Dariyus Z Kabraji MARS 6300 Project

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Tables, Figures, and Equations
Advertisements

CHAPTER 27 Mantel Test From: McCune, B. & J. B. Grace Analysis of Ecological Communities. MjM Software Design, Gleneden Beach, Oregon
Forecasting Using the Simple Linear Regression Model and Correlation
Class 14 Testing Hypotheses about Means Paired samples 10.3 p
Chapter 16 Introduction to Nonparametric Statistics
Agricultural and Biological Statistics
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved Least Squares Regression Models.
QUANTITATIVE DATA ANALYSIS
Chapter 14 Analysis of Categorical Data
Chapter 13 Introduction to Linear Regression and Correlation Analysis
Chapter Topics Types of Regression Models
From: McCune, B. & J. B. Grace Analysis of Ecological Communities. MjM Software Design, Gleneden Beach, Oregon
Measurement Tools for Science Observation Hypothesis generation Hypothesis testing.
Correlation.
Introduction to Regression with Measurement Error STA302: Fall/Winter 2013.
A Statistical Analysis of Seedlings Planted in the Encampment Forest Association By: Tony Nixon.
Multiple Regression The Basics. Multiple Regression (MR) Predicting one DV from a set of predictors, the DV should be interval/ratio or at least assumed.
The Examination of Residuals. Examination of Residuals The fitting of models to data is done using an iterative approach. The first step is to fit a simple.
Chapter 26 Chi-Square Testing
Skewness & Kurtosis: Reference
PCB 3043L - General Ecology Data Analysis. OUTLINE Organizing an ecological study Basic sampling terminology Statistical analysis of data –Why use statistics?
MGT-491 QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS AND RESEARCH FOR MANAGEMENT OSMAN BIN SAIF Session 26.
© Copyright McGraw-Hill 2000
1 Regression Analysis The contents in this chapter are from Chapters of the textbook. The cntry15.sav data will be used. The data collected 15 countries’
CD-ROM Chap 16-1 A Course In Business Statistics, 4th © 2006 Prentice-Hall, Inc. A Course In Business Statistics 4 th Edition CD-ROM Chapter 16 Introduction.
Review of fundamental 1 Data mining in 1D: curve fitting by LLS Approximation-generalization tradeoff First homework assignment.
PCB 3043L - General Ecology Data Analysis.
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall2(2)-1 Chapter 2: Displaying and Summarizing Data Part 2: Descriptive Statistics.
Data Transformations. 4 For some data sets, it may be necessary to transform variables –e.g. change units (lb to kg, ˚ C to ˚ F, etc.) This is simply.
Tutorial I: Missing Value Analysis
Statistical Methods. 2 Concepts and Notations Sample unit – the basic landscape unit at which we wish to establish the presence/absence of the species.
Class Seven Turn In: Chapter 18: 32, 34, 36 Chapter 19: 26, 34, 44 Quiz 3 For Class Eight: Chapter 20: 18, 20, 24 Chapter 22: 34, 36 Read Chapters 23 &
Quadrat Sampling Chi-squared Test
Chapter 11 Analysis of Variance
GS/PPAL Section N Research Methods and Information Systems
Populations.
Chapter 12 Chi-Square Tests and Nonparametric Tests
BAE 6520 Applied Environmental Statistics
Chapter 14 Inference on the Least-Squares Regression Model and Multiple Regression.
Design of Experiments (DOE)
Chi-square test or c2 test
STATISTICS POINT ESTIMATION
Aaker, Kumar, Day Ninth Edition Instructor’s Presentation Slides
Statistics for Managers using Microsoft Excel 3rd Edition
Model validation and prediction
PCB 3043L - General Ecology Data Analysis.
Hypothesis Testing and Confidence Intervals (Part 1): Using the Standard Normal Lecture 8 Justin Kern October 10 and 12, 2017.
Fundamentals of regression analysis
Elementary Statistics
IE-432 Design Of Industrial Experiments
Multivariate community analysis
CHAPTER 29: Multiple Regression*
Basic Statistical Terms
Multivariate Analysis of Trace Elements from Coral Cores
Statistics review Basic concepts: Variability measures Distributions
Project Presentation Template
J.-F. Pâris University of Houston
Stranding Patterns in Stenella spp.
Coral Species distribution and Benthic Cover type He’eia HI
Fish Communities Before and After a Bleaching Event
Identifying and Correcting Outliers From Paleo Forage Fish Records using a Multivariate Statistical Approach MARS6300 Alex Filardo 2018.
Multivariate Analysis of a Carbonate Chemistry Time-Series Study
PCA of Waimea Wave Climate
Dataset: Time-depth-recorder (TDR) raw data 1. Date 2
Inference for Two Way Tables
UNIT V CHISQUARE DISTRIBUTION
S.M.JOSHI COLLEGE, HADAPSAR
Introduction to Regression
Biostatistics Lecture (2).
Descriptive and elementary statistics
Presentation transcript:

Dariyus Z Kabraji MARS 6300 Project Analysis of Hawaiian Invertebrate Communities With Respect to Seagrass Sediment Cores Dariyus Z Kabraji MARS 6300 Project

Seagrasses Marine plants from the Alismatales family Halophila hawaiiana Halophila decipiens Marine plants from the Alismatales family Primary producers in marine ecosystems They are engineering species, i.e. capable of altering their habitat They attract a variety of species, offer protection from predators, food for herbivores, support epiphytes Images obtained from the UH Botany Department

Given Data Seagrass sediment cores collected from eight different locations on Oahu. Core samples were chilled in formalin to preserve the species. Sediment core types affected by seagrass presence, or absence. Bare sediment selected as control. Species data: 66 species (quantitative) from 8 locations, 2 seagrass species per location. Environmental variables: 6 sediment textural groups-presence (categorical) from 8 locations , 2 seagrass species per location.

Kaneohe Bay Sandbar Kaneohe Bay Sampan Channel Kahala Maunalua Bay 1 Waikiki Wailupe Maunalua Bay 3 Maunalua Bay 2

Objective Characterize the Hawaiian seagrass infaunal invertebrate community Confirm that the presence of seagrasses affect the abundance and diversity of associated invertebrates by comparing invertebrates within sediment core samples beneath the seagrass species to samples from a bare habitat. Hypotheses: Abundance of invertebrate species will vary according to the textural group of the sediment cores. There will be significant evidence of competition between the worms and crustacean species.

Data Matrix Locations: Sp = Kaneohe Bay Sampan Channel Sp = Kaneohe Bay Sandbar M1 = Maunalua Bay Niukuki M2 = Maunalua Bay Paiko M3 = Maunalua Bay Kuli’ou’ou beach park Wk = Waikiki Wa = Wailupe beach park KH = Kahala First attempt: arranged a full matrix with genus and species only. Suffix to locations: h = Halophila hawaiiana Sediment cores d = Halophila decipiens Sediment cores b = bare surfaces

Data Summary 1056 cells in main matrix Percent of cells empty = 69.223 Matrix total = 0.41117E+06 Matrix mean = 0.38936E+03 Variance of totals of species = 0.43892E+09 CV of totals of species = 336.29% Skewness Kurtosis Averages: 2.612 7.354

Data Summary Outliers: 3 ------------------------------------------------------------ ENTITY AVERAGE STANDARD RANK NAME DISTANCE DEVIATIONS 1 Leptochelia dubia 0.97566 2.09819 65 Paragrubia vorax 0.79381 -2.02055 66 Munna acarina 0.78825 -2.14649

Direct NMS-Texture groups Compared full species abundance with sediment core consistencies observed in various locations: STRESS IN RELATION TO DIMENSIONALITY (Number of Axes) -------------------------------------------------------------------- Stress in real data Stress in randomized data 50 run(s) Monte Carlo test, 50 runs ------------------------- ----------------------------------- Axes Minimum Mean Maximum Minimum Mean Maximum p 1 24.309 40.296 54.006 23.995 44.873 54.006 0.0392 2 13.586 14.882 36.596 12.554 16.939 36.592 0.1569

Direct NMS-Texture groups Compared full species abundance with sediment core consistencies observed in various locations: MANTEL TEST RESULTS: Mantel`s asymptotic approximation method ------------------------------------------------------------ 0.163693 = r = Standardized Mantel statistic 0.683858E+02 = Observed Z (sum of cross products) 0.666572E+02 = Expected Z 0.229742E+01 = Variance of Z 0.151572E+01 = Standard error of Z 0.114046E+01 = t Ho: no relationship between matrices 0.254457 = p (type I error)

Data Transformations As per the instructions in data manipulation and transformation for count data, a constant (1) can be added so fx = log(0+1) The logarithmic transformation f(x) is conducted since there are large amounts of zero values and a high degree of variation between the samples. Outliers: 2 ENTITY AVERAGE STANDARD RANK NAME DISTANCE DEVIATIONS ------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 Leptochelia dubia 0.59748 3.10979 2 Armandia intermedia 0.55879 2.06024 ------------------------------------------

Data Modification Relativization by maximum conducted on column species General Relativization conducted as a test run in case there is considerable noise generated by the rarer species in relativization by maximum. Since the data is not normal, conducting NMDS.

Data Modification (General Relativization) STRESS IN RELATION TO DIMENSIONALITY (Number of Axes) -------------------------------------------------------------------- Stress in real data Stress in randomized data 50 run(s) Monte Carlo test, 999 runs ------------------------- ----------------------------------- Axes Minimum Mean Maximum Minimum Mean Maximum p ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 36.101 47.926 53.863 34.577 49.721 54.010 0.0050 2 20.246 22.723 36.590 20.070 26.046 36.640 0.0030 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ p = proportion of randomized runs with stress < or = observed stress i.e., p = (1 + no. permutations <= observed)/(1 + no. permutations) Conclusion: a 2-dimensional solution is recommended.

Phoxichillidiidae sp. A Species Diversity H. hawaiiana only H. decipiens only Bare sediment only Amphliochidae sp. B Oligochaeta sp. B Cirratulidae sp. A Elasmopus spp. Spionidae sp. A   Amphipoda sp. A Eursiroides diplonyx Isopoda sp. A Photis spp. Smaragdia bryanae Phoxichillidiidae sp. A Aspidosiphon spp. Sipuncula sp. C Sipuncula sp. B Halophila hawaiiana did not support greater species biodiversity, even though it is an endemic species

Relation between Crustaceans and Worm Species Split the matrix into crustacean species data and annelid, phoronid, nemerted, sipunculate data. 2 matrices, 33 species each STRESS IN RELATION TO DIMENSIONALITY (Number of Axes) -------------------------------------------------------------------- Stress in real data Stress in randomized data 50 run(s) Monte Carlo test, 50 runs ------------------------- ----------------------------------- Axes Minimum Mean Maximum Minimum Mean Maximum p 1 26.453 40.827 54.006 26.787 46.109 54.005 0.0196 2 14.478 15.893 34.146 9.233 17.271 35.349 0.2941 p = proportion of randomized runs with stress < or = observed stress i.e., p = (1 + no. permutations <= observed)/(1 + no. permutations)

Relation between Crustaceans and Worm Species MANTEL TEST RESULTS: Mantel`s asymptotic approximation method ------------------------------------------------------------ 0.385575 = r = Standardized Mantel statistic 0.694247E+02 = Observed Z (sum of cross products) 0.673680E+02 = Expected Z 0.627768E+00 = Variance of Z 0.792318E+00 = Standard error of Z 0.259588E+01 = t Ho: no relationship between matrices 0.009572 = p (type I error) --------------------------------------------------------

Further Analysis Obtain the original datasets of leaf biomass and rhizome biomass. Conduct correlation studies between them, and ordination with the species data to determine species abundance with respect to seagrass abundance. Also conduct MRPP with species data against environmental variables.

Data source Matthew Spielman’s Thesis: ‘Benthic Community Structure of Hawaiian Seagrass Habitats’ (2011).