Smads “Freeze” When They Ski

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Figure 1. Functional classification of positive-acting transcription factors. Major functional groups are shown in black; specific examples are illustrated.
Advertisements

John W. Bloom, MD  Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology 
TGFb –Superfamily Proteins
Crystal structure of the chemotaxis receptor methyltransferase CheR suggests a conserved structural motif for binding S-adenosylmethionine  Snezana Djordjevic,
The Ids Have It Cancer Cell
Jan-Hendrik B. Hardenberg, Andrea Braun, Michael P. Schön 
Novel mutations and polymorphisms in the CFTR gene associated with three subtypes of congenital absence of vas deferens  Xiaojian Yang, M.D., Qipeng Sun,
Structure of the Rab7:REP-1 Complex
Trimeric C-type lectin domains in host defence
Mechanisms of TGF-β Signaling from Cell Membrane to the Nucleus
Crawling and Wiggling on DNA
Tom Huxford, De-Bin Huang, Shiva Malek, Gourisankar Ghosh  Cell 
Volume 34, Issue 4, Pages (May 2009)
Structure of the TPR Domain of p67phox in Complex with Rac·GTP
Volume 111, Issue 3, Pages (November 2002)
The Mechanism of E. coli RNA Polymerase Regulation by ppGpp Is Suggested by the Structure of their Complex  Yuhong Zuo, Yeming Wang, Thomas A. Steitz 
Crawling and Wiggling on DNA
David R Buckler, Yuchen Zhou, Ann M Stock  Structure 
Rong Shi, Laura McDonald, Miroslaw Cygler, Irena Ekiel  Structure 
Volume 20, Issue 6, Pages (December 2005)
T Cells Are Smad’ly in Love with Galectin-9
HIV-1 Entry Inhibitors in the Side Pocket
Volume 90, Issue 1, Pages (July 1997)
Crystal Structure of β-Arrestin at 1.9 Å
Volume 5, Issue 1, Pages 1-2 (July 2003)
Smad proteins and transforming growth factor-β signaling
Structure of the Human IgE-Fc Cε3-Cε4 Reveals Conformational Flexibility in the Antibody Effector Domains  Beth A. Wurzburg, Scott C. Garman, Theodore.
Daniel Peisach, Patricia Gee, Claudia Kent, Zhaohui Xu  Structure 
Rik van der Kant, Lawrence S.B. Goldstein  Developmental Cell 
Blinded by the Light: The Growing Complexity of p53
Each Actin Subunit Has Three Nebulin Binding Sites
Crystal Structure of the p53 Core Domain Bound to a Full Consensus Site as a Self- Assembled Tetramer  Yongheng Chen, Raja Dey, Lin Chen  Structure  Volume.
Volume 8, Issue 5, Pages (November 2001)
Volume 101, Issue 4, Pages (May 2000)
David Jeruzalmi, Mike O'Donnell, John Kuriyan  Cell 
Volume 15, Issue 2, Pages (February 2007)
Genetic Control of MHC Class II Expression
Volume 10, Issue 6, Pages (June 2002)
Repression Cell Volume 99, Issue 5, Pages (November 1999)
Meigang Gu, Kanagalaghatta R. Rajashankar, Christopher D. Lima 
Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages (December 2001)
Alternative Splicing: New Insights from Global Analyses
TGFβ Signaling in Growth Control, Cancer, and Heritable Disorders
Mechanisms Contributing to T Cell Receptor Signaling and Assembly Revealed by the Solution Structure of an Ectodomain Fragment of the CD3ϵγ Heterodimer 
Wnt/β-Catenin Signaling: Components, Mechanisms, and Diseases
David Jeruzalmi, Mike O'Donnell, John Kuriyan  Cell 
Jeffrey J. Wilson, Rhett A. Kovall  Cell 
Structure of the BRCT Repeats of BRCA1 Bound to a BACH1 Phosphopeptide
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages (January 2016)
Solution Structure of a TBP–TAFII230 Complex
Factors that Mediate and Modulate Androgen Action
E.Radzio Andzelm, J Lew, S Taylor  Structure 
Alexander Kiani, Anjana Rao, Jose Aramburu  Immunity 
Ethan B. Butler, Yong Xiong, Jimin Wang, Scott A. Strobel 
Volume 9, Issue 2, Pages (February 2001)
RelA Life and Death Decisions
Structure of STAT6CF and N4 site DNA complex.
Shared Principles in NF-κB Signaling
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages (June 2013)
Volume 21, Issue 7, Pages (July 2014)
Crystal Structure of the Flagellar σ/Anti-σ Complex σ28/FlgM Reveals an Intact σ Factor in an Inactive Conformation  Margareta K. Sorenson, Soumya S.
Crystal Structure of a Smad MH1 Domain Bound to DNA
Structure of an IκBα/NF-κB Complex
Guilty as charged Cancer Cell
Brett K. Kaiser, Matthew C. Clifton, Betty W. Shen, Barry L. Stoddard 
Volume 7, Issue 1, Pages 1-11 (July 1997)
Morgan Huse, Ye-Guang Chen, Joan Massagué, John Kuriyan  Cell 
Crystal Structure of a Phosphorylated Smad2
Update on glucocorticoid action and resistance
Volume 95, Issue 2, Pages (October 1998)
Presentation transcript:

Smads “Freeze” When They Ski Joshua P Frederick, Xiao-Fan Wang  Structure  Volume 10, Issue 12, Pages 1607-1611 (December 2002) DOI: 10.1016/S0969-2126(02)00914-0

Figure 1 The Formation of a Transcriptionally Active, Heteromeric Smad Complex R-Smads are serine phosphorylated by the TGF-β type I receptor at their conserved carboxy-terminal SXS motif and subsequently associate with Co-Smad4, forming a heteromeric Smad complex mediated through the R-Smad:Co-Smad interface. Heteromeric Smad complexes are then actively translocated from the cytoplasm to the nucleus in which they either bind DNA directly through interaction with promoter-contained Smad binding elements (SBEs) as depicted or indirectly through other DNA binding transcription factors. Smad-mediated transcriptional control of TGF-β target genes is affected both positively and negatively through interaction with cofactors, such as FAST1, coactivators such as p300/CBP, and corepressors such as c-Ski/SnoN. The Smad amino- and carboxy-terminal Mad Homology (MH) domains 1 and 2, respectively, are separated by a proline-rich linker region. Structure 2002 10, 1607-1611DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(02)00914-0)

Figure 2 c-Ski-Mediated Transcriptional Repression of Heteromeric Smad Complexes (A) The conserved interaction loop (I-Loop) of c-Ski forms an interface with the L3 loop region of Smad4. The structure of a Ski-Smad4 complex is schematically shown here, with Smad4 (magenta) and Ski (cyan) represented as a surface contour and a coil, respectively. A few important interface residues of c-Ski, invariant among Ski family members, are highlighted in yellow and magnified in the inlaid box. The region of Smad4 that binds R-Smads is indicated by the green oval. Figure preparation assisted by Y. Shi. (B) c-Ski acts as a disrupting bridge between the R-Smad:Co-Smad interface via R-Smad association through its amino terminus and Smad4 binding through its I-loop, as indicated within the dashed box. c-Ski interaction with R-Smads and Smad4 exerts transcriptional repression through disruption of the R-Smad:Co-Smad interface, binding occlusion of a subset of Smad cofactor/coactivators, and the c-Ski-mediated recruitment of other repressor molecules. A generic, transcriptionally active heteromeric Smad complex is depicted on the left, whereas a c-Ski-repressed complex is represented on the right. Structure 2002 10, 1607-1611DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(02)00914-0)