Volume 62, Issue 5, Pages (May 2015)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 63, Issue 1, Pages (July 2015)
Advertisements

Volume 141, Issue 5, Pages e1 (November 2011)
Elevated FOXC2 Expression Promotes Invasion of HCC Cell Lines and is Associated with Poor Prognosis in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Cell Physiol Biochem 2017;44:99–109.
Factor VII-Induced MicroRNA-135a Inhibits Autophagy and Is Associated with Poor Prognosis in Hepatocellular Carcinoma  Kuang-Tzu Huang, I-Ying Kuo, Ming-Chao.
Silencing NKD2 by Promoter Region Hypermethylation Promotes Esophageal Cancer Progression by Activating Wnt Signaling  Baoping Cao, MD, PhD, Weili Yang,
A Signal Transduction Pathway from TGF-β1 to SKP2 via Akt1 and c-Myc and its Correlation with Progression in Human Melanoma  Xuan Qu, Liangliang Shen,
Volume 67, Issue 2, Pages (August 2017)
Volume 143, Issue 3, Pages e2 (September 2012)
DNMT3B Overexpression by Deregulation of FOXO3a-Mediated Transcription Repression and MDM2 Overexpression in Lung Cancer  Yi-Chieh Yang, MS, Yen-An Tang,
Deregulation of SLIT2-Mediated Cdc42 Activity Is Associated with Esophageal Cancer Metastasis and Poor Prognosis  Ruo-Chia Tseng, PhD, Jia-Ming Chang,
Volume 81, Issue 1, Pages (January 2012)
Volume 136, Issue 2, Pages e1 (February 2009)
Volume 141, Issue 5, Pages e1 (November 2011)
Volume 138, Issue 3, Pages e2 (March 2010)
Volume 23, Issue 3, Pages (April 2018)
Volume 33, Issue 2, Pages (January 2009)
Modulation of K-Ras-Dependent Lung Tumorigenesis by MicroRNA-21
Volume 137, Issue 2, Pages (August 2009)
Volume 39, Issue 4, Pages (August 2010)
Volume 21, Issue 5, Pages (October 2017)
Volume 76, Issue 1, Pages (July 2009)
Volume 141, Issue 6, Pages (December 2011)
Volume 16, Issue 9, Pages (August 2016)
Volume 144, Issue 1, Pages e4 (January 2013)
Molecular Therapy - Nucleic Acids
Volume 67, Issue 6, Pages (December 2017)
Volume 133, Issue 3, Pages (September 2007)
Volume 32, Issue 1, Pages e8 (July 2017)
Volume 12, Issue 3, Pages (July 2015)
Volume 23, Issue 6, Pages (June 2013)
Volume 5, Issue 6, Pages (December 2013)
Volume 29, Issue 4, Pages (April 2016)
Volume 53, Issue 5, Pages (March 2014)
Molecular Therapy - Nucleic Acids
Volume 140, Issue 3, Pages (March 2011)
Tomoyasu Hattori, Lukasz Stawski, Sashidhar S
Volume 25, Issue 3, Pages (March 2017)
MicroRNA-101 Exerts Tumor-Suppressive Functions in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer through Directly Targeting Enhancer of Zeste Homolog 2  Ji-guang Zhang,
Volume 142, Issue 7, Pages e2 (June 2012)
MUC1 Oncoprotein Stabilizes and Activates Estrogen Receptor α
Volume 43, Issue 5, Pages (September 2011)
Volume 21, Issue 12, Pages (December 2017)
Volume 40, Issue 3, Pages e5 (February 2017)
MUC1 Oncoprotein Stabilizes and Activates Estrogen Receptor α
miR-124 Inhibits Lung Tumorigenesis Induced by K-ras Mutation and NNK
Volume 132, Issue 4, Pages (April 2007)
Volume 24, Issue 2, Pages (February 2016)
Promotion Effects of miR-375 on the Osteogenic Differentiation of Human Adipose- Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells  Si Chen, Yunfei Zheng, Shan Zhang, Lingfei.
A LIN28B Tumor-Specific Transcript in Cancer
Volume 19, Issue 8, Pages (August 2011)
Volume 10, Issue 3, Pages (September 2006)
Xudong Wu, Jens Vilstrup Johansen, Kristian Helin  Molecular Cell 
Figure 1. RSPO3 expression is upregulated in bladder cancer
Volume 25, Issue 4, Pages (April 2017)
Volume 44, Issue 4, Pages (April 2016)
An Epigenetic Switch Involving NF-κB, Lin28, Let-7 MicroRNA, and IL6 Links Inflammation to Cell Transformation  Dimitrios Iliopoulos, Heather A. Hirsch,
Volume 26, Issue 3, Pages (May 2007)
Dan Yu, Rongdiao Liu, Geng Yang, Qiang Zhou  Cell Reports 
Volume 15, Issue 12, Pages (June 2016)
MELK Promotes Melanoma Growth by Stimulating the NF-κB Pathway
Volume 29, Issue 3, Pages (March 2016)
Volume 17, Issue 3, Pages (October 2016)
The lncRNA PDIA3P Interacts with miR-185-5p to Modulate Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma Progression by Targeting Cyclin D2  Cheng-Cao Sun, Ling Zhang, Guang.
Molecular Therapy - Nucleic Acids
Volume 25, Issue 11, Pages e6 (December 2018)
Shipra Das, Olga Anczuków, Martin Akerman, Adrian R. Krainer 
Volume 9, Issue 3, Pages (November 2014)
A Direct HDAC4-MAP Kinase Crosstalk Activates Muscle Atrophy Program
Volume 26, Issue 9, Pages (September 2018)
Volume 53, Issue 5, Pages (March 2014)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 62, Issue 5, Pages 1100-1111 (May 2015) A CCRK-EZH2 epigenetic circuitry drives hepatocarcinogenesis and associates with tumor recurrence and poor survival of patients  Hai Feng, Zhuo Yu, Yuan Tian, Ying-Ying Lee, May S. Li, Minnie Y.Y. Go, Yue-Sun Cheung, Paul B.S. Lai, Andrew M.L. Chan, Ka-Fai To, Henry L.Y. Chan, Joseph J.Y. Sung, Alfred S.L. Cheng  Journal of Hepatology  Volume 62, Issue 5, Pages 1100-1111 (May 2015) DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2014.11.040 Copyright © 2014 European Association for the Study of the Liver Terms and Conditions

Journal of Hepatology 2015 62, 1100-1111DOI: (10. 1016/j. jhep. 2014 Copyright © 2014 European Association for the Study of the Liver Terms and Conditions

Fig. 1 EZH2 is required for CCRK-induced hepatocellular proliferation and transformation. (A) Immunoblot analysis of CCRK, EZH2, and H3K27me3 expression (left), focus formation (right), and (B) anchorage-independent growth in control and CCRK-expressing LO2 cells with or without EZH2 knockdown. (C and D) Same experiments for control and CCRK-silencing PLC5 cells with or without EZH2 over-expression. (E) Tumorigenicity of control and CCRK-expressing LO2 cells with or without EZH2 knockdown were determined by xenograft and (F) orthotopic mouse models (n=7 per group). Immunoblot analysis of CCRK, EZH2, H3K27me3 expression and representative images of the tumors in each group are shown. Tumor volume and weight of the excised tumors in the three groups were measured. ∗∗p<0.01; ∗∗∗p<0.001. (This figure appears in color on the web.) Journal of Hepatology 2015 62, 1100-1111DOI: (10.1016/j.jhep.2014.11.040) Copyright © 2014 European Association for the Study of the Liver Terms and Conditions

Fig. 2 CCRK upregulates EZH2 expression through activation of a GSK3β/β-catenin/TCF/E2F1 cascade. (A) Immunoblot analysis of CCRK, p-GSK3βSer9, GSK-3β, active and total β-catenin, E2F1, EZH2, and H3K27me3 in LO2 and SK-Hep1 cells expressing WT and KD CCRK (left), or WT CCRK with or without S9A-GSK3β mutant compared to the vector control (right). (B) Immunoblot analysis of CCRK, active and total β-catenin, Flag-tagged dnTCF, E2F1, EZH2, and H3K27me3 and quantitative RT-PCR analysis of E2F1 in control and CCRK-expressing LO2 cells with or without shβ-catenin and dnTCF expression. (C) Quantitative ChIP-PCR analysis of β-catenin binding on E2F1 promoter in control, WT and KD CCRK-expressing LO2 cells (left). Enrichment was determined as a percentage of input DNA. IgG antibody was used as a negative control. The activity of the E2F1 promoter luciferase reporter with or without TCF binding site deletion in CCRK-expressing LO2 cells (right). (D) Immunoblot and quantitative RT-PCR analyses in control and CCRK-expressing LO2 cells with or without E2F1 knockdown by two independent siRNAs. (E) Quantitative ChIP-PCR analysis of E2F1 binding on EZH2 promoter in control, WT and KD CCRK-expressing LO2 cells (left). The activity of the EZH2 promoter luciferase reporter with or without single or double E2F1-binding site deletion in CCRK-expressing LO2 cells (right). (F) Immunoblot and quantitative RT-PCR analyses in control and CCRK-silencing PLC5 cells with or without dpβ-catenin and dpTCF expression (left). Quantitative ChIP-PCR analysis of β-catenin and E2F1 binding on E2F1 and EZH2 promoters, respectively, in control and CCRK-silencing PLC5 cells with or without dpβ-catenin and dpTCF expression (right). Journal of Hepatology 2015 62, 1100-1111DOI: (10.1016/j.jhep.2014.11.040) Copyright © 2014 European Association for the Study of the Liver Terms and Conditions

Fig. 3 CCRK induces a β-catenin-EZH2 positive feedback loop to epigenetically enhance AR signaling. (A) Heatmap showing quantitative ChIP-PCR analyses of EZH2, SUZ12, H3K27me3 and H3K4me3 occupancies on the promoters of Wnt antagonists in control, WT and KD CCRK-expressing LO2 and SK-Hep1 cells. (B) Quantitative RT-PCR analysis of the Wnt antagonists in control, WT and KD CCRK-expressing LO2 and SK-Hep1 cells. (C) Immunoblot and (D) quantitative RT-PCR analysis in control, EZH2 and EZH2 ΔSET-expressing LO2 and SK-Hep1 cells. (E) Immunoblot analysis (left) and the activity of the ARE luciferase reporter (right) in control and EZH2-expressing LO2 cells with or without shβ-catenin and dnTCF expression. (F) Same experiments for control and EZH2-silencing PLC5 cells with or without dpβ-catenin and dpTCF expression. (This figure appears in color on the web.) Journal of Hepatology 2015 62, 1100-1111DOI: (10.1016/j.jhep.2014.11.040) Copyright © 2014 European Association for the Study of the Liver Terms and Conditions

Fig. 4 CCRK-mediated EZH2 phosphorylation by AKT functions as an AR co-activator for CCRK promoter co-occupancy and transcriptional activation. (A) Immunoblot analysis of CCRK, p-AKTSer473, AKT, p-EZH2Ser21, and EZH2 in control, WT and KD CCRK-expressing LO2 and SK-Hep1 cells. (B) Immunoblot analysis of CCRK, p-AKTSer473, AKT, p-EZH2Ser21, EZH2, and H3K27me3 in control and CCRK-expressing LO2 and SK-Hep1 cells with or without S473A AKT mutant expression. (C) Immunoblot analysis (left) and the activity of CCRK promoter luciferase reporter (right) in control, WT and S21A EZH2-expressing LO2 and SK-Hep1 cells. (D) Immunoblot analysis (top), the activities of the WT CCRK promoter and ARE-deleted mutant luciferase reporters (bottom) and (E) the heatmap showing the quantitative ChIP-PCR analyses of AR, EZH2, p-EZH2Ser21, H3K27me3, H3K4me3, and RNA polymerase II (RNA polII) occupancies on CCRK promoter in control and CCRK-expressing LO2 and SK-Hep1 cells with or without siRNA-mediated knockdown of AR and EZH2. (F) Co-immunoprecipitation of AR and p-EZH2Ser21 in control, WT and KD CCRK-expressing LO2 and SK-Hep1 cells, followed by immunoblot analysis of AR, p-EZH2Ser21 and EZH2 (left). Co-immunoprecipitation of AR and p-EZH2Ser21 in control, WT CCRK-expressing LO2 and SK-Hep1 cells with or without S21A EZH2 (middle) and S473A AKT mutant expression (right). IgG represents a control antibody used for IPs. Total lysates were used as input controls. (This figure appears in color on the web.) Journal of Hepatology 2015 62, 1100-1111DOI: (10.1016/j.jhep.2014.11.040) Copyright © 2014 European Association for the Study of the Liver Terms and Conditions

Fig. 5 Suppression of the CCRK-EZH2 circuit prevents HCC development in mice. (A) Immunoblot analysis of the CCRK-EZH2 circuit components (top) and quantitative RT-PCR analysis of the oncogenic factors (middle) and the Wnt antagonists (bottom) in untreated normal controls (Ctrl), and DEN-treated precancerous liver (DEN 6M) and HCC tissues (DEN 8M) from 6- to 8-month-old mice, respectively. (B) The liver to body weight, (C) numbers of tumors per mouse, (D) average tumor volume and weight and (E) average number of Ki67-positive proliferative cells per high-power field (HPF) in shCtrl-treated and shCCRK-treated groups were determined (n=12 per group). Representative images of livers with tumor nodules indicated by arrows and Ki67 immunohistochemistry (×200 magnification) in both groups are shown. (F) Immunoblot analysis of the CCRK-EZH2 circuit components (top) and quantitative RT-PCR analysis of the oncogenic factors (middle) and the Wnt antagonists (bottom) in the liver tissues of the shCtrl-treated and shCCRK-treated groups. ∗p<0.05; ∗∗p<0.01; ∗∗∗p<0.001. (This figure appears in color on the web.) Journal of Hepatology 2015 62, 1100-1111DOI: (10.1016/j.jhep.2014.11.040) Copyright © 2014 European Association for the Study of the Liver Terms and Conditions

Fig. 6 The CCRK-EZH2 circuitry is activated in human HCC tissues. (A) Immunoblot analysis of the CCRK-EZH2 circuit components in human tissues. Representative blots from normal liver (NL), adjacent non-tumor (NT) and tumor (T) tissues of both sexes are shown. (B) Relative protein expression levels of 34 paired HCC tumor and NT tissues. The expression levels of p-GSK3βSer9, active β-catenin and p-AKTSer473 were normalized by total GSK3β, β-catenin and AKT, respectively. The remaining protein expression levels were normalized by β-actin. The lines in the dot plot denote mean±standard deviation. ∗∗∗p<0.001. (C) Correlation of the expression levels among different CCRK-EZH2 circuit components in 5 NLs (green), 25 male (red) and 9 female (blue) paired HCC tumor (closed triangle) and NT (open triangle) tissues denoted with Pearson’s correlation coefficients. (D) Schematic representation of the CCRK-EZH2 epigenetic circuitry in hepatocarcinogenesis, with the sequence of the regulatory interactions numbered as the correlation plots in C. Journal of Hepatology 2015 62, 1100-1111DOI: (10.1016/j.jhep.2014.11.040) Copyright © 2014 European Association for the Study of the Liver Terms and Conditions

Fig. 7 Hyperactivation of the CCRK-EZH2 circuitry correlates with short survival of patients. (A) Relative protein expression levels of the CCRK-EZH2 circuit components in 34 HCC tumor tissues stratified by tumor stage and (B) differentiation. ∗p<0.05; ∗∗p<0.01. The lines in the dot plot denote mean±standard deviation. (C) Kaplan-Meier overall survival and (D) disease-free survival curves of HCC patients with high (n=11) and low (n=23) activity of the CCRK-EZH2 circuitry. Journal of Hepatology 2015 62, 1100-1111DOI: (10.1016/j.jhep.2014.11.040) Copyright © 2014 European Association for the Study of the Liver Terms and Conditions