Dark Matter, Dark Energy Interaction: Cosmological Implications, Observational Signatures and Theoretical Challenges Bin Wang Center for Gravitation and.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Seeing Dark Energy (or the cosmological constant which is the simplest form of DE) Professor Bob Nichol (ICG, Portsmouth)
Advertisements

Cosmic Baryons: The IGM Ue-Li Pen 彭威禮. Overview History of Cosmic Baryons: a gas with phase transitions Missing baryons simulations SZ-Power spectrum:
Weighing Neutrinos including the Largest Photometric Galaxy Survey: MegaZ DR7 Moriond 2010Shaun Thomas: UCL “A combined constraint on the Neutrinos” Arxiv:
P ROBING SIGNATURES OF MODIFIED GRAVITY MODELS OF DARK ENERGY Shinji Tsujikawa (Tokyo University of Science)
PRESENTATION TOPIC  DARK MATTER &DARK ENERGY.  We know about only normal matter which is only 5% of the composition of universe and the rest is  DARK.
1 Studying clusters and cosmology with Chandra Licia Verde Princeton University Some thoughts…
Lecture 2: Observational constraints on dark energy Shinji Tsujikawa (Tokyo University of Science)
July 7, 2008SLAC Annual Program ReviewPage 1 Future Dark Energy Surveys R. Wechsler Assistant Professor KIPAC.
CMB as a physics laboratory
Lecture 1: Basics of dark energy Shinji Tsujikawa (Tokyo University of Science) ``Welcome to the dark side of the world.”
Constraining Galactic Halos with the SZ-effect
Probing Dark Matter with the CMB and Large-Scale Structure 1 Cora Dvorkin IAS (Princeton) Harvard (Hubble fellow) COSMO 2014 August 2014, Chicago.
Large Scale Simulations of Reionization Garrelt Mellema Stockholm Observatory Collaborators: Ilian Iliev, Paul Shapiro, Marcelo Alvarez, Ue-Li Pen, Hugh.
Bin Wang Fudan University Shanghai Interaction between dark energy and dark matter.
Interaction between dark energy and dark matter Bin Wang Shanghai Jiao TongUniversity.
The Science Case for the Dark Energy Survey James Annis For the DES Collaboration.
Cosmological Tests using Redshift Space Clustering in BOSS DR11 (Y. -S. Song, C. G. Sabiu, T. Okumura, M. Oh, E. V. Linder) following Cosmological Constraints.
Polarization-assisted WMAP-NVSS Cross Correlation Collaborators: K-W Ng(IoP, AS) Ue-Li Pen (CITA) Guo Chin Liu (ASIAA)
Dark Energy The first Surprise in the era of precision cosmology?
Dark energy I : Observational constraints Shinji Tsujikawa (Tokyo University of Science)
Relic Neutrinos, thermal axions and cosmology in early 2014 Elena Giusarma arXiv: Based on work in collaboration with: E. Di Valentino, M. Lattanzi,
The Cosmic Microwave Background Lecture 2 Elena Pierpaoli.
Constraints on the neutrino mass by future precise CMB polarization and 21cm line observations Yoshihiko Oyama The Graduate University for Advanced Studies.
How can CMB help constraining dark energy? Licia Verde ICREA & Institute of space Sciences (ICE CSIC-IEEC)
Lecture 5: Matter Dominated Universe: CMB Anisotropies and Large Scale Structure Today, matter is assembled into structures: filaments, clusters, galaxies,
The dark universe SFB – Transregio Bonn – Munich - Heidelberg.
Our Evolving Universe1 Vital Statistics of the Universe Today… l l Observational evidence for the Big Bang l l Vital statistics of the Universe   Hubble’s.
Interaction between dark energy and dark matter Bin Wang Shanghai Jiao TongUniversity collaborated with Elcio Abdalla.
Michael Doran Institute for Theoretical Physics Universität Heidelberg Time Evolution of Dark Energy (if any …)
the National Radio Astronomy Observatory – Socorro, NM
Cosmic Microwave Background Carlo Baccigalupi, SISSA CMB lectures at TRR33, see the complete program at darkuniverse.uni-hd.de/view/Main/WinterSchoolLecture5.
Bin Wang Fudan University Shanghai Signature on the interaction between dark energy and dark matter.
 Acceleration of Universe  Background level  Evolution of expansion: H(a), w(a)  degeneracy: DE & MG  Perturbation level  Evolution of inhomogeneity:
The Feasibility of Constraining Dark Energy Using LAMOST Redshift Survey L.Sun.
Bwdem – 06/04/2005doing cosmology with galaxy clusters Cosmology with galaxy clusters: testing the evolution of dark energy Raul Abramo – Instituto de.
Interaction between dark energy and dark matter Bin Wang Shanghai JiaotongUniversity.
Bin Wang Fudan University Shanghai Interaction between dark energy and dark matter.
Dark Matter, Dark Energy Interaction: Cosmological Implications, Observational Signatures and Theoretical Challenges Bin Wang Shanghai Jiao Tong University.
Jochen Weller XLI Recontres de Moriond March, 18-25, 2006 Constraining Inverse Curvature Gravity with Supernovae O. Mena, J. Santiago and JW PRL, 96, ,
Future observational prospects for dark energy Roberto Trotta Oxford Astrophysics & Royal Astronomical Society.
Interaction between dark energy and dark matter Bin Wang Shanghai JiaotongUniversity.
Probing Dark Energy with Cosmological Observations Fan, Zuhui ( 范祖辉 ) Dept. of Astronomy Peking University.
Evolution of perturbations and cosmological constraints in decaying dark matter models with arbitrary decay mass products Shohei Aoyama Nagoya University.
Carlos Hernández-Monteagudo CE F CA 1 CENTRO DE ESTUDIOS DE FÍSICA DEL COSMOS DE ARAGÓN (CE F CA) J-PAS 10th Collaboration Meeting March 11th 2015 Cosmology.
Cheng Zhao Supervisor: Charling Tao
The cross-correlation between CMB and 21-cm fluctuations during the epoch of reionization Hiroyuki Tashiro N. Aghanim (IAS, Paris-sud Univ.) M. Langer.
Spherical Collapse and the Mass Function – Chameleon Dark Energy Stephen Appleby, APCTP-TUS dark energy workshop 5 th June, 2014 M. Kopp, S.A.A, I. Achitouv,
Reionization of the Universe MinGyu Kim
Dark Energy From the perspective of an American theorist fresh from the recent Dark Energy Survey Collaboration Meeting Scott Dodelson.
Jan Hamann Rencontres de Moriond (Cosmology) 21st March 2016
Outline Part II. Structure Formation: Dark Matter
Observational Constraints on the Running Vacuum Model
The influence of Dark Energy on the Large Scale Structure Formation
Princeton University & APC
Cosmological constraints from tSZ-X cross-correlation
Probing the Coupling between Dark Components of the Universe
Recent status of dark energy and beyond
Carlo Baccigalupi, SISSA
STRUCTURE FORMATION MATTEO VIEL INAF and INFN Trieste
Cosmology from Large Scale Structure Surveys
MASAHIDE YAMAGUCHI (山口 昌英)
Shintaro Nakamura (Tokyo University of Science)
Probing the Dark Sector
Precision cosmology, status and perspectives
Detection of integrated Sachs-Wolfe effect by cross-correlation of the
Outline Part II. Structure Formation: Dark Matter
Lecture 5: Matter Dominated Universe
The impact of non-linear evolution of the cosmological matter power spectrum on the measurement of neutrino masses ROE-JSPS workshop Edinburgh.
Measurements of Cosmological Parameters
ν Are we close to measuring the neutrino hierarchy? Filipe B. Abdalla
Presentation transcript:

Dark Matter, Dark Energy Interaction: Cosmological Implications, Observational Signatures and Theoretical Challenges Bin Wang Center for Gravitation and Cosmology YZU/SJTU B. Wang, E. Abdalla, F. Atrio-Barandela, D. Pavon Reports on Progress in Physics, 79, 096901 (2016)

Outline Cosmological Implications: Why do we need the interaction between DE&DM? Observational Signatures: Is the interaction between DE&DM allowed by observations? CMB ISW effect Kinetic SZ Galaxy Cluster scale tests Growth factor and Structure formation Number of Galaxy Cluster counting Weak Lensing HI intensity mapping observations Theoretical Challenges:

95% Unknown: 25% DM+70% DE DE-- ? QFT value 123 orders larger than the observed Coincidence problem: Why the universe is accelerating just now? In Einstein GR: Why are the densities of DM and DE of precisely the same order today? is not the end story to account for the cosmic acceleration

Evidence Against ΛDCM? Hubble constant constraints at 68% CL Ade et al. (2016, h = 0.673 ± 0.010) Riess et al. (2016, h = 0.732 ± 0.017) Discordance 2.7σ

Evidence Against ΛDCM? Baryon acoustic oscillations in the Lyα forest of BOSS DR11 quasars A&A 574, A59 (2015)  The study uses 137,562 quasars in the redshift range 2.1≤z≤3.5 from the Data Release 11 (DR11) of the Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey (BOSS) of SDSS-III DA/rd are 7% lower and DH/rd are 7% higher than the predictions of a flat ΛDCM cosmological model Discrepancy 2.5σ

Evidence Against ΛDCM? ΛDCM Weak Lensing from Kilo Degree Survey (KiDS) MNRAS471,1259(2017) ΛDCM The discordance between the two datasets is largely unaffected by a more conservative treatment of the lensing systematics.

Modification to ΛDCM is needed? Interaction 70% Dark Energy 25% Dark Matter

Why do we need the interaction between DE&DM? A phenomenological generalization of the LCDM model is LCDM model, Stationary ratio of energy densities Coincidence problem less severe than LCDM The period when energy densities of DE and DM are comparable is longer The coincidence problem is less acute can be achieved by a suitable interaction between DE & DM          

Is Einstein’s GR successful on large scale? Modified gravity: f(R) model ------ Extended GR by introducing Non-minimal coupling between DE and DM Motivations to introduce the interaction between DE and DM: Alleviate the coincidence problem Accommodate the DE with w<-1 Relate to the study of the modified gravity

The Interaction Between DE & DM Phenomenological interaction forms: For Q > 0 the energy proceeds from DE to DM Phenomenological forms of Q

Signature of the interaction in the CMB Sachs-Wolfe effects: non-integrated photons’ initial conditions Early ISW integrated has the unique ability to probe the “size” of DE: EOS, the speed of sound Late ISW Signature of the interaction between DE and DM?

ISW imprint of the interaction The analytical descriptions for such effect ISW effect is not simply due to the change of the CDM perturbation. The interaction enters each part of gravitational potential. J.H. He, B.Wang, P.J.Zhang, PRD(09) J.H.He, B.Wang, E.Abdalla, PRD(11)

Imprint of the interaction in CMB Interaction proportional to the energy density of DM & DE+DM EISW+SW He, Wang, Zhang, PRD(09) He, Wang, Abdalla, PRD(11)

Likelihoods of ,w and ξ ξ ~DM Alleviate the coincidence problem WMAP data: He, Wang, Abdalla, PRD(11) PLANCK 2013data: Costa, Xu, Wang, Ferreira, Abdalla, PRD(14) PLANCK 2015data: Costa, Xu, Wang, Abdalla, JCAP (17)

Sunyaev Zel'dovich effect The Kinetic SZ effect CMB photon TCMB=2.73K 1% probability free energetic electron in Inverse Compton scattering vp: peculiar velocity scattered CMB photon boost CMB photon scattering probability TCMB=2.73+ΔT Interesting to study KSZ effect Interesting to study KSZ effect PLANCK result: the upper limit of the peculiar velocity can be three times of the LCDM prediction. 1303.5090

X.D.Xu, B.Wang, P.J.Zhang, F.Atrio-Barandela, JCAP(13) In the small scale approximation k>>aH, neglect the time variation of the potential Evolution of DE, DM perturbation; background density Density perturbation of electrons Velocity field of electrons Interaction KSZ effect X.D.Xu, B.Wang, P.J.Zhang, F.Atrio-Barandela, JCAP(13)

Tension with negative coupling. ξ ~DE, w>-1 The amplitude increases with decreasing of coupling ξ >0, smaller than the LCDM model ξ <0, larger than the LCDM X: upper limit from ACT 8.6uk^2 at l=3000 +: upper limit from SPT 2.8uk^2 at l=3000 Upper limits depend on: reionization history the modeling of CIB TSZ contribution We just consider: homogeneous, linear patchy reionization, nonlinear ξ ~DE, w<-1 ξ~DM, w<-1 Tension with negative coupling. KSZ observations favor a positive coupling between DM-DE interaction !

Summary: complementary KSZ effect: potential, peculiar velocity, Large at big l, from the moment of reionization z ~10. ISW effect: time evolution of the potential, at large angular scales, during the period of acceleration complementary X.D.Xu, B.Wang, P.J.Zhang, F.Atrio-Barandela, JCAP(13)

The dynamics in the process of the structure formation. How does the interaction influence the structure formation? The dynamics in the process of the structure formation. Layzer-Irvine equation Virial condition of the galaxy cluster E. Abdalla, L.Abramo, L.Sodre, B.Wang, PLB(09) E. Abdalla, L.Abramo, J.Souza, PRD(09) 2. Spherical collapse model. Critical density to collapse Number of galaxy clusters at different redshift J.H.He, B.Wang, E.Abdalla, D.Pavon, JCAP(10)

Growth Index: The influence of the interaction between dark sectors The interaction influence on the growth index overwhelms the DE perturbation effect. This opens the possibility to reveal the interaction between DE&DM through measurement of growth factor in the future. He, Wang, Jing, JCAP09

Layzer-Irvine equation for DM Layzer-Irvine equation describes how a collapsing system reaches dynamical equilibrium in an expanding universe For DM: the rate of change of the peculiar velocity is describes how DM reaches dynamical equilibrium in the collapsing system in the expanding universe. E. Abdalla, L.Abramo, L.Sodre, B.Wang, PLB(09) J.H.He, B.Wang, E.Abdalla, D.Pavon, JCAP(10)

Virial condition For DM: equilibrium configuration of the system If the DE is distributed homogeneously, For DM: For a system in equilibrium Virial Condition: presence of the coupling between DE and DM changes the equilibrium configuration of the system Galaxy clusters are the largest virialized structures in the universe Comparing the mass estimated through naïve virial hypothesis with that from WL and X-ray E. Abdalla, L.Abramo, L.Sodre, B.Wang, PLB(09) E. Abdalla, L.Abramo, J.Souza, PRD(09) galaxy clusters optical, X-ray and weak lensing data

Layzer-Irvine equation for DE For DE: starting from Multiplying both sides of this equation by integrating over the volume and using continuity equation, we have: For DE: For DM: The time and dynamics required by DE and DM to reach equilibrium are different in the collapsing system. DE does not fully cluster along with DM. J.H.He, B.Wang, E.Abdalla, D.Pavon, JCAP(10)

Press-Schechter Formalism J.H.He, B.Wang, E.Abdalla, D.Pavon, JCAP(10)

Evidence for interacting model from BOSS Hubble parameter obtained by BOSS A&A 574, A59 (2015) ΛDCM differs from the BOSS combined contours by at least 2σ. This difference is reduced due to interaction between dark sectors.

Evidence for interacting model from Weak Lensing This difference is reduced due to interaction between dark sectors.

More evidence for interacting DE model The BAOs are a signature in the matter distribution from the recombination epoch. BAO the most powerful probes of DE To date, BAOs have only been detected by performing large galaxy redshift surveys in the optical waveband. The radio band provides a unique and complementary observational window. via the redshifted 21cm neutral hydrogen emission line from distant galaxies.

Evidence for interacting model from 21cm windows Reionization Epoch: Xu, Zhang, Wang 1702.06358 The coupling can speed up the reionization. Acceleration Epoch: Xu, Ma, Weltman 1710.03643 The auto-power spectra of 21-cm, IDE models with respect to the ΛCDM model window at z = 0.3

21cm windows: BINGO

Forcasted constraints on the interaction from 21cm windows: BINGO Xu, Ma, Weltman 1710.03643 FAST SKA

More tests are needed CMB A lot of efforts are required to disclose the signature on the interaction between DE and DM CMB Cluster M Cluster N kSZ Redshift Distortion Weak Lensing 21cm HI More tests are needed

Summary Cosmological Implications: Observational Signatures: Motivation to introduce the interaction between DE & DM Observational Signatures: CMB+SNIa+BAO+kSZ Galaxy cluster scale tests Weak Lensing HI intensity mapping observations Alleviate the coincidence problem Theoretical Challenges: Understanding the interaction from field theory

CosPA 2018 Welcome to Yangzhou

Thanks!!!