Safety Analysis Ian Bacon Zach Dicklin Amy Ritter Eric Yee.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
INDIVIDUAL PROJECT BY R.KARTHIKMANOJ
Advertisements

/// MELSEC Safety /// QS001CPU /// QS0J61BT12 /// QS0J65BTB2-12DT /// MELSEC Safety /// Mitsubishi Electric - MELSEC Safety - Training Documentation -
Josh Piron, Jacob Pfister, Kevin Templar, Mike Phillips Group Nine Reliability and Safety Analysis DART.
Milestone 2: Project Proposal and Statement of Work TEAM 8: ANDRE ELLIOTTPROJECT: BITCOIN WALLET MARK NIXON KISHEN PATEL ZACH HOELZLE.
RELIABILITY & SAFETY ANALYSIS PRESENTED BY: ANDREW BATEK Team # 15: Acoustic Storm Interweaving the impressive visual power of electricity and the visceral.
PIC Evaluation/ Development Board Dec02-12 December 10, 2002 Client: ECpE Department Faculty Advisors: Dr. Rover, Dr. Weber Chad Berg, Luke Bishop, Tyson.
Group Members: Brad Cox Kevin Burkett Tera Cline Arthur Perkins CS10 Battery Management System.
TEAM BRIGHTRIDERS Failure Modes, Effects, and Criticality Analysis “We put the SOUL in SOULAR racing”
ECE 477 Design Review Team 4  Spring 2008 Zach Dicklin Amy Ritter Ian Bacon Eric Yee.
Daryl SielaffBen McQuiston Will McKennaDavid Hartman Functional Blocks and FMECA Chart.
1 Ian Bacon Zach Dicklin Amy Ritter Eric Yee. 2 Block Diagram.
Matt Waldersen TJ Strzelecki Rick Schuman Krishna Jhajaria (Presenting)
Ground loops Why grounding is so important ?DefinitionGround loops :(Introduction)where ground loops affect ?Ground loops are created by :Solutions.
Kian Hui Wong Chia Siong Goh Wan Qi Choo Jun Jun Peh Presenter: Kian Hui Wong.
Presenter: Chia Siong Goh.  A music synthesizer that uses the 8x8 grid of 64 buttons as its user interface to produce sound and emit light.  3 music.
ECE 477 Group 3 The Gauntlet George Hadley Kelli Hacker Sean Ma Jacob Champion.
Team 3 Humphrey's Treasure Chest Roy Scheck Tony Leichty Charles Lan Steve Kingsley.
FEST Far End Speakerphone Test System ECE 477 Fall 2011 TEAM 5 Gloria Budiman Alexander Kidarsa Christopher Sakalis Vishal Gala.
Group 11. CriticalityFailure EffectMax Probability HighInjury to user may occur. LowLoss of some or all functions of the device. Customer dissatisfaction.
1 Ian Bacon Zach Dicklin Amy Ritter Eric Yee Patent Liability.
TCSP – Reliability and Safety. Reliability Analysis Major component chosen for analysis:Major component chosen for analysis: Switching Regulators (LM2679SD-5.0,
Solar Telematics System
ECE 477 Final Presentation Team 4  Spring Outline Project overviewProject overview Block diagramBlock diagram Design challengesDesign challenges.
Not So Deep Blue. LED chess board Detect piece movement Magnets/Reed switches Show possible moves Track game time (picture taken from a DIY project)
Senior Design Weekly Update GROUP MAY1633 9/28/2015.
Team 9 - Scribacious Rabble Safety and Reliability Analysis Mitchell Erdbruegger (presenting) Paul Rosswurm William Hess Ben Kobin.
ALEX BUSCHKOETTER ALEX GLENN KIMBERLY SOONG PETRA MUSTAFA Group 4: 3MS.
Nick Kwolek Martin Pendergast Stephen Edwards David Duemler.
The “Drink Mixer” Reliability and SafetyAnalysis.
Technical Communications Practicum: Failure Modes, Effects and Criticality Analysis SmartShopper Jeff Richards, John Sweeney, Stevi Wood and Tera Wong.
Team 5 Reliability & Safety TCSP. High Criticality = λ < Low Criticality = λ < High Criticality determined by constant vehicular movement.
Wall-E Prototype I TCSP #8 Safety and Reliability Analysis Team 1 Xin Jin Ranmin Chen Hang Xie Zelun Tie.
Field Replaceable Units, Common Problems, and Flowcharts.
Home Enhancement Suite Presenter: Allen Humphreys William Bouchonnet, Daniel Sabo, Nathan Irvin.
(Left to Right) Matt Finn Brian Crone Samuel Oshin Yonatan Feleke.
1 Ian Bacon Zach Dicklin Amy Ritter Eric Yee Software Overview.
Fly Spy – Group 12 Reliability and Safety Analysis Heather Barrett.
Self-Sustainable Electric Golf Bag Final Presentation Group 19 Jon Kinney, Cory Edwards, Harrison Kantner 30 April 2013.
A+ Computer Repair Lesson 9 Problems Causing Power Events.
P-REV Michael Connaboy Stephen Schiffli Ram Hudiara Win Than Aung.
Criticality measures Low  General annoyance – screen stops working, buttons don’t work  λ < High  Parts get hot, catch fire, and/or explode 
CONDUCTING TEST ON THE INSTALLED COMPUTER SYSTEM
Safety and Reliability Analysis
ECE 477 Design Review Team 12  Spring 2007
Autonomous Rescue Vehicle (Team 10)
FMECA chart April 12, 2006 The J Team Jennifer Tietz Jared Suttles
FLAC Audio Player Danielle Miller with Isaac Jones Greg McCoy
Reliability and Safety Analysis
Dec03-11 Portable Gas Safety Sensor December 9, 2003
Atrial Fibrillation Detection Device
Fix Windows 7 Blue Screen Error Call Support Number
Motherboard and its component What is Motherboard? Location Function.
ECE 477 Final Presentation Team 8 Spring 2013
Reliability & Safety Analysis
SHU: The Running Companion
Ian Bacon Zach Dicklin Amy Ritter Eric Yee.
Joe Trefilek Jeff Kubascik Paul Scheffler Matt Rockey
SHU: The Running Companion
ECE 477 Senior Design Group 4  Spring 2008
Universal Dim Actuator UD/S
ECE477 Team 6: The Soviet Challenge
Ryan McLean John-Michael Mulesa Joe Perrin Zach Schoenberger
Team We Ate 9 FMECA Worksheet.
Reliability and Safety Analysis
Matt Baker Laura Kassovic Corey Zahner Jason Eaton
Dong-Han Ryu Yukeun Sim Shiv Biddanda Po-Cheng (Robert) Wang
The Two Wheel Deal Group 12 Greg Eakins Eric Geier Pete Dudash
Electricity Module 13.
Reliability & Safety Analysis
The computer laboratory
Presentation transcript:

Safety Analysis Ian Bacon Zach Dicklin Amy Ritter Eric Yee

Definition of Criticality Levels Safety Analysis Definition of Criticality Levels Loss of some functionality, reparable by user Loss of some functionality, not reparable by user Device unusable, reparable by user Device unusable, not reparable by user Device is a personal injury risk

Components for Analysis Safety Analysis Components for Analysis Power Circuitry Microcontroller SD Memory Card LCD Module

Safety Analysis 1) Power Circuitry

1) Power Circuitry Safety Analysis # Failure Mode Possible Causes Effects of Failure Method of Detection Criticality Probability Remarks A1 Circuit is not powered LDO failure Disconnected power component Power supply failure, disconnect -Device is unusable -Observation status LEDs -Test with DMM 3, 4 A2 Power is unregulated PCB trace short -Damage to critical components -Device operates erratically -Fire hazard 2,4,5

Safety Analysis 2) Microcontroller

2) Microcontroller Safety Analysis # Failure Mode Possible Causes Effects of Failure Method of Detection Criticality Probability Remarks B1 Peripheral components damaged Shock Unregulated power Physical damage -Comm.with peripheral lost or erradic -Device is unusable -Observation 2, 4 .58E-6 B2 Critical components damaged -Device operated erradically 2,4

Safety Analysis 3) SD Memory Card

3) SD Memory Card Safety Analysis # Failure Mode Possible Causes Effects of Failure Method of Detection Criticality Probability Remarks C1 Read failure Physical damage Power surge -Incorrect data read -Device is unusable -Software error detection 1,3 Easy, cheap, user fix C2 Write failure Write lifetime exceeded -Incorrect data writes -Incorrect data reads Depends on update frequency, likely between 2E-6 and 4E-6

Safety Analysis 4) LCD Module

4) LCD Module Safety Analysis # Failure Mode Possible Causes Effects of Failure Method of Detection Criticality Probability Remarks D1 Connection failure Physical damage, disconnect -Displays incorrect or garbled data -Device is unusable -Observation 1, 3 Easy fix D2 Power failure -Disconnect -Damaged power adapter -Controller board power supply failure -Blank display 3,4 D3 Backlight failure Display lifespan exceeded Power surge 4 25E-6 Failure likely in <5 years

4) LCD Module (conti.) Safety Analysis # Failure Mode Possible Causes Effects of Failure Method of Detection Criticality Probability Remarks D4 Controller board failure Physical damage Power surge -Displays behaves erratically -Display is blank -Device is unusable -Observation -Software detection 2,4