Chondroitin Fragments Are Odorants that Trigger Fear Behavior in Fish

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Habenula Prevents Helpless Behavior in Larval Zebrafish Aletheia Lee, Ajay S. Mathuru, Cathleen Teh, Caroline Kibat, Vladimir Korzh, Trevor B. Penney,
Advertisements

The Habenula Prevents Helpless Behavior in Larval Zebrafish
Yvonne Aratyn-Schaus, Margaret L. Gardel  Current Biology 
Transient Membrane Localization of SPV-1 Drives Cyclical Actomyosin Contractions in the C. elegans Spermatheca  Pei Yi Tan, Ronen Zaidel-Bar  Current.
IP3 Receptor Activity Is Differentially Regulated in Endoplasmic Reticulum Subdomains during Oocyte Maturation  Michael J. Boulware, Jonathan S. Marchant 
Olfaction: How Fish Catch a Whiff
Volume 24, Issue 19, Pages (October 2014)
The Right Dorsal Habenula Limits Attraction to an Odor in Zebrafish
Volume 21, Issue 10, Pages (May 2011)
Representation of Natural Stimuli in the Rodent Main Olfactory Bulb
Colleen T. Skau, David R. Kovar  Current Biology 
Volume 27, Issue 5, Pages (March 2017)
Araceli Ramirez-Cardenas, Maria Moskaleva, Andreas Nieder 
Volume 19, Issue 23, Pages (December 2009)
Gene Evolution: Getting Something from Nothing
Volume 23, Issue 8, Pages (May 2018)
Olfactory Coding in the Honeybee Lateral Horn
Keratocyte Fragments and Cells Utilize Competing Pathways to Move in Opposite Directions in an Electric Field  Yaohui Sun, Hao Do, Jing Gao, Ren Zhao,
Red-Shifted Voltage-Sensitive Fluorescent Proteins
Volume 27, Issue 15, Pages e8 (August 2017)
Yusuke Hara, Murat Shagirov, Yusuke Toyama  Current Biology 
Real-Time Visualization of Neuronal Activity during Perception
Volume 24, Issue 19, Pages (October 2014)
Bennett Drew Ferris, Jonathan Green, Gaby Maimon  Current Biology 
Volume 27, Issue 20, Pages e4 (October 2017)
Nathan F. Putman, Katherine L. Mansfield  Current Biology 
Waking-like Brain Function in Embryos
Volume 27, Issue 5, Pages (March 2017)
Volume 24, Issue 6, Pages (March 2014)
Tetsuya Koide, Yoichi Yabuki, Yoshihiro Yoshihara  Cell Reports 
Emily I. Bartle, Tara M. Urner, Siddharth S. Raju, Alexa L. Mattheyses 
Cultural Confusions Show that Facial Expressions Are Not Universal
Rémi Bos, Christian Gainer, Marla B. Feller  Current Biology 
Rapid Innate Defensive Responses of Mice to Looming Visual Stimuli
Volume 18, Issue 15, Pages (August 2008)
Publication metrics and success on the academic job market
She1-Mediated Inhibition of Dynein Motility along Astral Microtubules Promotes Polarized Spindle Movements  Steven M. Markus, Katelyn A. Kalutkiewicz,
Volume 26, Issue 17, Pages (September 2016)
Agata Witkowska, Reinhard Jahn  Biophysical Journal 
Gene Evolution: Getting Something from Nothing
Acetylcholine Mediates Behavioral and Neural Post-Error Control
IP3 Receptor Activity Is Differentially Regulated in Endoplasmic Reticulum Subdomains during Oocyte Maturation  Michael J. Boulware, Jonathan S. Marchant 
EB3 Regulates Microtubule Dynamics at the Cell Cortex and Is Required for Myoblast Elongation and Fusion  Anne Straube, Andreas Merdes  Current Biology 
BOLD fMRI Correlation Reflects Frequency-Specific Neuronal Correlation
Franziska Auer, Stavros Vagionitis, Tim Czopka  Current Biology 
Quantitative Imaging of Transcription in Living Drosophila Embryos Links Polymerase Activity to Patterning  Hernan G. Garcia, Mikhail Tikhonov, Albert.
Einat S. Peled, Zachary L. Newman, Ehud Y. Isacoff  Current Biology 
Architecture Dependence of Actin Filament Network Disassembly
A Scalable Population Code for Time in the Striatum
Volume 60, Issue 4, Pages (November 2008)
Mosquitoes Use Vision to Associate Odor Plumes with Thermal Targets
Volume 124, Issue 5, Pages (March 2006)
Structure of the Catalytic Region of DNA Ligase IV in Complex with an Artemis Fragment Sheds Light on Double-Strand Break Repair  Takashi Ochi, Xiaolong.
Volume 88, Issue 4, Pages (November 2015)
Gilad A. Jacobson, Peter Rupprecht, Rainer W. Friedrich 
Facial-Expression and Gaze-Selective Responses in the Monkey Amygdala
Krzysztof Wabnik, Hélène S. Robert, Richard S. Smith, Jiří Friml 
The Cellular Organization of Zebrafish Visuomotor Circuits
Volume 24, Issue 9, Pages (May 2014)
The Right Dorsal Habenula Limits Attraction to an Odor in Zebrafish
Rahul Raman, V. Sasisekharan, Ram Sasisekharan  Chemistry & Biology 
Traces of Experience in the Lateral Entorhinal Cortex
Volume 24, Issue 4, Pages (February 2014)
Conformational Activation of Argonaute by Distinct yet Coordinated Actions of the Hsp70 and Hsp90 Chaperone Systems  Kotaro Tsuboyama, Hisashi Tadakuma,
Emily I. Bartle, Tara M. Urner, Siddharth S. Raju, Alexa L. Mattheyses 
Volume 59, Issue 2, Pages (July 2008)
Combinatorial and Chemotopic Odorant Coding in the Zebrafish Olfactory Bulb Visualized by Optical Imaging  Rainer W Friedrich, Sigrun I Korsching  Neuron 
Olfactory Coding in the Honeybee Lateral Horn
Volume 21, Issue 10, Pages (May 2011)
Self-Organization of Minimal Anaphase Spindle Midzone Bundles
Presentation transcript:

Chondroitin Fragments Are Odorants that Trigger Fear Behavior in Fish Ajay S. Mathuru, Caroline Kibat, Wei Fun Cheong, Guanghou Shui, Markus R. Wenk, Rainer W. Friedrich, Suresh Jesuthasan  Current Biology  Volume 22, Issue 6, Pages 538-544 (March 2012) DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2012.01.061 Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 The Response of Zebrafish to Crude and Fractionated Skin Extract (A) During behavioral experiments, substances are delivered to individual fish via the tube at the top of the tank (side view). (B) Swim speed of one fish before (blue) and after (orange) addition of crude skin extract. The extract elicited an increase in speed (arrow), followed by reduction (arrowhead). (C) Trajectory of the fish before (blue) and after (orange, green, red; each color represents 20 s) addition of crude skin extract. Note that the fish moved to the bottom of the tank (side view). See Movie S2. (D–H) Behavioral response of all individuals (n = 10) exposed to a particular substance. (D) Distribution of speed (mm/100 ms) during a 1 min period, before (blue) and after (orange) addition of test substance. Slowing down is reflected by an increase in the number of occurrences of low speed swimming, whereas darting is reflected by an increase in the occurrences of higher speed swimming, which can be more clearly seen in the insets. (E) Difference between speed distribution before and after substance addition. (F) Median number of darts before (black) or after addition of test substance. Boxes show 25th and 75th percentiles, and whiskers represent 1.5 IQR (interquartile range). (G) Median number of slow swim episodes before or after test substance. (H) The percentage of time spent by fish in the lower 1/3 of the tank after the addition of different substances (color code: red, 1 unit crude skin extract; green, 0.1 unit crude skin extract; blue, HMW; orange, LMW; purple, H3NO). In (B) and (D), the arrow indicates faster swimming, whereas the arrowhead indicates slow swimming. ∗p < 0.05; ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001 (Wilcoxon signed-rank test). See Figure S1. Current Biology 2012 22, 538-544DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2012.01.061) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 The Zebrafish Alarm Substance Contains a Glycan (A) Distribution of speed over a 1 min period, before (blue) and after (orange) addition of WGA eluate. (B) Difference between speed distribution before and after WGA eluate addition. Insets magnify the tail that shows darting episodes. (C) Median number of darting episodes before (black) or after WGA eluate (red) addition. (D) Median number of slow swim episodes before (black) or after (red) WGA eluate addition. (E) Percentage of time spent in the lower 1/3 of the tank after addition of WGA eluate. (F) Fast protein liquid chromatography profiles of eluate (blue) or flow-through (red) from a WGA column loaded with HMW. The green line shows HMW (arrow) and LMW (arrowhead) obtained in the second step of skin extract fractionation on the gel-filtration column Superdex-75. The WGA eluate and flow-through, which are derived from HMW, run at a smaller size than HMW. ∗p < 0.05; ∗∗p < 0.01 (Wilcoxon signed-rank test). Current Biology 2012 22, 538-544DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2012.01.061) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Glycosaminoglycans, a Component of Slough, May Be a Constituent of Schreckstoff (A) Distribution of speed over a 1 min period, before (blue) and after (orange) addition of slough (slgh), heated slough (h-slgh), or immunodepleted slough (CS-56 depleted). (B) Difference between speed distribution before and after substance addition. Insets magnify the tail that shows darting episodes. (C) Median number of darting episodes before (black) or after test substance (red) addition. (D) Median number of slow swim episodes before (black) or after (red) test substance addition. (E) Percentage of time spent in the lower 1/3 of the tank after substance addition. The response to crude skin extract is shown for comparison. (F) Quantitation of GAGs in fractions (concentrated 10-fold) from the ion-exchange column, determined by alcian blue binding. Fraction number 0 is the most active fraction. The blue lines show absorbance of different concentrations of chondroitin-6-sulfate (C6S), serving as a standard. (G) FACE analysis of disaccharides in skin extract. (H) Effect of chondroitinase ABC on skin extract, shown here eluting on a size fraction column. The arrow indicates the HMW peak that is lost. ∗p < 0.05; ∗∗p < 0.01; ∗∗∗p < 0.001 (Wilcoxon signed-rank test). See also Figure S2. Current Biology 2012 22, 538-544DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2012.01.061) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Chondroitin Oligosaccharides Are an Active Component of the Alarm Substance (A) Median number of darts before (black) or after test substance addition (red). (B) Median number of slow swim episodes, before (black) or after test substance (red). (C) Percentage of time spent in the lower 1/3 of the tank after substance addition. Test substances are chondroitin purified from other sources, at a concentration of 1 μg/ml, or zebrafish slough digested as indicated. For comparison, the response to crude skin extract is shown on the right. ∗p < 0.05; ∗∗p < 0.01; ∗∗∗p < 0.001 (Wilcoxon signed-rank test). Current Biology 2012 22, 538-544DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2012.01.061) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Olfactory Bulb Response to Skin Extract and Purified Chondroitin Sulfate (A–F) Increase in calcium in the mediodorsal (yellow arrow), anterior (white arrow) and lateral (magenta arrow) olfactory bulb, in response to stimulation of the olfactory epithelium with the active fraction of skin extract obtained by ion exchange chromatography. (A and B) Dorsal view of the olfactory bulb, at two different focal planes as indicated by the numbers on the top right of each panel. (C–E) Positions of the active loci, in frontal views generated from deconvolved z stacks at the level of arrows. (F–K) Activity in the left olfactory bulb of a 25-day-old fish, in response to HMW, LMW, and eluate from the WGA column. The images here show a dorsal view of the left bulb, at two different focal planes. (L–S) Response in the bulb at two different focal planes in another fish, following stimulation with partially purified skin extract (L and P), chondroitin sulfate purified from shark cartilage (M and Q), H3NO (N and R), and glycocholic acid (O and S; red arrow). The asterisk in (L) indicates a signal in the pallium. OE, olfactory epithelium; OB, olfactory bulb; Pa, pallium; IEX, active fraction from ion exchange column; d, dorsal; v, ventral; m, medial; l, lateral. Scale bar represents 50 μm; anterior is to the right in all cases. The wedge in (A) shows the look-up table used for ratio images. An intensity-modulated look-up table is used, with grays representing a ratio of 1 and yellows representing a ratio of 2.5. See also Figure S3. Current Biology 2012 22, 538-544DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2012.01.061) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions