Volume 22, Issue 17, Pages (September 2012)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Héctor Herranz, Ruifen Weng, Stephen M. Cohen  Current Biology 
Advertisements

Pralay Majumder, George Aranjuez, Joseph Amick, Jocelyn A. McDonald 
The Salvador-Warts-Hippo Pathway Is Required for Epithelial Proliferation and Axis Specification in Drosophila  Carine Meignin, Ines Alvarez-Garcia, Ilan.
The Sterile 20-like Kinase Tao-1 Controls Tissue Growth by Regulating the Salvador- Warts-Hippo Pathway  Carole L.C. Poon, Jane I. Lin, Xiaomeng Zhang,
Steroid Signaling Establishes a Female Metabolic State and Regulates SREBP to Control Oocyte Lipid Accumulation  Matthew H. Sieber, Allan C. Spradling 
Volume 16, Issue 21, Pages (November 2006)
The DHHC Palmitoyltransferase Approximated Regulates Fat Signaling and Dachs Localization and Activity  Hitoshi Matakatsu, Seth S. Blair  Current Biology 
Brian S. Robinson, Juang Huang, Yang Hong, Kenneth H. Moberg 
Hungry for Mechanism in Hippo Signaling
Laura Boulan, David Martín, Marco Milán  Current Biology 
Kibra Is a Regulator of the Salvador/Warts/Hippo Signaling Network
Volume 25, Issue 1, Pages (January 2015)
Yorkie and Scalloped Signaling Regulates Notch-Dependent Lineage Specification during Drosophila Hematopoiesis  Gabriel B. Ferguson, Julian A. Martinez-Agosto 
Volume 8, Issue 2, Pages (July 2014)
Volume 17, Issue 9, Pages (May 2007)
Karyn L. Sheaffer, Dustin L. Updike, Susan E. Mango  Current Biology 
Mutual Repression by Bantam miRNA and Capicua Links the EGFR/MAPK and Hippo Pathways in Growth Control  Héctor Herranz, Xin Hong, Stephen M. Cohen  Current.
Volume 18, Issue 21, Pages (November 2008)
Pralay Majumder, George Aranjuez, Joseph Amick, Jocelyn A. McDonald 
Volume 18, Issue 4, Pages (April 2010)
Rho-LIM Kinase Signaling Regulates Ecdysone-Induced Gene Expression and Morphogenesis during Drosophila Metamorphosis  Guang-Chao Chen, Patrycja Gajowniczek,
Volume 23, Issue 3, Pages (February 2013)
Volume 6, Issue 5, Pages (March 2014)
Helen Strutt, Mary Ann Price, David Strutt  Current Biology 
Susumu Hirabayashi, Thomas J. Baranski, Ross L. Cagan  Cell 
Transcription in the Absence of Histone H3.2 and H3K4 Methylation
Adrian Halme, Michelle Cheng, Iswar K. Hariharan  Current Biology 
Volume 20, Issue 15, Pages (August 2010)
Volume 16, Issue 21, Pages (November 2006)
Volume 22, Issue 5, Pages (March 2012)
Joanna Chen, Esther M. Verheyen  Current Biology 
Lan-Hsin Wang, Nicholas E. Baker  Developmental Cell 
Volume 19, Issue 18, Pages (September 2009)
Volume 18, Issue 21, Pages (November 2008)
Propagation of Dachsous-Fat Planar Cell Polarity
Julian C. Boggiano, Pamela J. Vanderzalm, Richard G. Fehon 
Drosophila CRYPTOCHROME Is a Circadian Transcriptional Repressor
Julien Colombani, Cédric Polesello, Filipe Josué, Nicolas Tapon 
Volume 16, Issue 3, Pages (March 2009)
Volume 78, Issue 3, Pages (May 2013)
Marisa M. Merino, Christa Rhiner, Marta Portela, Eduardo Moreno 
A Role of Receptor Notch in Ligand cis-Inhibition in Drosophila
Evolution of yellow Gene Regulation and Pigmentation in Drosophila
Cell Competition Drives the Formation of Metastatic Tumors in a Drosophila Model of Epithelial Tumor Formation  Teresa Eichenlaub, Stephen M. Cohen, Héctor.
Volume 49, Issue 2, Pages (January 2006)
Let-7-Complex MicroRNAs Regulate the Temporal Identity of Drosophila Mushroom Body Neurons via chinmo  Yen-Chi Wu, Ching-Huan Chen, Adam Mercer, Nicholas S.
Jillian L. Brechbiel, Elizabeth R. Gavis  Current Biology 
Drosophila ASPP Regulates C-Terminal Src Kinase Activity
Volume 14, Issue 3, Pages (March 2008)
The Hippo Pathway Regulates the bantam microRNA to Control Cell Proliferation and Apoptosis in Drosophila  Barry J. Thompson, Stephen M. Cohen  Cell 
Volume 18, Issue 21, Pages (November 2008)
Volume 27, Issue 11, Pages e4 (June 2017)
Amy Brittle, Chloe Thomas, David Strutt  Current Biology 
The Cell Adhesion Molecule Echinoid Functions as a Tumor Suppressor and Upstream Regulator of the Hippo Signaling Pathway  Tao Yue, Aiguo Tian, Jin Jiang 
Sandra Claret, Matthieu Sanial, Anne Plessis  Current Biology 
Héctor Herranz, Ruifen Weng, Stephen M. Cohen  Current Biology 
Volume 17, Issue 18, Pages (September 2007)
Volume 26, Issue 8, Pages (April 2016)
NLK positively regulates YAP activity in physiological settings
Fig. 4. Expression of miR-2 family mediates tissue growth of Hippo pathway.(A) Photomicrographs of adult wings of the indicated genotype. Expression of.
Fig. 2. p53 mediates the effects of Yorkie
Kieran F. Harvey, Cathie M. Pfleger, Iswar K. Hariharan  Cell 
F. Christian Bennett, Kieran F. Harvey  Current Biology 
Volume 17, Issue 12, Pages (June 2007)
Nucleoporin Nup98 Associates with Trx/MLL and NSL Histone-Modifying Complexes and Regulates Hox Gene Expression  Pau Pascual-Garcia, Jieun Jeong, Maya.
Volume 78, Issue 3, Pages (May 2013)
Mask Proteins Are Cofactors of Yorkie/YAP in the Hippo Pathway
Salvador-Warts-Hippo Signaling Promotes Drosophila Posterior Follicle Cell Maturation Downstream of Notch  Cédric Polesello, Nicolas Tapon  Current Biology 
Drosophila Schip1 Links Expanded and Tao-1 to Regulate Hippo Signaling
Evidence for a Growth-Stabilizing Regulatory Feedback Mechanism between Myc and Yorkie, the Drosophila Homolog of Yap  Ricardo M. Neto-Silva, Simon de.
Presentation transcript:

Volume 22, Issue 17, Pages 1587-1594 (September 2012) Homeodomain-Interacting Protein Kinase Regulates Hippo Pathway-Dependent Tissue Growth  Carole L.C. Poon, Xiaomeng Zhang, Jane I. Lin, Samuel A. Manning, Kieran F. Harvey  Current Biology  Volume 22, Issue 17, Pages 1587-1594 (September 2012) DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2012.06.075 Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Hipk Promotes Tissue Growth and Salvador-Warts-Hippo Pathway Activity (A–D) Adult female wings (anterior is to the left) expressing the following transgenes under the control of 71B-Gal4: (A) UAS-LacZ, (B) UAS-hipk III, (C) UAS-hipk II, and (D) UAS-hipk II in a fly that is also hemizygous for ykiB5. (E) Quantification of total wing area of the genotypes displayed in (A–D). n = 14, 21, 14, and 11, respectively. Results represent mean ± SEM, ∗∗∗ indicates p < 0.001, ∗∗ indicates p < 0.01. (F) ex mRNA expression relative to Actin5C mRNA in wing imaginal discs expressing the indicated transgenes under the control of 32B-Gal4. Results represent mean ± SEM n = 3, and ∗ indicates p < 0.05. In wing discs expressing UAS-hipk II the change in ex mRNA levels was not significant but was trending toward significance (p = 0.05). (G–I”) Third-instar larval wing imaginal discs (anterior is to the left) expressing UAS-hipk II under control of hh-Gal4 and reporting Yki activity with ex-lacZ (G–G”), Ex protein (H–H”), or a ban GFP sensor (I–I”). Scale bars represent 100 μM. See also Figure S1. Current Biology 2012 22, 1587-1594DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2012.06.075) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Hipk Is Required for Optimal Yorkie Activity (A–C) Adult female D. melanogaster wings (anterior is to the left) expressing the following transgenes under the control of hh-Gal4: (A) UAS-LacZ RNAi; (B) UAS-Hipk RNAi 1, and (C) UAS-Hipk RNAi 2. (D) Quantification of the wing area posterior to the L3 vein (false colored in green) of the genotypes displayed in (A–C). Results represent mean ± SEM n = 21 for each genotype, and ∗∗∗ indicates p < 0.001. (E–F”) Third-instar larval wing imaginal discs harboring hipk4 loss-of-function clones, which fail to express GFP (green). Yki activity was examined by assessing ex-lacZ (E–E”) or Ex protein (F–F”), both shown in grayscale. Yellow arrows indicate hipk4 tissue with reduced Yki activity, whereas white arrowheads denote hipk4 tissue with normal Yki activity. Scale bars represent 50 μM. Current Biology 2012 22, 1587-1594DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2012.06.075) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Hipk Controls Yorkie Activity in Parallel to Warts (A–F) Adult female D. melanogaster wings were too overgrown to mount flat onto glass slides; therefore, adult male D. melanogaster wings were mounted and measured. Adult male D. melanogaster wings (anterior is to the left) expressing the following transgenes under the control of en-Gal4: (A) UAS-ex RNAi and UAS-LacZ RNAi, (B) UAS-ex RNAi and UAS-Hipk RNAi 2, (C) UAS-hpo RNAi and UAS-LacZ RNAi, (D) UAS-hpo RNAi and UAS-Hipk RNAi 2, and (E) UAS-wts RNAi and UAS-LacZ RNAi, and (F) UAS-wts RNAi and UAS-Hipk RNAi 2. (G) Quantification of the wing area posterior to the L3 wing vein of the genotypes displayed in (A)–(F). n = 11, 20, 11, 22, 12, and 37, respectively. Results represent mean ± SEM, and ∗∗∗ indicates p < 0.001. (H) Loss of Hipk in wtsXI mutant eyFLP/MARCM clones promotes further pupal development (total n = 168) compared to wtsXI mutant eyFLP/MARCM control animals (total n = 85). Pupal lethality was scored as follows: early white pupae were classed as early pupal stage (pale gray bars) pupae that contained either discernible adult eye and/or wing structures through the pupal case were classed as midpupal stage (mid gray bars) and pupae with discernible adult eyes, wings, legs, and abdominal bristles through the pupal case were classed as pharate adults (dark gray bars). No adult escapers were observed. (I) Immunoblots were probed with the indicated antibodies on protein lysates from third-instar larval wing imaginal discs where UAS-lacZ control, UAS-hipk II, or UAS-hipk III were expressed with 32B-Gal4. (J–J’”) Third-instar larval wing imaginal disc (anterior is to the left) expressing UAS- yki.V5 (J–K”’) or UAS-yki.V5 and UAS-Hipk II (L–M”’) under the control of en-Gal4. Yki expression (J, K, L, M), DAPI (J’, K’, L’, M’), and Hipk (J”, K”, L”, M”) is greyscale, except for merges where Yki is green and DAPI is red (K”’ and M”’). Scale bar is 50 μM. Current Biology 2012 22, 1587-1594DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2012.06.075) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 HIPK’s Ability to Regulate the SWH Pathway Is Evolutionarily Conserved and Dependent on Its Kinase Domain (A) Luciferase assay measuring the capability of YAP2L to activate TEAD2 in 293T cells expressing the indicated plasmids. (B) Immunoblots performed with the indicated antibodies on lysates from 293T cells transfected with the following plasmids: empty vector control (C), YAP2L (Y), YAP2L-S127A (S), HIPK2 (H), or HIPK2-KD (KD). (C) Luciferase assay measuring the capability of YAP2 (Y) or hyperactivated YAP2 (5SA) to activate TEAD2 in 293T cells expressing the indicated plasmids. (D) Immunoblots were probed with the indicated antibodies on lysates from 293T cells transfected with the following plasmids: empty vector control (C), YAP2 (Y), YAP2L-5SA (S), or HIPK2 (H). (E) Luciferase activity measuring the ability of YAP2L to activate TEAD2 in 293T cells that were transiently transfected with either nontargeting siRNA (siNT) or HIPK2 siRNA (siHIPK2). (F) Hipk2 mRNA expression relative to actin mRNA in 293T cells treated as in (E). (G) Immunoblots of lysates from 293T cells used in (E) with antibodies specific for YAP or actin. In (A), (C), (E), and (F), data are presented as mean ± SEM, n = 3, ∗∗∗∗ indicates p < 0.0001, ∗∗ indicates p < 0.01, and ∗ indicates p < 0.05. See also Figure S2. Current Biology 2012 22, 1587-1594DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2012.06.075) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions