How we are Managing our RAG Status.....

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PRD Group Maturity Matrix 31/07/08. Maturity Matrix Guidance Notes Aims of the Matrix The Maturity Matrix is a tool aimed to support groups during their.
Advertisements

© Grant Thornton UK LLP. All rights reserved. Review of Partnership Working: Follow Up Review Vale of Glamorgan Council Final Report- November 2009.
The application of “Value Engineering” tools to risk assess the outputs of an NSI Graham Sharp Manager, Continuous Improvement Zone ONS, UK
10.5 Report Performance The process of collecting and distributing performance information, including status reports, progress measurements and forecasts.
Valuing People - Implementing a Programme to Reduce Restrictive Practices Liz Williams, Clinical Services Director Cambian Group.
© Grant Thornton UK LLP. All rights reserved. Review of Partnership Working Vale of Glamorgan Council Final Report- July 2008.
DEVELOPING AND SHARING RESOURCES Embedding Learning Development to enhance student experience.
The Coleg Powys Experience. Coleg Powys piloted the new inspection framework in November The inspection was learner centred and focused on pre-
The revised Common Inspection Framework for further education and skills Charlie Henry HMI Principal Officer Special Educational Needs and Disability Natspec.
Children’s Trust Network 19 October 2011 Developments in Safeguarding Anthony May Corporate Director for Children, Families and Cultural Services.
Establishing a baseline of the seven day services clinical standards in acute care ‘A how to guide’ To activate the links in this slide set please view.
Education Evaluation: Benefits to Trust and its Learners
Mr. Walter Balfe, Development Officer, FETAC Provider Self Evaluation of Programmes and Services Walter Balfe Development Officer – FETAC 4 October 2007.
Quality Assurance Programme of the Canadian Census of Population Expert Group Meeting on Population and Housing Censuses Geneva July 7-9, 2010.
X Project Highlight Report – (Date) Achievements  Key high level outputs delivered by the project this month. Communications Key high level communications.
Lessons from Programme Evaluation in Romania First Annual Conference on Evaluation Bucharest 18 February 2008.
Validated Self Evaluation of Alcohol and Drug Partnerships Evidencing Implementation: The Quality Principles – Care Inspectorate/The Scottish Government.
European Social Fund Promoting improvement 15 th March 2016 Nigel Finch.
Training for organisations participating in Peer Review of Paediatric Diabetes.
0 End of Year Arrangements Training Presentation for Access Practitioners.
Business Assessment Instructions on how to open the embedded Excel file are on the next slide.
Healthier Together Joint Committee Wednesday 15 th June 2016.
Reporting, Monitoring and Evaluation
MODULE 15 – ORGANISATIONAL COMMUNICATION
GOVERNING BODY SELF-EVALUATION TOOLKIT
Training Trainers and Educators Unit 8 – How to Evaluate
Primary Care Support England
MANCHESTER LOCALITY PLAN BOARD – GOVERNANCE RESPONSIBILITIES
Links in the Chain: turning learning analytics data into actions
[Project Name] [Presenter Name]
Assuring Quality The Early Help Assessment Journey
Navigating the Resident Quarterly Development Plan
Training Trainers and Educators Unit 8 – How to Evaluate
Reports for Data & Progress Monitoring
Change Assurance Dashboard
Cultural Assessment Instructions on how to open the embedded Excel file are on the next slide.
My Performance Journey
Our new quality framework and methodology:
Case Assessment and Tracking System …an outline
[Project Name] [Presenter Name]
Status Report - xx/xx/xx Workstream XX
[Project Name] [Presenter Name]
Balanced System® “The whole is greater than the sum of the parts”
Sustainability Plan 2015 Summary RAG Report
CEF Valuation Sub-Group Societal Valuation Programme Update
Stakeholder Management Template
[Project Name] [Presenter Name]
Launch readiness template
Assessment Workshop Title of the Project (date)
Module 8 ACTION PLANS.
My Performance Journey
Assessment Needs Analysis
My Performance Journey
Portfolio, Programme and Project
17 April 2018 Progress report ccc General capacity requirements for SAIs for conducting IT audits.
The Early Help Assessment Journey. How to Assure a Quality Journey.
Presentation to the Portfolio Committee of Justice and Correctional Services on DCS 1st Quarter Performance Report (2015/2016) 1 September 2015.
Launch readiness template
Overview Headlines RSP – Progress Overview General progress report
ACTION LOG GUIDANCE NOTES
(Project) SIGN OFF PROCESS MONTH DAY, YEAR
Laboratories Oversight Board 14th March 2019
RSP – Progress Overview General progress report High level plan
The Early Help Assessment Journey. How to Assure a Quality Journey.
Data Security and Protection Toolkit Assurance 2018/19
Using and Navigating the AACVPR Program Certification Annual Report Platform AACVPR is pleased to offer a new process of submitting an annual report for.
State Performance Standards System
[Project name] [Presenter name]
Why do we request a PIR? The information provided in the PIR helps inspectors to understand how the service meets the five key questions and the plans.
World-Changing Glasgow Transformation Programme Board Summary
Presentation transcript:

How we are Managing our RAG Status.....

Why did we identify a need to have a process to manage our RAG self assessment? Our Current local Set Up..... Because of this...... Ayrshire & Arran LDP Programme 16 Workstreams 16 Project Charters 16 workstream action plans We have 25 NDP Actions being managed across sixteen workstreams We needed a robust process to assure a consistent approach across the workstreams

How did we go about this ???....Firstly we listened to staff feedback. The NDP tool can be difficult to navigate We just need information on the actions that we are working on There is no summary of the actions indicating which have to be completed by year Are we self assessing where we are NOW or at the end of the year????

5.5(2014)- currently no metrics to measure this action against Some actions cannot physically be GREEN due to factors out with our control 6.1(2013)-A workstream with ISD has been established nationally to coordinate this 1.3(2014)- unable to locally progress to green 2013 requirements until the national aspects have been undertaken by NES & Quality Hub 5.5(2014)- currently no metrics to measure this action against 2.4(2015)- awaiting Community Care Outcome Framework to be published to progress 2013 green RAG requirements

The final 4 actions will have RAG deliverables for 2013/2014/2015 Simplifying the Process.......good to see what actions needed to completed by year 9 Actions should be completed by end 2013 & will only have RAG deliverables for 2013 12 Actions should be completed by end of 2014 & will have RAG deliverables for 2013 & 2014 The final 4 actions will have RAG deliverables for 2013/2014/2015

Simplifying the 2013 RAG Process Made a template for each NDP action illustrating the RAG deliverables for 2013 Templates for specific NDP actions given to the relevant workstream lead Leads for all workstreams brought together to conduct the RAG 2013 self assessment These templates ONLY focussed on the RAG deliverables for 2013 from the NDP Tool

The Process; illustrated using NDP Action 4.1 All the information relating to the process is taken directly from the “LIST VIEW” of the NDP tool 2013 RAG

The 6 Steps in the Process: Steps 1 to 4 2. Is each deliverable completed? 1. Discuss each element of the 2013 deliverables 3. Capture activity to date to address each deliverable 4. If any of the deliverables are incomplete then capture what needs to be done to address this

To progress to GREEN all 3 deliverables need to be complete The 6 Steps in the Process- Step 5 STEP 5- Refer to RAG Guide template to determine status To progress from RED to AMBER the first two deliverables NEED to be completed To progress to GREEN all 3 deliverables need to be complete

A Live Example from Our November 2013 Self Assessment Process- using NDP Action 4.1 Action point one was incomplete. Activity to date was noted and future actions captured The bottom two action points were completed. Activity was captured. No future action requirements

To progress off RED point one MUST be completed A Live Example from Our November 2013 Self Assessment Process- using NDP Action 4.1 To progress off RED point one MUST be completed In reviewing our activity against the RAG status in Step 5, although two out of the three actions were complete we were still RED...... Completion of the bottom two points alone does not allow you to progress from RED

Step 6- Collating the information & updating the NDP Tool Centrally we gather all the updated RAG status for each of the NDP actions Centrally this information is then input to the NDP Toolkit.....ownership of the tool sits with only 2 people. Information is then forwarded onto the CHPO

Our 2013 RAG Status as Assessed November 2013

RAG Status is reviewed intermittently to track progress across the actions.....

Moving onto the 2014 RAG Deliverables...What’s Next Any of the 9 NDP actions due for completion by 2013 that are not yet green will continue to be progressed against the RAG 2013 deliverables. The completed actions are embedded into our service plans and will be further developed locally The remaining actions due for completion by 2014 or 2015 will continue to work on any outstanding deliverables from the 2013 RAG whilst now beginning to address the 2014 & 2015 RAG deliverables

Repeat Self assessment process for 2014 RAG requirements for remaining 16 NDP Actions- NDP Action 4.1

Repeat Self assessment process for 2014 RAG- NDP Action 4.1 New templates issued to reflect additional 2014 RAG requirements

Repeat Self assessment process for 2014 RAG; NDP Action 4.1

Local Alerts from our Project leads Moving onto reporting the 2014 RAG Status....... If we have been green on our 2013 RAG deliverables and then move onto being assessed on the additional 2014 RAG deliverables, we will move from GREEN to RED and this could be disheartening Will there be clearer national guidance on IMPACT MEASURES to facilitate reporting

Locally Considering logging overall percentage completion of full NDP requirements by 2015; Action 4.1 3 deliverables within 2013 RAG Additional 2 deliverables within 2014 RAG No additions in 2015 For NDP Action 4.1 a total of 5 deliverables across the course of the NDP

Locally Considering logging overall percentage completion of full NDP requirements by 2015- NDP Action 4.1 Tracking Percentage Completion of 2015 NDP Requirements for NDP Action 4.1 Total activities to be completed by 2015 5 Total activities completed to date 3 Current Percentage completion 3/5 = 60% As this action finishes in 2014 then we would be looking for 100% in 2014