WILLARD HIGH SCHOOL SPEECH & DEBATE TOURNAMENT— October 19-20, 2018

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Judging 101 A Speech and Debate survival guide for everyone.
Advertisements

Grapevine Classic 2012 Judge workshop Extemporaneous Speaking, Public Forum and Congress.
Debate Judges Orientation. Volunteers make it Happen! 2 We can’t do this without you. YOU are making an investment. YOU are performing a teaching role.
Speech & Play Production Rules Meeting. The entries to the district contests are to be submitted no later than a fixed date to be determined annually.
Judging Speech Clash of the Titans, 2012 Speech Tournament Coach: Wendi Brandenburg Centennial High School, Frisco TX.
ORAL INTERPRETATION-PPT 2
National Christian Forensics and Communications Association “…addressing life issues from a biblical worldview in a manner that glorifies God…” Welcome.
Interpretive Categories  For the adventurous, these categories involve taking someone else’s work, (poems, plays, stories, etc.) and making them your.
Original Oratory Rules: 7-10 minute Speech Topic of your choice
What is it & how can you be involved? Shakopee Saber Speech Team.
ATM Speech & Debate A Commitment to Excellence
Welcome to the forensic team
Competitive Debate: An Introduction
Oral Interp… Reading Strategies & Marking Scripts
Public Forum Debate Partner debate.
COMPETITIVE DEBATE: AN INTRODUCTION ESSENTIAL QUESTION – WHAT ARE THE DIFFERENT EVENTS AVAILABLE IN COMPETITIVE DEBATE?
Lincoln Douglas Value Debate Orientation. Volunteers Make it Happen! 2 We can’t do this without you. You are making an investment. You are performing.
Volunteer Judge Training Presented by: Chris Cruz-Boone Department of Communications.
Welcome to the Team! Speech, Debate & Oral Interpretation Orientation Meeting.
A Speech and Debate survival guide for everyone
F O R E N S I C S SPEECH AND DEBATE TEAM. The Faces of Forensics.
Stoa Speech and Debate Lincoln Douglas Value Debate Judge Orientation.
St. Louise Speech Team Judge Training November, 2014.
Wilson Memorial High School Forensic Team No, it’s not anything like CSI, but is just as much FUN!
Speech and Debate Terms Basic Definitions Every Speechie Should Know!
Individual Policy Debate Orientation. Volunteers Make it Happen! 2 We can’t do this without you. You are making an investment. You are performing a teaching.
Debate, Public Speaking, and Speech Events
FORENSICS EVENT NOTES SPEAKING EVENTS pre-written and researched speech memorized delivery judged on both the speech and the delivery.
Wisconsin Forensics Coaches Association With thanks to Emily Wacker of Brookfield East HS.
INTRO TO SPEECH & DEBATE EVENTS. TOURNAMENT SEASON o Individuals can participate in up to 10 tournaments a season o 3 debate only o 5 speech/debate combined.
Welcome to Speech &Debate Mrs. O’Hara Events 101 Prose Interpretation 10-minute limit/30 second grace period Cut from a published prose/Fiction,
Lincoln Douglas Debate Orientation
An introduction to Speech and why you should join.
Affirmative vs. negative
Debate Orientation.
Limited Prep Platform Interpretive
LD Debate Study Information
A Speech and Debate survival guide for everyone Rev. September 2017
It’s not just about reading a cute story!
Oral Interp… Reading Strategies & Marking Scripts
Debate Jeopardy.
BFL Judge Training Presented by
It’s not just about reading a cute story!
A Speech and Debate survival guide for everyone
Last year in review… Won Worlds Debate at the NSDA National Tournament
Lincoln Douglas Debate Orientation
Debate Jeopardy 2.
Prepared Platform Speeches
Prose.
Lincoln Douglas Debate Orientation
Debate Judges Orientation
Debate Orientation.
The art of argumentation
Lincoln Douglas Debate Orientation
Willard High School Speech & Debate Tournament— October 20-21
Oral Interpretation: To Inform & Persuade
Lincoln Douglas Debate Orientation
Rules and Regulations for NSDA Individual Events
Organizing your FFA Meetings
LINCOLN-DOUGLAS DEBATE
Welcome to the Team! Parent Orientation 2018/19.
ORDER AND PURPOSE OF POLICY SPEECHES
Middle Level Forensics Association of Wisconsin
Debate and Speech Events
Lincoln Douglas Debate Orientation
Lincoln Douglas Debate Orientation
Team Policy Debate Orientation
Lincoln Douglas Debate Orientation
Judging Speech & Debate
Debate Orientation.
Presentation transcript:

WILLARD HIGH SCHOOL SPEECH & DEBATE TOURNAMENT— October 19-20, 2018 JUDGES’ WORKSHOP

WHAT IS SPEECH & DEBATE? A Co-Curricular Activity which teaches students to become effective communicators A competitive activity, much like Football or Marching Band.

2 MAJOR TYPES OF EVENTS: DEBATE EVENTS & INDIVIDUAL EVENTS International Extemp. U.S. Extemp Original Oratory Informative Speaking Humorous Interp Dramatic Interp Program of Oral Interp. Duo Interp Storytelling Radio Student Congress We will have a Novice division of the same events as well! Debate Events Policy Novice Policy Champ Lincoln/Douglas Regular Lincoln/Douglas Novice Lincoln/Douglas Champ Public Forum Regular Public Forum Novice Public Forum

ARE YOU QUALIFIED TO JUDGE?…YES! Anyone who is out of high school can judge. The goal of speech and debate is to teach students to communicate to all types of people. Thank you and please DO NOT underestimate yourself ☺

JUDGING INDIVIDUAL EVENTS You will watch approx. 6-8 performances per round. Each competitor will have a code, it is very important that your rank match the proper code. You will have 1 ballot for each performance. You may make comments and suggestions on the ballot. After watching all performances you will rank them in order from best to least best. NO 2 Performances may receive the same rank. Please wait for all performances, before leaving and/or making your decision. Following the round return your ballots to the Ballot Judges table in the Commons by the Library.

INTERNATIONAL AND U.S. EXTEMPORANEOUS SPEAKING Description A 7 minute Informative Speech Random questions dealing with current events. 30 minutes of preparation time. Speakers must perform in order. What to Look For Does the Speaker… Answer the question. inform you of the issues. speak to you, or over you. have good delivery and content.

Judges Signature _________________________ Rank _____

ORIGINAL ORATORY Description What to Look For Does the Speaker… A 10 minute persuasive speech. Written by the student Students do not have to perform in order. What to Look For Does the Speaker… Persuade and Motivate you. Use stories, examples, and quotes effectively. Clearly establish a problem and a solution. Have good delivery and content.

INFORMATIVE SPEAKING What to Look For Description Does the Speaker… An 10 minute informative speech. Written by the student Students do not have to perform in order. What to Look For Does the Speaker… Inform you. Use stories, examples, and quotes effectively. Have good delivery and content. They may use visual aids

HUMOROUS & DRAMATIC INTERPRETATION Description 10 minute performance Cut from a published source, (play, book, etc.) Creative development of characters. No costumes, props, or other visual aids. What to Look For Does the speaker… Have developed characters. Convey a clear understanding of the literature, & is the performance appropriate for the selection. Introduce and establish important information.

DUO INTERPRETATION Description What to Look For Do the Speakers… 10 minute performance of published material. Humorous or Dramatic No prop or costumes. Limited movement. Off-stage focus What to Look For Do the Speakers… Have developed characters. Convey a clear understanding of the literature, & is the performance appropriate for the selection. Introduce and establish important information.

Program of Oral Interpretation Description 10 minute performance of published material. Using selections from Prose, Poetry and Drama students create a ten minute performance around a central theme. Program Oral A binder is required and may be used as a prop within the performance. What to Look For Does the speaker… Convey a clear understanding of the literature, & is the performance appropriate for the selection. Display good eye contact and facial expression Introduce and establish important information.

Please comment on the following PROGRAM OF ORAL INTERPRETATION Round ________________ Room_________________ School Code ____________ Contestant________________________________________________________ Selection _________________________________________________________ Please comment on the following Introduction: Did the introduction serve a useful purpose? Delivery: Although the material should be well in mind, it shall not be memorized and shall be read from the printed page. Were at least two of the three genres of literature (Poetry/Prose/Drama) used in the program? Did all of the literature contribute to the theme or argument? Did the flow of the performance make sense? Was there a balance among genres in the performance? Was the student's voice suited to the selection? Did it indicate lively imagination and sympathy for the mood of the material, or did it fall into a tone and/or rhythm pattern? Was pronunciation correct? Enunciation clear cut? Did bodily action contribute to the interpretation? Understanding: Did the student appear to have an understanding of the meaning, mood, and emotion of the selection or selections? Can you tell what the performer was doing in each scene? Was it clear what selection the performer was using in each section? Did the performer maintain control of the manuscript at all times? Was the movement motivated in the performance? Note: *Judges are reminded not to collaborate on their decisions. *Rank on overall performance (1 being the best, 2 next and so on) *No Two speakers can receive the same ranking. PROGRAM OF ORAL INTERPRETATION

STORY TELLING This event is OPEN Description 8 minute performance of published material. The story shall be told from a seated position on a chair. Narrated by the contestant in a combination of the contestant’s own words and original essential phrases from the author without the use of notes. Limited movement. What to Look For Does the speaker… Convey a clear understanding of the literature, & is the performance appropriate for the selection. Display good eye contact and facial expression Introduce and establish important information.

RADIO SPEAKING This event is OPEN Description Not more than full 5 minutes with a minimum of "dead air". Prepare and present a script which contains news, weather and sports. Copy used to prepare the script shall be no more than 24 hours old No commercials may be used. The contestant will have their back to the judge. What to Look For Does the speaker… The contestant's voice shall be pleasing when heard on radio. The contestant’s articulation should be clear; enunciation distinct and pronunciation accurate. The student's voice, including quality, pitch, volume, modulation and rate, should be used to good advantage. The individual should have an understanding of the material read.

STUDENT CONGRESS What to Look For Does the Speaker… Description Seem informed about the issues. Provide support for their opinions. Work well with other students Conduct him/her self with integrity and respect. Description 15-20 students who give speeches about proposed laws. Students are controlled by a Presiding Officer. Students are ranked individually on a scale of 6-1. When the round is done you need to rank the room by ranking the top 8 speakers from 1-8

Ballot you fill out at the end of the round to rank the room. Ballot for Each Student that gives a Speech in the Round

JUDGING DEBATE EVENTS Each Debate Round you will watch 1 Policy Debate, 2 Lincoln Douglas Debates, or 2 Public Forum Debates. There will be an Affirmative and a Negative Team for each debate. Each debate team will have a code, it is very important that your decision match the proper code. You will have 1 ballot for each debate you watch in the round. You may make comments and suggestions on the ballot. After watching a full debate you will give one team a win, no ties. Following the round return your ballots to the Ballot Return table Please judge the debate regardless of the merits of the resolution.

POLICY DEBATE Resolved: The United States federal government should substantially reduce its restrictions on legal immigration to the United States. Two Sides: Affirmative (2 students) & Negative (2 students). Affirmative proposes a plan to change, & the negative argues against that plan. Rank Speakers from 1 to 4 (1=best). You should vote for the team that is most convincing, most prepared, and most professional.

LINCOLN/DOUGLAS DEBATE Resolved: In the United States, reporters ought to have the right to protect the identity of confidential sources. 1 Affirmative & 1 Negative Speaker Students debate the value of the issue, and not the policy of it. Vote for the competitor who is persuasive, proves his/her points, and is the most professional.

PUBLIC FORUM DEBATE Resolved: The United States should accede to the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea without reservations. They will flip a coin to decide who speaks first and who is Pro or Con Pro (2 speakers) and Con (2speakers) teams. Students debate the intent. Vote for the team that best persuades you, is best prepared, and is most professional. During crossfire, all four speakers will ask and answer questions.

The WHS Speech & Debate Team ANY QUESTIONS? Thank You For Your Help!. The WHS Speech & Debate Team