Volume 34, Issue 4, Pages (May 2009)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Structure of the Rho Transcription Terminator
Advertisements

Structure of the Protein Phosphatase 2A Holoenzyme
Crystal Structure of the Tandem Phosphatase Domains of RPTP LAR
Volume 9, Issue 7, Pages (July 2001)
Structural Basis of DNA Recognition by p53 Tetramers
Volume 9, Issue 2, Pages (February 2002)
Crystallographic Structure of SurA, a Molecular Chaperone that Facilitates Folding of Outer Membrane Porins  Eduard Bitto, David B. McKay  Structure 
Structure of an LDLR-RAP Complex Reveals a General Mode for Ligand Recognition by Lipoprotein Receptors  Carl Fisher, Natalia Beglova, Stephen C. Blacklow 
Hierarchical Binding of Cofactors to the AAA ATPase p97
Molecular Model of the Human 26S Proteasome
Volume 124, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Atomic Model of CPV Reveals the Mechanism Used by This Single-Shelled Virus to Economically Carry Out Functions Conserved in Multishelled Reoviruses 
Volume 39, Issue 6, Pages (September 2010)
Tom Huxford, De-Bin Huang, Shiva Malek, Gourisankar Ghosh  Cell 
Proteasome Activators
Tamas Yelland, Snezana Djordjevic  Structure 
Volume 8, Issue 2, Pages (August 2001)
Volume 24, Issue 1, Pages (October 2006)
The Mechanism of E. coli RNA Polymerase Regulation by ppGpp Is Suggested by the Structure of their Complex  Yuhong Zuo, Yeming Wang, Thomas A. Steitz 
Volume 24, Issue 5, Pages (May 2016)
Crystal Structure of the MHC Class I Homolog MIC-A, a γδ T Cell Ligand
Volume 14, Issue 10, Pages (October 2006)
Yanhui Xu, Yu Chen, Ping Zhang, Philip D. Jeffrey, Yigong Shi 
Volume 9, Issue 2, Pages (February 2001)
Structure of Bax  Motoshi Suzuki, Richard J. Youle, Nico Tjandra  Cell 
Volume 17, Issue 3, Pages (March 2009)
Volume 28, Issue 6, Pages (December 2007)
Volume 133, Issue 1, Pages (April 2008)
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages 9-19 (October 2005)
Protein Translocation Channels in the Proteasome and Other Proteases
Structural Analysis of the Voltage-Dependent Calcium Channel β Subunit Functional Core and Its Complex with the α1 Interaction Domain  Yarden Opatowsky,
Volume 124, Issue 5, Pages (March 2006)
Volume 90, Issue 1, Pages (July 1997)
Structure of the Human IgE-Fc Cε3-Cε4 Reveals Conformational Flexibility in the Antibody Effector Domains  Beth A. Wurzburg, Scott C. Garman, Theodore.
Daniel Peisach, Patricia Gee, Claudia Kent, Zhaohui Xu  Structure 
Volume 20, Issue 3, Pages (March 2012)
Volume 6, Issue 6, Pages (December 2000)
Volume 8, Issue 5, Pages (November 2001)
Volume 34, Issue 5, Pages (June 2009)
David Jeruzalmi, Mike O'Donnell, John Kuriyan  Cell 
A Putative Mechanism for Downregulation of the Catalytic Activity of the EGF Receptor via Direct Contact between Its Kinase and C-Terminal Domains  Meytal.
Mechanism of Substrate Unfolding and Translocation by the Regulatory Particle of the Proteasome from Methanocaldococcus jannaschii  Fan Zhang, Zhuoru.
Meigang Gu, Kanagalaghatta R. Rajashankar, Christopher D. Lima 
Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages (December 2001)
Volume 29, Issue 6, Pages (March 2008)
David Jeruzalmi, Mike O'Donnell, John Kuriyan  Cell 
Volume 139, Issue 4, Pages (November 2009)
Gymnastics of Molecular Chaperones
Volume 34, Issue 3, Pages (May 2009)
Solution Structure of a TBP–TAFII230 Complex
Structure of the Staphylococcus aureus AgrA LytTR Domain Bound to DNA Reveals a Beta Fold with an Unusual Mode of Binding  David J. Sidote, Christopher.
Visualizing the ATPase Cycle in a Protein Disaggregating Machine: Structural Basis for Substrate Binding by ClpB  Sukyeong Lee, Jae-Mun Choi, Francis.
Volume 14, Issue 6, Pages (June 2006)
Volume 9, Issue 2, Pages (February 2001)
The Crystal Structure of an Unusual Processivity Factor, Herpes Simplex Virus UL42, Bound to the C Terminus of Its Cognate Polymerase  Harmon J Zuccola,
Volume 87, Issue 7, Pages (December 1996)
Jia-Wei Wu, Amy E. Cocina, Jijie Chai, Bruce A. Hay, Yigong Shi 
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages (May 2005)
Pingwei Li, Gerry McDermott, Roland K. Strong  Immunity 
Crystal Structure of a Smad MH1 Domain Bound to DNA
Structure of CD94 Reveals a Novel C-Type Lectin Fold
Structure of the Histone Acetyltransferase Hat1
Volume 27, Issue 1, Pages (July 2007)
The Structure of T. aquaticus DNA Polymerase III Is Distinct from Eukaryotic Replicative DNA Polymerases  Scott Bailey, Richard A. Wing, Thomas A. Steitz 
Petra Hänzelmann, Hermann Schindelin  Structure 
The Crystal Structure of an Unusual Processivity Factor, Herpes Simplex Virus UL42, Bound to the C Terminus of Its Cognate Polymerase  Harmon J Zuccola,
Crystal Structure of Escherichia coli RNase D, an Exoribonuclease Involved in Structured RNA Processing  Yuhong Zuo, Yong Wang, Arun Malhotra  Structure 
Structure of GABARAP in Two Conformations
Morgan Huse, Ye-Guang Chen, Joan Massagué, John Kuriyan  Cell 
Volume 95, Issue 2, Pages (October 1998)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 34, Issue 4, Pages 473-484 (May 2009) Structural Insights into the Regulatory Particle of the Proteasome from Methanocaldococcus jannaschii  Fan Zhang, Min Hu, Geng Tian, Ping Zhang, Daniel Finley, Philip D. Jeffrey, Yigong Shi  Molecular Cell  Volume 34, Issue 4, Pages 473-484 (May 2009) DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2009.04.021 Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Structure of Subcomplex I of the PAN Regulatory Particle (A) Structure of the hexameric subcomplex I. The six Pan fragments are labeled A through F. Each Pan fragment (residues 74–150) contains an N-terminal α helix followed by a β domain that is structurally homologous to the oligonucleotide/oligosaccharide-binding fold (OB fold). Two α helices from adjacent domains form a coiled coil. The distal and proximal faces refer to their relative orientation with respect to the 20S core particle. (B) Surface potential of subcomplex I. The positive and negative charges are colored blue and red, respectively. Molecular Cell 2009 34, 473-484DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2009.04.021) Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Structure-Based Sequence Alignment between PAN and the AAA+ ATPases in Yeast and Human Proteasomes Rpt1 through Rpt6 are derived from S. cerevisiae. Secondary structural elements of PAN are indicated above the sequences. Invariant and conserved amino acids are colored yellow and cyan, respectively. Residues that correspond to Pro91, Asp99, and Arg134 of PAN are highlighted in red and green. Double arrows indicate residues that are predicted to line the substrate translocation channel. The loop that falls between β8 and α5 is known as pore loop 1 (pore 1 loop, or Ar-Φ loop), and that between α8 and α9 is pore loop 2 (pore 2 loop). The OB domain pore loops are termed L23 and L45. Molecular Cell 2009 34, 473-484DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2009.04.021) Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 The β Domain of PAN Exhibits an Oligonucleotide/Oligosaccharide-Binding Fold (A) Ribbon (left) and topology (right) diagrams of the β domain of PAN reveal an OB fold. The surface loops connecting adjacent β strands are highlighted in red. (B) Structure of a representative OB fold protein CspA (Schindelin et al., 1994). (C) Candidate substrate-binding site in subcomplex I. Subcomplex I is represented in ribbon diagram (left) and surface potential (right). The surface loops are concentrated in two areas: inner surface of the central passage (L23 and L45) and outer surface between coiled coils (L12 and L34). Molecular Cell 2009 34, 473-484DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2009.04.021) Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Conserved Asymmetry in Subcomplex I of the PAN Regulatory Particle (A) Interface between molecules A and B involves both the coiled-coil and the OB fold domains. (B) Structural difference between molecules A and B is rooted in the peptide bond configuration preceding Pro91. This bond exists in trans configuration in molecule A and cis in molecule B. (C) A stereo view of the A-B interface. Side chains from molecules A and B are colored green and blue, respectively. H bonds are represented by red dashed lines. (D) A conserved pattern of asymmetric amino acids that play key roles in stabilizing the structure of subcomplex I. The asymmetry defines two types of subunits in subcomplex I: cis-Pro subunits (c type) and trans-Pro subunits (t type). (E) A conserved pair of H bonds at the interface between molecules B and C. Arg134 and Asp99 come from the t- and c-type subunits, respectively. Molecular Cell 2009 34, 473-484DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2009.04.021) Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Structure of Subcomplex II of the PAN Regulatory Particle (A) Structure of the nucleotidase domain of PAN. The α/β fold and the helical domain are shown in magenta and cyan, respectively. ADP is bound to the hinge region between these two domains. (B) The nucleotidase domain of PAN is structurally similar to the AAA+ ATPases of ClpX and HslU. Shown here is a stereo comparison of the relevant structures. (C) ADP is coordinated by residues from both the α/β fold and the helical domain. (D) Model of the nucleotidase ring. The atomic coordinates of the PAN nucleotidase were superimposed onto those of the HslU hexamer (Bochtler et al., 2000; Sousa et al., 2000) to generate the nucleotidase ring. Two perpendicular views are shown on the left. The surface representations are shown on the right. Note the highly acidic proximal face. Molecular Cell 2009 34, 473-484DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2009.04.021) Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Structure of the 20S Core Particle from M. jannaschii (A) Structure of the 20S core particle. The α and β rings are colored cyan and magenta, respectively. Two perpendicular views of the ribbon representation are shown in the top panel. Surface representation of the α-β double ring is shown in the bottom panel. (B) Electrostatic surface potential of the α ring. Molecular Cell 2009 34, 473-484DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2009.04.021) Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Structural and Functional Implications on the Proteasome (A) A structure-based model of the PAN regulatory particle. Substrate protein is thought to bind to the distal face of subcomplex I as shown. (B) The constrictions are conferred by four layers of surface loops. The first two layers come from subcomplex I, involving loops L23 and L45, and the latter two layers come from the Ar-Φ and pore 2 loops in the nucleotidase domains. (C) A structural view of the complete proteasome in M. jannaschii. The modeled, complete proteasome is cut across the middle section to show the path and constrictions to the degradative chamber in the β rings. The placement of subcomplexes I and II and their position relative to the 20S CP were based on measurement of the reported electron microscopic images of the PAN-20S complex (Smith et al., 2005). Molecular Cell 2009 34, 473-484DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2009.04.021) Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions