© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

MULTIPLE INTELLIGENCES * Verbal / linguistic learners Logical / mathematical learners Visual / spatial learners Body / kinesthetic learners Musical / rhythmic.

Advertisements

*Gardner said that multiple intelligences were not limited *

Why different Teaching- Learning & Assessment? Hakim Usoof University of Colombo School of Computing.

Learning Language for Language Teaching a.a – 2016 Semester 1 Lesson 4 22/10/15.

and Statistics, 2016, Vol. 4, No. 1, 1-8. doi: /ajams-4-1-1

Intermediate-level learner

Gardner & Sternberg U11 – Testing and Individual Differences

Chapter 10 General Psychology Perspectives

Research, 2015, Vol. 3, No. 6, doi: /education

Figure 3. Comparison of class performance

Table 3. Quran memorization students survey responses about App

Table 1. A list of interview questions with lecturers

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 2. Result of intention to use

Table 1. Sample Size No Category Sample Size (F) Percentage (%) 1

Freshman Core Wednesday, February 3rd.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 3. Student’s Mathematical Critical Thinking Ability Description

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Teachers Response (N= 11)

Instructional materials

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 8. Drawing result before game

Table 2. Showing mean and SD along with t- critical ratio

student achievement scores

Table 2. A Sample Lesson on Teaching Prepositions

Nilai rata-rata total validitas

Table 11. Chi-Square Analysis Based on Grade Shift for Study Group

in the last evaluation of the software

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Howard Gardner's Multiple Intelligences

Test Mean Std. Dev. Mathematics English Language

Table 1. Student’s attitude towards technology (%)

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Contrast equality of group means

Table 2. Showing mean and SD along with t- critical ratio

Number of categories that are mentioned (0% < categories < 5%)

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Actual descriptive example

Table 2. Test of Normality

Text Format Files Number Files Size(Bytes) Words Number

Table 1. LLC Academics Outcome Report ( )

Number of questionnaires sent out

Table 1. Descriptive Statistics

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Behavioral strategies

Table 4. Summary of Multi ways ANOVA results

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

95% Confidence Interval for Mean

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

chemistry that are involved in peer group

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 3. (d) Summary of two way ANOVA for overall adjustment

Table 2. Sample items for measuring attitude towards e-learning

Category Quantity Secondary school 3 Student participant

Table 1. Illiteracy distribution by Gender and Place (No. in million)

Geometry and Mensuration

Table 1. Students` responses

Table 7. The Result of T Test After Treatment

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 4. Independent Samples Test Application of ICT by Gender

Table 6. Range Comparisons amongst Subgroups and grade levels

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Presentation transcript:

© The Author(s) 2015. Published by Science and Education Publishing. Table 1. Matching teaching some activities to the different types of intelligences in EFL classes Activity Intelligences involved Brainstorming and thinking individually Logical mathematical, spatial, intrapersonal, linguistic intelligences Pair and group working, Interacting in the class Interpersonal, linguistic, intelligence, Reading a text by a student or by a teacher. Linguistic intelligence Words Games Logical- mathematical, linguistic intelligence Writing journals Linguistic, intrapersonal intelligences Doing assignment outside the classroom Intrapersonal intelligences Watching video, listening to music, background music Musical intelligence, spatial intelligence Using pictures Spatial intelligence (Adapted from [2]). Sanan Shero Malo Zebari et al. A Multiple Intelligences Based-Teaching of English at University Level. American Journal of Educational Research, 2016, Vol. 4, No. 13, 948-953. doi:10.12691/education-4-13-6 © The Author(s) 2015. Published by Science and Education Publishing.