Volume 14, Issue 3, Pages (January 2016)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Dynamic epigenetic enhancer signatures reveal key transcription factors associated with monocytic differentiation states by Thu-Hang Pham, Christopher.
Advertisements

Structure of a Ternary Transcription Activation Complex
Jinwei Zhu, Yuan Shang, Yitian Xia, Rongguang Zhang, Mingjie Zhang 
Volume 12, Issue 9, Pages (September 2015)
Finn Werner, Robert O.J Weinzierl  Molecular Cell 
Volume 105, Issue 4, Pages (May 2001)
Ping Wang, Katelyn A. Doxtader, Yunsun Nam  Molecular Cell 
CpG Islands Recruit a Histone H3 Lysine 36 Demethylase
Volume 9, Issue 8, Pages (August 2016)
Ho-Geun Yoon, Doug W. Chan, Albert B. Reynolds, Jun Qin, Jiemin Wong 
Taichi Umeyama, Takashi Ito  Cell Reports 
Volume 33, Issue 2, Pages (January 2009)
Volume 23, Issue 7, Pages (May 2018)
Jinwei Zhu, Yuan Shang, Yitian Xia, Rongguang Zhang, Mingjie Zhang 
MeCP2 Binding to DNA Depends upon Hydration at Methyl-CpG
Volume 62, Issue 3, Pages (May 2016)
Volume 29, Issue 1, Pages (April 2014)
Rose-Anne Romano, Barbara Birkaya, Satrajit Sinha 
Structural Basis for the Specific Recognition of Methylated Histone H3 Lysine 4 by the WD-40 Protein WDR5  Zhifu Han, Lan Guo, Huayi Wang, Yue Shen, Xing.
Ying-Ying Yu, Ph. D. , Cui-Xiang Sun, Ph. D. , Yin-Kun Liu, Ph. D
Volume 10, Issue 12, Pages (March 2015)
Volume 10, Issue 5, Pages (February 2015)
Volume 3, Issue 2, Pages (February 2013)
Crystal Structure of Tetrameric Arabidopsis MYC2 Reveals the Mechanism of Enhanced Interaction with DNA  Teng-fei Lian, Yong-ping Xu, Lan-fen Li, Xiao-Dong.
Volume 22, Issue 5, Pages (January 2018)
Volume 25, Issue 10, Pages e3 (October 2017)
Volume 17, Issue 8, Pages (November 2016)
Volume 151, Issue 7, Pages (December 2012)
Volume 2, Issue 2, Pages (February 2008)
Volume 135, Issue 4, Pages (November 2008)
Volume 10, Issue 6, Pages (June 2018)
Diabetes Mutations Delineate an Atypical POU Domain in HNF-1α
Volume 21, Issue 13, Pages (December 2017)
Volume 108, Issue 1, Pages (January 2002)
Volume 7, Issue 9, Pages (September 2014)
Volume 8, Issue 5, Pages (May 2017)
Volume 30, Issue 4, Pages (May 2008)
Molecular Therapy - Nucleic Acids
Volume 17, Issue 4, Pages (October 2016)
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages 9-19 (October 2005)
Volume 61, Issue 1, Pages (January 2016)
Volume 42, Issue 4, Pages (May 2011)
Volume 10, Issue 7, Pages (February 2015)
Volume 62, Issue 1, Pages (April 2016)
Structure of the Catalytic Domain of Human DOT1L, a Non-SET Domain Nucleosomal Histone Methyltransferase  Jinrong Min, Qin Feng, Zhizhong Li, Yi Zhang,
Volume 39, Issue 6, Pages (September 2010)
Volume 66, Issue 5, Pages e3 (June 2017)
Volume 23, Issue 8, Pages (May 2018)
Structural Basis of EZH2 Recognition by EED
Volume 55, Issue 3, Pages (August 2014)
Volume 132, Issue 6, Pages (March 2008)
Antonina Roll-Mecak, Chune Cao, Thomas E. Dever, Stephen K. Burley 
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages (April 2016)
Xudong Wu, Jens Vilstrup Johansen, Kristian Helin  Molecular Cell 
Volume 23, Issue 9, Pages (September 2015)
Volume 55, Issue 5, Pages (September 2014)
Volume 17, Issue 4, Pages (February 2007)
Volume 64, Issue 5, Pages (December 2016)
Volume 55, Issue 5, Pages (September 2014)
SUMO-1 Modification Represses Sp3 Transcriptional Activation and Modulates Its Subnuclear Localization  Sarah Ross, Jennifer L Best, Leonard I Zon, Grace.
Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages (July 2015)
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages (January 2012)
Volume 23, Issue 8, Pages (May 2018)
Volume 26, Issue 2, Pages e3 (February 2018)
Volume 42, Issue 1, Pages (April 2011)
Structural and Mechanistic Analysis of the Slx1-Slx4 Endonuclease
Volume 24, Issue 8, Pages e7 (August 2018)
Taichi Umeyama, Takashi Ito  Cell Reports 
Molecular Therapy - Nucleic Acids
Georgina Berrozpe, Gene O. Bryant, Katherine Warpinski, Mark Ptashne 
Presentation transcript:

Volume 14, Issue 3, Pages 493-505 (January 2016) Tet3 Reads 5-Carboxylcytosine through Its CXXC Domain and Is a Potential Guardian against Neurodegeneration  Seung-Gi Jin, Zhi-Min Zhang, Thomas L. Dunwell, Matthew R. Harter, Xiwei Wu, Jennifer Johnson, Zheng Li, Jiancheng Liu, Piroska E. Szabó, Qiang Lu, Guo-liang Xu, Jikui Song, Gerd P. Pfeifer  Cell Reports  Volume 14, Issue 3, Pages 493-505 (January 2016) DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2015.12.044 Copyright © 2016 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Cell Reports 2016 14, 493-505DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2015.12.044) Copyright © 2016 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Functional Characterization of Different Tet3 Isoforms (A) Schematic of the three Tet3 isoforms. (B) Anti-V5 western blot of transfected Tet3 protein isoforms. (C) Immunofluorescence detection of 5hmC in cells transfected with different Tet3 isoforms. Cells were co-immunostained with anti-V5 tag antibody (green) and anti-5hmC antibody (red). Scale bars, 20 μm. (D) 5hmC production by Tet3 isoforms as analyzed by anti-5hmC dot blot. Tet3FL-CXXC-DM, Tet3FL with a CXXC domain double mutation (C60A and C72A) deficient in DNA binding. (E) Reactivation of a methylation-silenced luciferase construct by Tet3 isoforms and by Tet3FL containing the CXXC domain DNA binding mutations (Tet3FL-CXXC-DM) in the absence or presence of sodium ascorbate. (F) An unmethylated luciferase vector was used as a control for (E). See also Figure S1 and Table S1. Cell Reports 2016 14, 493-505DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2015.12.044) Copyright © 2016 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 The CXXC Domain of Tet3 Is a Specific Reader of 5-Carboxylcytosine at 5′CCG Sequences (A) Sequence of Tet-associated CXXC domains from mouse (m), human (h), and Xenopus tropicalis (xt). Cxxc4 is a separate protein associated with Tet2. Amino acid positions and mutants are indicated. Asterisks and dots indicate identical and similar residues, respectively. (B) Gel mobility shift assay of the mouse Tet3 CXXC domain and its mutant (C60A and C72A) with oligonucleotides containing different cytosine modifications. (C) ITC of the Tet3 CXXC domain and oligonucleotides containing 5caC or C at a CCG sequence. See also Figure S2. Cell Reports 2016 14, 493-505DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2015.12.044) Copyright © 2016 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Complex of the Tet3 CXXC Domain with DNA Containing 5caC X-ray crystallography was used for structure determination. (A) Ribbon representation of the mTet3 CXXC domain (light blue) bound to CcaCG DNA (wheat). The zinc ions in the CXXC domain and the carboxylates in DNA are shown as green and red spheres, respectively. (B) Electrostatic surface representation of the mTet3 CXXC domain bound to CcaCG DNA, with positively charged, neutral, and negatively charged areas shown in blue, gray, and red, respectively. (C) Schematic of intermolecular interactions between the Tet3 CXXC domain and CcaCG DNA, with intermolecular hydrogen bonds shown by red arrows. (D–F) Specific hydrogen bonding interactions between side chains of the Tet3 CXXC domain and the CcaC step in the DNA. The nitrogen, oxygen, and phosphorous atoms are shown in dark blue, red, and yellow, respectively. Water molecules are shown in light purple. See also Figure S3 and Table S2. Cell Reports 2016 14, 493-505DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2015.12.044) Copyright © 2016 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Isothermal Titration Calorimetry Analysis of Different CXXC Domain Mutants (A) Interaction of mutants with DNA containing CCG. (B) Interaction of mutants with DNA containing CcaCG. (C) Summary of ITC data. N/A, not available. See also Figure S4. Cell Reports 2016 14, 493-505DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2015.12.044) Copyright © 2016 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Mapping of Tet3FL in Mouse Neural Progenitor Cells and Embryonic Brain-Derived Neurons (A) Distribution of peaks in the genome. TSS peaks were defined as peaks between −0.5 and +0.5 kb relative to the TSS (green). Extended promoter peaks are located outside of the TSS and are between 0.5 kb and 2.5 kb up- or downstream of the TSS (purple). (B) Overlap of Tet3FL peaks with H3K4me3 and histone H3 lysine 27 trimethylation (H3K27me3). (C) Histogram of E15.5 brain Tet3FL distribution near the TSS. The histogram shows the TSS ± 1 kb on each side with 100 bp in each bin. The TSS is at the center. (D) Composite profile of Tet3FL (red), H3K4me3 (blue), and H3K27me3 (green) for mouse embryo brain. The profile shows the gene body ± 5 kb. The gene body was separated into 250 bins, whereas the upstream and downstream 5 kb were separated into 125 bins each. (E) Gene ontology analysis of genes with Tet3FL peaks near the TSS in E15.5 brain. Shown are Molecular Signatures Database (MSigDB) analysis results using GREAT. (F) Enrichment of TFEB sequence motifs at Tet3FL peaks. (G) Expression levels of genes with and without Tet3FL peaks at the TSS in E15.5 brain. Genes with Tet3FL peaks are expressed at higher levels (p < 2.2 × 10−e16). See also Figure S5 and Table S3. Cell Reports 2016 14, 493-505DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2015.12.044) Copyright © 2016 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Transcription Start Site-Centered Tet3FL Peaks ChIP-seq data show Tet3FL peaks at the TSSs in NPCs (light blue) and mouse brain (dark blue). The 5mC patterns (shown as vertical bars representing 0%–100% methylation at individual CpG sites) were obtained from whole-genome bisulfite sequencing data of mouse ESCs (red) and NPCs (blue) (Stadler et al., 2011). (A) Genes related to the base excision repair pathway. (B) Genes important for lysosome structure and function. See also Figure S6 and Table S4. Cell Reports 2016 14, 493-505DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2015.12.044) Copyright © 2016 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Model for the Biological Role of Tet3FL in Maintaining the Unmethylated State of CpG Islands through Anchoring to 5caC Tet3FL binds to unmethylated CpG sites at the TSS of CpG islands of specific target genes. Tethering of Tet3FL to transcription start sites maintains these critical sequences in a methylation-free state. Binding of Tet3FL to its reaction product 5-carboxylcytosine (ca) allows for highly localized 5mC (m) oxidation in which Tet3 stays bound to 5caC through the CXXC domain, promoting rapid oxidation of adjacent, erroneously introduced methyl groups. Cell Reports 2016 14, 493-505DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2015.12.044) Copyright © 2016 The Authors Terms and Conditions