Volume 18, Issue 7, Pages (February 2017)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Cheng-Ming Sun, Edith Deriaud, Claude Leclerc, Richard Lo-Man  Immunity 
Advertisements

Volume 23, Issue 8, Pages (May 2018)
Volume 39, Issue 3, Pages (September 2013)
Volume 43, Issue 4, Pages (October 2015)
Pathways Responsible for Human Autoantibody and Therapeutic Intravenous IgG Activity in Humanized Mice  Inessa Schwab, Anja Lux, Falk Nimmerjahn  Cell.
Volume 44, Issue 3, Pages (March 2016)
Local Inflammatory Cues Regulate Differentiation and Persistence of CD8+ Tissue- Resident Memory T Cells  Tessa Bergsbaken, Michael J. Bevan, Pamela J.
Volume 41, Issue 4, Pages (October 2014)
Volume 20, Issue 8, Pages (August 2017)
Marc Hertz, David Nemazee  Immunity 
Volume 11, Issue 12, Pages (June 2015)
Volume 29, Issue 6, Pages (December 2008)
Volume 18, Issue 5, Pages (May 2003)
Volume 17, Issue 12, Pages (December 2016)
Replacing mouse BAFF with human BAFF does not improve B-cell maturation in hematopoietic humanized mice by Julie Lang, Bicheng Zhang, Margot Kelly, Jacob.
Volume 3, Issue 5, Pages (November 2014)
Volume 35, Issue 1, Pages (July 2011)
Volume 24, Issue 8, Pages (August 2018)
Kathleen R. Bartemes, BA, Gail M. Kephart, BS, Stephanie J
Volume 22, Issue 13, Pages (March 2018)
Positive Regulation of Lyn Kinase by CD148 Is Required for B Cell Receptor Signaling in B1 but Not B2 B Cells  Katarzyna M. Skrzypczynska, Jing W. Zhu,
Volume 17, Issue 5, Pages (October 2016)
CD22 is a negative regulator of B-cell receptor signalling
Volume 23, Issue 8, Pages (May 2018)
Volume 34, Issue 5, Pages (May 2011)
Volume 125, Issue 4, Pages (May 2006)
Adam C. Silver, Alvaro Arjona, Wendy E. Walker, Erol Fikrig  Immunity 
Complex Antigens Drive Permissive Clonal Selection in Germinal Centers
Volume 13, Issue 6, Pages (November 2015)
Volume 34, Issue 5, Pages (May 2011)
Volume 13, Issue 12, Pages (December 2015)
Volume 21, Issue 13, Pages (December 2017)
Volume 29, Issue 2, Pages (August 2008)
B Cell Receptor and CD40 Signaling Are Rewired for Synergistic Induction of the c-Myc Transcription Factor in Germinal Center B Cells  Wei Luo, Florian.
Volume 37, Issue 6, Pages (December 2012)
Volume 36, Issue 2, Pages (February 2012)
Volume 9, Issue 5, Pages (November 2017)
Volume 17, Issue 5, Pages (October 2016)
Volume 7, Issue 1, Pages (April 2014)
Volume 10, Issue 2, Pages (January 2015)
Pivotal Role of Dermal IL-17-Producing γδ T Cells in Skin Inflammation
Volume 44, Issue 4, Pages (April 2016)
Volume 15, Issue 4, Pages (April 2014)
Volume 37, Issue 5, Pages (November 2012)
Volume 32, Issue 5, Pages (May 2010)
Volume 44, Issue 3, Pages (March 2016)
Volume 38, Issue 3, Pages (March 2013)
Volume 22, Issue 5, Pages e5 (November 2017)
Volume 19, Issue 1, Pages (April 2017)
Volume 19, Issue 3, Pages (April 2017)
Volume 19, Issue 4, Pages (October 2003)
Volume 46, Issue 1, Pages (January 2017)
Volume 22, Issue 5, Pages e5 (November 2017)
Volume 23, Issue 8, Pages (August 2016)
Volume 19, Issue 9, Pages (May 2017)
Volume 19, Issue 11, Pages (June 2017)
Volume 37, Issue 5, Pages (November 2012)
Arp2/3-mediated formation of nuclear actin networks is essential for CD4+ T cell effector functions. Arp2/3-mediated formation of nuclear actin networks.
Volume 17, Issue 12, Pages (December 2016)
Volume 12, Issue 2, Pages (July 2015)
Volume 15, Issue 11, Pages (June 2016)
Volume 19, Issue 1, Pages (April 2017)
Volume 25, Issue 9, Pages e5 (November 2018)
Volume 31, Issue 6, Pages (December 2009)
Volume 38, Issue 3, Pages (March 2013)
Volume 28, Issue 5, Pages (May 2008)
Volume 21, Issue 13, Pages (December 2017)
Volume 156, Issue 4, Pages (February 2014)
Volume 23, Issue 8, Pages (May 2018)
Volume 13, Issue 11, Pages (December 2015)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 18, Issue 7, Pages 1627-1635 (February 2017) BCR and Endosomal TLR Signals Synergize to Increase AID Expression and Establish Central B Cell Tolerance  Masayuki Kuraoka, Pilar B. Snowden, Takuya Nojima, Laurent Verkoczy, Barton F. Haynes, Daisuke Kitamura, Garnett Kelsoe  Cell Reports  Volume 18, Issue 7, Pages 1627-1635 (February 2017) DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.01.050 Copyright © 2017 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Cell Reports 2017 18, 1627-1635DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2017.01.050) Copyright © 2017 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Anti-μ+CpG Co-activation Synergistically Elevated AID mRNA Expression in Immature/T1 B Cells (A and B) qPCR analysis of AID mRNA levels in bone marrow immature/T1 B cells (A) and splenic MF B cells (B) cultured for 24 hr in the presence of indicated stimuli (n = 4–15). AID expression in splenic GC B cells (▿; n = 4) from chicken gamma globulin conjugated with (4-hydroxy-3-nitrophenyl)acetyl (NP) in alum (NP-CGG/alum) immunized mice are shown in both panels. Each point represents an individual mouse and determination from at least four independent experiments. NS, not significant, p > 0.05; ∗∗∗p < 0.001, ∗∗∗∗p < 0.0001, unpaired Student’s t test. See also Figure S4. Cell Reports 2017 18, 1627-1635DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2017.01.050) Copyright © 2017 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 PLD Activation, Endosomal Acidification, and Myd88 Are Required for Anti-μ+CpG-Induced Synergistic AID Upregulation in Immature/T1 B Cells (A–D) Representative images of immature/T1 B cells (IgM, TLR9, differential interference contrast [DIC], and merged images) cultured with CpG (A), anti-μ+CpG (B), anti-μ+CpG+n-butanol (C), and anti-μ+CpG+chloroquine (D). Top and bottom represent two independent cells. Scale bars, 5 μm. (E–G) AID mRNA levels in immature/T1 B cells stimulated with CpG or anti-μ+CpG in the presence of various concentrations of (E) n-butanol (v/v, n = 4) or (F) chloroquine (n = 3–4). (G) AID mRNA levels in immature/T1 B cells from B6 and B6.Myd88−/− mice before (n = 13) and after culture (n = 4) in the presence of CpG or anti-μ+CpG. Each point represents an individual mouse and determination from at least two independent experiments. NS, not significant, p > 0.05; ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001, unpaired Student’s t test. See also Figure S1. Cell Reports 2017 18, 1627-1635DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2017.01.050) Copyright © 2017 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Autoreactive Immature/T1 B Cells Are Not Efficiently Purged in the Absence of Myd88 (A–D) Single immature/T1 B cells isolated from indicated mice were grown in Nojima cultures (A) and (D). Culture supernatants containing 1 to 3 μg/mL IgG were screened for DNA reactivity by ELISA. Anti-DNA IgG AvIn of individual cultures of immature/T1 B cells (B6, n = 45; B6.Myd88−/−, n = 43; 3H9, n = 63; 3H9.Myd88−/−, n = 64) are shown. Each point represents an individual immature/T1 B cell culture and determination from at least two independent experiments. Boxes extend from the 25th to 75th percentiles, and lines in the boxes represent median. Error bars represent the 10th to 90th percentiles. ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗∗p < 0.0001, Mann-Whitney’s U test. (B) Representative flow diagrams for IgM/IgD expression by bone marrow cells of B1-8i, 3H9, and 3H9.Myd88−/− mice. Numbers near boxes represent frequencies of immature B cells (imm; IgMloIgD−), T1 B cells (T1; IgMhiIgD+/−) and mature B cells (mature; IgMintIgDhi). (C) Absolute cell numbers of immature/T1 B cells in bone marrow of B1-8i (n = 9), 3H9 (n = 29), and 3H9.Myd88−/− (n = 12) mice. NS, not significant, p > 0.05; ∗∗∗∗p < 0.0001, unpaired Student’s t test; error bars, SEM. (E) Number of immature/T1 B cells (relative to 3H9) in bone marrow of B1-8i (n = 9), 3H9 (n = 29), 3H9.Aicda+/− (n = 5), 3H9.Myd88+/− (n = 7), 3H9.Aicda+/−Myd88+/− (n = 18), 3H9.Aicda−/− (n = 10), and 3H9.Myd88−/− (n = 12) mice. Error bars, SEM. ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001, unpaired Student’s t test. See also Figure S2. Cell Reports 2017 18, 1627-1635DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2017.01.050) Copyright © 2017 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Endosomal Acidification Is Required for Central B Cell Tolerance (A and B) Representative flow plots for IgM/IgD expression by B220loCD93+CD43−CD23− small bone marrow lymphocytes (A), and ratio of immature/T1 B cells to small pre-B cells (B) in B1-8 mice (n = 9), and PBS-treated (n = 7) or chloroquine-treated (n = 10) 3H9 mice from five independent experiments. (C and D) Single immature/T1 B cells isolated from PBS- or chloroquine-treated 3H9 mice were grown in Nojima cultures (see legend for Figures 3A and 3D). (C) Anti-DNA IgG AvIn of individual immature/T1 B cell cultures [n = 206 and 186 for PBS-treated (n = 5) and chloroquine-treated (n = 5) 3H9 mice, respectively]. Boxes extend from the 25th to 75th percentiles, and lines in the boxes represent median. Error bars represent the 10th to 90th percentiles. (D) Anti-DNA IgG AvIn of immature/T1 B cell cultures of B6 (Figure 2A, gray), 3H9 (C; PBS-treated, green; chloroquine-treated, blue), and 3H9.Myd88−/− mice (Figure 3D; purple) were compartmentalized by binning into 2-fold intervals. (E) Ratio of indicated B cell compartments to small pre-B cells compared between control (n = 5) and chloroquine-treated (n = 7) 2F5 dKI mice. Boxes extend from the 25th to 75th percentiles, and lines in the boxes represent median. Bars represent the range (minimum/maximum) of values. Each symbol represents individual mice from two independent experiments. ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗∗p < 0.001, Mann-Whitney’s U test. Error bars, SEM. See also Figure S3. Cell Reports 2017 18, 1627-1635DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2017.01.050) Copyright © 2017 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions