Diffusion Regulation in the Vitreous Humor

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Membrane Physical Chemistry - II
Advertisements

Clamping Down on Tumor Proliferation
Volume 90, Issue 10, Pages (May 2006)
Protein Diffusion in Living Skeletal Muscle Fibers: Dependence on Protein Size, Fiber Type, and Contraction  Simon Papadopoulos, Klaus D. Jürgens, Gerolf.
Ining Jou, Murugappan Muthukumar  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 89, Issue 4, Pages (October 2005)
Steve P. Meisburger, Suzette A. Pabit, Lois Pollack 
Bacterial Motility Reveals Unknown Molecular Organization
Volume 113, Issue 9, Pages (November 2017)
Visualizing the Analogy between Competitive Adsorption and Colloid Stability to Restore Lung Surfactant Function  Ian C. Shieh, Alan J. Waring, Joseph A.
Stephen R. Norris, Marcos F. Núñez, Kristen J. Verhey 
Single-Molecule TPM Studies on the Conversion of Human Telomeric DNA
Maria A. Vorontsova, Ho Yin Chan, Vassiliy Lubchenko, Peter G. Vekilov 
Volume 109, Issue 8, Pages (October 2015)
Surface Characterization of Insulin Protofilaments and Fibril Polymorphs Using Tip- Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy (TERS)  Dmitry Kurouski, Tanja Deckert-Gaudig,
Volume 103, Issue 5, Pages (September 2012)
Volume 110, Issue 4, Pages (February 2016)
Volume 106, Issue 12, Pages (June 2014)
Dynamics of the Serine Chemoreceptor in the Escherichia coli Inner Membrane: A High- Speed Single-Molecule Tracking Study  Dongmyung Oh, Yang Yu, Hochan.
One-Dimensional Brownian Motion of Charged Nanoparticles along Microtubules: A Model System for Weak Binding Interactions  Itsushi Minoura, Eisaku Katayama,
Yuhong Xu, Sek-Wen Hui, Peter Frederik, Francis C. Szoka 
Nanopore Sequencing: Forcing Improved Resolution
Taylor Fuselier, William C. Wimley  Biophysical Journal 
Intact Telopeptides Enhance Interactions between Collagens
Christopher B. Stanley, Tatiana Perevozchikova, Valerie Berthelier 
Phosphatidylserine Inhibits and Calcium Promotes Model Membrane Fusion
Volume 108, Issue 7, Pages (April 2015)
Ion Specificity and Nonmonotonic Protein Solubility from Salt Entropy
Steve P. Meisburger, Suzette A. Pabit, Lois Pollack 
Experimental and Computational Studies Investigating Trehalose Protection of HepG2 Cells from Palmitate-Induced Toxicity  Sukit Leekumjorn, Yifei Wu,
Volume 110, Issue 11, Pages (June 2016)
Volume 107, Issue 6, Pages (September 2014)
Volume 105, Issue 10, Pages (November 2013)
An Electrostatic Model for DNA Surface Hybridization
Fiber-Dependent and -Independent Toxicity of Islet Amyloid Polypeptide
Glucose and Mannitol Diffusion in Human Dura Mater
Volume 100, Issue 10, Pages (May 2011)
Yuno Lee, Philip A. Pincus, Changbong Hyeon  Biophysical Journal 
V.M. Burlakov, R. Taylor, J. Koerner, N. Emptage  Biophysical Journal 
Samuel P. Veres, J. Michael Lee  Biophysical Journal 
Actin Assembly at Model-Supported Lipid Bilayers
Molecular Model of a Cell Plasma Membrane With an Asymmetric Multicomponent Composition: Water Permeation and Ion Effects  Robert Vácha, Max L. Berkowitz,
Clipping of Flexible Tails of Histones H3 and H4 Affects the Structure and Dynamics of the Nucleosome  Nathan P. Nurse, Isabel Jimenez-Useche, Ian Tad.
Erik Hellstrand, Emma Sparr, Sara Linse  Biophysical Journal 
Molecular Interactions of Alzheimer's Biomarker FDDNP with Aβ Peptide
Enhanced Tethered-Particle Motion Analysis Reveals Viscous Effects
Volume 99, Issue 8, Pages (October 2010)
Yiider Tseng, Thomas P. Kole, Denis Wirtz  Biophysical Journal 
Chetan Poojari, Dequan Xiao, Victor S. Batista, Birgit Strodel 
Dirk Gillespie, Le Xu, Gerhard Meissner  Biophysical Journal 
M. Boström, D.R.M. Williams, B.W. Ninham  Biophysical Journal 
Fredrik Elinder, Michael Madeja, Hugo Zeberg, Peter Århem 
Volume 106, Issue 10, Pages (May 2014)
Ion-Induced Defect Permeation of Lipid Membranes
Volume 112, Issue 4, Pages (February 2017)
Ining Jou, Murugappan Muthukumar  Biophysical Journal 
Abir M. Kabbani, Christopher V. Kelly  Biophysical Journal 
Interaction of Oxazole Yellow Dyes with DNA Studied with Hybrid Optical Tweezers and Fluorescence Microscopy  C.U. Murade, V. Subramaniam, C. Otto, Martin.
Volume 109, Issue 9, Pages (November 2015)
Maria Goiko, John R. de Bruyn, Bryan Heit  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 113, Issue 9, Pages (November 2017)
Volume 86, Issue 2, Pages (February 2004)
Volume 100, Issue 6, Pages (March 2011)
Volume 112, Issue 3, Pages (February 2017)
Volume 104, Issue 9, Pages (May 2013)
Volume 111, Issue 11, Pages (December 2016)
Ping-Jung Su, Wei-Liang Chen, Yang-Fang Chen, Chen-Yuan Dong 
Effects of Dextran Molecular Weight on Red Blood Cell Aggregation
Volume 100, Issue 5, Pages (March 2011)
Geert van den Bogaart, Jacek T. Mika, Victor Krasnikov, Bert Poolman 
Presentation transcript:

Diffusion Regulation in the Vitreous Humor Benjamin Tillmann Käsdorf, Fabienna Arends, Oliver Lieleg  Biophysical Journal  Volume 109, Issue 10, Pages 2171-2181 (November 2015) DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2015.10.002 Copyright © 2015 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Schematic overview of a mammalian eye (a) and vitreous preparation process for SPT (b–e). (a) The vitreous humor of the mammalian eye mainly consists of collagen fibrils, as well as the GAGs HA and HS, both of which carry several negative charges. From fresh ovine eyes (b), the vitreous humor is carefully removed (c), and nanoparticles are injected into the vitreous (d). Trajectories characterizing the thermal motion of the nanoparticles in the vitreous humor (e) are obtained by optical microscopy. To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2015 109, 2171-2181DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2015.10.002) Copyright © 2015 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Diffusive mobility of 200 nm polystyrene particles in bovine vitreous humor. (a) MSD curves calculated from the individual trajectories of amine-terminated 200 nm polystyrene particles in bovine vitreous humor. (b) The distribution curves contain data from >1000 apparent diffusion coefficients from carboxyl-terminated (COOH), PEGylated (PEG), and amine-terminated (NH2) 200 nm polystyrene particles in bovine vitreous humor. The dash-dotted line in both graphs is located at 10% of the diffusion coefficient of 200 nm particles in water (Dfree). Using this line as a threshold, the particle ensemble can be divided into a mobile and an immobile fraction. To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2015 109, 2171-2181DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2015.10.002) Copyright © 2015 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Interspecies comparison of the diffusive mobility of polystyrene and liposome particles in vitreous. (a) Comparison of the mobile fraction (Dapp > 10% of Dfree) of carboxyl-terminated (COOH), PEGylated (PEG), and amine-terminated (NH2) 200 nm polystyrene particles in bovine, porcine, and ovine vitreous humor. (b) Comparison of the mobile fractions (Dapp > 10% of Dfree) of DOPG, DOPC, and DOTAP 200 nm liposomes in bovine, porcine, and ovine vitreous humor. Several hundred particle trajectories were acquired per sample and then categorized into mobile and immobile fractions. The error bars denote the standard deviation for those fractions as obtained from at least three vitreous samples. Asterisks denote statistically significant differences (∗∗p < 0.01; ∗∗∗p < 0.001). To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2015 109, 2171-2181DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2015.10.002) Copyright © 2015 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 The mobility of trapped particles can be restored via charge screening. (a) Schematic illustration of charge screening as induced by ions (orange cloud) that are added to the vitreous. Charged particles (or polymers of the vitreous) concentrate counterions around their surface and thus avoid electrostatic trapping. (b) When KCl or NaCl is injected together with the particles, the mobile fraction of amine-terminated (NH2) 200 nm polystyrene particles in ovine vitreous humor is increased compared to physiological salt concentrations (154 mM). At 2 h after injection, this remobilization effect is not present any more. More than 1000 particle trajectories were analyzed per experimental condition and categorized into mobile and immobile particle fractions. The error bars denote the standard deviation for those fractions as obtained from at least three vitreous samples. Asterisks denote statistically significant differences compared to physiological salt conditions (∗∗∗p < 0.001). To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2015 109, 2171-2181DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2015.10.002) Copyright © 2015 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Enzymatic degradation of the polyanionic GAGs HA and HS in ovine vitreous increases particle mobility. (a) The mobile fraction (Dapp > 10% of Dfree) of amine-terminated (NH2) 200 nm polystyrene particles after 72 h GAG digestion in ovine vitreous humor is compared to the mobile fraction of those particles in undigested vitreous. The control samples have been incubated in digestion buffer without enzymes. More than 1000 particle trajectories were analyzed per experimental condition and categorized into mobile and immobile particle fractions. The error bars denote the standard deviation for those fractions as obtained from at least three vitreous samples. (b and c) The concentration of HA and HS in fresh, untreated vitreous, as well as digested samples and control samples, was determined via competitive ELISA. Please note the different y-axis scaling for HA and HS. Asterisks denote statistically significant differences (∗∗p < 0.01; ∗∗∗p < 0.001). To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2015 109, 2171-2181DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2015.10.002) Copyright © 2015 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Penetration efficiency of different dextran molecules and oligopeptides into ovine vitreous humor. The concentrations of dextrans (a) and peptides (b) in ovine vitreous humor are shown after incubation of the vitreous samples overnight in different dextran/peptide solutions. DEAE (polycationic), unmodified (neutral), and CM (polyanionic) dextrans are compared at two different molecular masses (a). The sequence of the peptides P1–P7 (b) is described in Materials and Methods and in the Supporting Material. The error bars denote the standard deviation as obtained from three vitreous samples. Asterisks denote statistically significant differences (∗∗∗p < 0.001). To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2015 109, 2171-2181DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2015.10.002) Copyright © 2015 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions