Lower Susquehanna River Watershed Assessment

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Irene Seco Manuel Gómez Alma Schellart Simon Tait Erosion resistance and behaviour of highly organic in-sewer sediment 7th International Conference on.
Advertisements

Transport of nitrogen and phosphorus from Rhode River watersheds during storm events David Correll, Thomas Jordan, and Donald Weller Water Resources Research,
The Effect of the Changing Dynamics of the Conowingo Dam on the Chesapeake Bay Mukhtar Ibrahim and Karl Berger, COG staff Water Resources Technical Committee.
JSSBIO1Huttula Lecture Set Sediment transport models.
For flow of 1 m/s in round-bottom channel of radius 1 m, what is the Reynold’s number? Is the flow laminar or turbulent? Re < 500 laminar Re > 2000 turbulent.
Permeable Heavy Use Area for Livestock Farms Presentation for Kitsap County DCD, September 28 th, 2006, Lab Test Findings and Calculated Storm Water Performance.
Sensitivity Analysis In deterministic analysis, single fixed values (typically, mean values) of representative samples or strength parameters or slope.
EAS4480 Environ. Data Analysis Project Effects of Physical Properties on Critical Shear Stress of Fine Sediments Becky (Yung-Chieh) Wang April 24 th 2012.
Sediment Task Force Meeting April 30, 2012 Marjorie L. Zeff, PhD., PG Gary Lemay Conowingo Hydroelectric Project (FERC No. 405) Updated 2011 Bathymetric.
Sediment Movement after Dam Removal
2011 Storm impacts on nutrients and sediment in the Susquehanna River Basin Presentation for the Impacts of Tropical Storms Irene and Lee on the Hudson.
Part 3 RECURRENCE FREQUENCY OF FLOODING. River flow data can be shown in a variety of formats on probability plots like that shown here, which relates.
Environmental Fluid Mechanics Laboratory
Cohesive Sediment Algorithms in ROMS and Sediment Test Cases Chris Sherwood 1, Larry Sanford 2, John Warner 1 Bénédicte Ferré 1, Courtney Harris 3, Rich.
GEOTECHNICAL PROPERTIES (CE1203)
US Army Corps of Engineers ® Engineer Research and Development Center West Bay Diversion Evaluation 1-Dimensional Modeling CWPPRA Technical Committee and.
Suspended Load Above certain critical shear stress conditions, sediment particles are maintained in suspension by the exchange of momentum from the fluid.
Field Methodologies: Detailed Investigation Andrew Simon USDA-ARS National Sedimentation Laboratory, Oxford, MS
Lower Susquehanna River Dam Sediment and Solutions Conowingo Relicensing; LSRWA; MD County Resistance; Solutions; CAC Involvement Thursday November 29.
Streams, rivers and landscape evolution. Q1: List and describe the parts of a stream system (5)? Watersheds: The water–collecting area of a stream or.
US Army Corps of Engineers Coastal and Hydraulics Laboratory Engineer Research and Development Center Lower Susquehanna River Watershed Assessment Two.
Update on the HEC-RAS Reservoir Transport Simulation Mike Langland and Ed Koerkle 03/30/2012.
Academic Background: Ph.D. Student in Water Resources Engineering at the University of Alabama. Currently working on Computational Fluid Dynamics and Physical.
Intro to Geomorphology (Geos 450/550) Lecture 5: watershed analyses field trip #3 – Walnut Gulch watersheds estimating flood discharges.
Bathymetry Changes Caused by a Tropical Storm Chris Scheiner and Gary Pelton US Army Corps of Engineers.
Lower Susquehanna River Watershed Assessment Citizens Advisory Committee November 29, 2012 Anna Compton USACE 1.
Citizens Advisory Committee to the Chesapeake Executive Council November 29, 2012.
Bedload-transport measurements with geophones
Timeline Impaired for turbidity on Minnesota’s list of impaired waters (2004) MPCA must complete a study to determine the total maximum daily load (TMDL)
US Army Corps of Engineers Coastal and Hydraulics Laboratory Engineer Research and Development Center Lower Susquehanna River Watershed Assessment SedFlume.
Section 13.1 Streams and Rivers
CACHE CREEK WATERSHED Watershed Overview –Physical Description –Land Uses Present –Flow Characteristics –Beneficial Uses Point and Non-Point Source Pollutants.
The Structure of Hydrosphere
Robert M. Hirsch, Research Hydrologist, USGS September 6, 2012 Nitrogen, Phosphorus, and Suspended Sediment fluxes from the Susquehanna River to the Bay.
Development, Testing and Application of the Multi-Block LTFATE Hydrodynamic and Sediment Transport Model Earl J. Hayter See instructions for customizing.
Morphological Modeling of the Alameda Creek Flood Control Channel Rohin Saleh, Alameda County Flood Control District Søren Tjerry, Ph.D., DHI Portland,
Intro to Geomorphology (Geos 450/550) Lecture 7: channel geometry and sediment transport power laws in channel geometry bed load sediment transport Rouse.
Interill Erosion. Interill Detachment and Sediment Delivery to Rills.
US Army Corps of Engineers ® Engineer Research and Development Center West Bay Diversion Evaluation Integration of Results 6 Month Progress ERDC West Bay.
1 INTRODUCTION TO “Stratigrafia” The code in the workbook “stratigrafia” computes - longitudinal profiles; - water surface elevation; - sediment transport.
4. Properties of Materials Sediment (size) Physical States of Soil Concepts of Stress and Strain Normal and Shear Stress Additional Resistance Components.
Learning objectives To understand why the Hjulstrom curve is a logarithmic graph To interpret the Hjulstrom curve.
Gennaro Cioffi. Field evidence for rapid downstream fining of river gravels through selective transport Ferguson, R.I, Hoey, T., Wathen, S. and Werrity,
Journal #4 Why are river system constantly changing? The narrow depression that a stream follows downhill is called its _________. What causes the formation.
Effects of N Loadings from Dairy Cows to the Susquehanna River Effects of N Loadings from Dairy Cows to the Susquehanna River Austin Weidner CE394K : GIS.
Sediment Transport Modelling Lab. The Law of the Wall The law of the wall states that the average velocity of a turbulent flow at a certain point is proportional.
CONEWAGO CREEK GROUND WATER STUDY Base Flow and Impervious Cover November 7, 2007 Watershed Alliance of Adams County Joe McNally, P.G. GeoServices, Ltd.
An introduction to cohesive sediment transport modelling
Channel Processes and Hjulstrom’s Curve
Anthony Alvarado, PE, CFM National Hydraulic Engineering Conference
FE: Geotechnical Engineering
UPDATE ON FHWA’S IN-SITU SCOUR TESTING DEVICE (ISTD)
Presentation to Roanoke River Basin Bi-State Commission March 31, 2010
What is the Hjulstrom Curve?
The Hjulstrom Curve Predicting velocity.
DEP Citizen Advisory Committee October 17, 2017
4 channel types defined at reach scale, based on 3 features
Uniform Open Channel Flow
4 channel types defined at reach scale, based on 3 features
2 Understanding Variables and Solving Equations.
Water Testing Project for the North Fork River
Redahegn Sileshi1, Robert Pitt2, Shirley Clark3, and Chad Christian4
The Work of Streams.
Exercise 1: Fenton River Floodplain Exercise
Conowingo Dam Update Presented to the Citizens Advisory Committee
Status Nearly 30 scenarios completed for NAB and CBP over a year’s effort. Report on application of CBEMP in preparation. October time frame for draft.
Lower Susquehanna River Watershed Assessment
OCEAN/ESS Physics of Sediment Transport William Wilcock (based in part on lectures by Jeff Parsons)
SIEVE RIVER: SIMULATION OF THE 19/11/1999 FLOW EVENT
Enforcement Advocacy Stewardship Education
Presentation transcript:

Lower Susquehanna River Watershed Assessment SedFlume Findings and Initial 2D Sediment Model Results Conowingo Pond Conowingo Dam Susquehanna Flats

Lower Susquehanna River Watershed Assessment Topics: SedFlume Field Activities and Data Analysis Preliminary Sediment Transport Results with SedFlume Data

Lower Susquehanna River Watershed Assessment SedFlume Description Field – Portable Laboratory Flume Used to Evaluate Erosion Rate and Critical Shear of Cohesive Sediments

Lower Susquehanna River Watershed Assessment SedFlume Operations

Lower Susquehanna River Watershed Assessment Description of Sediment Coring Process

Lower Susquehanna River Watershed Assessment Sampling Locations in Conowingo Reservoir

Lower Susquehanna River Watershed Assessment SedFlume Analysis Core Lengths Varied From Approximately 6 – 12 inches The Entire Core was Analyzed Erosion Rate Coefficients and Exponents Evaluated by Layer Along with Critical Shear Stress for Erosion Core Bulk Density and Particle Size Distribution Evaluated

Lower Susquehanna River Watershed Assessment SedFlume Analysis Results

Lower Susquehanna River Watershed Assessment Example of SedFlume Results

Lower Susquehanna River Watershed Assessment Core Physical Properties Bulk Density Range – 1320 kg / m3 to 1500 kg / m3 Sediment Fractions Sand: 10% - 45% Silt: 50% - 82% Clay: 5% - 9%

Lower Susquehanna River Watershed Assessment SedFlume Data Assigned by Material Type in Model Model Domain Divided into Areas Based on Change in Properties Three Layers Assigned in Model Using Average SedFlume Data Average Sediment Size Fractions Assigned to Layers

Lower Susquehanna River Watershed Assessment Material Designation in AdH Model

Lower Susquehanna River Watershed Assessment 2D Model Development – 2008 Bathymetry

Lower Susquehanna River Watershed Assessment Preliminary Sediment Transport Simulation Evaluate the 2008 – 2011 Susquehanna River Flows Period of Record Includes the September 2001 Tropical Storm Lee Event Sediment Inflows Estimated From Previous HEC-6 Modeling

Lower Susquehanna River Watershed Assessment 2008 – 2011 Susquehanna Flow Record

Lower Susquehanna River Watershed Assessment Sediment Rating Curve for 2008 – 2011 Simulation

Lower Susquehanna River Watershed Assessment Simulated Sediment Load in and out of Conowingo Reservoir: 2008 – 2011 Assumptions: Top 1 ft layer critical Shear = 2 Pa Below 1 ft layer critical shear = 4 Pa Total In: 12 million tons Total Out: 16.6 million tons Net Scour: 4.6 million tons

Lower Susquehanna River Watershed Assessment Computed Bed Shear Stress for 300,000 cfs

Lower Susquehanna River Watershed Assessment Computed Bed Shear Stress for 400,000 cfs

Lower Susquehanna River Watershed Assessment Computed Bed Shear Stress for 600,000 cfs

Lower Susquehanna River Watershed Assessment Bed Change After the 2008 – 2011 Simulation