Evolutionary Rewiring of Human Regulatory Networks by Waves of Genome Expansion  Davide Marnetto, Federica Mantica, Ivan Molineris, Elena Grassi, Igor.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Comprehensive Analysis of Tissue-wide Gene Expression and Phenotype Data Reveals Tissues Affected in Rare Genetic Disorders  Ariel Feiglin, Bryce K. Allen,
Advertisements

Estrogen Receptor α Controls a Gene Network in Luminal-Like Breast Cancer Cells Comprising Multiple Transcription Factors and MicroRNAs  Luigi Cicatiello,
Katarzyna Bryc, Eric Y. Durand, J
Michael Dannemann, Janet Kelso  The American Journal of Human Genetics 
Volume 44, Issue 1, Pages (January 2016)
Comprehensively Evaluating cis-Regulatory Variation in the Human Prostate Transcriptome by Using Gene-Level Allele-Specific Expression  Nicholas B. Larson,
Frequency of Nonallelic Homologous Recombination Is Correlated with Length of Homology: Evidence that Ectopic Synapsis Precedes Ectopic Crossing-Over 
Dynamic epigenetic enhancer signatures reveal key transcription factors associated with monocytic differentiation states by Thu-Hang Pham, Christopher.
The Functional Impact of Alternative Splicing in Cancer
Matan Goldshtein, David B. Lukatsky  Biophysical Journal 
CYP3A Variation and the Evolution of Salt-Sensitivity Variants
Genetic-Variation-Driven Gene-Expression Changes Highlight Genes with Important Functions for Kidney Disease  Yi-An Ko, Huiguang Yi, Chengxiang Qiu, Shizheng.
Claudio Verzilli, Tina Shah, Juan P
Volume 38, Issue 4, Pages (May 2010)
Volume 112, Issue 7, Pages (April 2017)
Katarzyna Bryc, Eric Y. Durand, J
Volume 18, Issue 9, Pages (February 2017)
Michael Cullen, Stephen P
Volume 17, Issue 3, Pages (March 2015)
Volume 10, Issue 4, Pages (February 2015)
Volume 7, Issue 5, Pages (June 2014)
Volume 146, Issue 6, Pages (September 2011)
Volume 9, Issue 3, Pages (September 2017)
Genome-wide Analysis of Body Proportion Classifies Height-Associated Variants by Mechanism of Action and Implicates Genes Important for Skeletal Development 
Thomas Willems, Melissa Gymrek, G
Identification and Validation of Genetic Variants that Influence Transcription Factor and Cell Signaling Protein Levels  Ronald J. Hause, Amy L. Stark,
Transcriptional Consequences of 16p11
Latent Regulatory Potential of Human-Specific Repetitive Elements
Understanding Tissue-Specific Gene Regulation
PheWAS and Beyond: The Landscape of Associations with Medical Diagnoses and Clinical Measures across 38,662 Individuals from Geisinger  Anurag Verma,
Volume 111, Issue 2, Pages (July 2016)
Alternative Splicing QTLs in European and African Populations
Gene-Expression Variation Within and Among Human Populations
Biased Gene Conversion Skews Allele Frequencies in Human Populations, Increasing the Disease Burden of Recessive Alleles  Joseph Lachance, Sarah A. Tishkoff 
Leonie Ringrose, Marc Rehmsmeier, Jean-Maurice Dura, Renato Paro 
Michael Dannemann, Janet Kelso  The American Journal of Human Genetics 
The Functional Impact of Alternative Splicing in Cancer
Volume 154, Issue 1, Pages (July 2013)
Jingjing Li, Xiumei Hong, Sam Mesiano, Louis J
Evidence for Widespread Reticulate Evolution within Human Duplicons
Mapping Global Histone Acetylation Patterns to Gene Expression
Volume 24, Issue 4, Pages (July 2018)
TED-Seq Identifies the Dynamics of Poly(A) Length during ER Stress
Integrative Multi-omic Analysis of Human Platelet eQTLs Reveals Alternative Start Site in Mitofusin 2  Lukas M. Simon, Edward S. Chen, Leonard C. Edelstein,
CYP3A Variation and the Evolution of Salt-Sensitivity Variants
Daniel F. Tardiff, Scott A. Lacadie, Michael Rosbash  Molecular Cell 
Volume 14, Issue 7, Pages (February 2016)
Xin Li, Alexis Battle, Konrad J. Karczewski, Zach Zappala, David A
Volume 17, Issue 6, Pages (November 2016)
Volume 24, Issue 4, Pages (November 2006)
Contrasting Effects of Natural Selection on Human and Chimpanzee CC Chemokine Receptor 5  Stephen Wooding, Anne C. Stone, Diane M. Dunn, Srinivas Mummidi,
Matthieu Foll, Oscar E. Gaggiotti, Josephine T
Volume 128, Issue 6, Pages (March 2007)
Javier A. Couto, Matthew P. Vivero, Harry P. W. Kozakewich, Amir H
Evolution of Alu Elements toward Enhancers
Volume 10, Issue 10, Pages (October 2017)
Pier Francesco Palamara, Todd Lencz, Ariel Darvasi, Itsik Pe’er 
Alterations in mRNA 3′ UTR Isoform Abundance Accompany Gene Expression Changes in Human Huntington’s Disease Brains  Lindsay Romo, Ami Ashar-Patel, Edith.
Comprehensive Analysis of Tissue-wide Gene Expression and Phenotype Data Reveals Tissues Affected in Rare Genetic Disorders  Ariel Feiglin, Bryce K. Allen,
Volume 122, Issue 6, Pages (September 2005)
Volume 85, Issue 4, Pages (February 2015)
Gene Density, Transcription, and Insulators Contribute to the Partition of the Drosophila Genome into Physical Domains  Chunhui Hou, Li Li, Zhaohui S.
Volume 1, Issue 1, Pages (July 2015)
Volume 12, Issue 8, Pages (August 2015)
Genetic and Epigenetic Regulation of Human lincRNA Gene Expression
Pervasive Targeting of Nascent Transcripts by Hfq
IMPACT: Genomic Annotation of Cell-State-Specific Regulatory Elements Inferred from the Epigenome of Bound Transcription Factors  Tiffany Amariuta, Yang.
Volume 11, Issue 7, Pages (May 2015)
Next-Generation Sequencing of Duplication CNVs Reveals that Most Are Tandem and Some Create Fusion Genes at Breakpoints  Scott Newman, Karen E. Hermetz,
Mapping of Small RNAs in the Human ENCODE Regions
Presentation transcript:

Evolutionary Rewiring of Human Regulatory Networks by Waves of Genome Expansion  Davide Marnetto, Federica Mantica, Ivan Molineris, Elena Grassi, Igor Pesando, Paolo Provero  The American Journal of Human Genetics  Volume 102, Issue 2, Pages 207-218 (February 2018) DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2017.12.014 Copyright © 2017 American Society of Human Genetics Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Genome Segmentation in Ages Maximum parsimony applied to a multiple alignment of the human genome to 100 vertebrates is used to infer the presence of a genomic region in each ancestor and thus the evolutionary age of the region. A green bar indicates that the human genome region aligns to sequence, rather than to a gap, in the non-human genome. Each region can be classified into one of three classes. “Inconsistent” indicates the reconstructed ancestral states are incompatible with a single birth event for the region; “age interval” indicates the reconstruction is compatible with single birth but only a time interval can be estimated; and “precise age” indicates the precise time of the birth of the region can be estimated. The fraction of genome sequence falling into each class is shown. The American Journal of Human Genetics 2018 102, 207-218DOI: (10.1016/j.ajhg.2017.12.014) Copyright © 2017 American Society of Human Genetics Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Genomic Age Distribution and Properties (A) Age distribution of the genome. Most of the human genome appeared after the split between placentals and marsupials. Note the increasing relative importance of TEs as we move toward younger regions. This is partly due to the difficulty in recognizing TEs that have been integrated in the genome for very long times. (B) Length distribution of reconstructed insertions of each age. Colors are associated with ages as in (A). The major peaks at length ∼300 and ∼6,000 correspond to ALU and L1 insertions, respectively. (C) Comparison between the age of genomic regions (x axis) to the age of the surrounding genome (y axis) shows that new genomic sequence is preferentially inserted in younger regions, possibly because these are subjected to less selective pressure. The heatmap shows the chi-squared residuals with respect to a null hypothesis of no preferential insertion, in which the insertion probability in a region of a certain age is simply proportional to the genome fraction of that age. (D) Enrichment of genomic ages in functional sequence classes. We show the coverage fold enrichment compared to what is expected if all functional classes shared the genome-wide age distribution. The American Journal of Human Genetics 2018 102, 207-218DOI: (10.1016/j.ajhg.2017.12.014) Copyright © 2017 American Society of Human Genetics Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Enrichment of ChIP-Seq Peaks for Each TF in Genomic Regions of Different Evolutionary Age The heatmap represents the deviations of the age distribution of the binding sites of each TF from the overall TFBS distribution. Chi-squared residuals are shown, so that positive values (red) correspond to enrichment and negative values (blue) to depletion. Only the top 50% TFs by significance are shown: a complete figure is available as Figure S1. TF/age combinations with significant repeat class enrichments are bordered, separately for non-transposon repeats (yellow) and transposon repeats (green). The American Journal of Human Genetics 2018 102, 207-218DOI: (10.1016/j.ajhg.2017.12.014) Copyright © 2017 American Society of Human Genetics Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Classes of Repeated Elements Carry Specific TFs (A) Distribution across RE classes of the number of enriched TFs. (B) The heatmap shows which TFs are enriched in each class of repeated elements: for each TF-RE class pair, the age with the strongest enrichment is shown, color intensity corresponds to −log10(p) (Fisher’s exact test). RE classes are labeled by the top colored bar, where each color corresponds to a RE family. See the legend for a count of the RE classes included, divided by family. The American Journal of Human Genetics 2018 102, 207-218DOI: (10.1016/j.ajhg.2017.12.014) Copyright © 2017 American Society of Human Genetics Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Enriched TFBSs that Have a Constant Position within Repeated Elements (A) Cases with significantly lower entropy in the position distribution with respect to the background. Each bar represents the number of TF/age pairs that resulted significant (dark green), not significant (light green), not tested (gray), for each age. (B) Entropies for each tested TF/TE/age triplet: on the vertical axis is reported the entropy of the position distribution of BS for the enriched TF within the corresponding TE, whereas on the horizontal axis the entropy of the background, that is the same distribution but considering all TFs binding to the TE. Point size and color represent, respectively, number of tested instances and test result, with green being significant. (C–H) Significant examples: green bars represent the position distribution of BS considering only the enriched TF, gray bars represent the background. In particular, (G) is the case with most instances and (H) is being considered a borderline case with FDR 0.05. The American Journal of Human Genetics 2018 102, 207-218DOI: (10.1016/j.ajhg.2017.12.014) Copyright © 2017 American Society of Human Genetics Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 TFBSs with RE-Specific Motif-Word Distribution (A) Cases with word occurrences in the enriched RE class significantly different than elsewhere. Each bar represents for each age the number of TF/RE pairs that resulted significant (dark colors), not significant (light colors), not tested (gray), separating for transposon (green) and non-transposon (yellow) repeats. (B–D) Significant examples: the word frequency matrix is represented by the heatmap (colors are in log2 scale, white means 0 occurrences); the Positional Weight Matrix logo obtained from binding site motifs occurring on the tested RE class is compared with the logo from all other binding sites. The American Journal of Human Genetics 2018 102, 207-218DOI: (10.1016/j.ajhg.2017.12.014) Copyright © 2017 American Society of Human Genetics Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Age Distribution of TFBSs in the Regulatory Region of Genes which Underwent an Expression Shift in a Human Ancestor The heatmap represents, for each ancestor in which the shift occurred, the fraction of TFBSs with a certain age transformed into z-scores. The size of the circle represents the number of TFBSs in each cell. Next to each ancestor name is annotated in parentheses the number of genes whose expression shifted. Asterisks indicate significant enrichment of TFBSs of the same age as the expression shift (∗p < 0.05; ∗∗p < 0.01). z-scores and enrichment p values were based on 5,000 randomizations of the age of the expression shift. The American Journal of Human Genetics 2018 102, 207-218DOI: (10.1016/j.ajhg.2017.12.014) Copyright © 2017 American Society of Human Genetics Terms and Conditions