Analyzing CM-Related Condition Reports

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ensure Vendor/Engineer of Choice Product Quality
Advertisements

Process Safety Management of Highly Hazardous & Explosive Chemicals Operating Procedures, Safety Procedures & Training.
More CMM Part Two : Details.
1 Component Design Basis Inspection (CDBI) Graydon Strong 6/17/14.
HACCP Validation The FSIS Perspective Charles Gioglio FSIS/OPPD Director, Meat and Poultry Advisory Committee Staff.
Humans in safety critical systems
NRC Perspective of Recent Configuration Management Issues Tom Farnholtz Chief, Engineering Branch 1 Division of Reactor Safety, Region IV June 2014 CMBG.
Sheila Schulmeyer CAS February 12, 2012 Permian Basin STEPS.
2007 CMBG Conference Temporary Configuration Changes Tony Hathcock Duke Energy - Oconee June 18-20, 2007 Charleston, SC.
SAE AS9100 Quality Systems - Aerospace Model for Quality Assurance
Temporary Configuration Change Mike Hayes Exelon Nuclear.
Lindy Hughes Fleet Fire Protection Program Engineer Southern Nuclear Operating Company June 4, 2013 Fire Protection.
Main Requirements on Different Stages of the Licensing Process for New Nuclear Facilities Module 4.7 Commissioning Geoff Vaughan University of Central.
Responsible CarE® Employee health and Safety Code David Sandidge Director, Responsible Care American Chemistry Council June 2010.
KELDRICK W. APRIL Power plant  Prevent blackouts by inspecting power plant equipment and ordering repairs when necessary What do they do?
MCC PRESENTATION - GMP MANUFACTURING ENVIRONMENTS
Seafood HACCP Alliance for Training and Education Chapter 10 Principle 6: Establish Verification Procedures.
Radiation Protection Technology High Radiation Area Access and Control Radiological Safety and Response RPT-243-PE-7.
Copyright © 2002 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved. Topic 28 : Total Quality Management By Zhu Wenzhong.
HPT Rev. 1 Page 1 of 22 TP-1 TVAN Technical Training Health Physics (RADCON) Initial Training Program Radiological Control Current Concerns and.
Configuration Management Benchmarking Group Conference June 6 – 9, 2004 Kansas City, MO © 2004 CMBG Configuration Management Fundamentals including Margin.
NHUG - Boston - 08/04/20101 Considerations for Operability of Chillers and Chilled Water Systems NHUG Summer Meeting August 4, 2010 Tim Mitchell Component.
NERC Lessons Learned Summary April NERC lessons learned published in April 2015 Two NERC lessons learned (LL) were published in April 2015 LL
School for drafting regulations Nuclear Safety Operation Vienna, 26 November -7 December 2012 Tea Bilic Zabric.
Georgia Institute of Technology CS 4320 Fall 2003.
10th Configuration Management Benchmarking Conference June 15-18, 2003 Hershey, PA 2003 CONFERENCE " A Decade of Sharing" Operational Configuration Management.
Electrical Fire in Terminal Room at Collider-Accelerator Department Relay-Fire Investigation Committee
Validation | Slide 1 of 27 August 2006 Validation Supplementary Training Modules on Good Manufacturing Practice WHO Technical Report Series, No. 937, 2006.
Configuration Management Fundamentals including Margin Management Bill Kline FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company (FENOC) June 2, 2008 Shell Beach, CA.
1 Review of Specifications for Digital Upgrades NHUG Summer Meeting July 17, 2008 Tim Mitchell Component Engineering Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station.
2006 CMBG Conference Keith A. Reinsmith PPL Susquehanna 2006 CMBG Conference June 11-14, 2006 Richmond, VA Configuration Management Awareness Training.
2006 CMBG Conference Workshop 2: Facilitator: Keith Reinsmith PPL Susquehanna June 11-14, 2006 Richmond, VA.
CM Tools Data Management Trends Wednesday, June 4, 2008 Laurent Perkins Enterprise Informatics.
1 Safety factors for periodic safety review for research reactors Group A: SF1 – SF4.
Supervisor services. Project manager Technological group Chief supervisor Supervisors facilities HSE Quality engineer HSE engineer Administrative support.
Evaluating Configuration Management
2006 CMBG Conference BREAKOUT 1: Component Design Basis Inspection Facilitators: Bill Kline/FENOC Sonya Myers/NMC June 11-14, 2006 Richmond, VA.
Visit us at E mail: Tele:
Ruben Carcagno, Sandor Feher, George Velev (team leader) MQXFS1 status meeting Summary of the MQXFS1 Investigation.
Version 1.0, May 2015 BASIC PROFESSIONAL TRAINING COURSE Module XX Regulatory control Case Study This material was prepared by the IAEA and co-funded by.
Process engineering Quality controls.
Quality Assurance.
Food Safety Program Based on HACCP Principles by Ramadan Badran
Governing Body QAPI 2013 Update for ASC
BASIC PROFESSIONAL TRAINING COURSE Module XI Operational limits and conditions Case studies Version 1.0, May 2015 This material was prepared.
Incident Reporting And Investigation Program
World Health Organization
APQP Five Phase Process
The Risk Assessment in the Food Industry
The following training presentation is for all employees and is taken upon joining the company team. Quality Management System (QMS) Training Proprietary.
Flooding Walkdown Guidance
A Road Map to Food Safety
UN Task Force on Cyber Security and OTA issues
Identification of Processes Turtle Diagrams Approach
NRC CM Pilot Inspections Methodology and Results
Chapter 4: Food Hazard Analysis
Incident Reporting And Investigation Program
APQP PROCESS FLOW Prepare for APQP Plan and Define Program
INPO Perspective of Industry CM Performance
Configuration Management Fundamentals including Margin Management
Quality Assurance Documentation
Margin Management Configuration Management Benchmarking Group
Capability Maturity Model
Identification of Processes Turtle Diagrams Approach
Temporary Alterations in Support of Maintenance and Temporary Modifications Beth Kernes Krause - Cooper Station February 24, 2019 Cleveland 2005.
Identification of Processes Turtle Diagrams Approach
Capability Maturity Model
BASIC PROFESSIONAL TRAINING COURSE Module XX Regulatory control Case Study Version 1.0, May 2015 This material was prepared by the IAEA and.
Mikael Olsson Control Engineer
Identification of Processes Turtle Diagrams Approach
Presentation transcript:

Analyzing CM-Related Condition Reports Sonja Myers / Mike Nordin Nuclear Management Company Fleet Design Engineering June 11-14, 2006 Richmond, VA

Analyzing CM Condition Reports Understand What your Corrective Action Program is Indicating Work through 2 examples to compare where the issues are in the 3-Ball Diagram Bin the issues in both the 3-ball diagram and in your own Human Performance tools Process improvements to place barriers to prevent recurrence of issues

CM Related Issues In-Process Errors committed during preparation of Engineering Products can be subtle: Latent Errors go undetected for years Errors caught in reviews may not get into CRs Limits the feedback and course correction

Look at the issues and bin them to the 3-Ball Diagram. How to do this Look at the issues and bin them to the 3-Ball Diagram. Determine where the issue caused an unbalance Take this information and apply your station’s Human Performance tools

CM Model Functions #1 Protect the Design Basis #2 Modify the Plant #3 Design Basis Configuration #2 Modify the Plant Engineering Change Control #3 Operate the Plant Operational Configuration Control #4 Maintain the Plant Configuration of SSCs not in service #5 Test the Plant Plant Design Validation 25

NMC Picture Of Excellence Tools Qualified Workers Job Planning and Preparation Procedure/Work Instructions Verification and Validation Supervisor Oversight Worker Practices

Protect the Design Basis Example 1 Protect the Design Basis Instrument Air Compressor Room Temperature Compressor Room Temperature was limited to 100 F Intake Air for the Compressor was limited to 85 F Intake Air was drawn from inside the Compressor room. Station monitored the room temperature and assured the temperature did not exceed 100F

Upsets in the 3-Ball Diagram Upsets Between Design Requirements & Facility Configuration Information What went wrong Design characteristics and bounding parameters needed for the design to work The design had assumed the compressor intake air came from outside air. The intake actually came from inside the room. The limit was selected on other parameters for the compressor. Must be verified or monitored to confirm that design is valid Operator rounds recorded the temperature, but had the wrong limit.

NMC Tools Procedure/Work Instructions Verification and Validation Procedures at the time allowed assumptions to be made without justification for why they were valid. Verification and Validation Assumption was made in the analysis and not verified Worker Practices Preparer thought intake was from the outside and incorrectly assessed the equipment requirements Reviewer did not identify this.

Operate the Plant Objective: Assure that alignment of in-service equipment is consistent with approved design through use of approved technical procedures.

Operate the plant Example 2 Recurring T-mod to allow testing of Safety-Related Batteries in Modes 5 and 6 Temporary cable to allow the battery loads to be supplied by a smaller sized batteries HELB pressure boundaries need to be maintained

Upsets in 3-Ball Diagram Upsets Between Physical Configuration & Facility Configuration Information What went wrong HELB boundary requires a special permit and engineering review to assure analysis assumptions and technical requirements are met Temporary procedure did not have a verification the permit was obtained

Procedure/Work Instructions NMC tools Procedure/Work Instructions Procedures for installation did not have a step to assure the HELB boundary permit was obtained Procedure for T-mods did not include a review of the recurring T-mod procedure to assure all critical aspects were included Verification and Validation T-mod assumption was that the installation procedure had the permit, engineer did not verify this was included. Procedure verification did not identify this issue

Conclusions Although many issues in CM are found a long time after the error was made, the barriers to prevent an error from entering the plant, may still be the same. Look at the processes and where the issues entered the plant to strengthen your CM program Focus on the tools.

Questions?