Faculty Prioritization Process - Fall 2018 Faculty Senate Presentation August 15, 2018 Presented by Tram Vo-Kumamoto, VPI and Co-chair of Faculty Prioritization Committee

Provide the President with two prioritized lists for Replacement & New FT faculty requests to inform decision-making regarding the announcements of new faculty positions. COMMITTEE CHARGE

Represent the interest of the college community Represent the interest of the college community. Committee members will make decisions on campus- wide needs and opportunities. Promote fairness and equity in resource allocations Align your decision making with Mission and goals for the college GUIDING PRINCIPLES

GROUND RULES Come prepared and on time Stay mentally and physically present Ask genuine questions Explain reasoning and intent Test assumptions and inferences Listen with an open mind Stay on point GROUND RULES

Timeline Day of the Week Date/Dates Time Location Action Tuesday   Date/Dates Time Location Action Tuesday September 4, 2018 3:00 PM - 5:00 PM AGB 106 Committee to meet to review process and to receive access to packets Tues - Fri September 4 - 7, 2018 Online Review and provide questions regarding proposals Friday September 7, 2018 9:00 AM Deadline for questions pertaining to submissions to OOI September 14, 2018 Deadline for Divisions (Chairs and Deans) to provide responses to the questions to OOI Monday September 17, 2018 Committee to meet for proposal review and ranking Week of September 24 Academic Senate President and College President to review requests Week of October 1 College President meets with Cabinet to review requests October 16, 2018 8:00 AM Prioritized requests due to Chancellor's Office to be placed on Board of Trustees Docket for approval October 29, 2018 5:00 PM HS 145 Board of Trustees Meeting for request approval Timeline

Community Needs

2016-2025 Workforce Projections Emsi Q3 2018 Data Set – www.economicmodeling.com

Emsi Q3 2018 Data Set – www. economicmodeling. com Emsi Q3 2018 Data Set – www.economicmodeling.com LQ=Location Quotient (concentration in region)

College Needs

Saddleback College will foster an environment characterized by creativity, innovation, respectful interactions and collaboration. Saddleback College will promote students’ success by enhancing the teaching and learning environment Saddleback College will advance economic and workforce development through regional partnerships with educational institutions and industry by strengthening career technical education. Saddleback College will strengthen long-term financial health and institutional effectiveness through integrated planning and resource allocation. Strategic Goals 2014-2020

Full-Time Faculty Count at Present

4,1.7%

FTES/# of FT Faculty Data point reflects the ratio of Full-time Equivalent Students to 1 FT faculty.

PT Faculty/FT Faculty Data point reflects the ratio of PT faculty to 1 FT faculty

Weekly Student Contact Hour (WSCH)/FTEF Data point reflects the ratio of weekly student contact hours to 1 Full-time Equivalent Faculty (includes PT and FT faculty). Also known as “productivity”.

Ranking

CRITERIA & POINTS: 7.25 total points Narrative (70%) – highest score is 5 FTES/# of FT faculty in area (30%) – highest score is 2.25 CRITERIA & POINTS: 7.25 total points Each rep will score each request 1 (low to need/goal) to 5 (high to need/goal) Final score will be total of all scores for the request/24 Counseling, librarians& Nursing will have a 1.45 multiplier bc scored on narrative only ordered from high to low & broken up into 5ths 2.25pts., 1.80 pts., 1.35 pts., 0.90 pts., 0.45pts. (1 FTES= 1 student enrolled in 15 hours for 2 terms)

Scoring Guide for Narratives 1 point 3 points 5 points Data/Evidence in support of Need Minimal needs as substantiated by appropriate data Moderate need as substantiated by appropriate data Significant need as substantiated by appropriate data Critical for Program Goals and Needs Lack of position would minimally impact the program's ability to support student success Lack of position would moderately impact the program's ability to support student success Lack of position would significantly impact the program's ability to support student success Critical to College Goals and Needs Lack of position would minimally impact the College's capacity to achieve its goals Lack of position would moderately impact the College's capacity to achieve its goals Lack of position would significantly impact the College's capacity to achieve its goals Critical to Community/ Culture/Industry Needs Lack of position would minimally impact the College's capacity to support the community, culture, & industry Lack of position would moderately impact the College's capacity to support the community, culture, & industry Lack of position would significantly impact the College's capacity to support the community, culture, & industry Scoring Guide for Narratives

Proposal Review

Submit questions by 9AM, Friday September 7 via form.

Answers to questions Due by 9AM, Friday, September 14. Compiled and sent out to committee to review during weekend prior to Monday, September 17 meeting. Answers to questions

Next meeting Monday, September 17, 3-5PM, AGB 106

Discussion of Position Requests & Scoring No more than 3 minutes per position Scoring guide for the narrative portion will be provided for each position request Scores for the FTES/# of FT Faculty will be presented Scoring will be done electronically and is not anonymous Discussion of Position Requests & Scoring