Distinct but Concerted Roles of ATR, DNA-PK, and Chk1 in Countering Replication Stress during S Phase  Rémi Buisson, Jessica L. Boisvert, Cyril H. Benes,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
E2 GSCE2 bulkG7 GSCG7 bulk Mean SF4Gy (95% CI) 0.78 (0.72, 0.83) 0.56 (0.47, 0.64) 0.65 (0.57,0.72) 0.43 (0.34,0.51) T test of meansp = 0.001p =
Advertisements

Volume 14, Issue 2, Pages (August 2008)
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages (February 2016)
Volume 53, Issue 4, Pages (February 2014)
Volume 34, Issue 4, Pages (August 2015)
Volume 35, Issue 3, Pages (August 2009)
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (August 2010)
Anthony J. Cesare, Makoto T. Hayashi, Laure Crabbe, Jan Karlseder 
Volume 65, Issue 1, Pages (January 2017)
Volume 64, Issue 6, Pages (December 2016)
NRF2 Is a Major Target of ARF in p53-Independent Tumor Suppression
Richard C. Centore, Stephanie A. Yazinski, Alice Tse, Lee Zou 
Cdc45 Is a Critical Effector of Myc-Dependent DNA Replication Stress
Volume 18, Issue 3, Pages (April 2005)
Oliver I. Fregoso, Shipra Das, Martin Akerman, Adrian R. Krainer 
Volume 44, Issue 2, Pages (October 2011)
Volume 22, Issue 1, Pages (January 2012)
Volume 15, Issue 7, Pages (May 2016)
Volume 130, Issue 4, Pages (August 2007)
Volume 63, Issue 2, Pages (July 2016)
Coupling of Homologous Recombination and the Checkpoint by ATR
Volume 60, Issue 6, Pages (December 2015)
Volume 53, Issue 2, Pages (January 2014)
Volume 43, Issue 2, Pages (July 2011)
Jungmook Lyu, Vicky Yamamoto, Wange Lu  Developmental Cell 
Activation of DNA Damage Response Signaling by Condensed Chromatin
Volume 35, Issue 3, Pages (August 2009)
Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages (January 2008)
Volume 66, Issue 4, Pages e5 (May 2017)
Volume 69, Issue 5, Pages e5 (March 2018)
Volume 38, Issue 1, Pages (April 2010)
Cytoplasmic ATR Activation Promotes Vaccinia Virus Genome Replication
Volume 56, Issue 5, Pages (December 2014)
Ken-ichi Yoshioka, Yoshiko Yoshioka, Peggy Hsieh  Molecular Cell 
Laura Lande-Diner, Jianmin Zhang, Howard Cedar  Molecular Cell 
Volume 6, Issue 1, Pages (January 1997)
Andrew N. Blackford, Stephen P. Jackson  Molecular Cell 
Volume 25, Issue 21, Pages (November 2015)
Activation of DSB Processing Requires Phosphorylation of CtIP by ATR
Volume 7, Issue 1, Pages e3 (July 2018)
A Critical Role for Noncoding 5S rRNA in Regulating Mdmx Stability
Volume 60, Issue 2, Pages (October 2015)
Volume 46, Issue 5, Pages (June 2012)
Volume 19, Issue 1, Pages (April 2017)
Volume 19, Issue 5, Pages (September 2005)
Yi Tang, Jianyuan Luo, Wenzhu Zhang, Wei Gu  Molecular Cell 
Volume 26, Issue 6, Pages (June 2007)
Shrimp miR-34 from Shrimp Stress Response to Virus Infection Suppresses Tumorigenesis of Breast Cancer  Yalei Cui, Xiaoyuan Yang, Xiaobo Zhang  Molecular.
Volume 59, Issue 4, Pages (August 2015)
Single-Stranded DNA Orchestrates an ATM-to-ATR Switch at DNA Breaks
Volume 47, Issue 4, Pages (August 2012)
DNA Damage Foci at Dysfunctional Telomeres
Volume 71, Issue 2, Pages e3 (July 2018)
Two Distinct Modes of ATR Activation Orchestrated by Rad17 and Nbs1
Negative Regulation of Tumor Suppressor p53 by MicroRNA miR-504
Volume 52, Issue 2, Pages (October 2013)
Christopher Bruhn, Zhong-Wei Zhou, Haiyan Ai, Zhao-Qi Wang 
Volume 19, Issue 9, Pages (May 2017)
Volume 49, Issue 5, Pages (March 2013)
Transcriptional Regulation of AKT Activation by E2F
Oliver I. Fregoso, Shipra Das, Martin Akerman, Adrian R. Krainer 
Volume 37, Issue 5, Pages (March 2010)
Volume 14, Issue 2, Pages (August 2008)
Volume 26, Issue 10, Pages (October 2018)
Multiple Rad5 Activities Mediate Sister Chromatid Recombination to Bypass DNA Damage at Stalled Replication Forks  Eugen C. Minca, David Kowalski  Molecular.
Single-Stranded DNA Orchestrates an ATM-to-ATR Switch at DNA Breaks
Volume 40, Issue 1, Pages (October 2010)
Volume 65, Issue 5, Pages e4 (March 2017)
Chih-Yung S. Lee, Tzu-Lan Yeh, Bridget T. Hughes, Peter J. Espenshade 
Yun-Gui Yang, Tomas Lindahl, Deborah E. Barnes  Cell 
Presentation transcript:

Distinct but Concerted Roles of ATR, DNA-PK, and Chk1 in Countering Replication Stress during S Phase  Rémi Buisson, Jessica L. Boisvert, Cyril H. Benes, Lee Zou  Molecular Cell  Volume 59, Issue 6, Pages 1011-1024 (September 2015) DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2015.07.029 Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Molecular Cell 2015 59, 1011-1024DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2015.07.029) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Acute ATR Inhibition Exerts Two Distinct Effects on S-Phase Cells (A) U2OS cells were cultured in BrdU for 36 hr, treated with DMSO or ATRi 1 (10 μM VE-821), and analyzed for BrdU and γH2AX by immunostaining. (B) Quantification of the BrdU intensity of 1,000 U2OS cells treated with DMSO or ATRi. Black lines indicate median BrdU intensities of BrdU-positive cells in various cell populations. (C) Quantification of the BrdU and γH2AX intensities of 1,200 U2OS cells treated with DMSO or ATRi. Cell subpopulation 1 displayed less ssDNA at 8 hr than at 2 hr. Cell subpopulation 2 displayed very high levels of ssDNA and became γH2AX positive at 8 hr. (D) Levels of RPA32, pRPA32, and γH2AX in the soluble and chromatin fractions of ATRi-treated cells were analyzed by western blot. (E) The levels of chromatin-bound RPA32 and pRPA32 were analyzed in cells treated with ATRi 2 (AZ20) and ATRi 3 (EPT-46464). See also Figure S1. Molecular Cell 2015 59, 1011-1024DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2015.07.029) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 ATR Suppresses ssDNA Accumulation in Early S Phase (A and B) Quantification of chromatin-bound RPA, EdU incorporation, and DNA contents of 5,000 U2OS cells treated with DMSO or ATRi 1 (10 μM VE-821). Cells were color coded according to the intensity of RPA staining (left). (C) T98G cells were released synchronously from G0 and analyzed for EdU incorporation at the indicated times. (D) Staining intensity of chromatin-bound RPA was analyzed at different stages of the cell cycle after ATRi or DMSO treatment. Red lines indicate mean RPA intensities in various cell populations. ∗∗p < 0.01; ∗∗∗p < 0.001. See also Figure S2. Molecular Cell 2015 59, 1011-1024DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2015.07.029) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 ATRi Suppresses DNA Damage by Promoting RRM2 Accumulation and Limiting Origin Firing (A) T98G cells were released synchronously from G0 in the presence or absence of ATRi 1 (10 μM VE-821). Levels of RRM2, γH2AX, RPA70, RPA32, RPA14, and Cyclin A were analyzed during the time course. (B) Asynchronously growing U2OS cells were treated with ATRi 1 (10 μM VE-821) or Chk1i 1 (2 μM MK-8776). Levels of RRM2 and E2F1 were analyzed at the indicated times. (C) Levels of RRM2 and E2F1 were analyzed in U2OS cells treated with DMSO or ATRi in the presence of cycloheximide (CHX). Relative levels of RRM2 and E2F1 were quantified from three blots (n = 3). Error bars, SD. (D) U2OS cells transfected with empty vector or E2F1-expressing plasmids were treated with ATRi for 8 hr. Levels of RRM2, E2F1, and γH2AX were analyzed. (E) U2OS cells were treated with the indicated inhibitors for 8 hr. Levels of RRM2, E2F1, and γH2AX were analyzed. (F) U2OS cells were treated with DMSO or ATRi for 8 hr in the presence or absence of MG132 or MLN4924. (G) U2OS cells infected with HA-RRM2-expressing retrovirus or control virus were treated with ATRi for 8 hr. Levels of RRM2 and γH2AX were analyzed at the indicated times. (H) A model in which ATR coordinates RRM2 accumulation and origin firing in early S phase is shown. See also Figure S3. Molecular Cell 2015 59, 1011-1024DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2015.07.029) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 ATRi-Treated Cells Recover via a Chk1-Mediated Mechanism (A) U2OS cells were treated with DMSO, ATRi 1 (10 μM VE-821), or Chk1i 1 (2 μM MK-8776). Levels of RPA32, pRPA32, and γH2AX were analyzed at the indicated times. (B) U2OS cells were treated with increasing concentrations of ATRi or Chk1i for 24 hr and then cultured in inhibitor-free media. Cell survival was analyzed 4 days after treatment. Error bar, SD (n = 3). (C) U2OS cells were treated with DMSO, ATRi, or Chk1i for 8 hr. BrdU and γH2AX intensities were quantified in 1,200 cells at the indicated times. (D) U2OS cells were treated with ATRi or Chk1i. Levels of chromatin-bound RPA were analyzed at the indicated times. (E) U2OS cells were treated with ATRi, and levels of pChk1 and CDC25A were analyzed at the indicated times. (F) Levels of CDC25A in U2OS cells treated with ATRi or Chk1i were compared at the indicated times. (G) A model in which Chk1 promotes the recovery of ATRi-treated cells with moderate ssDNA is shown. See also Figure S4. Molecular Cell 2015 59, 1011-1024DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2015.07.029) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Regulation and Function of Chk1 during Recovery (A) Levels of pDNA-PK, pATM, pChk1, and CDC25A were analyzed in ATRi-treated U2OS cells at the indicated times. (B) U2OS cells were treated with ATRi, ATMi, DNA-PKi, or the combinations of these inhibitors. Levels of pDNA-PK, pATM, pChk1, and CDC25A were analyzed 8 hr after treatment. (C) The percentage of replication tracts containing fired origins was determined in RPE1 cells treated with DMSO or ATRi at the indicated times. Error bars, SD (n = 3 experiments). ∗∗p < 0.01; ∗∗∗p < 0.001. (D) RPE1 cells were treated with DMSO or various inhibitors as indicated. The inter-origin distance was analyzed using a DNA fiber assay at the indicated times. Error bars, SEM (n = 25 to 67 as indicated). ∗∗∗∗p < 0.0001; n.s., not significant. (E and F) RPE1 cells were treated with DMSO or various inhibitors as indicated. The length of continuous replication tracts was determined using a DNA fiber assay at the indicated times (>600 forks per condition, n = 3 experiments). See also Figure S5. Molecular Cell 2015 59, 1011-1024DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2015.07.029) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 ATRi Selectively Kills Cells under High Replication Stress (A) U2OS cells were treated with ATRi for 2 hr in the presence of increasing concentrations of HU. The BrdU intensity of 1,000 U2OS cells was quantified. Black lines indicate mean BrdU intensities of BrdU-positive cells in various populations. (B) U2OS cells were treated with ATRi or Chk1i for 16 hr in the presence of increasing concentrations of HU. Cell death was measured by the TUNEL assay. Error bars, SD (n = 3). (C and D) U2OS cells were induced to overexpress Cyclin E or left uninduced, and treated with ATRi or Chk1i for 16 hr. Levels of Cyclin E and γH2AX were analyzed by western blot (C). Fractions of TUNEL-positive cells were quantified (D). Error bars, SD (n = 3). (E and F) T98G, RPE1, and MCF10A cells were treated with DMSO or ATRi. Levels of ssDNA were analyzed by native BrdU staining 2 hr after ATRi treatment (E). Yellow lines indicate mean BrdU intensities of BrdU-positive cells in various populations. Levels of cell death were measured by TUNEL assay at the indicated times (F). Error bars, SD (n = 3). (G) Quantification of ssDNA, γH2AX, and cell survival of ten colorectal cell lines after ATRi treatment. Levels of ssDNA and γH2AX were analyzed 2 and 16 hr after the indicated treatments, respectively. Fractions of ATRi-treated cells displaying stronger BrdU staining than untreated cells were determined (see Supplemental Experimental Procedures). Cell survival was analyzed 6 days after the indicated treatments using CellTiter-Glo. See also Figure S6. Molecular Cell 2015 59, 1011-1024DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2015.07.029) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Modeling the Roles for ATR, DNA-PK, and Chk1 in Countering Replication Stress (A) A fraction of early S-phase cells are particularly vulnerable to ATR inactivation. (B) ATRi selectively kills cells under high replication stress, whereas Chk1i induces cell death even in cells in which replication stress is moderate. (C) ATRi-induced ssDNA is an indicator of replication stress that may predict the ATRi sensitivity of cancer cells. Molecular Cell 2015 59, 1011-1024DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2015.07.029) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions