 42, Issue 6, Pages (June 2011)
Distal Alternative Last Exons Localize mRNAs to Neural Projections
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages (April 2007)
Brandon Ho, Anastasia Baryshnikova, Grant W. Brown  Cell Systems 
Maria S. Robles, Sean J. Humphrey, Matthias Mann  Cell Metabolism 
Volume 22, Issue 6, Pages (June 2006)
Volume 52, Issue 1, Pages (October 2013)
Volume 41, Issue 2, Pages (January 2011)
Genome-wide “Re”-Modeling of Nucleosome Positions
The Genetics of Transcription Factor DNA Binding Variation
Volume 11, Issue 7, Pages (May 2015)
Hinrich Gronemeyer, Arthur Zelent  Cancer Cell 
Volume 97, Issue 6, Pages (June 1999)
Update on glucocorticoid action and resistance
Presentation transcript:

Volume 46, Issue 6, Pages 871-883 (June 2012) Tissue-Specific Splicing of Disordered Segments that Embed Binding Motifs Rewires Protein Interaction Networks  Marija Buljan, Guilhem Chalancon, Sebastian Eustermann, Gunter P. Wagner, Monika Fuxreiter, Alex Bateman, M. Madan Babu  Molecular Cell  Volume 46, Issue 6, Pages 871-883 (June 2012) DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2012.05.039 Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Molecular Cell 2012 46, 871-883DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2012.05.039) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Classification of Exons and Characterization of the Protein Segments (A) Cassette exons that are tissue-specifically spliced are in red, and alternatively spliced cassette exons not present in the set of tissue-specific exons are in dark gray. Constitutive exons are in light gray. (B) Shown are types of data and computational approaches used to characterize the exons. See also Figure S1. Molecular Cell 2012 46, 871-883DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2012.05.039) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Tissue-Specific Segments Are Enriched in Disordered Binding Motifs and Are Conserved Percentages of protein segments encoded by the three different sets of exons that contain (A) Pfam domains, (B) disordered regions, (C) ANCHOR-binding motifs, and (D) PTM sites. Significance was assessed by chi-square test, and p values are indicated in each panel. Box plot of the distribution of conservation (percent amino acid identity) for the (E) disordered region, (F) binding motifs, and (G) binding motifs versus other regions for the three different sets of exons. Statistical significance was assessed using Mann-Whitney test. The median value within each set is shown with a thick black line. Boxes enclose values between the first and third quartile. Interquartile range (IQR) is calculated by subtracting the first quartile from the third quartile. All values that lie more than 1.5× IQR lower than the first quartile or 1.5× higher than the third quartile are considered to be outliers and were removed from the graphs to improve visualization. The smallest and highest values that are not outliers are connected with the dashed line. The notches correspond to ∼95% confidence interval for the median. See also Figure S2 and Table S1. Molecular Cell 2012 46, 871-883DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2012.05.039) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Genes with Tissue-Specific Exons Play an Important Role in Protein Interaction Networks (A) Distribution of the number of interaction partners for genes with a TS exon (TSE genes; with and without predicted binding motif) and for all other genes (non-TSE genes). See Figure 2 legend for the description of a box plot. (B) Average number of interaction partners for the TSE (red circles) and non-TSE (gray circles) genes in different tissues. The average and median number of interactions for TSE genes was greater than for non-TSE genes in each of the tissues (p < 5 × 10−2; Mann-Whitney), except for liver and testis interstitial cells. (C) Principle of the Jaccard similarity index. The score for a gene varies between 0 and 1, where 0 indicates that no interactions are maintained and 1 indicates that all interactions are maintained between a pair of tissues. Hence, the smaller the number is, the more tissue specific are its interactions. (D) Distribution of Jaccard similarity indices for TSE and non-TSE genes in the tissues included in this study. Gray horizontal line in all box plots indicates median value for the non-TSE genes. Statistical significance was assessed using Mann-Whitney test. See also Figure S3 and Table S2. Molecular Cell 2012 46, 871-883DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2012.05.039) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Examples of Tissue-Specific Exons that Can Affect Protein Interactions Transcripts (above) and the encoded protein sequences (below) are shown for tissues (box). Protein domains (colored regions) and tissue-specific segments (red) are shown. (A) The PIP5K1C gene shows differential inclusion of a TS exon between cerebellum and lymph node. This segment undergoes disorder-to-order transition when interacting with the clathrin adaptor AP-2 (AP2B1). The exclusion of this segment is likely to abolish the interaction. (B) Protein structure (3H1Z), containing interacting segments from these two proteins. (C) PACSIN2 shows differential inclusion of a TS exon between cerebellum and breast tissue. All four annotated phosphorylation sites are inside the TS exon. Thus, the exclusion is likely to affect regulation via phosphorylation. See also Table S3. Molecular Cell 2012 46, 871-883DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2012.05.039) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Alternative Inclusion of Tissue-Specific Exons Can Rewire Interaction Networks and Modulate Protein Interactions (A) When tissue-specific splicing gives rise to isoforms that differ in the presence of interacting protein segments, this can result in the rewiring of an interaction network in the respective tissues. This is illustrated with the PIP5K1C kinase gene that has an exon with different inclusion levels in cerebellum and lymph mode. The exon encodes a binding motif (red cartoon representation), which mediates the interaction with the AP-2β appendage domain (cyan surface representation). (B) Molecular mechanisms by which a tissue-specific segment can rewire or fine-tune protein interactions. Segments in red are encoded by TS exons; other regions encoded by the same protein are colored dark gray. Interaction partners are colored in cyan. Segments encoded by TS exons can include a region that directly interacts with other proteins, DNA, RNA, or ligands, or indirectly affect the protein's binding properties (e.g., affinity, kinetics, and selectivity). TS segments that are involved in interactions are less frequently domains and more often disordered regions that embed peptide-binding motifs. An example for the former is a TS segment encoding the complete PF21A PHD zinc finger domain that recognizes nonmethylated lysine 4 of histone H3 (2PUY). An example for the latter is the disordered segment encoded by a TS exon of PEX19, which becomes ordered upon binding to PEX3 (3MK4). An example of a splicing event that affects linker length, thereby altering its affinity to bind DNA, is the fly UBX gene (1B8I; disordered linker, red line; and DNA, light gray surface). An example of where the spliced exon encodes an intramolecular interaction motif that competes or masks an interaction interface is the acid box region of the FGFR kinases (model based on 2CKN and 1YRY; acidic linker, red line). See also Table S4. Molecular Cell 2012 46, 871-883DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2012.05.039) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions