(School Name) Self-Assessment Analysis April 8, 2013

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
District Accreditation
Advertisements

Using the P Scales launch conferences 2009 Richard Byers University of Cambridge Faculty of Education.
Academic Senate November 6, 2013 STUDENT AFFAIRS INTEGRATED CO-CURRICULAR MODEL Presented by Dilcie D. Perez, Dean of Students.
Center of Excellence in Leadership of Learning October 5, 2010.
Nebraska Summit on Career Readiness Businesses. Nebraska Summit on Career Readiness High School.
Planning & IPS An overview and timeline. Timeline Term 1: 19 th April Annual Report Business Plan Operational Plan Performance Agreement.
Professional Learning Communities in Schools Online Workshop.
February 8, 2012 Session 4: Educational Leadership Policy Standards 1 Council of Chief School Officers April 2008.
ASSESSING & DEVELOPING YOUR WORKPLACE COMMUNICATION SKILLS Professional Year Program - Unit 1: Workplace Communication.
Using the QSA P–10 Literacy and Numeracy Indicators
MAPS DATA SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT
Program Overview The College Community School District's Mentoring and Induction Program is designed to increase retention of promising beginning educators.
Creating a jigsaw for early learning: developing high quality teaching and learning programs for K-3 classrooms Jean Rice September 2008.
NEW ENGLAND ASSOCIATION OF SCHOOLS AND COLLEGES NEASC.
Making DATA Actionable… School Improvement and Student Success Timberlane Regional School District Christi Michaud Director of Data, Assessment, and Accountability.
Making Plans for the Future April 29, 2013 Brenda M. Tanner, Ed.D.
April 29, 2011 Developing Effective Leaders: Principal Evaluation Systems CCSSO – National Summit on Educator Effectiveness.
2.0 Leadership Team and Systems Review Winter 2012.
New England Association of Schools and Colleges The Accreditation Process A Report Guide.
Assessing What Matters Article 12. Article Summary Skills vs knowledge Teaching for wisdom vs rote memorization Wisdom, Intelligence, and Creativity Synthesized.
Understanding Assessments Welcome to Catsfield CE School: 6 th November 2012.
The context for the revised guidance Alan Inglis Assistant Principal, John Wheatley College.
Readiness Rubrics 6 th Grade 12 th Planning #1. Objectives Today, you’re going to take some time to assess yourself and see where you are at on the path.
The NAGs and the Principal National Aspiring Principals Conference April 2010.
A Signature Tool of The Institute for Learning
NEASC SITE VISIT SEPTEMBER 30-OCTOBER 3, Standards of Accreditation 4 standards of Teaching and Learning 1- Mission and Expectations for Student.
The 2012 Ofsted inspection framework SCHOOLS North East 14 th October 2011.
Systemic Change Framework. District Effort and Support Systemic Infrastructure and Organizational Support Resources Development and Allocation District/Community.
CECV Intervention Framework Module 2 Identification 1.
S TANDARDS U PDATE. Purpose and Direction What does the CSI committee want the External Review team to know about the school’s Purpose and Direction that.
MONTEREY COUNTY OFFICE OF EDUCATION – EDUCATIONAL SERVICES - MONTEREY COUNTY OFFICE OF EDUCATION – EDUCATIONAL LCAP EVALUATION RUBRICS UPDATE.
Vision Statement We Value - An organization culture based upon both individual strengths and relationships in which learners flourish in an environment.
MAPLE VALLEY PUBLIC SCHOOLS DISTRICT PD January 18, 2016.
Adaptive Leadership in Changing Curricular Times Secondary Curriculum Leaders Tuesday, April 13.
Meeting One: Leadership for Technology Integration and Implementation.
Values Education: A Whole School Approach. Effective values education: occurs in partnership with students, staff, families and the school community as.
A Trend Analysis Presentation John Poilek Franciscan University EDU 723 3/30/2014.
Gap Analysis Action Plan: Trends PREPARED BY: OFFICE OF INSTITUTIONAL EFFECTIVENESS APRIL 28, 2015.
STaR stands for: School Technology and Readiness It is a tool for planning and self- assessing aligned with the Texas Long-Range Plan for Technology,
Developmental Intervention Model Use for student or institution Can be planned or responsive Planned (Disable Student Services) Responsive (Teacher notices.
Lake Sybelia Elementary
Mathematics Assessment (Math 321 & Math 334)
Whose curriculum is it anyway?
Adaptive Leadership in Changing Curricular Times
Tippie RISE Colleen Opal Assistant Director, Experiential Learning
ASSESSMENT FOR LEARNING: FORMATIVE APPROACHES
Impact Learning Ed Tips
School Self-Evaluation
ACS WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation
ACC 700 Teaching Effectively-- snaptutorial.com
NR 510 Teaching Effectively-- snaptutorial.com
Session 6, Writing Performance Task Preparation Guide, Part 2
edTPA and Teacher Preparation at ISU
Jean Scott & Logan Searcy July 22, MEGA
GDOE/ACS WASC Visiting Committee Final Presentation
Questions about Implementation
QI Management Plan Learning Objectives
District Education Improvement Council (DEIC)
Adapt – Adopt Module 7 Activity Overview Approximate Time: ___ minutes
Assessing Where You Are To Know Where to Go Next
Welcome Back to the District Assessment Selection Committee (DASC)!
ACS WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation
___________________ <Name of School>
WASC/Hawaii HIDOEVisiting Committee Final Presentation
Chris McCloud: Self-assessment against the rubric
___________________ <Name of School>
State Department of Education
HIDOE/ACS WASC Visiting Committee Final Presentation
The School development plan for Parents and Carers
ACS WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation
Presentation transcript:

(School Name) Self-Assessment Analysis April 8, 2013

Ready for College Data

Ready for College Rubric Assessment

Powerful Teaching and Learning Data

Powerful Teaching and Learning Rubric Assessment

Personalization Data

Personalization Rubric Assessment

Redefined Professionalism Data

Redefined Professionalism Rubric Assessment

Purposeful Design Data

Purposeful Design Rubric Assessment

Leadership Data

Leadership Rubric Assessment

School Strengths from Data (whole staff)

Surprises from Data (whole staff)

Major Trends from Data (whole staff)

Gaps/Inconsistencies in Data (whole staff)

Area for Study#1 (whole staff) Problem Statement: Related Design Principles:

Area for Study#2 (whole staff) Problem Statement: Related Design Principles:

Area for Study#3 (whole staff) Problem Statement: Related Design Principles:

Feedback: Privacy Policy Feedback
Do Not Sell My Personal Information
About project: SlidePlayer Terms of Service

© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc. All rights reserved.